the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
![](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-avatar-thumb150.png)
Hygroscopic growth and activation changed submicron aerosol composition and properties in the North China Plain
Weiqi Xu
Wanyun Xu
Zhiqiang Zhang
Biao Luo
Xiaoyi Zhang
Jiangchuang Tao
Hongqin Qiao
Li Liu
Aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation under high-relative-humidity (RH) conditions significantly influence the physicochemical properties of submicron aerosols (PM1). However, this process remains poorly characterized due to limited measurements. To address this gap, we deployed an advanced aerosol–fog sampling system that automatically switched between PM1, PM2.5 and total suspended particulate (TSP) inlets at a rural site in the North China Plain in the cold season. The results revealed that aerosol swelling due to water vapor uptake influenced aerosol sampling under high-RH conditions by shifting the cut-off size of impactors. At subsaturated high RH (> 90 %), over 25 % of aerosol mass with dry diameters below 1 µm resided in supermicron ranges, while in supersaturated foggy conditions, more than 70 % of submicron aerosol migrated to supermicron ranges. Hygroscopic growth and activation particularly affected highly hydrophilic inorganic salts, shifting a significant number of submicron sulfate and nitrate particles to supermicron ranges, with 27 %–33 % at 95 % ≤ RH ≤ 99 % and more than 78 % under supersaturated foggy conditions. Moreover, more than 10 % of submicron biomass burning organic aerosols grew beyond 2.5 µm during fog events, while fossil-fuel-related organic aerosol (FFOA) remained dominantly in submicron ranges, suggesting inefficient aqueous conversion of FFOA. The two secondary organic aerosol (SOA) factors (OOA1 and OOA2) behaved differently under supersaturated conditions, with OOA2 exhibiting a higher activated fraction despite a lower oxygen carbon ratio. A substantial increase in organic nitrate and organosulfur mass concentrations in activated droplets during fog events suggested aqueous conversions and formations of brown carbon with potential radiative impacts. Overall, our study highlights remarkably different cloud and fog processing behaviors between primary and secondary aerosols, which would benefit a better understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions under distinct atmospheric conditions.
- Article
(3431 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(1233 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Submicron aerosols (PM1, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 1 µm) are significant components of atmospheric aerosol particles, impacting air quality, climate change and human health (Fuzzi et al., 2015; Shrivastava et al., 2017; Pope et al., 2002; Molina and Molina, 2004). Extensive research has been devoted to explore their characteristics, such as mass concentrations, sources and size distributions across diverse atmospheric conditions (Sun et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2011). Recent studies have also examined the influence of relative humidity (RH) on PM1 physicochemical properties (Li et al., 2019; R.-J. Huang et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2013). However, these measurements were constrained by the occurrence of high-RH conditions or limitations in sampling techniques under both subsaturated and supersaturated conditions, making it challenging to accurately quantify the effects of aerosol swelling due to hygroscopic growth and activation on PM1 properties. Most current studies primarily focus on the impact of RH on aerosol chemical compositions, with only a limited number of studies directly quantifying how aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation affect size and/or chemical compositions of aerosol. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the changes in size-resolved mass concentrations, composition and properties of PM1 under subsaturated and supersaturated conditions is needed.
While previous studies have provided a relatively clear understanding of the impact of RH on the mass concentrations of secondary inorganic aerosols (SIAs), our comprehension of its effects on the evolution of organic aerosol (OA) species remains incomplete. For example, coal combustion OA (CCOA) increases with rising RH in Beijing during wintertime (Sun et al., 2013), whereas it remains relatively stables as a function of RH in Xi'an (Elser et al., 2016). Furthermore, Gilardoni et al. (2016) demonstrated that the aqueous-phase processing of emissions from biomass burning contributes significantly to the formation of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), while Duan et al. (2022) emphasized the predominant role of photochemical oxidation in comparison to aqueous-phase processing in the contributions of biomass burning emissions to SOA. In addition, many studies have suggested that aqueous processing plays a significant role in changing SOA physicochemical properties, and the influences depend strongly on SOA species. For instance, Hu et al. (2016) proposed that aqueous chemistry could enhance the formation of less-oxidized SOA (LO-OOA), while Xu et al. (2017) found that it largely increased more-oxidized SOA (MO-OOA) with an increase in RH in Beijing across three seasons. Furthermore, the changes in organic aerosol oxidation, often indicated by f44 (fraction of 44 in OA) and oxygen carbon (O C) ratio as a function of RH, exhibit noticeable discrepancies in different environments. Wang et al. (2016) observed an increase in O C ratio at high RH levels, while Sun et al. (2013) reported a significant decrease in f44 followed by minor variations at high RH levels. D. D. Huang et al. (2020) also demonstrated a decrease in average carbon oxidation state (OSC = 2 × O C − H C) with increasing liquid water content. Besides the differences in precursors and chemical processes, the enlargement of particle size due to water condensation beyond the sampling cut-off size may also contribute to these discrepancies. However, the studies regarding the effect of particle sizes on OA composition and oxidation degree remain limited.
