Articles | Volume 23, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
Research article
 | 
24 Oct 2023
Research article |  | 24 Oct 2023

Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy

Matthew Henry, Jim Haywood, Andy Jones, Mohit Dalvi, Alice Wells, Daniele Visioni, Ewa M. Bednarz, Douglas G. MacMartin, Walker Lee, and Mari R. Tye

Viewed

Total article views: 2,207 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,614 534 59 2,207 38 35
  • HTML: 1,614
  • PDF: 534
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,207
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Jun 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,207 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,232 with geography defined and -25 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
Solar climate interventions, such as injecting sulfur in the stratosphere, may be used to offset some of the adverse impacts of global warming. We use two independently developed Earth system models to assess the uncertainties around stratospheric sulfur injections. The injection locations and amounts are optimized to maintain the same pattern of surface temperature. While both models show reduced warming, the change in rainfall patterns (even without sulfur injections) is uncertain.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint