Articles | Volume 22, issue 14
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9721–9745, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9721-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9721–9745, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9721-2022
Research article
29 Jul 2022
Research article | 29 Jul 2022

Circum-Antarctic abundance and properties of CCN and INPs

Circum-Antarctic abundance and properties of CCN and INPs
Christian Tatzelt1, Silvia Henning1, André Welti2, Andrea Baccarini3,4, Markus Hartmann1,5, Martin Gysel-Beer4, Manuela van Pinxteren1, Robin L. Modini4, Julia Schmale3,4, and Frank Stratmann1 Christian Tatzelt et al.
  • 1Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palménin aukio 1, FI-00560 Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Extreme Environments Research Laboratory, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lausanne, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 4Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • 5Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence: Silvia Henning (silvia.henning@tropos.de) and Julia Schmale (julia.schmale@epfl.ch)

Abstract

Aerosol particles acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice-nucleating particles (INPs) play a major role in the formation and glaciation of clouds. Thereby they exert a strong impact on the radiation budget of the Earth. Data on abundance and properties of both types of particles are sparse, especially for remote areas of the world, such as the Southern Ocean (SO). In this work, we present unique results from ship-borne aerosol-particle-related in situ measurements and filter sampling in the SO region, carried out during the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE) in the austral summer of 2016–2017. An overview of CCN and INP concentrations over the Southern Ocean is provided and, using additional quantities, insights regarding possible CCN and INP sources and origins are presented. CCN number concentrations spanned 2 orders of magnitude, e.g. for a supersaturation of 0.3% values ranged roughly from 3 to 590cm−3. CCN showed variable contributions of organic and inorganic material (inter-quartile range of hygroscopicity parameter κ from 0.2 to 0.9). No distinct size dependence of κ was apparent, indicating homogeneous composition across sizes (critical dry diameter on average between 30 and 110nm). The contribution of sea spray aerosol (SSA) to the CCN number concentration was on average small. Ambient INP number concentrations were measured in the temperature range from −5 to −27C using an immersion freezing method. Concentrations spanned up to 3 orders of magnitude, e.g. at −16C from 0.2 to 100m−3. Elevated values (above 10m−3 at −16C) were measured when the research vessel was in the vicinity of land (excluding Antarctica), with lower and more constant concentrations when at sea. This, along with results of backward-trajectory analyses, hints towards terrestrial and/or coastal INP sources being dominant close to ice-free (non-Antarctic) land. In pristine marine areas INPs may originate from both oceanic sources and/or long-range transport. Sampled aerosol particles (PM10) were analysed for sodium and methanesulfonic acid (MSA). Resulting mass concentrations were used as tracers for primary marine and secondary aerosol particles, respectively. Sodium, with an average mass concentration around 2.8µg m−3, was found to dominate the sampled, identified particle mass. MSA was highly variable over the SO, with mass concentrations up to 0.5µg m−3 near the sea ice edge. A correlation analysis yielded strong correlations between sodium mass concentration and particle number concentration in the coarse mode, unsurprisingly indicating a significant contribution of SSA to that mode. CCN number concentration was highly correlated with the number concentration of Aitken and accumulation mode particles. This, together with a lack of correlation between sodium mass and Aitken and accumulation mode number concentrations, underlines the important contribution of non-SSA, probably secondarily formed particles, to the CCN population. INP number concentrations did not significantly correlate with any other measured aerosol physico-chemical parameter.

1 Introduction

Earth's changing climate and the human influence on it are undeniable facts (IPCC2013). Emissions of greenhouse gases (e.g. carbon dioxide) and their impact on the radiation budget are well understood, with high confidence and low uncertainty. A larger uncertainty emerges from the lack of knowledge on atmospheric aerosol particles, in particular their influence on cloud-radiative properties. As there are natural and anthropogenic aerosol sources, the human impact on aerosol–cloud interactions is difficult to quantify. One way of reducing the uncertainty concerning the human influence on atmospheric aerosol particles, pointed out by Carslaw et al. (2013), is better constraining conditions before human impact, in the preindustrial time. With an atmospheric general-circulation model, Hamilton et al. (2014) searched for still-existing regions with preindustrial-like conditions, by comparing simulations of atmospheric conditions in 1750 and 2000. The Southern Ocean region was found to feature pristine aerosol conditions during the Southern Hemisphere summer months, making it an excellent region for measurements of preindustrial-like aerosol conditions. This was one of the key motivations for the “Study of Preindustrial-like Aerosol Climate Effects” (ACE-SPACE; Schmale et al.2019) project within the framework of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE), which was conducted across all sectors of the SO in the austral summer 2016–2017. The focus of this study is on aerosol particles that can modulate cloud micro-physical properties and hence affect the cloud albedo (Twomey1974) and lifetime (Albrecht1989). Aerosol particles can initiate cloud droplet formation at levels of supersaturation (SS) much lower than the supersaturation necessary for homogeneous droplet formation (Köhler1936). The SS at which particles activate is dictated primarily by their size, but also their chemical composition (Dusek et al.2006). Particles acting as nuclei for cloud droplet formation at atmospherically relevant (water vapour) supersaturation are commonly referred to as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Another group of cloud property-altering aerosol particles are ice-nucleating particles (INPs), which initiate cloud droplet freezing above the point of homogeneous freezing (−38C). In summary, CCN play an important role in the formation of clouds, while INPs alter the phase state (frozen or liquid) of cloud droplets, which affects cloud radiative properties (Vergara-Temprado et al.2018). Furthermore, cloud glaciation influences the precipitation formation (Wegener1911) and dissipation of clouds (Albrecht1989). As a consequence, changes in cloud radiative properties and cloud lifetime impact Earth's climate (Lindzen1990; Murray et al.2012). With that, CCN and INPs play an important role for both weather and climate, and respective observations are fundamental to estimate the progression of climate change.

Of the few aerosol-related studies over the SO, the majority focused on physical aerosol particle properties and aerosol composition. During the first Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-1) in the Australian sector of the SO in 1995, Quinn et al. (1998) found the marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosol population with a particle diameter (Dp) between 100 and 300nm (referred to as “accumulation mode”) to be minimally influenced by sea salt and mainly comprised of non-sea-salt (nss) sulfate, i.e. the fraction of total sulfate not associated with sea salt. The main sources of nss sulfate are (1) sulfur compounds derived from continental anthropogenic sources (Savoie and Prospero1989), (2) oxidation of atmospheric dimethyl sulfide (DMS; Covert et al.1992; Raes1995), and (3) volcanic emissions. DMS is produced by marine microbial activity and emitted from the ocean into the atmosphere in the gas phase (Curran et al.2003; Abram et al.2010). Sulfate formation from DMS oxidation is a complex, multi-step process involving several intermediate molecules. For the sake of brevity, we simplify the description of the processes with three main pathways: (1) sulfuric acid production from homogeneous gas phase oxidation of DMS followed by condensation, (2) sulfur dioxide production from homogeneous gas phase oxidation of DMS followed by heterogeneous oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfuric acid in the liquid phase, and (3) reactive uptake of DMS into aqueous solution or cloud droplets followed by heterogeneous oxidation (Chen et al.2018). Properties of Aitken (Dp=10100nm) and accumulation mode particles (Dp=1001000nm in this study) in the SO region were found to be clearly dependent on air-mass origin, with two distinct air masses (polar and maritime) being encountered during the British Southern Ocean (BSO) campaign (O'Dowd et al.1997), and the Plankton-derived Emissions of trace Gases and Aerosols in the Southern Ocean (PEGASO) cruise (Dall’Osto et al.2017; Fossum et al.2018). The two air masses featured distinctly different aerosol populations in terms of concentration and chemical composition.

Looking at the chemical composition in the larger particle size ranges, for ACE-1 the population of particles with Dp=3005000nm (referred to as “coarse mode”) was found to be dominated by sea salt, with sporadic and minor contributions from nss sulfate. Variations in the coarse mode sea salt concentrations could only partially (40%) be explained by local wind speeds (Quinn et al.1998).

The concentrations of particles in the MBL of the SO that act as CCN were investigated by a smaller number of studies. Quinn et al. (2017) found a large portion of the Aitken mode to act as CCN at a SS >0.5%. Sea spray aerosol (SSA), a mix of sea salt particles and ocean-derived organic species (de Leeuw et al.2011), was found to dominate the CCN population, but only at SS =0.1% in the high latitudes (down to 70 S) of the Southern Hemisphere (Quinn et al.2017). Cases of polar air during PEGASO featured CCN number concentrations at SS =0.8% (NCCN,0.8) of 217±31cm−3, while maritime cases showed almost doubled concentrations (420±168cm−3).

It remains an open question how CCN abundance is distributed over the SO and what typical values are, especially during the pristine conditions of the austral summer. Further, CCN properties and origin are of interest. It is known that new particle formation (NPF) in the free troposphere (FT) is an important source of CCN in the MBL and occurs frequently over the summertime SO (McCoy et al.2021). To our knowledge, it is not known which process or source (e.g. NPF or SSA) governs the CCN population of the SO generally and what role horizontal and vertical atmospheric transport plays (Baccarini et al.2021).

Studies of INP number concentration (NINP) and origin in the SO region started with immersion freezing experiments by Bigg (1973), who measured NINP between 3250m−3 at −15C. Two recent cruises were conducted as part of the Cloud, Aerosols, Precipitation, Radiation and Atmospheric Composition campaign (CAPRICORN-I and II). For CAPRICORN-I, observed NINP over the SO in the temperature range between −12 and −31C varied between 0.04 and 1000m−3 (McCluskey et al.2018a). For context, NINP at −20C was found to be lower by a factor of up to 100 compared to Bigg (1973). Preliminary INP results for CAPRICORN-II are presented in McFarquhar et al. (2021) and underline the findings for CAPRICORN-I of low but highly variable NINP values over the SO. They also investigated the contribution of biological INPs using heat treatment methods, assuming biological INPs to be heat-labile. McCluskey et al. (2018a) found INPs over the SO to be mainly heat-resistant, with contributions from heat-labile INPs in the −15 to −20C temperature range. In Bigg (1973) it was hypothesized, based on the fact that INP concentrations did not increase significantly in the vicinity of Australia, that there was no influence of dust from the continent. Correlation of INP and ambient radon concentration was used to assess whether sampled INPs had terrestrial or oceanic sources for the CAPRICORN-I cruise. The INP source potential of bubble bursting was characterized for CAPRICORN-I in McCluskey et al. (2018a), using seawater samples. They found that INPs were from oceanic sources, aerosolized by bubble bursting. Additionally, Uetake et al. (2020) showed that bacteria sampled during CAPRICORN-II are mostly of marine origin, suggesting a restricted meridional transport of continental aerosol towards the SO. As a consequence, a dominance of sea spray on the INP population in the SO's MBL was concluded.