Numerous studies have observed a shift in the peak diameter of PM species towards larger sizes during fog periods, with some particles growing into the supermicron range (Ge et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2022; Gupta and Elumalai, 2018). For instance, Wang et al. (2015) documented a notable increase in the PM1–2.5 fraction in Beijing during highly polluted days, while Elser et al. (2016) reported significant enhancements of SIA components and SOA in sizes over 1 µm during extreme haze episodes in Beijing and Xi'an. Additionally, Chen et al. (2018) highlighted that aerosol hygroscopic growth could induce a shift in the size distribution of dry-state aerosols as captured by impactors. Moreover, recent studies have conducted simultaneous comparisons of the physicochemical properties of PM1 and PM2.5 (Li et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2023), investigating chemical disparities caused by different particle sizes. Sun et al. (2020) observed a different RH dependence of PM1 PM2.5 species due to different hygroscopicity and phase states. In addition, Zheng et al. (2023) noted a larger increase in MO-OOA with diameters ranging from 1 to 2.5 µm compared to LO-OOA under conditions of high-aerosol liquid water content. Despite their significant implications for the variation in aerosol mass loading and chemical composition caused by size differences, a direct quantification of the contribution of hygroscopic growth and activation of PM species has not yet been achieved.
In this study, we conducted real-time measurements of size-resolved PM1 species using a high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-AMS) and an aerodynamic aerosol classifier (AAC) in tandem with a condensation particle counter (CPC) combined with an advanced aerosol–fog sampling system that is capable of switching automatically between inlets with three different cut-off sizes. This allows us to investigate how aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation impacted the size shifts in various PM1 components under different ambient RH conditions. The impacts of RH, particularly high RH levels, on changes in mass concentrations and size distributions of PM species, as well as the oxidation degree of OA at different sizes, are assessed.
2.1 Sampling and data analysis
The AQ-SOFAR campaign, so-named and dedicated to investigating AQueous Secondary aerOsol formation in Fogs and Aerosols and their Radiative effects in the North China Plain, was conducted in Gucheng, a representative rural site in the North China Plain (NCP), from 11 October to 14 November 2021. Ambient particles and droplets were initially selected using an advanced aerosol–cloud sampling inlet system, which alternated between the PM1 cyclone, PM2.5 cyclone and total suspended particulate (TSP) passage every 20 min. The filtered particles were then dried using a Nafion dryer to maintain inlet RH below 20 % throughout the campaigns. Size-resolved submicron aerosols species, including organics (Org), sulfate (SO4), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4) and chloride (Chl), were measured using a HR-AMS. Note that the PM1, PM2.5 and TSP species in this study refer to the PM species measured by HR-AMS, which is selected using the PM1 cyclone, PM2.5 cyclone and TSP passage. Additionally, an AAC operated in tandem with a CPC employing a sheath sampling flow ratio of 10 facilitated measurements of aerosol size distributions spanning aerodynamic diameters from approximately 200 nm to 4 µm. Note that the aerodynamic diameter of the AAC was converted to mobility diameter (Dp) assuming a spherical aerosol shape and an aerosol density of 1.6 g cm−3, which differs from the vacuum aerodynamic diameter (Dva) measured by HR-AMS. A more detailed description of the sampling procedures and instruments used can be found in Kuang et al. (2024).
The ionization efficiency (IE) was calibrated using pure NH4NO3 particles with a diameter of 300 nm following standard protocols (Jayne et al., 2000). The relative ionization efficiency (RIE) of ammonium and sulfate was determined as 5.3 and 1.3, respectively, while the default RIE values were utilized for organic species (1.4), nitrate (1.1) and chloride (1.3). Composition-dependent collection efficiency (Middlebrook et al., 2012) was employed in this study. Elemental ratios were derived using the “improved ambient” method (Canagaratna et al., 2015), which includes calculations for O C, hydrogen carbon (H C), nitrogen carbon (N C) and organic mass organic carbon (OM OC) ratios.
2.2 Source apportionment of OA
Two primary organic aerosol (POA) factors, namely biomass burning OA (BBOA) and fossil-fuel-related OA (FFOA), along with two SOA factors, were identified using positive matrix factorization (PMF) (Ulbrich et al., 2009; Paatero and Tapper, 1994). The mass spectra of OA factors and correlations between these factors and external species are presented in Figs. S1–S2 in the Supplement. The BBOA spectrum was characterized by prominent 60 (mainly C2H4O, f60 = 1.8 %) and 73 (mainly C3H5O, f73 = 1.1 %), which are well-established marker ions of biomass burning (Mohr et al., 2009). Additionally, BBOA showed strong correlations with C2H4O (R2 = 0.96) and C3H5O (R2 = 0.96). Consistent with previous studies in Beijing (Xu et al., 2019), a mixed factor termed FFOA, comprising contributions from traffic emissions and coal combustion, was identified by PMF. FFOA was characterized by typical hydrocarbon ion series, yet a relatively high f44 (0.089) was observed, likely from the aging during regional transport, consistent with observations in winter 2016 in Beijing (Xu et al., 2019) and the previous study in Gucheng (Chen et al., 2022). Although the mass spectra of the two SOA factors both showed high f44 (0.16–0.21) and O C (0.78–0.91), they showed different spectral patterns, correlation with tracers and diurnal variations, suggesting different chemical processing and formation mechanisms for these two factors. For instance, the first factor (OOA1) exhibits a pronounced increase during daytime (Fig. S3), whereas the second factor (OOA2) remains relatively constant throughout the day. Furthermore, OOA1 exhibits higher CO C2H3O+ (3.9) and O C (0.91) values compared to OOA2 (CO C2H3O+ = 2.1, O C = 0.78). The significant signal of f29 (0.076) and high N C (0.014) were observed in OOA2 but not OOA1, suggesting that OOA2 is more like a factor associated with aqueous-phase processing (Zhao et al., 2019).
3.1 General descriptions
Figure 1 illustrates the temporal variations in meteorological parameters, gaseous pollutants and PM1 species for the entire study. Overall, the mass concentrations of PM species at different sizes were comparable (Fig. S4), except during episodes with high RH levels (> 95 %; Table S1). Five episodes (Ep1–Ep5 in Fig. 1) with high RH levels exhibited notable differences in the properties of PM species at different sizes. Further details are provided in Sect. 3.2–3.5. These results suggest significant impacts of aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation on aerosol sampling under high-RH and supersaturated conditions. Unless otherwise specified, the characterizations of aerosols presented in this section refer to PM1 species. For reference, the mass concentrations of PM2.5 and TSP species are also provided in Table S2. The mass concentrations of non-refractory (NR) PM1 varied from 0.58 to 123.7 µg m−3, with an average of 25.4 µg m−3. Compared to the measurements in winter 2018 and 2019 at the same site, a notable decrease in OA mass concentration was observed (36.6 µg m−3 in winter 2018 vs. 11.2 µg m−3 in winter 2021), while the mass concentrations of SO4 and NO3 initially increased in 2019 and then decreased to 1.8 and 8.7 µg m−3, respectively, in winter 2021 (Fig. S5). These changes are strongly associated with the largely decreased coal combustion emission in rural areas in the NCP and the varying responses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and SO2 NO2 to the emission changes. Additionally, the fraction of NO3 exhibited a continuous increase from 2018 (17 %) to 2021 (34 %), leading to an increase in the NO3 SO4 ratio from 1.4 in winter 2018 to 4.8 in winter 2021, highlighting the increasing importance of nitrate in the NCP (Lei et al., 2021).
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f01](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f01-thumb.png)
Figure 1Time series of meteorological variables, gaseous species and PM1 species. In addition, five episodes (Ep1–5) with relatively high RH levels (> 95 %) are marked for further discussion, with Ep5 being a continuous 3 d fog event that was further divided into nine stages (S1–S9).
In comparison to 2018, the decrease in POA concentration in 2021 (23.0 µg m−3 vs. 4.8 µg m−3) was more significant than that of SOA (13.5 µg m−3 vs. 6.1 µg m−3), indicating the direct impact of pollution control policies on primary emissions in the NCP (Liu et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2023). Consequently, the fraction of SOA increased from 35.9 % in winter 2018 to 50.2 % in winter 2021, highlighting the increased oxidation of organic aerosols. This increase in oxidation is further supported by the rise in the O C ratio from 0.51 in 2019 to 0.55 in 2021. Notably, the O C observed in Gucheng was higher than those at urban sites with an average O C ratio of 0.43 in Asia (Zhou et al., 2020), suggesting a greater oxidation of OA in suburban areas. Additionally, the frequent occurrence of episodes with relatively high RH levels, which were characterized by relatively high O C ratios (0.44–0.67 in Ep1–Ep5 on average) compared to urban sites, could contribute to this difference.
The size distributions of PM species also exhibited variations at the same sampling site when compared to previous winter. The peak diameters of SO4 and NO3 were found to be similar (∼ 500 nm; Fig. S6), contrasting with the results observed in winter 2019 in Gucheng, where SO4 peaked at ∼ 600 nm and NO3 at ∼ 400 nm (Chen et al., 2022). Additionally, a larger peak diameter of OA (450 nm) was observed in winter 2021 compared to winter 2019 (400 nm). The discrepancy in size is likely attributed to the more frequent occurrence of high-RH events in winter 2019 (Fig. S7), leading to variations in aqueous-phase processes and hygroscopic growth. Notably, the differences in size distributions of SO4 and NO3 between PM2.5 and TSP are negligible, whereas smaller peak diameters were observed for PM1 species. Such results indicate that hygroscopic growth of aerosols ranging from 1 to 2.5 µm is relatively facile, while it becomes more challenging for them to grow beyond 2.5 µm. In contrast, OA exhibited similar peak diameters for different sampling size cutoffs, although the mass concentrations of PM1 OA above ∼ 700 nm and in the range of 200-400 nm were lower compared to PM2.5 and TSP OA. These differences in mass concentrations above 700 nm are likely attributable to contributions from SOA, while the variations in the 200–400 nm range may be influenced by the conversion of POA during aqueous-phase processes.
3.2 Impact of aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation on size distributions
In this section, and are defined to indicate the size-resolved ratios of submicron aerosols that grow above 1 and 2.5 µm through water condensation, respectively. Subsaturated (measured RH < 99 %) and supersaturated conditions (determined based on aerosol activation characteristics of submicron aerosols) were individually investigated in order to discuss the impacts of hygroscopic growth and activation (in fogs).
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f02](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f02-thumb.png)
Figure 2Average particle number size distributions of PM1 and TSP for different RH ranges on the left axis, while the right axis shows the corresponding average .
