the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Vertically resolved aerosol variability at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory under wet-season conditions
Rafael Valiati
Bruna A. Holanda
Bruno B. Meller
Leslie A. Kremper
Luciana V. Rizzo
Samara Carbone
Fernando G. Morais
Janaína P. Nascimento
Meinrat O. Andreae
Micael A. Cecchini
Luiz A. T. Machado
Milena Ponczek
Ulrich Pöschl
David Walter
Paulo Artaxo
The wet-season atmosphere in the central Amazon resembles natural conditions with minimal anthropogenic influence, making it one of the rare preindustrial-like continental areas worldwide. Previous long-term studies have analyzed the properties and sources of the natural Amazonian background aerosol. However, the vertical profile of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) has not been assessed systematically. Since 2017, such a profile assessment has been possible with the 325 m high tower at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO), located in a largely untouched primary forest in the central Amazon. This study investigates the variability of submicrometer aerosol concentration, size distribution, and optical properties at 60 and 325 m in the Amazonian PBL. The results show significant differences in aerosol volumes and scattering coefficients in the vertical gradient. The aerosol population was well-mixed throughout the boundary layer during the daytime but became separated upon stratification during the nighttime. We also found a significant difference in the spectral dependence of the scattering coefficients between the two heights. The analysis of downdrafts and the related rainfall revealed changes in the aerosol populations before and after rain events, with absorption and scattering coefficients decreasing as optically active particles are removed by wet deposition. The recovery of absorption and scattering coefficients is faster at 325 m than at 60 m. Convective events were concomitant with rapid increases in the concentrations of sub-50 nm particles, which were likely associated with downdrafts. We found that the aerosol population near the canopy had a significantly higher mass scattering efficiency than at 325 m. There was also a clear spectral dependence, with values for λ=450, 525, and 635 nm of 7.74±0.12, 5.49±0.11, and 4.15±0.11 m2 g−1, respectively, at 60 m, while at 325 m the values were 5.26±0.06, 3.76±0.05, and 2.46±0.04 m2 g−1, respectively. The equivalent aerosol refractive index results, which were obtained for the first time for the wet season in the central Amazon, show slightly higher scattering (real) components at 60 m compared to 325 m of 1.33 and 1.27, respectively. In contrast, the refractive index's absorptive (imaginary) component was identical for both heights, at 0.006. This study shows that the aerosol physical properties at 60 and 325 m are different, likely due to aging processes, and strongly depend on the photochemistry, PBL dynamics, and aerosol sources. These findings provide valuable insights into the impact of aerosols on climate and radiative balance and can be used to improve the representation of aerosols in global climate models.
- Article
(1925 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(2114 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
The central Amazon is one of the few continental places where the atmospheric aerosol population, along with aerosol–cloud interactions, approaches conditions without significant anthropogenic impacts during particular periods of the wet season (February to May) (Martin et al., 2010; Pöhlker et al., 2016, 2018; Andreae et al., 2022). Cloud and precipitation formation is directly linked to the concentration and properties of atmospheric aerosols, which greatly affects the hydrological cycle of the basin (Andreae et al., 2001; Andreae, 2007; Artaxo et al., 2022; Khadir et al., 2023). In the Amazon, biogenic emissions, such as organic gases and aerosols, combined with the high concentration of water vapor and intense solar radiation, result in an atmosphere particularly susceptible to different external forcings that may change its composition (Pöhlker et al., 2012; Carslaw et al., 2013; Artaxo et al., 2022). The episodic occurrence of clean conditions in today's atmosphere is critically important for studying the fundamental processes that control the natural aerosol population in the Amazon and beyond (Holanda et al., 2023). This includes, for instance, the diverse sources of primary biological aerosol particles (Pöhlker et al., 2012; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016; Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2020; Prass et al., 2021) as well as the likewise diverse emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), followed by cascades of atmospheric oxidation that form secondary organic aerosol (SOA) through new particle formation (NPF) and condensation (Andreae et al., 2022; Kirkby et al., 2016; Rose et al., 2018; Edtbauer et al., 2021; Pfannerstill et al., 2021; Yáñez-Serrano et al., 2020).
Earlier studies documented the physical and chemical properties of the atmospheric aerosol in the central Amazon (e.g., Rizzo et al., 2011; Artaxo et al., 2013; Rizzo et al., 2013; Pöhlker et al., 2016, 2018; Rizzo et al., 2018; Saturno et al., 2018b; Talbot et al., 1988, 1990). In places such as the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) site, the strongly seasonal aerosol optical properties and particle number concentrations were defined by the different aerosol sources and atmospheric aging involved (Pöhlker et al., 2016; Saturno et al., 2018b; Franco et al., 2022b). Under very clean atmospheric conditions during the wet season, the submicrometer aerosol population is dominated by sub-50 nm and Aitken mode particles (mode centered on average at DAIT∼70 nm). Moreover, there is also a significant amount of aerosols from the accumulation mode (DACC∼160 nm), mainly from particle growth events and horizontal atmospheric transport. Under clean atmospheric conditions like these, the mean total aerosol concentration reaches values as low as ∼250 cm−3 (Pöhlker et al., 2018; Franco et al., 2022b; Machado et al., 2021).
During the wet season, long-range-transport (LRT) plumes from the African continent often affect atmospheric composition and air quality in the central Amazon (Pöhlker et al., 2016; Talbot et al., 1990; Moran-Zuloaga et al., 2018; Holanda et al., 2023). These plumes consist mainly of dust and aged smoke from biomass burning but may also include marine primary and secondary aerosols. The difference of up to 20 nm in the accumulation mode between local aerosols and LRT plumes suggests that aging significantly occurs in the plumes (Pöhlker et al., 2018; Holanda et al., 2020, 2023). These LRT events can cause aerosol concentrations to reach levels as high as 430 cm−3, and the chemical composition of these aerosols is dominated by dust, smoke, sea salt, and marine biogenic sulfate (Andreae et al., 1990; Holanda et al., 2020, 2023). Coarse-mode aerosols also exhibit significant variations during LRT events (Moran-Zuloaga et al., 2018).
The aerosol optical properties during the wet season show distinct characteristics compared to the dry season. The average scattering and absorption coefficients during the wet season are 7.5 and 0.68 M m−1, respectively, with single-scattering albedos at 637 nm, ω0,637 nm, of 0.93 for clean periods and 0.80 for LRT periods (Saturno et al., 2018b; Holanda et al., 2023). The high value of ω0,637 nm during the clean periods indicates that these aerosols are efficient at scattering radiation and are likely composed of SOA and primary biogenic particles. During LRT events, on the other hand, the plumes that originated from the African continent are dominated by dust and aged biomass burning particles (Holanda et al., 2023).
The scattering and absorption coefficients during the dry season, from August to November, are on average 33 and 4 M m−1, respectively, with (Saturno et al., 2018b). The aerosols are comparatively much more absorbing during this period than during the wet season. This is due to the increased influence of regional emissions, such as biomass burning and anthropogenic activities that occur in several Amazonian regions (Palácios et al., 2020; Ponczek et al., 2022; Morais et al., 2022), and a decrease in wet deposition. It is worth noting that the aerosol optical properties have important implications for Earth's radiation budget and climate (Liu et al., 2020). Highly scattering aerosols, such as those present during the wet season in the Amazon, predominantly reflect incoming solar radiation back to space and have a cooling effect on the climate. On the other hand, more absorbing aerosols, such as those present during the dry season, trap radiation in the atmosphere and can lead to warming (Boucher, 2015).
Previous in situ studies on long-term optical and physical properties of aerosols in the central Amazon have relied on measurements taken at a single height (Rizzo et al., 2011, 2013; Artaxo et al., 2013; Saturno et al., 2018a). For instance, at the ATTO site, measurements were obtained at a height of 60 m, which is relatively close to the canopy top located at about ∼40 m (Lang et al., 2023). However, these studies have not investigated the vertical variability of aerosols throughout the boundary layer in the region. This information is crucial for understanding the vertical distribution of aerosols and their sources, transport, and fate, which are essential for accurate modeling and prediction of aerosol impacts on climate and health.
With its 325 m tall tower, the ATTO site offers a unique opportunity to investigate aerosol physical properties at different heights. Here, we use 60 and 325 m, the heights of the aerosol inlet lines at ATTO (Andreae et al., 2015; Machado et al., 2021). By measuring aerosol properties at different heights, it is possible to better understand the vertical variation of aerosols and the processes that influence them and to characterize the temporal variability of the vertical gradients. For example, measuring at least two heights can help distinguish between local and regional sources of aerosols and provide insights into the role of atmospheric transport and mixing in shaping aerosol distribution. Additionally, the data collected at different heights can be used to validate and improve aerosol models and remote sensing retrievals. Characterizing aerosol properties at two or more heights is an important step toward comprehensively understanding aerosol sources, transport, and impacts in the Amazon and other regions. So far, there have only been two bioaerosol studies that resolved the profiles (Prass et al., 2021; Barbosa et al., 2022), but none of them has focused systematically on the aerosol fine mode.
This study aims to improve our understanding of the vertical distribution of atmospheric aerosols in the lower Amazonian troposphere. Specifically, we examine the variability of the optical properties, particle number concentration, and size distribution of aerosols at two different heights (60 and 325 m) at the ATTO site. By characterizing the vertical gradient of aerosols, we shed light on the sources, transport, and fate of these particles and improve our understanding and ability to predict their impacts on biosphere–atmosphere exchange and climate. Comparing results at different heights provides insights into the processes that shape aerosol distribution and helps validate and improve aerosol models and remote sensing retrievals. Overall, this study has important implications for our understanding of aerosol impacts on the Amazonian ecosystem.
2.1 The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory
This study's primary data were obtained from the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory, a remote scientific station located in the central Amazon about 150 km northeast of Manaus (02°08.9′ S, 59°00.2′ W; 120 m.a.s.l.) comprising two 80 m high towers. One of them has the 60 m inlet, and a third tower is the 325 m tall ATTO tower, about 650 m away. The ATTO site is located on a plateau surrounded by a pristine tropical forest environment, as shown in Fig. 1. The instruments are installed in temperature-controlled containers at the bases of the towers, while the air is sampled above and transported by a set of inlet lines. The ATTO site is thoroughly described in Andreae et al. (2015), providing more details about the site's location and instrumental settings.
2.2 Aerosol number size distributions
To measure the size distributions of fine-mode particles, referred to as particle number size distributions (PNSDs), we employed two Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers (SMPSs), with sample inlets located at 60 and 325 m above ground level. The TSI Inc. Model 3082 instruments were coupled with a CPC (Condensation Particle Counter) Model 3772. Air samples were transmitted through metal tubes to the instruments located in air-conditioned containers on the ground beside the towers. Prior to entering the instruments, the air was dried to approximately 40 % relative humidity using different driers, as described elsewhere (Franco et al., 2022b; Machado et al., 2021). Additional details on the aerosol transmission system can be found elsewhere (Andreae et al., 2015; Franco et al., 2022b; Holanda et al., 2023). The SMPSs utilized in this study covered an aerosol diameter range from 10 to 400 nm, including 104 size bins. More details can be found in the literature (Machado et al., 2021; Franco et al., 2022b). For the wet-season months of 2019 and 2020, the 30 min average data coverage for both instruments was satisfactory, with 70.5 % of the studied period covered by the instrument measuring at 60 m and 91.8 % covered by the one at 325 m. The fine-mode number concentration and the aerosol volume were obtained by integrating the PNSD. For the particle volume, it was considered that all particles are spherical, following single-particle characterizations developed with Amazonian aerosols (Wu et al., 2019).
To ensure consistent measurements, all PNSDs were corrected for standard conditions of temperature and pressure (273.15 K and 1013.25 hPa). Moreover, due to the required connections between the inlet and the instruments on the ground, the sampled air had to traverse transmission lines, which led to losses. To compensate for these losses, similarly to what was done in Holanda et al. (2023), we corrected all particle number size distributions measured at both 60 and 325 m within the entire measurement range of the instrument (10 to 400 nm), using transmission efficiency curves. These curves were calculated using a software package developed by von der Weiden et al. (2009), accounting for factors such as geometry, sedimentation, diffusion losses, and electrostatic and turbulent deposition. It is worth noting that the surfaces of the tubes mostly affected the smallest particles (<50 nm) due to Brownian diffusion. Figure S1 in the Supplement shows the correction curves obtained by the calculations. For the particles at the high end of the Aitken-accumulation mode, which dominate the optical properties, we did not need to correct the optical measurements.
2.3 Aerosol optical properties
The optical properties of the aerosol particles were obtained at the ATTO site using a variety of instruments. Nephelometers, specifically Aurora Ecotech 3000 models, were used to measure scattering coefficients at both height levels at three wavelengths in the visible spectrum: 450, 525, and 635 nm. Truncation corrections were made according to the literature (Müller et al., 2011). The absorption component of the aerosols was measured using MAAPs (multi-angle absorption photometers) at 637 nm and aethalometers (model AE33) that determine the absorption coefficient across seven wavelengths (370, 470, 520, 590, 660, 880, and 950 nm). The aethalometer data were corrected similarly to Saturno et al. (2018b). As both MAAP and AE33 measure the absorption coefficient, a comparison between the two was performed by interpolating the AE33 data to 637 nm, ensuring that there were no calibration issues (Fig. S2). All the optical instruments operated with a size cut of 2.5 µm.
2.3.1 Aerosol intensive properties
Measurements of the aerosol optical properties at multiple wavelengths allow estimations of their intensive properties. Specifically, the single-scattering albedo (ω0,λ) was calculated using Eq. (1), where σabs,λ, σscat,λ, σext,λ are the absorption, scattering, and extinction coefficients, respectively, at a given wavelength λ. To calculate ω0,637 nm, the scattering coefficients measured by the nephelometers had to be interpolated to 637 nm, since the nephelometers and MAAPs do not measure at the same wavelengths. By doing so, we can compare the optical properties at the same wavelength and obtain a valid ω0,637 nm value.
The scattering and absorption Ångström exponents were estimated through linear regression (Eq. 2), where λ is the wavelength, C is a constant value obtained by the data fit, and å is the mean Ångström exponent, which can be the scattering (SAE) or absorption (AAE) Ångström exponent.
2.4 Refractive index estimation
The refractive index (m (λ)) is a complex mathematical scalar quantity, a function of the wavelength λ used to describe the interaction between electromagnetic waves and matter. Both real (n (λ)) and imaginary (k (λ)) components of m (λ) are intensive aerosol properties; i.e., they do not depend on the aerosol concentration but rather on their intrinsic chemical and physical properties. In this study, we use the following definition of the refractive index: . This is similar to what is found elsewhere (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2012; Boucher, 2015). The n(λ) component is associated with radiation scattering, and the k(λ) component is related to radiation absorption by the aerosols in the atmosphere. The aerosol refractive index is fundamental to modeling the aerosol's interaction with the incident radiation. It provides information about its radiative impact and efficiency of scattering and absorbing radiation at a particular wavelength. In this study, we applied the Mätzler collection of MATLAB scripts (Mätzler, 2002; Jacques, 2010) that use Mie theory calculations to a homogeneous single spherical particle of a known refractive index. Using the core of Mätzler's scripts, we developed an algorithm to estimate the equivalent refractive index of the observed aerosol size distribution as an inversion problem. Figure 2 shows a scheme of the algorithm. It utilizes the measured PNSD and the scattering and absorption coefficients at 637 nm as input parameters. The algorithm then proceeds to perform the Mie simulation, which computes the modeled σscat(λ) and σabs(λ) for each specific PNSD at 637 nm.
The simulated optical parameters are subsequently compared with the on-site measurements using the minimization function ϕ. This comparative analysis identifies the optimal parameters that produce the minimum ϕ. This methodology differs from the one used in Rizzo et al. (2013), in particular, because it consumes less computational processing time to estimate the indices, as Mie calculations are performed once and are not needed for every point in time. Also, it gives more control of the intermediate variables related to calculating the output.
2.5 Terminology
The seasonal classification adopted in this study follows Pöhlker et al. (2016), where the wet season is defined as February to May and the dry season spans from August to November. The transition period between the two seasons is denoted by June and July, while December and January mark the transition between the dry and wet seasons. To describe aerosol size distributions, we employed the widely recognized nomenclature for multimodal classification (Boucher, 2015; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2012). Specifically, particles with diameters greater than 100 nm and smaller than 400 nm are classified as the accumulation mode, while the Aitken mode comprises particles ranging from 50 to 100 nm in diameter. The smallest particles are referred to as the “sub-50 nm mode”, encompassing particles measuring between 10 and 50 nm in diameter, as defined by Franco et al. (2022b). Particles larger than 400 nm are not investigated in this study due to the limitations of the SMPS (Franco et al., 2022b; Machado et al., 2021).
2.6 Period selection
The core study period with simultaneous data coverage at both heights was defined as the months of April and May 2019 and 2020, with notable exceptions. To ensure data quality and the selection of the cleanest periods based on Pöhlker et al. (2018) and Franco et al. (2022b), the following data configuration was used in this study.
-
Nephelometer data: April and May 2019. During this period, the two instruments were calibrated three times to ensure the quality of the comparisons. The scattering coefficient data for 2020 were not used for vertical comparison, as the COVID-19 pandemic made it impossible to calibrate the instruments with regular frequency and thus guarantee the robustness of the comparisons.
-
MAAP, AE33, SMPS, and CPC data: April and May 2019 and 2020. These instruments do not require frequent calibrations, and their data can be used for vertical comparisons. In particular, simultaneous AE33 data comprising the selected periods of the wet season were only available in May 2020.
-
The two-height meteorological characterization was performed using the entire dataset from 2013 to 2022 for statistical significance. The temperature and humidity conditions in the wet season are very similar among different years, justifying the calculation of interannual averages.
-
For the downdraft studies, the selection of months was expanded for the entire wet season (February to May 2019 and 2020) to increase the statistical significance of the results. The 325 m nephelometer data were available only in 2019.
2.7 Meteorological parameters
Meteorological parameters, such as air temperature (T), pressure (p), wind speed and direction, and relative humidity (RH), were measured at two different heights at the ATTO site. This study considers the period from 2013 to 2022 to be a consistent database for meteorological characterization. From 2013 to 2018, the measurements were conducted at the 80 m high tower, with instruments installed at about 60 m above the ground. The wind speed and direction sensors had instrumental problems during 2017 and 2018, so the analysis did not consider these data. Between 2019 and April 2022, all measurements were conducted using a compact weather station (Lufft, WS600-LMB, G. Lufft Mess- und Regeltechnik GmbH, Fellbach, Germany) installed at 321 m at the ATTO. The dataset allowed a precise meteorological description of the site and an analysis of the vertical gradient of these parameters. Detailed information on the meteorological instruments can be found in Andreae et al. (2015) and Franco et al. (2022b).