However, data on INP abundance, spatial distribution, properties, and sources over the SO region remain sparse. Regayre et al. (2020) pointed out that model uncertainty in the aerosol–cloud interaction radiative forcing can already be reduced by a small number of observations from the SO. Here, a small number of measurements is even more effective than hundreds of measurements in the Northern Hemisphere, as current simulations are only based on very few observations in the Southern Hemisphere. This demonstrates a need for further field measurements of CCN and INPs in the SO region.

Parts of the CCN and INP data set presented in this study have previously been presented in the overview on the ACE cruise in Schmale et al. (2019). Aerosol properties were found to be highly heterogeneous over the SO. The CCN abundance in the MBL showed a significant sea spray contribution in the strong westerly wind belt, while in the polynyas of the Ross and Amundsen Sea biogenic emissions are more important. INP abundance was shown to be lower over the SO than in northern hemispheric marine air, with small differences between samples on the open ocean and close to the Antarctic coast. INP abundance was found to be similar to other studies over the SO (e.g. McCluskey et al.2018a) but lower than historic data from Bigg (1973). INP number concentrations at −15C from the ACE expedition have been presented in Welti et al. (2020). They show that NINP from ship-based measurements are lowest in polar regions and highest in temperate climate zones. Overall, geographical variation in NINP is below 2 orders of magnitude at any temperature. At low temperature, lower NINP were encountered in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere, and this was attributed to the concentration of dust particles active as INPs. These two previous studies (Schmale et al.2019; Welti et al.2020) presented a subset of the CCN and the INP data in larger contexts. This paper focuses on the detailed analysis and interpretation of the observations, including NCCN at all available SS and NINP at the full investigated temperature range. Based on 10 d backward trajectories, an air-mass analysis was performed to locate potential INP sources. In addition, a correlation analysis was performed using CCN, INPs, and additional data from the ACE expedition in order to find potential links between the measured properties.

2 Methods

Measurements were carried out in the framework of ACE (Walton and Thomas2018). The cruise took place between December 2016 and March 2017 on board the research vessel (RV) Akademik Tryoshnikov. Starting and ending in Cape Town (South Africa), the cruise was divided into three legs: Cape Town to Hobart (Australia), Hobart to Punta Arenas (Chile) and Punta Arenas to Cape Town (Fig. 1). Several islands (Marion, Crozet, Kerguelen, Balleny, Scott, Peter I, Diego Ramierez, South Georgia, South Sandwich, and Bovetoya island), an Antarctic glacier (Mertz Glacier), and the Siple ice shelf were passed during ACE. At Mertz Glacier the southern-most latitude of 78 S was reached.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f01

Figure 1Hourly position of the RV Akademik Tryoshnikov during ACE. The ports visited as part of the cruise are indicated (stars). Leg 1 (green) from Cape Town (South Africa) to Hobart (Australia) between 20 December 2016 and 19 January 2017, Leg 2 (orange) from Hobart to Punta Arenas (Chile) between 22 January and 22 February 2017, and Leg 3 (purple) from Punta Arenas to Cape Town between 26 February and 19 March 2017.

The instrumentation for real-time aerosol measurements was situated in a laboratory container on the fore-deck of the RV, equipped with two standard aerosol inlets (Global Atmosphere Watch; Weingartner et al.1999) at roughly 15m above sea level, allowing for particles with Dp≤40µm (PM40) to be sampled. The sampled air was dried to a relative humidity below 40%. An iso-kinetic splitter was used, together with as short as possible tubing, to feed the aerosol to the different instruments inside the measurement container.

The operated low- and high-volume filter samplers were positioned on the upper deck of the RV (∼28 m a.s.l.) and each one run on a PM10 inlet. Further details on the filter sampling can be found in Sect. 2.3. An ultrasonic anemometer was operated next to the high-volume filter sampler and provided wind direction data for an automatic shut-down mechanism exclusive to the high-volume sampler. Sampling was stopped automatically during periods with wind direction within a half-circle at the sampler centred towards the stack exhaust situated on the RV's stern. A detailed description of the instrument set-up of the ACE-SPACE project is given in Schmale et al. (2019), and a full description of the instrument set-up during ACE is given in the cruise report by Walton and Thomas (2018). In the following, we focus on the instruments used in conjunction with our CCN- and INP-related investigations.

2.1 Aerosol size distribution

Particle number size distributions (PNSDs) of aerosol particles in the mobility diameter range of 11400nm and aerodynamic range of 500nm19µm were measured using a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; custom-built by PSI) and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS; model 3321 by TSI inc., Shoreview, MN, USA), respectively. The custom-built SMPS instrument is further described in Wiedensohler et al. (2012). Validation of sizing accuracy of both instruments was performed using polystyrene latex spheres. To minimize influences of the ship exhaust, data filtering was performed for the SMPS and APS data, based on sudden changes in the total aerosol particle number concentration, concentrations of carbon dioxide, black carbon, and wind direction (Moallemi et al.2021).

PNSDs of SMPS and APS were merged by assuming spherical particle shape for the SMPS output to convert mobility diameter to geometric diameter as a first step. As a second step, the APS output is converted from aerodynamic to geometric diameter assuming spherical shape and material density of 1.8g cm−3. The combination of both outputs enables interpolation of the gap between the SMPS (Dp≤400nm) and APS (Dp>500nm) instruments. Further, a mode fitting technique analogue to Modini et al. (2015) was applied that is based on a method described in Khlystov et al. (2004) and fully described in the supplement to Landwehr et al. (2021). In this approach, each PNSD is assumed to be a superposition of up to three aerosol modes, and log-normal distributions in pre-defined size ranges are fitted. The three modes are Aitken (modal diameter in the range 1 to 20nm; referred to as “mode 1” in the following), accumulation (10 to 100nm; “mode 2”), and a sea-spray mode (centred around 140 to 220nm; “mode 3”). For each time step, combining all fitted modes results in a smoothed total PNSD that is used where a measured PNSD is too noisy at low concentrations, e.g. for the calculation of the particle hygroscopicity parameter described in Sect. 2.2. An example of the mode fitting is given in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. Integration of smoothed total PNSD over all geometric diameters gave total aerosol particle number concentration (Ntotal) for each time step. Analogously, the concentration of particles with Dp>500nm (N>500) was derived, which is later used in a commonly used parameterization for INP number concentration (see Sect. 3.4).

2.2 Cloud condensation nuclei

A cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNc; CCN-100 instrument by DMT, Longmont, CO, USA) was used to measure the CCN number concentration at various SS values. The CCNc's main part is a continuous-flow thermal gradient diffusion chamber, in which a stream-wise temperature gradient is induced to achieve defined SS and corresponding particle activation to droplets. The aerosol flow rate inside the CCNc is 0.5L min−1. Activated particles are counted by an optical particle counter. Further documentation on the CCNc can be found in Roberts and Nenes (2005). Calibration of the CCNc was performed prior to the cruise, following the standard operating procedure given in Gysel and Stratmann (2014) and recommendations in Schmale et al. (2017). During ACE, the CCNc was operated at SS of 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.5%, and 1% maintained for 10 min each. To ensure stable thermal conditions within the instrument, data collected during the first 5 min of each SS set-point were discarded. Furthermore it was ensured that (1) the instrument's internal thermal stability control reported thermally stable conditions, and (2) the absolute difference between set and read temperature of the optics was smaller than 2K. The remaining data were aggregated into 1 min intervals and filtered for ship exhaust influences (same as for the SMPS and APS instruments). Based on the filtered values, averaged NCCN at a particular SS were calculated. This procedure results in one NCCN value per hour and supersaturation. During data analysis, CCN number concentrations at 0.1% were found to lack sufficient data quality, therefore measurements at this supersaturation were discarded.

For determining the critical dry diameters for particle activation (Dcrit) and aerosol particle hygroscopicity parameters (κ), we applied the procedure used in, for example, Kristensen et al. (2016) and Petters and Kreidenweis (2007). Dcrit is implicitly defined as the lower boundary of the integral over the PNSD for which the integrated particle number concentration equals the measured CCN number concentration. In our case, the upper boundary of the integral was always 40µm, due to using instruments operated on a PM40 inlet. The κ value, an indirect measure of chemical composition of the CCN at given Dcrit, is derived from the SS applied in the CCNc and the corresponding Dcrit. Corresponding to NCCN, one κ value per hour and supersaturation is determined. A Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) approach with an iterative solver was used, following the procedure described in Herenz et al. (2019), to model error propagation in both derivation of Dcrit and calculation of κ(Dcrit). The calculation of Dcrit and thus κ is highly sensitive to the PNSD which, in our case, depends on the quality of the mode-fitting. To exclude unreasonable values, Dcrit values were filtered. For this, the range between the 10th and 90th percentiles of Dcrit was calculated for each SS separately. Dcrit values outside this range and associated κ values were excluded from further analysis. Hence, the presented results are representative of the most frequently occurring κ values.

2.3 Filter sampling for INPs, sodium, and MSA analysis

Filter sampling of ambient air for off-line INP, sodium, and MSA analysis at the laboratories of Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS) was carried out using a high-volume sampler (HV; DHA-80 filter sampler, DIGITEL, Volketswil, Switzerland). Further, a low-volume sampler (LV; DPA-14 filter sampler, DIGITEL) was used to collect additional samples for INP analysis. LV sampling was performed at 8 h time resolution using track-etched polycarbonate membrane filters (Whatman Nuclepore, Cytiva, Little Chalfont, UK; 200nm pore size, 47mm in diameter) at a flow rate of roughly 25 L min−1. The HV sampler used a flow rate of roughly 500 L min−1, sampling air through quartz-fibre filters (MK 360, Munktell, Bärenstein, Germany) of 150mm in diameter for up to 24 h per filter. Here, filters showed an average sampled volume of 471.3±151.4m3 (mean±SD) due to individual sampling time (<1 to 1437min) depending on the automatic shut-down mechanism. In total, 258 LV and 94 HV filters were collected throughout the cruise, including five (four) un-sampled reference filters for LV (HV) sampling, called field blank filters (FBFs). FBFs were handled in the same way as the sampled ones, enabling assessment of background concentrations due to both methodology and handling. After sampling, filters were stored in a freezer at −20C and shipped frozen to TROPOS for off-line analysis after the cruise concluded. INP analysis was performed for both LV and HV filters. LV filters were used solely for the INP analysis, while the HV filters were split between INP, sodium, and MSA analysis and reserve samples. HV filters with an overly small sampling volume (<100m3), due to the aforementioned automated shut-down mechanism, were not considered further to prevent unreasonably high conversion factors to infer atmospheric concentrations from filter analysis results. A total of 79 sampled HV filters were included in the following analysis.

The immersion freezing capability of the aerosol particles collected on each LV and HV filter was measured using the Ice Nucleation Droplet Array (INDA) at TROPOS. INDA is based on the freezing array method described in Conen et al. (2012), and a detailed instrument description is given in the supporting information in Hartmann et al. (2019). As a first step of the analysis process, stored filters were acclimatized to roughly −3C in a fridge. LV filter contents were washed off by submerging the filter in 7.5mL (Vwater; 10mL at later stages) ultra-pure water (milliQ, 18.2MΩ cm−2). In contrast, 96 randomly punched-out pieces of 1mm in diameter (Dpunchout) per filter were used for the INP analysis of the HV filters. The 96 wells of a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) plate (BRAND, Wertheim, Germany) were either filled with 50µL each (Vdroplet) of the filter washing water (LV) or with 50µL of milliQ water and one punch-out (HV). The PCR plate was sealed and partially submerged in the ethanol bath of a cryostat (FP 40, Julabo, Seelbach, Germany). Cooled at a rate of roughly 1K min−1, the number of frozen droplets (nfrozen) and corresponding temperature value (T) was documented automatically every 6 s. Recommendations on sample handling and processing given in Polen et al. (2018) were followed.

The frozen fraction (fice) was calculated by dividing nfrozen by the total number of droplets per PCR plate (ntotal=96). Obtained fice at any T was used to derive the cumulative INP concentration NINP, as follows:

(1) N INP T = - ln 1 - f ice ( T ) V

according to Vali (1971). The reference volume V for the LV filters was calculated as follows:

(2) V = V flow V water V droplet ,

where Vflow is the sampled air volume, Vwater is the volume of washing water, and Vdroplet is the water volume per PCR plate well. For the HV filters, V was calculated as follows:

(3) V = 0.5 D punchout 2 0.5 D filter , HV 2 V flow ,

where Dpunchout is the diameter of the filter sub-sample per well and Dfilter,HV is the diameter of a HV filter. Vflow was logged by both (LV and HV) samplers. Due to the higher number of LV samples, resulting in more robust statistics compared to the HV samples, we focus in Sect. 3.2 on INP results derived from the LV samples, while only briefly commenting on results from the HV samples.

Uncertainties arising from the methodology were assessed similarly to previous studies (e.g. Wex et al.2019; Gong et al.2020). Confidence intervals for fice(T) of each filter were determined using a method described in Agresti and Coull (1998). Resulting lower and upper values of each fice(T) in Eq. (1) are reported as error bars of NINP(T) values.

Lower and upper limits of INP number concentrations are given for cases when ice fractions of fice=0 or fice=1 were obtained, i.e. none or all wells of the PCR plate were frozen. For these two cases, Eq. (1) is not applicable to calculate concentrations. We then assume the probabilities of either none (fice=0/96) or one (fice=1/96) of the PCR wells to be frozen as equal. A similar assumption is made in the case of all (fice=96/96) or all but one (fice=95/96) wells being frozen. Considering fice=1/96 and fice=95/96 in Eq. (1) yields estimates for the lower and upper limit of detectable NINP, respectively.

Based on the fice of the FBFs we determined averaged temperature-dependent INP number concentrations, NINP,FBF, which are given as point of reference for background concentration levels whenever NINP for the sampled filters are shown. Equation (1) with an average (mean±SD) volume of sampled air for all sampled LV (HV) filters of 8.95±0.74m3 (471.3±151.4m3) was used to calculate NINP,FBF. In Table S3 NINP,FBF is given for the LV and the HV filters. No correction for contamination by the RV's stack exhaust was applied, as it was shown in Welti et al. (2020) that ship exhaust is not ice-active in the temperature range we are presenting (T>-30C).

The INP number concentrations derived for the LV filters were normalized to the aerosol surface area or alternatively volume, following Mitts et al. (2021), in order to obtain normalized ice (nucleation) activity. For this, the particle surface area and volume size distributions were first inferred from the number size distribution, assuming spherical particles, and then integrated over the entire diameter range. This was done for each size distribution measurement. These values were averaged over the 8h sampling time of each LV filter and NINP is divided by these values, resulting in the ice active site density (ns) and ice active volume density (nv), respectively.

Analysis of the HV filters regarding mass concentrations of sodium and MSA was performed. Total filter mass load for each HV filter was determined using a micro-balance (AT261 Delta Range, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Filter contents were extracted and ion chromatography performed, following the procedures described in Müller et al. (2010) and van Pinxteren et al. (2017). Results of the analysis were corrected for standard conditions and are reported as atmospheric mass concentrations (in µg m−3). An influence from the RV's exhaust stack on the measured sodium or MSA mass concentrations is not expected due to their respective marine sources. Sodium is used as a conservative tracer for primary aerosol particles of marine origin, and MSA was found to be solely a product of DMS oxidation (Legrand and Pasteur1998).

2.4 Further resources

During the ACE cruise sea water was sampled every 4 h using the RV's underway water supply system and during CTD (conductivity, temperature, and depth) rosette deployments, at specific depths down to 200m (Walton and Thomas2018). Glass fibre filters (25mm in diameter, 700nm pore size) were sampled with up to 2L of sampled sea water under low vacuum pressure and stored at −80C prior to analysis on-board the RV. After extraction in 90% acetone for 24h, chlorophyll a (Chl-a) pigment concentration (in mg m−3) was measured on a fluorometer (AU-10, Turner Designs, San Jose, CA, USA). Calibration was performed against a standard Chl-a solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), like isoprene and DMS, in sea water were measured using a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system (5975-T LTM-GC/MSL, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) by the Surveying Organic Reactive gases and Particles Across the Surface Southern Ocean (SORPASSO) project. A description of the full procedure can be found in Rodriguez-Ros et al. (2020).

Continuous data of wind speed and direction during the cruise were obtained from two ultrasonic anemometers (part of MAWS 420 system, Vaisala, Vantaa, Finland) located on the port- and starboard side of the RV on the observation deck (∼30 m a.s.l.) above the bridge of the RV (Walton and Thomas2018). Observed wind speeds were corrected by Landwehr et al. (2020) regarding the instrument's position on the ship. To estimate the wind speed at 10 m a.s.l. (U10), measurement height and atmospheric stability were considered using a logarithmic wind speed profile, including the drag coefficient. Quantification of air-flow distortion bias generated by the RV's structures was performed using the data from the operational ERA-Interim weather model as a free stream reference. The resulting correction was applied to the observed wind speed, leading to a data set of wind speed at 10 m a.s.l. for the cruise with a 5 min time resolution.

The distance between the RV's position and the nearest land for ACE was calculated by Volpi et al. (2020) using the cruise track, coast lines of the continents from the NaturalEarth project (version 4.1.0), and additional information on islands in the SO inside the geographic information system qGIS (version 3.2.3-Bonn) with the help of the NNJoin plugin (version 3.1.2).

Backward trajectories along the ship track for ACE are available in Thurnherr et al. (2020). Calculations have been performed with the “LAGRANgian analysis TOol” (LAGRANTO). The three-dimensional wind fields used by LAGRANTO are from the 6-hourly global operational analyses of ECMWF and short-term forecasts in between the analysis time steps. A variety of variables were interpolated along the trajectories, e.g. the pressure level of the planetary boundary layer (PBL), the condition of the underlying surface (e.g. land, open ocean, ice) or the total precipitation. In our study the air parcel's height in combination with boundary layer height was used to assess when it was within the PBL. When in the PBL, the information on the type of underlying surface was used. The surface below the air parcel was characterized using geographical location information, similar to what is done in Radenz et al. (2021). The full procedure of the analysis is described in the Supplement of this study.

2.5 Correlation analysis

The collected data were used in a correlation analysis. The goal was to characterize the aerosol population over the SO by finding possible connections between their associated quantities, with the strength or lack of correlation as a first hint for potential sources.

Input variables were the MSA and sodium mass concentrations from the HV filters, INP number concentrations at five temperatures (−8, −12, −16, −20, and −24C) from the LV filters, Ntotal, N>500, particle concentrations of individual PNSD modes (Nmode1, Nmode2, and Nmode3), NCCN at all measured SS and respective κ values, U10, and in-water Chl-a and DMS concentrations. Note that NINP values from the analysis of the LV filters were considered in the correlation analysis given better statistical robustness due to a larger number of samples. Correlation analysis was performed by calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and associated p values between input variables. As data of diverse temporal resolution were used, the coarsest resolution (24h, chemical analysis) was chosen and variables with finer resolution were averaged over 24 h periods, using arithmetic mean values. For each variable, 79 data points were used for the correlation analysis. This corresponds to the number of HV filters which sampled a sufficient (>100m3) volume (see Sect. 2.3).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Aerosol particles and cloud condensation nuclei

In Fig. 2a, smoothed PNSDs for Legs 1–3 of ACE are presented. For the majority of the cruise, a bi-modal particle number size distribution was present. Potential sources for the pronounced accumulation mode, which is causing the bi-modality, are either entrainment of aerosol particles from the FT into the MBL or in-cloud processing, according to Hoppel et al. (1986). A general characterization of the aerosol particles sampled during ACE is given in Schmale et al. (2019), including median values for the diameter of the Hoppel minimum, which are 48, 74, and 68nm for Leg 1, Leg 2, and Leg 3, respectively (see Fig. 2a).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f02

Figure 2Time series of (a) hourly smoothed PNSD and (b) total aerosol particle (black) and CCN number concentration (colour-coded by supersaturation) during Legs 1–3. Ports visited (dashed lines) and vicinity to land (grey area) are indicated in the figure. Data gaps stem from filtering for instrument availability and exclusion of stack exhaust contamination periods. In (a) the Hoppel minimum can be seen as local minimum in the Aitken mode of the PNSD (Leg 1: 48nm, Leg 2: 74nm, Leg 3: 68nm on average).