We focus on comparing the size distributions of PM1 and TSP, as well as the corresponding average , due to the negligible differences in size distributions of PM species between PM2.5 and TSP under subsaturated conditions (Fig. S8). Note that under conditions of low RH (< 60 %), there was no activation of aerosols. In the RH range of 60 %–80 %, there were minimal differences observed in the size distributions between PM1 and TSP (Fig. 2). Only small fractions (< 20 %) of aerosols larger than 700 nm were found to grow beyond an aerodynamic diameter of 1 µm. As RH increased above 95 %, the minimal size for growing beyond PM1 shifted to about 300 nm. A significant portion (> 50 %) of aerosols larger than 500 nm was observed to grow beyond an aerodynamic diameter of 1 µm when RH varied from 95 % to 99 %. These results suggest that at relative humidity levels above 90 %, a considerable fraction (> 25 %) of submicron aerosol mass is present in supermicron diameter ranges, which may significantly enhance multiphase reactions of aerosols.
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f03](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f03-thumb.png)
Figure 3Average ) and ) as a function of Dp for different critical activation diameter (Da) ranges. The dashed green and purple lines refer to the fitted average critical diameter that grow beyond PM1 () and PM2.5 (Da).
As relative humidity exceeded 99 %, aerosol activation was typically observed most of the time, although it may not occur in every instance. The average and curves as a function of Dp are presented in Fig. 3, showing that the minimal size for growing beyond PM1 shifted to about 200 nm and portions of dry-state submicron aerosols could grow even beyond PM2.5 through aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation. To further investigate how aerosol activation processes have an impact on the ambient size shift, the size-resolved activation ratio of aerosols in fogs represented by and were further analyzed for the case of a continuous 3 d fog event (Ep5 in Fig. 1). Critical activation diameters (Da), representing the submicron diameter at which activation beyond 2.5 µm occurs and fitted using the error function (erf) as detailed in Kuang et al. (2024), ranged from 362 to 664 nm, with an average of 487 nm. The supersaturation ratios observed during fogs, as calculated based on the aerosol activation theory proposed by Petters and Kreidenweis (2007), ranged from 0.016 % to 0.042 %, with an average value of 0.026 %. Figure 3 illustrates the average and curves for three different Da ranges, along with the corresponding average supersaturation ratios. Interestingly, as the average Da increased from 413 to 607 nm, the average critical diameter () required to grow beyond 1 µm only increased from 283 to 327 nm. Generally, ranged from 255 to 381 nm, with an average of 303 nm, suggesting the relatively smaller variations in compared with Da under supersaturated conditions. While the differences in the fractions of aerosol components residing in supermicron diameters were small across different Da ranges, consistent with observed changes in aerosol size distributions, the fractions residing with diameters larger than 2.5 µm would decrease noticeably as Da increased due to the decrease in supersaturation levels. Furthermore, under supersaturated conditions, more than 70 % of the dry-state submicron aerosol mass was observed to reside in supermicron diameter ranges. It is noteworthy that aerosol mass measurements from mass spectrometry indicated that only 55 % of the dry-state submicron aerosol mass resided in supermicron diameter ranges during fogs. This discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the collection efficiency of HR-AMS is lower than 1 for diameters larger than ∼ 600 nm (Liu et al., 2007), thus leading to a lower fraction being captured. These results provide direct evidence for the shift in cut-off size of PM1 and PM2.5 associated with aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation.
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f04](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f04-thumb.png)
Figure 4Average size distributions of OA, SO4 and NO3 at (a) RH = 60 %–80 %, (b) RH = 80 %–90 %, (c) RH = 90 %–95 %, (d) RH = 95 %–99 % and (e) RH > 99 %. The right axis shows the corresponding average .
Figure 4 shows the average size distributions of PM species for different RH ranges. The size distributions of SO4 at RH < 90 % were comparable between PM1 and TSP, with only a small fraction of PM1 SO4 at Dva < 800 nm being able to grow beyond 1 µm (Fig. 4). In comparison, the peak diameter of PM1 SO4 (Dva of 520 nm) was lower than that in TSP (Dva of 600 nm), and the size for PM1 SO4 capable of growing beyond 1 µm shifted to Dva of 400 nm at RH ranging from 95 % to 99 %. The variations in size distributions of NO3 are generally consistent with SO4 as influenced by the changes in RH. For example, the increases in NO3 mass concentrations from PM1 to TSP were also predominantly particles with Dva of 400 nm at RH = 95 %–99 %. However, small differences between variations in size distributions of NO3 and SO4 were also observed. For example, the different for the RH range of 95 %–99 % may be attributed to their diverse mixing state across different sizes. Similar to the variations in size distributions of SIA, the increase in peak diameters of OA in TSP was faster than that in PM1 as RH increased, and the TSP OA peaked at 520 nm, exceeding that of PM1 (∼ Dva of 400 nm) at RH > 99 %. PM1 OA above ∼ 450 nm exhibited lower mass concentrations compared to that in TSP at RH = 95 %–99 %. Conversely, the minimal size of differences in OA concentrations between PM1 and TSP were shifted to ∼ 400 nm at RH > 99 %, which was larger than that of SIA (∼ Dva of 300 nm). Figure S8 also illustrates the comparison of size distributions of PM species in PM2.5 and TSP. Notably, the disparities between PM2.5 and TSP are only discernible at RH > 99 %, which is consistent with the fact that dry-state submicron aerosols would substantially migrate beyond 2.5 µm only under supersaturated conditions. While SIA above Dva of 400 nm showed the differences in mass concentrations between PM2.5 and TSP, the differences in OA concentrations between PM2.5 and TSP were concentrated at Dva > 600 nm, suggesting the SOA with a larger size contributed more to the activation compared to POA with a smaller size.