2.8 Downdraft detection
To study the influence of meteorological events on the analyzed aerosol properties, we developed a method for detecting downdrafts. We applied it to the considered months (February to May) using each instrument's appropriate periods, as discussed in Sect. 2.6. The method to detect convective events uses the time series of the equivalent potential temperature anomaly (Δθ), which is an adequate tracer for this type of event (Machado et al., 2002; Gerken et al., 2016; Franco et al., 2022b). Δθ was calculated according to Franco et al. (2022b). Here, the method was constructed considering the time series derived from a 90 min moving average of the Δθ value (i.e., an average of three points, since the data are available at 30 min averages), which we will call Δθmov, to smooth the curve and decrease the algorithm's sensitivity to short and weak events. From there, we considered that the beginning of a convective event occurs when Δθmov falls below the value given by the 25th percentile of the entire series (Δθ25). This value is usually between −1 and −2 K for different analysis periods, reducing the algorithm's sensitivity by discarding events of very low intensity. In addition, we determined that the convective event ends when Δθmov>Δθ25. Figure S3 shows an example of the application of this algorithm for a representative period of 6 d when multiple events were detected. This algorithm identified 188 intense downdraft events during the wet-season months of 2019 and 2020, with an average duration of 7 h and a mean Δθmin of −5.7 K. Finally, it was possible to select events to eliminate those with higher Δθmin and to consider only the most intense events in subsequent analyses. For example, for the same data period, excluding events with Δθmin>Δθ10 (where Δθ10 is the value given by the 10th percentile of the entire series, usually between −4 and −5 K), we are left with 120 events, with an average duration of 9.5 h and a mean Δθmin of −7.1 K. The comparison shown in Fig. S3 indicates the types of events typically discarded by this filter. The analyses presented in Sect. 3.4 were performed with the intense event filter on to attenuate the noise caused by weak and short downdrafts and to understand the changes in the properties observed in the boundary layer caused by air parcels moving during strong convective events. Additionally, Fig. S12 shows that the most common times for detecting the onset of a convective event roughly coincide with precipitation peaks in the early morning and mid-afternoon, which are the periods related to more particle growth events (Franco et al., 2022b). Only 32 % of the events start during the nighttime.
3.1 Meteorological conditions
In the period of April and May 2019 and 2020, the average T and RH measured at 325 m were 24.6 °C and 85.2 %, respectively. In comparison, the average T and RH values at 60 m were 24.9 °C and 92.8 %, respectively. The average accumulated precipitation between April and May was 685 mm, representing ∼63 % of all accumulated precipitation in the wet season. Figure S4 shows the wind rose for the period studied for 2019 and 2020. On average, the wind speed at 325 m was 4.4 m s−1, which is slightly lower than the wet-season average for the same years, which was 5.3 m s−1. The dominant wind directions coincide with the wet-season directions obtained by previous studies, i.e., mainly from the northeast (Pöhlker et al., 2019), which provides air mass origins from untouched Amazonian vegetation.
Figure 3 presents the diurnal pattern of the meteorological variables measured at 60 (blue curves) and 325 m (red curves) during the cleanest months. Although different periods were considered in this particular analysis, the main objective here is to show the behavior of the diurnal cycle at each height, considering the maximum comprised data period. The temperature during the early afternoon is, on average, 2 °C higher at 60 m than at 325 m. With the development of the nocturnal stable boundary layer, this temperature profile is reversed at nighttime. The temperature at canopy height begins to rise right after sunrise, while it takes around another 2.5 h for the morning warming to be observed at 325 m. This behavior is also observed in the diurnal cycle of RH (Fig. 3b). While during most of the day RH is lower, at 325 m, both curves are nearly identical during the warming hours (from 09:00 to 15:00 LT). All the results obtained for the 60 m level agree with the site's meteorological description provided by Andreae et al. (2015), who reported the prevalence of ENE winds during the wet season and daily temperatures between 22.5 and 28 °C during these months.
3.2 Aerosol vertical gradient
Figure 4 presents direct comparisons between optical properties, particle number concentration, and fine-mode aerosol volume in the vertical profile, with simultaneous measurements at 60 and 325 m for each variable. The scattering coefficient (Fig. 4a), σscat, 525 nm, at 60 m had a median and interquartile range (IQR) of 5.4 (1.5–10.1) M m−1, while at 325 m the median and IQR were 6.6 (3.6–10.0) M m−1. The statistical significance of this difference was verified through a Z test of the means, which yielded a Z score above the significance level of 99 %. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was also evaluated, which returned a p value of <0.01, indicating that differences in scattering coefficients are statistically significant. Figure S5a and b show the spectral dependence of the aerosol scattering coefficient at 60 and 325 m, respectively. At all the wavelengths, the median scattering coefficients are higher, at 325 m, with medians of 8.6, 6.6, and 5.1 M m−1 for λ=450, 525, and 635 nm, respectively. At 60 m, the medians of the scattering coefficients are 6.8, 5.4, and 4.6 Mm−1 for λ=450, 525, and 635 nm, respectively. These differences are directly reflected in the scattering Ångström exponent (Fig. S5c), where the median of this coefficient at 60 m is 1.29, while at 325 m it is 1.61. Note that the SAE is an intensive property that does not depend directly on the aerosol number concentration, and it shows that aerosol populations at different heights have different spectral dependencies on incident radiation, particularly with higher scattering coefficients at 325 m. In particular, the SAE differences may be linked to the influence of different coarse-mode fractions on the aerosol populations at 60 and 325 m, which this study did not investigate in detail. The lower SAE value has been reported as representing aerosol populations with size distributions dominated by larger particles (Schuster et al., 2006). For instance, Prass et al. (2021) showed that the bioaerosols have a different population distribution along with the vertical profile of the ATTO tower. Their study reported different populations of eukaryotic and bacterial particles between 60 and 325 m, a significant component of the coarse aerosol mode in the central Amazon. Thus, biogenic aerosols may play a significant role in aerosol optical properties, which has important implications for radiative balance. Figure 4b compares the absorption coefficients σabs, 637 nm. At 60 m, the coefficient at 637 nm had a median and an IQR of 0.17 (0.07–0.35) M m−1, while at 325 m the median and IQR were 0.20 (0.09–0.42) M m−1. The statistical significance obtained with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the absorption coefficient also presented a p value <0.01 and a Z score of the means above the 99 % level threshold, indicating that the differences are statistically significant. However, the relatively small difference could also be associated with the instrumental uncertainties due to the very low absorption coefficients measured in the cleanest months of the wet season, so σabs, 637 nm is approximately the same at both heights. Figure S6a and b show the spectral dependence of the absorption of the coefficients measured at 60 and 325 m, calculated from the AE33 data for May 2020, and they corroborate the observation that the absorption coefficients are slightly higher at 325 m than at 60 m. Specifically, at 325 m, the medians of the coefficient varied between 0.63 and 0.20 M m−1 for λ=370 and 950 nm, respectively. At 60 m, the medians varied between 0.60 and 0.18 M m−1 for λ=370 and 950 nm, respectively. Furthermore, the similarity between the absorbing components of the aerosols is reflected in the Ångström absorption exponent, åAbs, whose medians at 60 and 325 m are, respectively, 1.27 and 1.24. The single-scattering albedo, ω0,637 nm, also an intensive aerosol property, is slightly higher for the aerosol population at 60 m. The median ω0,637 nm and its IQR at 60 m were 0.94 (0.91–0.96), while at 325 m the median ω0,637 nm and its IQR were 0.93 (0.91–0.95). Although the values are similar for the cleanest periods, statistical tests (both Wilcoxon rank-sum and Z-score tests) indicate that these differences are significant. Differences were observed for the SAE in the vertical profile, indicating different aerosol coarse-mode populations, which were not investigated in this study. Meanwhile, the high values of ω0,637 nm indicate that the fine-mode aerosol population at both heights is very efficient at scattering radiation. Figure 4c compares aerosol number concentrations in the vertical profile within the 10–400 nm size range measured by the SMPS. The results showed similar medians at 60 and 325 m: at 60 m, the median and IQR of N10–400 were 340 (240–490) cm−3, while at 325 m the median and IQR of N10–400 were 320 (220–460) cm−3. While the differences in the median values of the number concentrations were less than 10 %, which could also be related to instrument-counting efficiencies for particles smaller than 50 nm, the fine-mode aerosol volume (Fig. 4d) showed significant differences between the two heights. At 60 m, the median volume and IQR were 0.50 (0.32–0.88) µm3 cm−3. At 325 m, the median and IQR of the volume were 0.68 (0.43–1.07) µm3 cm−3. The statistical significance test gave a p value of virtually null, indicating that the differences are significant. In particular, the difference of about 26 % in the aerosol volume, combined with the similar number concentrations, indicates that the fine-mode aerosol particles closest to the canopy are smaller than those at 325 m. These results are well-aligned with recent findings of the continuous appearance of sub-50 nm aerosol particles, observed as frequent nanoparticle bursts close to the canopy, which are likely associated with new particle formation processes (Unfer et al., 2024). The results for the aerosol volume (Fig. 4d) agree with the medians of the aerosol size distributions at the two height levels shown in Fig. S7. The peak representing the Aitken mode at 60 and 325 m has the same geometric mean diameter of Dg=68.5 nm. In contrast, the accumulation modes at the two heights showed differences that explain the volume difference. At 60 m the peak of the accumulation mode is centered at Dg=144 nm, while at 325 m the peak is centered at Dg=163 nm. The larger mean diameter of the accumulation mode particles at 325 m is associated with aging processes and upward transport inside the planetary boundary layer (PBL), which may result in differences in the coatings of these particles. The gradient observed in the aerosol fine-mode volume may also imply different scattering and absorption efficiencies in the vertical profile that are likely related to different atmospheric processes and meteorological transport. The scattering and absorption efficiencies will be explored in more detail in Sect. 3.5.