Download

Time series of Ntotal and NCCN(SS) for the ACE cruise are given in Fig. 2b. Here, days for which the average distance to land is lower than 200km are highlighted with grey shading. Additionally, the starts and ends of the different legs are given as dashed lines. Filtering by stack exhaust contamination caused concurrent data unavailability, while differences in temporal resolution and availability of the instruments create times with no overlap between Ntotal and NCCN(SS). Figure 2b shows that NCCN at a particular SS varied over 2 orders of magnitude throughout the cruise, e.g. at a SS of 0.2% (NCCN,0.2) from 4 to 309cm−3. In the vicinity of the ports, higher Ntotal and NCCN(SS) are observed compared to the open-ocean sections (stack exhaust contamination filtering being performed for both as described in Sect. 2.2). This suggests aerosol particle abundance to be influenced by terrestrial and anthropogenic sources and is in line with Schmale et al. (2019) showing pristine conditions during ACE being encountered only south of 55 S.

Periodic differences between Ntotal and NCCN,1.0 throughout the cruise were observed (Fig. 2b). Periods of larger differences coincide with PNSD in Fig. 2a featuring a pronounced Aitken mode (Dp=10100nm) with elevated numbers in the size range below 40nm. During these periods even SS =1% was not sufficient to activate the smaller Aitken mode particles. Consequently, quantities presented later in this article, that are derived from NCCN,1.0, are representative for the larger Aitken mode particles (Dcrit at this SS of ∼30nm; see Table S1 in the Supplement).

In addition to the time series presented in Fig. 2b, spatial distribution of NCCN at all measured SS are given as daily averages in Fig. S2.

Averages of NCCN(SS) for the legs of ACE are shown in Fig. 3a. Due to the frequency distributions of NCCN in Fig. 4a (introduced later) resembling log-normal distributions, leg-aggregated data and variability are given as geometric mean and geometric standard deviation values, respectively. NCCN values increase with SS, e.g. for Leg 1 from 91cm−3 (NCCN,0.15) to 241cm−3 (NCCN,1.0). For all SS values, the largest geometric mean values of NCCN(SS) are observed during Leg 2. Moreover, the average Hoppel minimum diameter was found to be the largest for Leg 2, when compared to Legs 1 and 3, indicating a pronounced Aitken mode. This, together with Schmale et al. (2019) showing less contribution (relative and absolute) of SSA to CCN during Leg 2, suggests a significant fraction of CCN originating from secondary aerosol production. However, differences in NCCN between legs are within the ranges given by the respective geometric standard deviations. The longitudinal differences in CCN abundance are either small against the overall variability in the data, or a variety of effects cancel each other out so that no clear longitudinal trend can be observed. A similar conclusion can be drawn in terms of latitudinal trends, because the majority of the cruise track during Leg 2 was south of 60 S, compared to Legs 1 and 3 being solely north of 60 S. With this, the CCN number concentrations given in Table S1 in the Supplement can be considered representative for the MBL over the whole SO region during summertime.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f03

Figure 3(a) Geometric mean values (meangeo) and geometric standard deviation (SDgeo; whiskers) of CCN number concentration (NCCN) and (b) median values and respective inter-quartile range (IQR) of aerosol particle hygroscopicity parameter (κ). Both NCCN and κ are given as function of supersaturation (SS) for Leg 1 (green), Leg 2 (orange), and Leg 3 (purple), respectively. All κ values resulting from Dcrit values outside of 10th to 90th percentile range for Dcrit (per SS) are excluded here. Included for comparison in (a) are the averages (median and IQR) over all measurements at Cape Grim Baseline Station (CGBS) coinciding with PEGASO and CAPRICORN-II from Humphries et al. (2021) (triangle pointing left) and measurements for “baseline” conditions (triangle pointing right) during that period. Baseline conditions are defined as wind directions between 190 and 280, and ambient radon concentrations below 100mBq m−3. Averages for events of modified Antarctic air (upward pointing triangle) and maritime polar air (downward pointing triangle) from Fossum et al. (2018) are given. As reference, mean κ values for sodium chloride (dashed blue line) and ammonium sulfate (dashed orange line) from Petters and Kreidenweis (2007), and a hypothetical κ value for MSA from Schmale et al. (2019) (dashed teal line) is given in (b). Averages for Antarctica from Herenz et al. (2019) for cases of continental (triangle pointing left) and marine events (triangle pointing right) are given. Modelled κ values for the Southern Ocean's surface layer (magenta line and area) from Pringle et al. (2010) for reference. The number of data points (n) are indicated in the figure.

Download

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f04

Figure 4Normalized probability density function of (a) CCN number concentration (NCCN) and (b) hygroscopicity parameter (κ) for levels of supersaturation 0.15 %, 0.2 %, 0.3 %, 0.5 %, and 1% (SS, colour-coded) of all observations taken during Legs 1–3. The NCCN result from averaging 5min long intervals of 1Hz measurements. Each of the six SS levels is repeated once per hour. The κ values result from Monte Carlo simulation runs (nMCS=104) of hourly smoothed particle number size distributions. All κ values that resulted from Dcrit outside of 10th to 90th percentile range (per SS) are excluded. The number of data points are indicated (n) in the figure.