3.3 Impact of aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation on aerosol bulk compositions
As shown in Fig. 5, consistent with previous studies at urban sites (Wang et al., 2015; Elser et al., 2016), the mass concentrations of PM species showed considerable increases from RH < 60 % to RH > 60 %, highlighting the effect of aqueous-phase processing. While comparable mass concentrations of PM species were observed for different sizes at RH < 60 % due to small effects of hygroscopic growth on the cut-off size as discussed before, the increases in PM species with different sizes vary with the change in RH levels (Table S3). For example, the mass concentration of aerosols in PM1 increased from 20.0 µg m−3 at RH < 80 % to 39.8 µg m−3 at RH = 90 %–95 %, while such a nearly doubled mass increase was less than that in PM2.5 and TSP. Note that the mass concentrations of NR PM1 did not continuously increase with the further increase in RH, rather decreasing to 32.6 µg m−3 at RH = 95 %–99 % and 30.2 µg m−3 at RH > 99 %. One explanation was that hygroscopic growth of PM1 at high RH levels rendered some of the submicron aerosols unable to be captured by the PM1 cyclone. In contrast to the negligible differences in mass concentrations between PM2.5 and TSP at RH < 99 %, significant disparities in concentrations are observed between PM2.5 and TSP (40.1 µg m−3 vs. 44.9 µg m−3) at RH > 99 %. As discussed above, such behaviors could be attributed to the fact that the particles that grew to larger sizes due to hygroscopic water uptake and activation could not be captured by the PM1 and PM2.5 cyclones.
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f05](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f05-thumb.png)
Figure 5Average concentrations and contributions of PM and OA species for different sizes at different RH levels.
As expected, the hygroscopic growth and activation-induced PM mass concentration increases varied among distinct chemical species. At an RH of 95 %–99 %, the mass concentration of SO4 in PM2.5 increased by 33 % (3.6 µg m−3) compared to that in PM1 (2.7 µg m−3), which was larger than that for NO3 (27 %) and OA (18 %). Additionally, OOA1 increased by 21.8 % from PM1 (5.5 µg m−3) to PM2.5 (6.7 µg m−3) at RH = 95 %–99 %, lower than the increase observed in OOA2 (36.8 %). We also observed a 18.2 % increase in BBOA concentration in PM2.5 compared to that in PM1 at RH = 95 %–99 %, which was larger than that for FFOA (7.9 %), indicating that BBOA was more susceptible to hygroscopic growth than FFOA. Such contributions confirmed the different hygroscopic growth of POA components, consistent with previous studies (Betha et al., 2018; Kuang et al., 2024). The PM2.5 and TSP compositions were comparable at RH < 99 %, confirming the fact that aerosol activation did not occur under conditions of RH < 99 %. At RH > 99 %, obvious differences in compositions were detected among different sizes, with detailed mass concentrations of PM species listed in Table S3.
The particle differences that could be captured by the PM2.5 cyclone but not by the PM1 cyclone were defined as the hygroscopic growth contribution, while particles that were not captured by the PM2.5 cyclone but measured by the TSP passage were attributed to the activation contribution. The SO4 mass concentration in TSP increased by 78 % (1.7 µg m−3) compared to that in PM1 at RH > 99 %, including 1.1 µg m−3 attributed to hygroscopic growth and 0.58 µg m−3 to activation. Such contributions of mass concentrations from hygroscopic growth and activation to the increase in SO4 were comparable to those observed for NO3. OA species showed different contributions from hygroscopic growth and activation. For example, the mass concentration of OOA1 in TSP showed a 2.7 µg m−3 increase compared to PM1 at RH > 99 %, with 2.0 µg m−3 attributed to hygroscopic growth and 0.7 µg m−3 to activation. Although the absolute increase in OOA2 mass concentration was lower from PM1 to TSP (0.78 µg m−3 from hygroscopic growth and 0.38 µg m−3 from activation), the relative contribution of activation was higher (33 % for OOA2 vs. 26 % for OOA1). These discrepancies highlight differences in hygroscopic growth and activation properties of distinct SOA species likely due to diverse chemical compositions and sizes.
On average, the mass concentration of BBOA in TSP was 2.2 µg m−3, which was larger than PM2.5 (2.1 µg m−3) and PM1 BBOA (1.9 µg m−3) at RH > 99 %, suggesting more than at least 5.8 % activation for submicron BBOA. Comparatively, the mass concentrations of FFOA showed negligible differences between different sizes likely due to the insufficient hygroscopicity of FFOA. As shown in Fig. S9, the average activation ratios of BBOA for different supersaturations were generally higher than 10 % during Ep5; however, no activation of FFOA was observed. Indeed, the contributions of hygroscopic growth and activation of POA vary with the development of fog processes (Figs. S10–S11). For example, the contribution of POA to the difference between PM2.5 and TSP of OA decreased from 52.1 % in S2 to 11.6 % in S6 at RH > 99 % during Ep5. These results suggest the changes in aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation of POA containing aerosols vary with the development of fog processes due to the supersaturation variations and even deactivation of POA containing aerosols.
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f06](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f06-thumb.png)
Figure 6Average NO+ NO, SO SO, mass concentrations of OS, and lower bounds of ON for different sizes at different RH levels.
Organic nitrates (ON) and organosulfur compounds (OS) were estimated using the NOx method (Farmer et al., 2010) and the method proposed by Chen et al. (2019), respectively (Table S4). As depicted in Fig. 6, ON and OS revealed significant variations among different sizes across different RH levels. For example, while the mass concentrations of ON and OS were comparable for different sizes at RH < 80 %, the mass concentrations of ON and OS in TSP were 8.1 % and 39.1 % higher compared to that in PM1, respectively, at RH ranging from 95 % to 99 %. Under RH conditions of > 99 %, the mass concentration of ON in TSP showed a 4.05 µg m−3 increase compared to PM1, with 0.76 µg m−3 attributed to hygroscopic growth and 0.26 µg m−3 to activation. While the absolute increases in OS mass concentrations from hygroscopic growth (0.29 µg m−3) and activation (0.14 µg m−3) were lower than ON, the contributions of activation (25.5 % vs. 32.6 %) to the increased concentrations of ON were found to be lower compared to those for OS. Despite the mass concentrations of ON and OS in TSP increases due to hygroscopic growth and activation, the NO+ NO and SO SO ratios in PM1 were lower than those observed in TSP, indicating that ON and OS mass concentration increments caused by high RH levels were of smaller magnitudes than those of NO3 and SO4, respectively. These findings suggest that ON and OS may have lower hygroscopicity or reside in smaller sizes than NO3 and SO4. Nevertheless, ON and OS were still non-negligible components of fog droplets. Considering that ON often serves as an important component of brown carbon (Laskin et al., 2015), it might have a significant implication in radiative impacts of fog and cloud droplets by absorbing solar radiation at ultraviolet wavelengths.
3.4 Impact of hygroscopic growth and activation on OA mass spectra
While the mass spectra of OA were comparable at RH < 80 % across different sizes (Fig. 7) due to similar chemical compositions, the variations in ion categories for different sizes as a function of RH revealed significant differences. For example, the CxH of the PM1 TSP ratio exhibited substantial increases as the RH increased, with values larger than 1 at RH > 90 % (Fig. S12). This suggests a decreased contribution of CxH in TSP at high RH levels, implying less hygroscopic growth potential of POA compared to SOA. The CxHyO of PM1 TSP ratios was below 1 at RH < 95 % across all 's but exceeded 1 at > 60 at RH > 95 %. The behavior of CxHyO did not exhibit a clear changing pattern with RH. These findings underscore the differences in hygroscopic growth and activations of various molecular compositions, yet it remains a challenge to identify them by HR-AMS. Furthermore, comparisons of typical ion mass concentrations between different sizes at different RH levels revealed distinct responses of chemical compounds to RH changes. CO and CHO+, which are associated with SOA and aqueous processes (Zhao et al., 2019), exhibited a 20.0 % increase in TSP compared to that in PM1 at RH = 95 %–99 %. Additionally, the N C in PM1 was lower than that in TSP at RH > 90 %, and a significant CH4N+ signal was observed, implying the contribution of N-containing compounds to hygroscopic growth and activation. These results indicate different responses of chemical compounds to RH level changes, with almost all species showing significant increases in the TSP compared to that in PM1 at RH > 95 %.
![https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f07](https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9387/2024/acp-24-9387-2024-f07-thumb.png)
Figure 7Average high-resolution mass spectra of PM1 (left panel) and TSP (middle panel) OA at (a) RH = 60 %–80 %, (b) RH = 80 %–90 %, (c) RH = 90 %–95 %, (d) RH = 95 %–99 % and (e) RH > 99 %. The differences in mass spectra of TSP and PM1 OA are shown in the right panels.
While similar O C ratios were generally observed among different sizes at RH < 95 %, the O C in TSP (0.64) was higher than that in PM1 (0.59) at RH > 99 % likely due to the change in chemical compositions for different sizes due to activation. As shown in Fig. 7, the dominant contribution to the difference between PM1 and TSP was attributed to CO and CO+, followed by CHO+ and C2H3O+. One possible explanation is that particles with relatively higher O C possibly exhibit higher hygroscopicity and are more susceptible to hygroscopic growth, rendering part of them unable to be captured by the PM1 cyclone at RH > 99 % (Kuang et al., 2020). This interpretation is supported by the observation that SOA contributed more to the increase in TSP OA concentrations than POA at supersaturated conditions. The CxH ion categories also contributed in part to the disparity between PM1 and TSP at RH > 99 % likely due to the activation of POA.
This study comprehensively characterized the composition, sources and size distributions of submicron aerosols utilizing an advanced fog–aerosol sampling system at a rural site in the NCP. Highly hygroscopic aerosol components, such as inorganic nitrate and sulfate, exhibited significant variations for different sizes, particularly under higher-RH conditions. For instance, at RH = 95 %–99 %, the mass concentration of PM2.5 SO4 increased by 33 % compared to PM1, surpassing the increases observed for NO3 and OA. Conversely, the PM2.5 and TSP compositions were similar to each other at RH < 99 %. Our results indicate that aerosols ranging from 1 to 2.5 µm experience relatively facile hygroscopic growth but face challenges in growing beyond 2.5 µm in size. Furthermore, we observed increased ON and OS mass concentrations in TSP compared to those in PM1 despite decreases in NO+ NO and SO SO. During supersaturated fog conditions, over 70 % of dry-state submicron aerosol mass was found to reside in supermicron diameter ranges. The critical diameter for growth beyond the supermicron range was from 255 to 381 nm, with an average of 303 nm, while the critical activation diameter ranged from 362 to 664 nm, averaging 487 nm. These results highlight significant impacts of aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation on aerosol sampling under high-RH conditions.
The study also provided insights into the activation characteristics of SOA and POA factors during fog periods, shedding light on the aqueous processing of POA and SOA conversion. For instance, the potential aqueous conversion of BBOA in fog and cloud droplets was indicated by its activation abilities to form fog droplets, which would depend on supersaturations and other environmental factors. However, the efficiency of aqueous conversion for FFOA in fogs appeared to be low, as only small portions of submicron FFOA could grow beyond 1 µm. Furthermore, distinct ion categories including CxH, CxHyO, CxHyO and CxHyN in PM1 TSP ratios at different RH levels suggested varying hygroscopic growth and activation abilities as well as diverse chemical compounds. However, detailed mechanisms require further comprehensive investigations. Overall, these results demonstrate significantly different cloud and fog processing behaviors between primary and secondary aerosols.
Data will be made available on request.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024-supplement.
WeX, YK and YS designed the research. WeX, YK, WaX, BL, XZ, JT and HQ conducted the measurements. WeX, YK, WaX and YS analyzed the data. WaX, ZZ, LL and YS reviewed and commented on the paper. WeX and YK wrote the paper.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
This research has been supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB0760200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42377101 and 42175083).
This paper was edited by Dara Salcedo and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J., Chen, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Collier, S. C., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Larger Submicron Particles for Emissions With Residential Burning in Wintertime San Joaquin Valley (Fresno) than for Vehicle Combustion in Summertime South Coast Air Basin (Fontana), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 10526–10545, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd026730, 2018.
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015, 2015.
Chen, C., Qiu, Y., Xu, W., He, Y., Li, Z., Sun, J., Ma, N., Xu, W., Pan, X., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Primary Emissions and Secondary Aerosol Processing During Wintertime in Rural Area of North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035430, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035430, 2022.
Chen, Y., Wild, O., Wang, Y., Ran, L., Teich, M., Größ, J., Wang, L., Spindler, G., Herrmann, H., van Pinxteren, D., McFiggans, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: The influence of impactor size cut-off shift caused by hygroscopic growth on particulate matter loading and composition measurements, Atmos. Environ., 195, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.049, 2018.
Chen, Y., Xu, L., Humphry, T., Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Ovadnevaite, J., Huang, S., Poulain, L., Schroder, J. C., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Herrmann, H., O'Dowd, C., Stone, E. A., and Ng, N. L.: Response of the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to Inorganic Sulfates and Organosulfur Compounds: Applications in Field and Laboratory Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5176–5186, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00884, 2019.
Duan, J., Huang, R.-J., Gu, Y., Lin, C., Zhong, H., Xu, W., Liu, Q., You, Y., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Hoffmann, T., and O'Dowd, C.: Measurement report: Large contribution of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processes to the wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Xi'an, Northwest China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10139–10153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10139-2022, 2022.
Elser, M., Huang, R.-J., Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Wang, Q., Canonaco, F., Li, G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Cao, J., Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: New insights into PM2.5 chemical composition and sources in two major cities in China during extreme haze events using aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3207–3225, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016, 2016.
Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J. H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912340107, 2010.
Fuzzi, S., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Decesari, S., Denier van der Gon, H., Facchini, M. C., Fowler, D., Koren, I., Langford, B., Lohmann, U., Nemitz, E., Pandis, S., Riipinen, I., Rudich, Y., Schaap, M., Slowik, J. G., Spracklen, D. V., Vignati, E., Wild, M., Williams, M., and Gilardoni, S.: Particulate matter, air quality and climate: lessons learned and future needs, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8217–8299, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015, 2015.
Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Ruehl, C. R., and Setyan, A.: Effect of aqueous-phase processing on aerosol chemistry and size distributions in Fresno, California, during wintertime, Environ. Chem., 9, 221–235, 2012.
Gilardoni, S., Massoli, P., Paglione, M., Giulianelli, L., Carbone, C., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Sandrini, S., Costabile, F., Gobbi, G. P., Pietrogrande, M. C., Visentin, M., Scotto, F., Fuzzi, S., and Facchini, M. C.: Direct observation of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from biomass-burning emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 10013–10018, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602212113, 2016.
Gupta, S. K. and Elumalai, S. P.: Adverse impacts of fog events during winter on fine particulate matter, CO and VOCs: a case study of a highway near Dhanbad, India, Weather, 73, 396–402, 2018.
Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical composition, sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: Contrast between summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024020, 2016.
Hu, X., Sun, J., Xia, C., Shen, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Yu, A., Lu, J., Liu, S., and Zhang, X.: Measurement report: Rapid decline of aerosol absorption coefficient and aerosol optical property effects on radiative forcing in an urban area of Beijing from 2018 to 2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5517–5531, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5517-2023, 2023.
Huang, D. D., Kong, L., Gao, J., Lou, S., Qiao, L., Zhou, M., Ma, Y., Zhu, S., Wang, H., Chen, S., Zeng, L., and Huang, C.: Insights into the formation and properties of secondary organic aerosol at a background site in Yangtze River Delta region of China: Aqueous-phase processing vs. photochemical oxidation, Atmos. Environ., 239, 117716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117716, 2020.