An interesting aspect of the aerosol-absorbing properties was observed by calculating the brown carbon (BrC) component using the AE33 data and a methodology similar to that described in Morais et al. (2022) and Saturno et al. (2018b). This method derives the BrC component at 470 nm, using the AAE calculations with two different pairs of wavelengths and the expected black carbon (BC) value obtained with Mie code simulations. Figure 5 presents the boxplots with comparative results for the total absorption coefficient, measured at 470 nm, and the individual absorption coefficients for BC and BrC at 470 nm at both height levels. The results show different contributions of BC and BrC at the two heights. At the 60 m level, the median and IQR of the BrC absorption coefficient were 0.10 (0.06–0.16) M m−1, while at the 325 m level the median and IQR were 0.07 (0.05–0.10) M m−1. In contrast, the coefficients for BC were higher at 325 m, with a median and IQR of 0.46 (0.30–0.78) M m−1, while at 60 m the median and IQR were 0.30 (0.17–0.56) M m−1. In percentage comparisons, the contribution of BrC at 60 m is approximately 27 %, which agrees with previous studies (Saturno et al., 2018b), while at 325 m this contribution is only 14 %, which is a remarkable contrast. The results show that, close to the canopy, the contribution of BrC to the total absorption coefficient at 470 nm is approximately 2 times larger than at 325 m, while at the highest level the contribution of BC is dominant. This may be related to the presence of fresher and likely newly formed aerosols at 60 m, which contain a higher fraction of BrC (Updyke et al., 2012). At 325 m, where the BC contribution is higher, aerosols are likely to be more influenced by the free troposphere, mainly during the night as the residual layer forms, and by long-range transport from Africa, which brings more aged aerosols to the site. These African plumes are rich in BC but are poor in BrC, which is consumed due to photochemical aging (Holanda et al., 2020, 2023). The differences in the coatings of these aerosol populations between the two heights could indicate different processing stages. Particles with larger volumes also result in larger-scattering and absorption cross sections. This could partially explain the spectral differences obtained in the vertical profile, with more significant differences in the scattering coefficients and the SAE for the aerosol populations at both height levels. As most of the particles found above the canopy are within the fine-mode range, the scattering coefficient is largely dependent on the surface area of fine-mode aerosols and less on the coarse-mode mass concentration. This is likely the reason for the higher-scattering coefficient at 325 m, as the larger particles have higher-scattering cross sections. Nevertheless, Schuster et al. (2006) found that the SAE is less dependent on the effective diameter of the fine-mode particles and more influenced by the balance between fine- and coarse-mode aerosols. A strong vertical gradient of coarse-mode particles, more prevalent at 60 m, is likely the reason for the large difference in the SAE. The occurrence of low-level jets (LLJs) in the Amazon region (Anselmo et al., 2020) may be a source of aged aerosols. These LLJs could act by bringing to the surface aged aerosols from the atmospheric rivers above the forest, a process that, in the Amazon, occurs mainly during the night (Chakraborty et al., 2022). Another possibility is the presence of a more important coarse mode at 60 m, as highlighted by different studies (Prass et al., 2021; Barbosa et al., 2022).
3.3 Diurnal cycles
The median diurnal cycles of the optical coefficients and the aerosol volume are shown in Fig. 6. During the daytime, when the boundary layer reaches its highest vertical extension and when turbulent processes are maximized, the scattering and absorption coefficients are identical at 60 and 325 m, with median scattering coefficients at 525 nm of about 8 M m−1. The absorption coefficients are about 0.25 M m−1 at 14:00 LT, when they reach their highest values. The single-scattering albedo, ω0, 637 nm, does not vary significantly throughout the day, with similar values of approximately 0.94 for both heights.
Figure S8 shows the mean diurnal cycles of particle number concentrations in each of the three aerosol size modes: the sub-50 nm, Aitken, and accumulation modes. As in Fig. 6, the diurnal behavior is quite evident. Following the results of Franco et al. (2022b), the sub-50 nm particle fraction has an interesting behavior: particle number concentrations tend to increase between 14:00 and 08:00 LT, with averages of 75 and 60 cm−3, respectively, for 60 and 325 m. The concentrations decrease from 08:00 to 14:00 LT, with minimum values of 45 and 25 cm−3, respectively, at 60 and 325 m. These results agree with the literature results (Machado et al., 2021). Differences in concentrations in the vertical profile, as shown in Fig. S8a, are observed throughout the day. In particular, the possibility of an aerosol source close to the canopy in the central Amazon was discussed recently (Unfer et al., 2024).
The diurnal cycles of the accumulation mode (Fig. S8c) have the opposite trend to the sub-50 nm particles but the same trend as the aerosol volume, where concentrations decrease during the night until the beginning of the day and then start growing again with the evolution of the PBL as the photochemical processes provide conditions for particle growth. In particular, during the day, the accumulation mode particle number concentrations at both height levels are similar, showing the effectiveness of mixing in the PBL, in particular when the PBL reaches its greatest height at approximately 13:00–14:00 LT, with an average concentration of about 220 cm−3. Note that the aerosol optical coefficients also follow a similar trend (Fig. 6c–d), showing that the optically active aerosols are those of the accumulation mode.
In contrast, during the nighttime, there are clear differences in all the aerosol physical properties. After establishing the stable nocturnal boundary layer, whose height is below 300 m (Fisch et al., 2004; Carneiro and Fisch, 2020), both absorption and scattering coefficients are typically higher, at 325 m. The scattering coefficient shows differences up to ∼3 M m−1, and the absorption coefficient presents differences of ∼0.1 M m−1 between the levels. The aerosol volume also shows clear differences, with higher medians at 325 m, mainly during the nighttime. Also, there is a clear separation between the accumulation mode particles at the two height levels, which explains the differences in the optical properties and volume. The accumulation mode at 60 m decreases more strongly in the nocturnal boundary layer, indicating dry deposition onto the canopy during the nighttime. Aitken mode concentrations are quite stable at 60 m during the daytime, with a mean value of about 135 cm−3, but a sudden decrease is observed between 03:00 and 07:00 LT. In comparison, at 325 m, concentrations are lower during the daytime, increasing again after sunset. The observed differences in the diurnal cycles are likely related to mixing processes that can still occur at 325 m during the nighttime within the residual layer, which ages the aerosol, increasing its absorption and scattering cross sections. In addition, the processing of aerosols in clouds and fog is more likely to occur at the highest level, unlike at 60 m, since the stable layer does not contribute efficiently to the aging of aerosol particles. Another possibility as presented in Sect. 3.2 is the nocturnal occurrence of LLJs, which could bring aged particles to the residual layer. Therefore, the differences in the diurnal concentration profiles suggest that different processes can influence the aerosol population at each height level. More detailed investigations are suggested for future studies, seeking to identify and characterize in detail the sources and sinks of these particles and the role of meteorology in the vertical profile of the PBL in the central Amazon.
3.4 Downdraft events
Weather events modify the physical and chemical properties of aerosols and the mixing ratios of trace gases through various processes. The main ones can be summarized as the wet deposition of particles during precipitation and in clouds, injection of aerosol populations with different characteristics into a specific layer of the atmosphere through downdraft and updraft mechanisms, and transport of air masses through advection, as already discussed for both the aerosol number concentration and the gas mixing ratio in the central Amazon (Machado et al., 2021, 2024). This section presents how intense downdraft events affect the aerosol population in the vertical profile of the lower troposphere at the ATTO site during the wet season, focusing on their optical properties.
Using the downdraft detection algorithm presented in Sect. 2.8, we identified 120 strong convective events. Furthermore, a composite analysis was performed on the dataset, similarly to Machado et al. (2021), regarding the positions of the data points relative to the onset of the closest detected downdraft event. Thus, it was possible to explore the average effect of intense convective events on the aerosol properties. Figure S14 shows the mean behavior of the potential temperature anomaly and precipitation before and during intense convective events. It is shown that, on average, the potential temperature drops rapidly for 1.5 h and then slowly rises at a rate of 0.30±0.03 K h−1. Furthermore, precipitation increases at the event onset and reaches its maximum 0.5 h later, decreasing rapidly but remaining above the reference (before the event) for up to 5 h. Figure 7 shows how convective events influence the aerosol populations observed at 60 and 325 m, reducing particle absorption and scattering through wet deposition of larger particles when there is associated precipitation. As previously shown, the aerosol load is higher at 325 m, which is reflected in a higher absorption coefficient for Δt<0 in Fig. 7a. However, when a convective event begins, the associated precipitation removes a large portion of the absorbing particles from the atmosphere at both heights, equalizing the values for a short period. Quickly after the decrease in precipitation, the absorption at both heights differs again, with a more pronounced growth in the values measured at 325 m of 0.026 M m−1 h−1 against 0.011 M m−1 h−1 at 60 m above ground level. The scattering coefficient, however, remained very low during the entire period, revealing that very clean conditions prevailed. Under these conditions, the average effect of downdraft events was less impactful due to the lower number of optically active particles in the atmosphere. There is still a noticeable decrease in the scattering coefficient before the downdrafts and a slow climb after the event onset. However, more measurements are required to increase the number of events in this analysis. The study of the intensive properties of the aerosols yielded results that indicate a more profound change in the aerosol population after downdrafts, and the observed trends are not entirely explained by the reduction in the number concentrations. The composite analysis indicated that ω0,637 nm at 325 m remains relatively stable at around 0.94 and is less affected by downdrafts than ω0,637 nm at 60 m, which decreases from 0.92 before the event onset to 0.88 a few hours after. Thus, despite the increase in absorption and scattering coefficients as the aerosol population recovers from the weather events, the scattering coefficient rises more slowly, which leads to a lower ω0,637 nm than before the convective event, as shown in Fig. 7b. This conclusion is consistent with the BC results, where the BC fraction under convection conditions is slightly higher than under stable atmospheric conditions. The SAE composite analysis is inconclusive due to the period's low number of reliable nephelometer data. However, it is noticeable that the SAE fluctuated less before the downdrafts and decreased at around Δt=0 at both heights, with less variation at 325 m, reaching previous levels up to 4 h, unlike the other properties, which take longer on average to return to the pattern found under stable atmospheric conditions. In addition, the decrease observed in the scattering Ångström exponent as soon as a convective event begins indicates a predominance of secondary organic aerosols and larger particles primarily emitted by the vegetation.
The relationships between precipitation and convection with the PNSDs were also studied using composite analyses for simultaneous measurements taken at both heights, with an approach similar to that of Machado et al. (2021). During downdraft events, the injection of small ultrafine particles from the upper layers of the atmosphere and the increased ozone concentration (Machado et al., 2024) that also favors the oxidation of VOCs is responsible for an increase of approximately 50 % in the concentration of sub-50 nm mode particles at both measurement heights. The number concentration values increased from 28 to 43 cm−3 at 325 m and from 53 to 78 cm−3 at 60 m in the 2 h following the onset of the downdraft events (Fig. 7c). In contrast, the other two size modes experience decreases in their average concentrations after convective events since precipitation can remove particles in these size ranges through wet-deposition scavenging. After the downdrafts, the Aitken mode shows a strong increase of 2.5 cm−3 h−1 at both heights.