Huang, R.-J., He, Y., Duan, J., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., Hu, W., Lin, C., Ni, H., Dai, W., Cao, J., Wu, Y., Zhang, R., Xu, W., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Hoffmann, T., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Contrasting sources and processes of particulate species in haze days with low and high relative humidity in wintertime Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9101–9114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9101-2020, 2020.
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, 2000.
Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Tao, J., Ma, N., Zhao, C., and Shao, M.: A Review on Laboratory Studies and Field Measurements of Atmospheric Organic Aerosol Hygroscopicity and Its Parameterization Based on Oxidation Levels, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 6, 410–424, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00164-2, 2020.
Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Tao, J., Luo, B., Liu, L., Xu, H., Xu, W., Xue, B., Zhai, M., Liu, P., and Sun, Y.: Divergent Impacts of Biomass Burning and Fossil Fuel Combustion Aerosols on Fog-Cloud Microphysics and Chemistry: Novel Insights From Advanced Aerosol-Fog Sampling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107147, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107147, 2024.
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167, 2015.
Lei, L., Zhou, W., Chen, C., He, Y., Li, Z., Sun, J., Tang, X., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Long-term characterization of aerosol chemistry in cold season from 2013 to 2020 in Beijing, China, Environ. Pollut., 268, 115952, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115952, 2021.
Li, X., Song, S., Zhou, W., Hao, J., Worsnop, D. R., and Jiang, J.: Interactions between aerosol organic components and liquid water content during haze episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12163–12174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12163-2019, 2019.
Li, Z. J., Xu, W. Q., Zhou, W., Lei, L., Sun, J. X., You, B., Wang, Z. F., and Sun, Y. L.: Insights into the compositional differences of PM1 and PM2.5 from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 301, 119709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119709, 2023.
Liu, P. S. K., Deng, R., Smith, K. A., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Moore, K., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., and Deshler, T.: Transmission efficiency of an aerodynamic focusing lens system: Comparison of model calculations and laboratory measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 721–733, 2007.
Liu, Y. W., Wang, M. H., Yue, M., and Qian, Y.: Distinct Seasonality in Aerosol Responses to Emission Control Over Northern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038377, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd038377, 2023.
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041, 2012.
Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of primary organic aerosol emissions from meat cooking, trash burning, and motor vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and comparison with ambient and chamber observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449, https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518, 2009.
Molina, M. J. and Molina, L. T.: Megacities and atmospheric pollution, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 54, 644–680, 2004.
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203, 1994.
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.
Pope, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., and Thurston, G. D.: Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution, JAMA-J. Am. Med. Assoc., 287, 1132–1141, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132, 2002.
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J. W., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B., Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T., Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J., Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016rg000540, 2017.
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019, 2013.
Sun, Y., He, Y., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Song, S., Ma, N., Tao, J., Cheng, P., Wu, C., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Xie, C., Chen, C., Lei, L., Qiu, Y., Fu, P., Croteau, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical Differences Between PM1 and PM2.5 in Highly Polluted Environment and Implications in Air Pollution Studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086288, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086288, 2020.
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan, X. L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10149–10165, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015, 2015.
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009, 2009.
Wang, J., Ge, X., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Xu, J., Ge, S., Yu, H., and Chen, M.: Highly time-resolved urban aerosol characteristics during springtime in Yangtze River Delta, China: insights from soot particle aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9109–9127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9109-2016, 2016.
Wang, Y. C., Wang, Q. Y., Ye, J. H., Yan, M. Y., Qin, Q. D., Prevot, A. S. H., and Cao, J. J.: A Review of Aerosol Chemical Composition and Sources in Representative Regions of China during Wintertime, Atmosphere, 10, 277, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050277, 2019.
Wang, Y. H., Liu, Z. R., Zhang, J. K., Hu, B., Ji, D. S., Yu, Y. C., and Wang, Y. S.: Aerosol physicochemical properties and implications for visibility during an intense haze episode during winter in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3205–3215, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3205-2015, 2015.
Xu, W., Han, T., Du, W., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Effects of Aqueous-Phase and Photochemical Processing on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Evolution in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 762–770, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04498, 2017.
Xu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Ge, X., Xie, C., Zhou, W., Du, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Coe, H.: Changes in Aerosol Chemistry From 2014 to 2016 in Winter in Beijing: Insights From High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1132–1147, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029245, 2019.
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Ulbrich, I., Ng, N., Worsnop, D., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401, 3045–3067, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y, 2011.
Zhao, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Du, W., Worsnop, D., Zhou, L., ge, X., Fu, P., Li, J., Wang, Z., Donahue, N., and Sun, Y.: Organic Aerosol Processing During Winter Severe Haze Episodes in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10248–10263, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030832, 2019.
Zheng, Y., Miao, R. Q., Zhang, Q., Li, Y. W., Cheng, X., Liao, K. R., Koenig, T. K., Ge, Y. L., Tang, L. Z., Shang, D. J., Hu, M., Chen, S. Y., and Chen, Q.: Secondary Formation of Submicron and Supermicron Organic and Inorganic Aerosols in a Highly Polluted Urban Area, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037865, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037865, 2023.
Zhou, W., Xu, W., Kim, H., Zhang, Q., Fu, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: A review of aerosol chemistry in Asia: insights from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp., 22, 1616–1653, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em00212g, 2020.