On the other hand, the number concentration in the accumulation mode shows different post-downdraft growth rates at 60 and 325 m, which are 3.8 and 6.2 cm−3 h−1, respectively. We also observed an increase in particle concentration in the accumulation mode at 60 m before the events, contrasting with a slight decrease in the Aitken mode and indicating that particle growth processes occur under stable atmospheric conditions. This is also reflected in the increase in the fine-mode volume without an increase in the total number concentration (Fig. 7d). After the events, the fine-mode aerosol volume increases because the high concentration of sub-50 nm particles increases in diameter through oxidation and hygroscopic growth. However, the total number concentration also increases at both heights as the aerosol population recovers from the events, suggesting the occurrence of biogenic emissions. Using linear regression, we can estimate particle number increase rates for the total concentrations at both heights of around 5.7 cm−3 h−1 at 60 m and 7.9 cm−3 h−1 at 325 m.
3.5 Vertical gradient of mass scattering and absorption efficiencies
This section explores the mass scattering and absorption efficiencies (αscat(λ) and αabs(λ), respectively) of the aerosol populations in the vertical profile. Understanding these efficiencies is crucial for assessing how aerosols influence the balance of incoming and outgoing radiation in Earth's atmosphere. The scattering and absorption efficiencies are calculated through the slope of the fitting curve between the scattering or absorption coefficient at a given wavelength and the mass concentration. Approximate mass concentrations used in the analyses were retrieved from the aerosol volume at each height (within the size range of 10 to 400 nm) multiplied by the average total loading of the wet season (1.4 µg m−3), which was obtained by previous studies at the ATTO site (Artaxo et al., 2022). This procedure was necessary since, in the analyzed periods, no chemical concentration measurements were obtained simultaneously at the two heights using similar instruments. A similar approach was also used by Ponczek et al. (2022). Figure S9 shows the variability of the scattering coefficients at 525 nm, σscat,525 nm, as a function of the mass concentration, where the colors in panels (a) and (b) represent ω0,637 nm, and in panels (c) and (d) they represent the total concentrations N10–400 nm. As in the previous sections, comparative analyses were obtained for periods when the instruments measured simultaneously at 60 and 325 m. In Fig. S9, there is more variability of the scattering efficiency at 60 m, as the slopes of the curves that could be fitted to adjust the data change more frequently according to different atmospheric conditions related to different aerosol populations. We also find that ω0,637 nm and N10–400 nm show more variability during specific aerosol events at 60 m, while they are more stable at 325 m. The period from 8 to 19 May 2019 was chosen as representative clean days to assess the differences in scattering efficiencies in the vertical profile, now considering all wavelengths measured by the nephelometer (450, 525, and 635 nm). In addition, this period presents clear linearity in σscat vs. mass concentration curves unaffected by strong episodic events, as shown in Fig. S11. Panels (a) to (c) show the measurements at 60 m, and panels (d) to (f) show the measurements at 325 m. Figure S11 confirms that there is more dispersion in the scattering coefficient and mass concentration at 60 m, while at 325 m the linear relationship is more homogeneous. The result supports the hypothesis that the 325 m aerosol population is more processed and aged than near the canopy. The spectral dependence is also clear in Fig. S11. Scattering efficiencies are higher for shorter wavelengths: at 60 m, we obtained , 5.49±0.11, and 7.74±0.12 m2 g−1 for 635, 525, and 450 nm, respectively. At 325 m, the observed variability was , 3.76±0.05, and 5.26±0.06 m2 g−1 for 635, 525, and 450 nm, respectively.
A direct comparison between the scattering efficiencies at 60 and 325 m as a function of wavelength is presented in Fig. 8. The difference in scattering efficiency with height is evident. Aerosol populations near the canopy are more efficient at scattering radiation than at 325 m for all wavelengths. The percentage differences vary with wavelength, but they are approximately 35 % on average. The results suggest that aerosols at 325 m, as observed in Fig. S7, are likely to be more processed and less efficient at scattering radiation. In contrast, smaller aerosols in direct contact with fresh VOC emissions from vegetation are more likely to scatter radiation more efficiently. Holanda et al. (2023) showed that, at 325 m at the ATTO site, pristine aerosols, which are mainly formed by oxidized SOA (80 % of the mass fraction), have a significantly higher ω0,637 nm than long-distance aged aerosols, which are larger with a substantial coating thickness and are more absorbing, even during the wet season. The ω0,637 nm, just like the mass scattering efficiency (MSE), is an intensive aerosol property, and both are directly correlated: the greater the ω0,637 nm, the greater the MSE. Another possibility that might explain the results is that the higher apparent MSE at 60 m may be due to the presence of a coarse mode, which the SMPS does not detect. In fact, Prass et al. (2021) observed that bioaerosols account for about 70 % of the aerosol coarse mode at ATTO, with higher concentrations at 60 m. This decreases with height. Both hypotheses are likely, and further analyses are required to determine which is more relevant. Figure S10 presents the absorption coefficient, σabs,637 nm, as a function of the mass concentration in a representation similar to Fig. S9. The figure shows a peculiar behavior of the coefficient variability at 60 and 325 m. In contrast to the scattering efficiency case, the absorption coefficient varies significantly less at 60 m. As obtained from the comparisons in Fig. 5, this is likely due to the influence of long-range aerosol transport at 325 m, which increases the BC concentration more than at 60 m. Figure S10a and b suggest that the differences in the mass absorption efficiency (MAE) values, as reflected in the slopes of the fitting curves, are related to the differences in ω0,637 nm, while aerosol number concentration also appears to have a significant influence, as shown in Fig. S10c and d. The median ω0,637 nm at 60 m is 0.96, compared to the median at 325 m of 0.92. Figure S10b, in particular, shows a pronounced increase in MAEs with decreasing ω0,637 nm. The results suggest the influence of different aerosol sources on the physical characteristics in the vertical profile: the aerosol population closer to the canopy is, for instance, less susceptible to long-range transport events than the population at 325 m. Also, the differences regarding daytime and nighttime discussed in Sect. 3.3 could play an important role. The difference between this result and the one obtained in the comparisons in Fig. 4 is that here we consider exclusively the periods in which the absorption and scattering coefficients and the aerosol size distributions were measured simultaneously in the same time interval, at 60 and 325 m. In the case of Fig. 4, as already mentioned, comparisons were performed for periods in which similar instruments that measure the same physical property operated simultaneously.
A comparison of the MAEs, αabs,637 nm, in the vertical profile was made for the same period considered for the mass scattering efficiencies: 8 to 19 May 2019. The absorption coefficients at 637 nm measured by the MAAPs were considered for the αabs,637 nm calculations. Figure S13 presents the absorption coefficient at 637 nm as a function of mass concentration, with linear fits for 60 and 325 m. In contrast to the scattering efficiencies, which showed pronounced differences between the two heights, the absorption efficiencies were very similar, with αabs,637 nm values of 0.210±0.003 and 0.226±0.004 m2 g−1 at 60 and 325 m, respectively. As with the spectral dependence of the absorption coefficients shown in Fig. S6, αabs,637 nm does not vary significantly with height. This indicates that, although the results in Fig. 4 show more influence of the BC component at 325 m and BrC at 60 m, the mass absorption efficiency of the total absorption coefficient is similar for the aerosol populations at both heights.
However, contrasting results are obtained when analyzing the BC and BrC components of the total absorption coefficient separately. Figure S15 shows comparative analyses obtained with the BC and BrC components at 60 and 325 m from 8 to 18 May 2020. This period was chosen because AE33 measurements are available at both heights, and it represents clean atmospheric conditions with no clear particle events that could change the linearity of σabs,470 nm vs. the mass concentration. Figure S15a and b show the absorption coefficients exclusively due to BrC as a function of mass concentration for 60 and 325 m, respectively. At 60 m in panel (a), there is no apparent correlation between the variables, so it was not possible to estimate αBrC,470 nm in this case. The lack of correlation at 60 m is likely related to the high variability of the aerosol population, which is influenced by fresh primary and secondary biogenic aerosols.
At 325 m in panel (b), despite some dispersion, it was possible to obtain a linear fit and estimate the mass absorption efficiency due exclusively to BrC, m2 g−1, although with a relatively low correlation (R2 of 0.4). The BrC absorption coefficients are significantly smaller than the total absorption coefficients and very close to the detection limit of the technique. This increases the coefficient estimation uncertainty, which may explain the low correlation. Figure S15c and d show the absorption coefficients exclusively due to BC as a function of mass concentration for 60 and 325 m, respectively. Linear fits were obtained for both cases, with satisfactory correlation coefficients of R2>0.65. The results show clear differences in BC's mass absorption efficiencies in the vertical profile. At 60 and 325 m, and 0.55±0.04 m2 g−1, respectively. The almost 2-fold difference in efficiencies highlights BC's strong absorption efficiency in the aerosol population at 325 m, even during the cleaner months of the wet season. The result reinforces the hypothesis that long-range transport strongly influences this population, bringing dust and biomass burning from western Africa and northeastern Brazil to the central Amazon (Talbot et al., 1990; Wang et al., 2016). The BC influence is less significant close to the canopy than at 325 m, most likely because the population of biogenic aerosols is more prevalent there.
3.6 Effective aerosol refractive index
Figure 9 presents the results for the effective aerosol refractive index at 637 nm obtained at 60 (blue) and 325 m (red). The statistical analysis showed a strong correlation between the measured and modeled optical coefficients, with R2 values of 0.99 and 0.98 for scattering and absorption coefficients, respectively, where all p values were statistically significant (p values <0.05). The results indicate that the scattering component of the refractive index, n, is, on average, higher at 60 m than at 325 m, with values of 1.33 and 1.27, respectively. The diurnal cycle of n also reflects this difference, with higher values at 60 m, particularly in the early morning, as the differences are less pronounced during the afternoon, with the PBL mixing the air very effectively.
These results also agree with the higher radiation-scattering efficiency at 60 m, confirming that the aerosol populations at 60 and 325 m have different radiative properties. In contrast, the real component of the refractive index remains relatively constant at 325 m throughout the day, suggesting that the aerosols at this height are affected less by fresh emissions and are likely more aged than those at 60 m. Higher values of n at 60 m confirm the higher mass scattering efficiency observed at this height. The results show that the aerosol particles at 60 m are more efficient at scattering radiation than those at 325 m. Moreover, the imaginary component of the aerosols' refractive index, k, is similar for both heights, having a mean value of 0.006 and being nearly constant throughout the day. This particular aspect also explains the similar absorption coefficients at both heights.
Guyon et al. (2003) retrieved the effective refractive indices for aerosols near the surface during the wet season at a remote Amazonian forest site. The study obtained –0.006±0.003i, which is close to the values observed for 60 m. The slightly higher value of n in Guyon et al. (2003) is likely associated with primary emissions directly from the ground, while at 60 m the primary canopy emissions likely play a significant role in the effective n. The imaginary part of the refractive index in both studies was identical. Similarly to our study, Guyon et al. (2003) also observed a pronounced diurnal variability of n likely associated with fresh emissions from the vegetation, with the imaginary part showing much less variability, in agreement with our results.
In addition, Rizzo et al. (2013) obtained the refractive index for a remote site in the central Amazon at 550 nm when considering a transition period between the wet and dry seasons. Although the considered period does not match the wet season, the study obtained –0.008±0.005i. It is worth mentioning that both Rizzo et al. (2013) and Guyon et al. (2003) observed a much higher n during the dry season, which is associated with fresh biomass burning emissions. Differently from what is observed, for instance, at 325 m, the lower n at this level is likely due to the aging processes and not BC. Nakayama et al. (2018) showed that SOA composed mainly of oxidized isoprene, which is the main VOC in the central Amazon (Yáñez-Serrano et al., 2020; Machado et al., 2024), has real and imaginary refractive indices similar to the ones obtained in this study. The study also shows that the refractive indices depend on the considered wavelength, the oxidation degree, and the oxidant. Their conclusions confirm our results that indicate the aging processes as drivers of the observed differences in the aerosol physical properties along with the central Amazon's lower troposphere.
This study provides new insights into the variability of physical aerosol properties in the vertical profile of the lower troposphere in the central Amazon. The extensive aerosol properties, such as aerosol volumes and scattering coefficients, showed significant variability in the vertical profile. The analysis of diurnal cycles revealed differences in the particle number concentrations of each size mode, indicating a strong efficiency of the boundary layer in mixing aerosols during the day and the divergent evolution of aerosol populations during the night, separated by the establishment of the stable nocturnal boundary layer. We also found a pronounced difference in the magnitude and spectral dependence of the scattering coefficient in the vertical profile. In contrast, no such difference was detected in the absorption coefficients measured at different wavelengths. We found and characterized the changes in the aerosol populations before and after downdraft events at the two measurement heights. The absorption and scattering coefficients decrease as optically active particles are removed by wet deposition. Absorption quickly increases again after the events, but the recovery is faster at 325 m than at 60 m, while scattering remains lower for several hours. Similarly, the concentrations of the Aitken and accumulation modes decrease and recover quickly after the end of precipitation, with similar particle number growth rates between the two heights in the Aitken mode and slightly faster recovery at 325 m in the case of the accumulation mode. In addition, convective events were concomitant with an increase in sub-50 nm mode particles, whose concentration rapidly increased by up to 50 % at both heights. The total volume of aerosol particles, generally larger at 325 m, is practically equalized during convective events, but the post-downdraft increase differs between the two heights, separating the curves. These results show that vegetation greatly influences the atmosphere close to the canopy under clean conditions, and forest emissions largely determine the response to weather events. At the same time, at 325 m, the physical properties of the aerosols are less determined by how the ecosystem responds; thus, the return to initial conditions is faster. Intensive properties also change, with a decrease in the single-scattering albedo values after the events as absorption increases quickly and scattering remains lower. Finally, the scattering Ångström exponent quickly drops as the events begin but then rises again, reaching the previous levels within 4 h, unlike the other properties, which on average take longer to return to the values found under stable atmospheric conditions. However, future studies would benefit from further investigations of this aspect. The estimation of mass scattering and absorption efficiencies and their variability in the vertical profile of the troposphere in the central Amazon is an unprecedented and climatically relevant component of this study. The results show that the aerosol population close to the canopy had a higher mass scattering efficiency than at 325 m, both with a clear spectral dependence. This difference could be explained by the different size distributions at each height and shows more small ultrafine particles at 60 m. These fresh particles are transported to the upper levels and age along the path, increasing in size until they reach the measurement height of 325 m. Considering the total absorption coefficient, the mass absorption efficiency was similar at 60 and 325 m, at approximately 0.21 m2 g−1. The equivalent aerosol refractive index shows a higher scattering component at 60 m than at 325 m, which is reflected in the refractive index's diurnal cycle. The real component remains constant at 325 m and increases during the night at 60 m, suggesting that more aged aerosols are constantly found at the higher levels. Furthermore, the imaginary component is similar for both heights, with no significant diurnal trend. These results corroborate the mass scattering and absorption efficiencies obtained in the vertical profile. The findings of an aerosol population with a lower real component of the refractive index at higher levels, while the particles closer to the canopy scatter radiation more efficiently, are fundamental in global climate modeling for representing better the aerosol component of Earth's system in tropical regions. In conclusion, the study provides new insights into the variability of aerosol properties in the vertical profile of the troposphere in the central Amazon, which is essential for understanding the impact of aerosols on the climate. The findings of this study can be used to improve aerosol models and their representation in climate models, ultimately contributing to more accurate predictions of future climate change.
The data of the key results presented here have been deposited in associated data files for use in follow-up studies. The SMPS data, aerosol optical data and aerosol number concentration data used in this study are available at https://doi.org/10.17617/3.1QM21F (Franco et al., 2022a). Additional ATTO data can be found in the ATTO data portal at https://www.attodata.org/ (last access: 1 July 2023, ATTO, 2023). For data requests beyond the available data, please refer to the corresponding authors.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8751-2024-supplement.
MAF and RV contributed equally to this study. MAF, PA, and CP designed the study. MAF, RV, BH, BBM, FGM, LAK, and DW processed and analyzed the ATTO data. LATM, MOA, LVR, JPN, MAC, UP, and SC contributed with valuable ideas and comments to the analysis and the manuscript. MAF and RV wrote the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the discussion of the results as well as the finalization of the manuscript. PA and CP supervised the study.
At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
Marco A. Franco acknowledges the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) scholarship (grant no. 169842/2017-7), the CNPq Universal Project (grant no. 407752/2023-4), the CAPES Sandwich Doctorate Program (grant no. 88887.368025/2019-00), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) grant no. 21/13610-8. Rafael Valiati acknowledges the CAPES scholarship (grant no. 88887.611308/2021-00). Bruna A. Holanda acknowledges the CNPq (grant no. 200723/2015-4) and the Max Planck Graduate Center at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (MPGC). Micael A. Cecchini was funded by FAPESP grant no. 2022/13257-9 and by Serrapilheira grant no. Serra-2211-41823. The ATTO research has been supported by the Max Planck Society, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung – BMBF) grant nos. 01LB1001A, 01LK1602A, 01LK1602B, and 01LK2101B, the Brazilian Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI/FINEP grant no. 01.11.01248.00), the FAPESP (grant nos. 2017/17047-0, 2022/07974-0, and 2023/04358-9), the CNPq project (grant nos. 169842/2017-7 and 88887.611308/2021-00), the CAPES project (grant no. 88887.368025/2019-00), LBA/INPA, Amazonas State University (UEA), FAPEAM, and SDS/CEUC/RDS-Uatumã. We acknowledge the support by the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA). We would like to thank the ATTO team members, including Reiner Ditz, Jürgen Kesselmeier, Susan Trumbore, Alberto Quesada, Thomas Disper, Thomas Klimach, Andrew Crozier, Björn Nillius, Uwe Schulz, Steffen Schmidt, Delano Campos, Sam Jones, Fábio Jorge, Stefan Wolff, Juarez Viegas, Sipko Bulthuis, Francisco Alcinei Gomes da Silva, Valmir Ferreira de Lima, Feliciano de Souza Coelho, André Luiz Matos, Davirley Gomes Silva, Torsten Helmer, Karl Kübler, Olaf Kolle, Martin Hertel, Kerstin Hippler, Hermes Braga Xavier, Nagib Alberto de Castro Souza, Adir Vasconcelos Brandão, Amauri Rodriguês Perreira, Antonio Huxley Melo Nascimento, Roberta Pereira de Souza, Bruno Takeshi, and Wallace Rabelo Costa, as well as all further colleagues involved in the technical, logistical, and scientific support within the ATTO project.
This research has been supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (grant nos. 2017/17047-0, 2021/13610-8, and 2022/07974-0), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (grant nos. 169842/2017-7, 200723/2015-4, and 407752/2023-4), the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (grant nos. 88887.368025/2019-00 and 88887.611308/2021-00), the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (grant no. 01.11.01248.00), and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant nos. 01LB1001A, 01LK1602A, 01LK1602B, and 01LK2101B).
The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.
This paper was edited by Stefania Gilardoni and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Andreae, M., Berresheim, H., Bingemer, H., Jacob, D. J., Lewis, B., Li, S.-M., and Talbot, R. W.: The atmospheric sulfur cycle over the Amazon Basin: 2. Wet season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 16813–16824, 1990. a
Andreae, M. O.: Aerosols Before Pollution, Science, 50, 50–51, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136529, 2007. a
Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Fischer, H., Freitas, S., Grégoire, J.-M., Hansel, A., Hoor, P., Kormann, R., Krejci, R., Lange, L., Lelieveld, J., Lindinger, W., Longo, K., Peters, W., de Reus, M., Scheeren, B., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Strom, J., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Williams, J.: Transport of biomass burning smoke to the upper troposphere by deep convection in the equatorial region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 951–954, 2001. a
Andreae, M. O., Acevedo, O. C., Araùjo, A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, C. G. G., Barbosa, H. M. J., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Cintra, B. B. L., da Silva, N. F., Dias, N. L., Dias-Júnior, C. Q., Ditas, F., Ditz, R., Godoi, A. F. L., Godoi, R. H. M., Heimann, M., Hoffmann, T., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, M. L., Lavric, J. V., Manzi, A. O., Lopes, A. P., Martins, D. L., Mikhailov, E. F., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Nelson, B. W., Nölscher, A. C., Santos Nogueira, D., Piedade, M. T. F., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Quesada, C. A., Rizzo, L. V., Ro, C.-U., Ruckteschler, N., Sá, L. D. A., de Oliveira Sá, M., Sales, C. B., dos Santos, R. M. N., Saturno, J., Schöngart, J., Sörgel, M., de Souza, C. M., de Souza, R. A. F., Su, H., Targhetta, N., Tóta, J., Trebs, I., Trumbore, S., van Eijck, A., Walter, D., Wang, Z., Weber, B., Williams, J., Winderlich, J., Wittmann, F., Wolff, S., and Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10723–10776, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10723-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Andreae, M. O., Andreae, T. W., Ditas, F., and Pöhlker, C.: Frequent new particle formation at remote sites in the subboreal forest of North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2487–2505, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2487-2022, 2022. a, b
Anselmo, E. M., Schumacher, C., and Machado, L. A.: The Amazonian low-level jet and its connection to convective cloud propagation and evolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 4083–4099, 2020. a
Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena, E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., and Andreae, M. O.: Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic to biomass burning conditions, Faraday Discuss., 165, 203–235, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00052d, 2013. a, b
Artaxo, P., Hansson, H.-C., Andreae, M. O., Bäck, J., Alves, E. G., Barbosa, H. M. J., Bender, F., Bourtsoukidis, E., Carbone, S., Chi, J., Decesari, S., Després, V. R., Ditas, F., Ezhova, E., Fuzzi, S., Hasselquist, N. J., Heintzenberg, J., Holanda, B. A., Guenther, A., Hakola, H., Heikkinen, L., Kerminen, V.-M., Kontkanen, J., Krejci, R., Kulmala, M., Lavric, J. V., de Leeuw, G., Lehtipalo, K., Machado, L. A. T., McFiggans, G., Franco, M. A. M., Meller, B. B., Morais, F. G., Mohr, C., Morgan, W., Nilsson, M. B., Peichl, M., Petäjä, T., Praß, M., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., Von Randow, C., Riipinen, I., Rinne, J., Rizzo, L. V., Rosenfeld, D., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Sogacheva, L., Stier, P., Swietlicki, E., Sörgel, M., Tunved, P., Virkkula, A., Wang, J., Weber, B., Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Zieger, P., Mikhailov, E., Smith, J. N., and Kesselmeier, J.: Tropical and Boreal Forest Atmosphere Interactions: A Review, Tellus B, 74, 24–163, 2022. a, b, c
Barbosa, C. G., Taylor, P. E., Sá, M. O., Teixeira, P. R., Souza, R. A., Albrecht, R. I., Barbosa, H. M., Sebben, B., Manzi, A. O., Araújo, A. C., et al.: Identification and quantification of giant bioaerosol particles over the Amazon rainforest, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 5, 73, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00294-y, 2022. a, b
Boucher, O.: Atmospheric aerosols, Springer, France, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9649-1, 2015. a, b, c
Carneiro, R. G. and Fisch, G.: Observational analysis of the daily cycle of the planetary boundary layer in the central Amazon during a non-El Niño year and El Niño year (GoAmazon project 2014/5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5547–5558, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5547-2020, 2020. a
Carslaw, K., Lee, L., Reddington, C., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Forster, P., Mann, G., Spracklen, D., Woodhouse, M., Regayre, L., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, 2013. a
Chakraborty, S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and da Silva, A. M.: Aerosol atmospheric rivers: climatology, event characteristics, and detection algorithm sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8175–8195, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8175-2022, 2022. a
Edtbauer, A., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Pires Florentino, A. P., Barbosa, C. G., Rodriguez-Caballero, E., Zannoni, N., Alves, R. P., Wolff, S., Tsokankunku, A., Aptroot, A., de Oliveira Sá, M, de Araújo, A. C., Sörgel, M., de Oliveira, S. M., Weber, B., and Williams, J.: Cryptogamic organisms are a substantial source and sink for volatile organic compounds in the Amazon region, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 258, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00328-y, 2021. a
Fisch, G., Tota, J., Machado, L. A. T., Silva Dias, M. A. F., da F. Lyra, R. F., Nobre, C. A., Dolman, A. J., and Gash, J. H. C.: The convective boundary layer over pasture and forest in Amazonia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 78, 47–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0043-x, 2004. a
Franco, M. A., Holanda, B., Valiati, R., Kremper, L. A., Pöhlker, C., Artaxo, P., and Walter, D.: SMPS and aerosol physical properties at 60 and 325 m height at ATTO, Max Planck Society [data set], https://doi.org/10.17617/3.1QM21F, 2022a. a
Franco, M. A., Ditas, F., Kremper, L. A., Machado, L. A. T., Andreae, M. O., Araújo, A., Barbosa, H. M. J., de Brito, J. F., Carbone, S., Holanda, B. A., Morais, F. G., Nascimento, J. P., Pöhlker, M. L., Rizzo, L. V., Sá, M., Saturno, J., Walter, D., Wolff, S., Pöschl, U., Artaxo, P., and Pöhlker, C.: Occurrence and growth of sub-50 nm aerosol particles in the Amazonian boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3469–3492, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3469-2022, 2022b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kampf, C. J., Weber, B., Huffman, J. A., Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., Lang-Yona, N., Burrows, S. M., Gunthe, S. S., Elbert, W., Su, H., Hoor, P., Thines, E., Hoffmann, T., Després, V. R., and Pöschl, U.: Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions, Atmos. Res., 182, 346–376, 2016. a
Gerken, T., Wei, D., Chase, R. J., Fuentes, J. D., Schumacher, C., Machado, L. A., Andreoli, R. V., Chamecki, M., de Souza, R. A. F., Freire, L. S., Jardine, A. B., Manzi, A. O., DOS SANTOS, R. M. N., von Randow, C., Costa, P. S., Stoy, P. C., Tota, J., and Trowbridge, A. M.: Downward transport of ozone rich air and implications for atmospheric chemistry in the Amazon rainforest, Atmos. Environ., 124, 64–76, 2016. a
Guyon, P., Boucher, O., Graham, B., Beck, J., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Roberts, G. C., Maenhaut, W., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Refractive index of aerosol particles over the Amazon tropical forest during LBA-EUSTACH 1999, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 883–907, 2003. a, b, c, d
Holanda, B. A., Pöhlker, M. L., Walter, D., Saturno, J., Sörgel, M., Ditas, J., Ditas, F., Schulz, C., Franco, M. A., Wang, Q., Donth, T., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann, S., Braga, R., Brito, J., Cheng, Y., Dollner, M., Kaiser, J. W., Klimach, T., Knote, C., Krüger, O. O., Fütterer, D., Lavrič, J. V., Ma, N., Machado, L. A. T., Ming, J., Morais, F. G., Paulsen, H., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Schneider, J., Su, H., Weinzierl, B., Walser, A., Wendisch, M., Ziereis, H., Zöger, M., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöhlker, C.: Influx of African biomass burning aerosol during the Amazonian dry season through layered transatlantic transport of black carbon-rich smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4757–4785, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4757-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Holanda, B. A., Franco, M. A., Walter, D., Artaxo, P., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chowdhury, S., Ditas, F., Gysel-Beer, M., Klimach, T., Kremper, L. A., Krüger, O. O., Lavric, J. V., Lelieveld, J., Ma, C., Machado, L. A. T., Modini, R. L., Morais, F. G., Pozzer, A., Saturno, J., Su, H., Wendisch, M., Wolff, S., Pöhlker, M. L., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: African biomass burning affects aerosol cycling over the Amazon, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 154, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00795-5, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Jacques, S.: Maetzler's MATLAB code for Mie theory, http://omlc.ogi.edu/software/mie/ (last access: 1 October 2023), 2010. a
Khadir, T., Riipinen, I., Talvinen, S., Heslin-Rees, D., Pöhlker, C., Rizzo, L., Machado, L. A. T., Franco, M. A., Kremper, L. A., Artaxo, P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Tunved, P., Ekman, A. M. L., Krejci, R., and Virtanen, A.: Sink, Source or Something In-Between? Net Effects of Precipitation on Aerosol Particle Populations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104325, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104325, 2023. a
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., et al.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953, 2016. a
Lang, N., Jetz, W., Schindler, K., and Wegner, J. D.: A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7, 1778–1789, 2023. a
Liu, L., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Wei, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Artaxo, P., Shrivastava, M., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Impact of biomass burning aerosols on radiation, clouds, and precipitation over the Amazon: relative importance of aerosol–cloud and aerosol–radiation interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13283–13301, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13283-2020, 2020. a
Machado, L. A., Laurent, H., and Lima, A. A.: Diurnal march of the convection observed during TRMM-WETAMC/LBA, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 1–15, 2002. a
Machado, L. A. T., Franco, M. A., Kremper, L. A., Ditas, F., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Cecchini, M. A., Holanda, B. A., Pöhlker, M. L., Saraiva, I., Wolff, S., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: How weather events modify aerosol particle size distributions in the Amazon boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18065–18086, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18065-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Machado, L. A. T., Kesselmeier, J., Botia, S., Van Asperen, H., de Araújo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Edtbauer, A., Ferreira, R., Harder, H., Jones, S., Dias-Júnior, C. Q., Haytzmann, G. G., Quesada, C. A., Komiya, S., Lavric, J., Lelieveld, J., Levin, I., Nölscher, A., Pfannerstill, E., Pöhlker, M., Pöschl, U., Ringsdorf, A., Rizzo, L., Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Trumbore, S., Valenti, W. I. D., Vila-Guerau de Arellano, J., Walter, D., Williams, J., Wolff, S., and Pöhlker, C.: How Rainfall Events Modify Trace Gas Concentrations in Central Amazonia, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2901, 2024. a, b, c
Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Baumgardner, D., Chen, Q., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Heald, C. L., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McMurry, P. H., Pauliquevis, T., Pschl, U., Prather, K. A., Roberts, G. C., Saleska, S. R., Silva Dias, M. A., Spracklen, D. V., Swietlicki, E., and Trebs, I.: Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles, Rev. Geophys., 48, 1–42, 2010. a
Mätzler, C.: MATLAB functions for Mie scattering and absorption, version 2, 2002. a
Morais, F. G., Franco, M. A., Palácios, R., Machado, L. A., Rizzo, L. V., Barbosa, H. M., Jorge, F., Schafer, J. S., Holben, B. N., Landulfo, E., and Artaxo, P.: Relationship between land use and spatial variability of atmospheric brown carbon and black carbon aerosols in Amazonia, Atmosphere, 13, 1328, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081328, 2022. a, b
Moran-Zuloaga, D., Ditas, F., Walter, D., Saturno, J., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Hrabě de Angelis, I., Baars, H., Godoi, R. H. M., Heese, B., Holanda, B. A., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Ming, J., Pöhlker, M. L., Ruckteschler, N., Su, H., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Weber, B., Wolff, S., Artaxo, P., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöhlker, C.: Long-term study on coarse mode aerosols in the Amazon rain forest with the frequent intrusion of Saharan dust plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10055–10088, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10055-2018, 2018. a, b
Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011, 2011. a
Nakayama, T., Sato, K., Imamura, T., and Matsumi, Y.: Effect of oxidation process on complex refractive index of secondary organic aerosol generated from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2566–2574, 2018. a
Palácios, R. d. S., Morais, F. G., Landulfo, E., Franco, M. A. d. M., Kuhnen, I. A., Marques, J. B., Nogueira, J. d. S., Júnior, L. C. G. d. V., Rodrigues, T. R., Romera, K. S., Curado, L. F. A., Banga, N. M., Rothmund, L. D., Sallo, F. d. S., Morais, D., Santos, A. C. A., and Moraes, T. J.: Long Term Analysis of Optical and Radiative Properties of Aerosols in the Amazon Basin, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20, 139–154, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.04.0189, 2020. a
Pfannerstill, E. Y., Reijrink, N. G., Edtbauer, A., Ringsdorf, A., Zannoni, N., Araújo, A., Ditas, F., Holanda, B. A., Sá, M. O., Tsokankunku, A., Walter, D., Wolff, S., Lavrič, J. V., Pöhlker, C., Sörgel, M., and Williams, J.: Total OH reactivity over the Amazon rainforest: variability with temperature, wind, rain, altitude, time of day, season, and an overall budget closure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6231–6256, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6231-2021, 2021. a
Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, K. T., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S. S., Smith, M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M. K., Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Moffet, R. C., Weigand, M., Martin, S. T., Pöschl, U., and Andreae, M. O.: Biogenic potassium salt particles as seeds for secondary organic aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–8, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223264, 2012. a, b
Pöhlker, C., Walter, D., Paulsen, H., Könemann, T., Rodríguez-Caballero, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Degrendele, C., Després, V. R., Ditas, F., Holanda, B. A., Kaiser, J. W., Lammel, G., Lavrič, J. V., Ming, J., Pickersgill, D., Pöhlker, M. L., Praß, M., Löbs, N., Saturno, J., Sörgel, M., Wang, Q., Weber, B., Wolff, S., Artaxo, P., Pöschl, U., and Andreae, M. O.: Land cover and its transformation in the backward trajectory footprint region of the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8425–8470, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8425-2019, 2019. a
Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Ditas, F., Klimach, T., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Araújo, A., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rose, D., Saturno, J., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei in the Amazon rain forest – Part 1: Aerosol size distribution, hygroscopicity, and new model parametrizations for CCN prediction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15709–15740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15709-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e
Pöhlker, M. L., Ditas, F., Saturno, J., Klimach, T., Hrabě de Angelis, I., Araùjo, A. C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Holanda, B. A., Kandler, K., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, O. O., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rizzo, L. V., Rose, D., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei over the Amazon rain forest – Part 2: Variability and characteristics of biomass burning, long-range transport, and pristine rain forest aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10289–10331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10289-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e
Ponczek, M., de Menezes Franco, M. A., Carbone, S., Rizzo, L. V., dos Santos, D. A. M., Morais, F. G., Duarte, A. F., Barbosa, H. D. M. J., and Artaxo, P.: Linking chemical composition and optical properties of biomass burning aerosols in Amazonia, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 2, 252, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00055A, 2022. a, b
Prass, M., Andreae, M. O., de Araùjo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Ditas, F., Elbert, W., Förster, J.-D., Franco, M. A., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Kesselmeier, J., Klimach, T., Kremper, L. A., Thines, E., Walter, D., Weber, J., Weber, B., Fuchs, B. M., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: Bioaerosols in the Amazon rain forest: temporal variations and vertical profiles of Eukarya, Bacteria, and Archaea, Biogeosciences, 18, 4873–4887, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4873-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Rizzo, L. V., Correia, A. L., Artaxo, P., Procópio, A. S., and Andreae, M. O.: Spectral dependence of aerosol light absorption over the Amazon Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8899–8912, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011, 2011. a, b
Rizzo, L. V., Artaxo, P., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., Paixão, M., Cirino, G. G., Arana, A., Swietlicki, E., Roldin, P., Fors, E. O., Wiedemann, K. T., Leal, L. S. M., and Kulmala, M.: Long term measurements of aerosol optical properties at a primary forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2391–2413, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2391-2013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e
Varanda Rizzo, L., Roldin, P., Brito, J., Backman, J., Swietlicki, E., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Artaxo, P.: Multi-year statistical and modeling analysis of submicrometer aerosol number size distributions at a rain forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10255–10274, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018, 2018. a
Rose, C., Zha, Q., Dada, L., Yan, C., Lehtipalo, K., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Jokinen, T., Sarnela, N., Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Bianchi, F., and Kulmala, M.: Observations of biogenic ion-induced cluster formation in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 4, 1–11, 2018. a
Šantl-Temkiv, T., Sikoparija, B., Maki, T., Carotenuto, F., Amato, P., Yao, M., Morris, C. E., Schnell, R., Jaenicke, R., Pöhlker, C., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., and Huffman, J. A.: Bioaerosol field measurements: Challenges and perspectives in outdoor studies, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 520–546, 2020. a
Saturno, J., Ditas, F., Penning de Vries, M., Holanda, B. A., Pöhlker, M. L., Carbone, S., Walter, D., Bobrowski, N., Brito, J., Chi, X., Gutmann, A., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Machado, L. A. T., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rüdiger, J., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Wang, Q., Wendisch, M., Artaxo, P., Wagner, T., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöhlker, C.: African volcanic emissions influencing atmospheric aerosols over the Amazon rain forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10391–10405, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10391-2018, 2018a. a
Saturno, J., Holanda, B. A., Pöhlker, C., Ditas, F., Wang, Q., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditas, J., Hoffmann, T., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Könemann, T., Lavrič, J. V., Ma, N., Ming, J., Paulsen, H., Pöhlker, M. L., Rizzo, L. V., Schlag, P., Su, H., Walter, D., Wolff, S., Zhang, Y., Artaxo, P., Pöschl, U., and Andreae, M. O.: Black and brown carbon over central Amazonia: long-term aerosol measurements at the ATTO site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12817–12843, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12817-2018, 2018b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328, 2006. a, b
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Washington, United States of America, ISBN: 1118947401, 9781118947401, 2012. a, b
Talbot, R., Andreae, M., Andreae, T., and Harriss, R.: Regional aerosol chemistry of the Amazon Basin during the dry season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 1499–1508, 1988. a
Talbot, R., Andreae, M., Berresheim, H., Artaxo, P., Garstang, M., Harriss, R., Beecher, K., and Li, S.: Aerosol chemistry during the wet season in central Amazonia: The influence of long-range transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 16955–16969, 1990. a, b, c
Unfer, G. R., Machado, L. A. T., Artaxo, P., Franco, M. A., Kremper, L. A., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: Amazonian aerosol size distributions in a lognormal phase space: characteristics and trajectories, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3869–3882, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3869-2024, 2024. a, b
Updyke, K. M., Nguyen, T. B., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Formation of brown carbon via reactions of ammonia with secondary organic aerosols from biogenic and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Environ., 63, 22–31, 2012. a
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009, 2009. a
Wang, Q., Saturno, J., Chi, X., Walter, D., Lavric, J. V., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Ditas, F., Pöhlker, C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Modeling investigation of light-absorbing aerosols in the Amazon Basin during the wet season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14775–14794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14775-2016, 2016. a
Wu, L., Li, X., Kim, H., Geng, H., Godoi, R. H. M., Barbosa, C. G. G., Godoi, A. F. L., Yamamoto, C. I., de Souza, R. A. F., Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., and Ro, C.-U.: Single-particle characterization of aerosols collected at a remote site in the Amazonian rainforest and an urban site in Manaus, Brazil, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1221–1240, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1221-2019, 2019. a
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Bourtsoukidis, E., Alves, E. G., Bauwens, M., Stavrakou, T., Llusià, J., Filella, I., Guenther, A., Williams, J., Artaxo, P., Sindelarova, K., Doubalova, J., Kesselmeier, J., and Peñuelas, J.: Amazonian biogenic volatile organic compounds under global change, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 4722–4751, 2020. a, b