Download

Herenz et al. (2019)Humphries et al. (2021)Fossum et al. (2018)Sanchez et al. (2021)Humphries et al. (2021)Sanchez et al. (2021)Humphries et al. (2021)

Table 1Overview of a selection of studies on aerosol particles and CCN over the summertime Southern Ocean.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

In addition to our data, NCCN from a selection of other studies performed on Antarctica or over the SO are given in Fig. 3a and summarized in Table 1. For the continental Antarctic research station Princess Elisabeth (PES), located at 71.95 S and 23.35 E on East Antarctica's Queen Maud Land and about 200km in-land from the Antarctic coast, Herenz et al. (2019) reported NCCN,0.1, NCCN,0.2, NCCN,0.3, NCCN,0.5, and NCCN,0.7. Overall, we find good agreement between values for the measurement period 2013–2016 in Herenz et al. (2019) and the geometric mean values of this study covering roughly 3 months during the Austral summer. The reported values of NCCN,0.2, NCCN,0.3, and NCCN,0.5 for cases of maritime air masses reaching PES show a difference of −28%, −9%, and +3% to our values, respectively. A first hypothetical reason for the differences at SS =0.2 % is that PES is not located directly at the Antarctic coast. A second hypothetical reason is that activation at this low SS is associated with large particles, which might be removed due to atmospheric processes during transport to PES. At the Australian Cape Grim Baseline Station (CGBS; 40.68 S, 144.68 E), NCCN,0.5 has been measured continuously since the mid-1970s (Gras and Keywood2017). In Humphries et al. (2021), average NCCN,0.5 values over ACE's time frame (November 2017 to March 2018) at CGBS are given. For this period, a NCCN,0.5 median of ∼230cm−3 is reported (triangle pointing left in Fig. 3a). This is above our median value for Leg 1 of 181cm−3 and at the upper end of our results (inter-quartile range (IQR): 138225cm−3). Differences could be due to continental air masses reaching CGBS. Conditions at CGBS are only representative for the SO when the wind direction is between 190 and 280, the so-called “baseline” conditions (Gras and Keywood2017). At CGBS, the ambient radon concentration is used as a proxy for terrestrial influence (e.g. McCluskey et al.2018a) and a threshold of 100mBq m−3 is used in Humphries et al. (2021). The averaging of the CGBS measurements which feature only baseline conditions gives a median of ∼130cm−3 (triangle pointing right in Fig. 3a). This is at the lower end of our results for Leg 1, and we conclude that the terrestrial influence on our NCCN,0.5 average values is small. The terrestrial influence during Leg 1 being small is underlined later in the text by the backward trajectory analysis (see Sect. 3.2). As for ship-based CCN measurements, comparison between our findings and the PEGASO cruise in the SO's Atlantic sector during January–February 2015 (Fossum et al.2018) can only be done semi-quantitatively, since SS are not identical. Further, a comparison is only reasonable for Leg 3, the part of ACE on the Atlantic sector of the SO. The result of visual interpolation between our NCCN,0.5 and NCCN,1.0 for Leg 3 lies in the ranges of 217±31cm−3 reported for modified Antarctic air encountered during PEGASO (Fig. 3a). For the British Southern Ocean (BSO) cruise, only CCN number concentrations inferred from nss sulfate are available in O'Dowd et al. (1997), not comparable with any of our NCCN. As for aircraft-based CCN measurements, NCCN,0.3 between 17 and 264cm−3, with an average of 123±58cm−3 (mean±SD), are reported in Sanchez et al. (2021) for flights through the MBL between 42.562.1 S and 133.8163.1 E during the Southern Ocean Clouds, Radiation, Aerosol Transport Experimental Study (SOCRATES). The reported concentrations are slightly lower than what was measured in that area during ACE, with values between 48 and 452cm−3 and an average of 178±99cm−3 (mean±SD). Besides the difference in measurement height (SOCRATES: 50 m a.s.l. until height of inversion; ACE: ∼15 m a.s.l.; see Sect. 2), another factor is that measurements are from successive years, with the ACE cruise being in that area during 16 January to 26 January 2017 and the 15 flights during SOCRATES in the period of 15 January to 25 February 2018.

An overview on the aerosol particle hygroscopicity parameter, κ, observed during Legs 1–3 is given in Fig. 3b. Leg-wise averages of the hourly available κ values per SS are given as median values and respective IQRs because the frequency distributions of κ(SS) in Fig. 4b (introduced later) do not resemble log-normal distributions. Error bars include both natural variability and the measurement uncertainty in κ, as described in Sect. 2.2. Median κ values for all legs and SS are spread between 0.3 and 0.7, with a combined variability–uncertainty range (indicated by IQR as error bars) ranging from 0.2 to 0.9. Differences between legs can be seen, with the highest median values at each SS found for Leg 2. Reference values for pure compounds or compound classes are given in Petters and Kreidenweis (2007); a mean κ between 0.1 and 0.2 for organic material, κmean=0.6 for ammonium sulfate, κmean=0.9 for sulfuric acid, and κmean=1.3 for sodium chloride is reported. A typical κ value for ammonium nitrate is omitted in Fig. 3b, as nitrate-containing compounds were found to not play an important role for the CCN population. Additionally, in Schmale et al. (2019) a κ∼0.3 for MSA is hypothesized. The majority of our κ values are above what is given for organic material and below the value given for sulfuric acid, which indicates that the sampled CCN population consists of a variable mixture of organic and inorganic materials. Median κ values for Leg 1 are closest to what is assumed for MSA, while median values for Legs 2 and 3 are closer to the value for pure ammonium sulfate. Looking at size dependency, no clear trend in κ values between different SS is apparent when considering error bars. For the size range between roughly 30 and 110nm probed by the range of SS (Table S1 in the Supplement), the chemical composition appears to be independent of particle size, which further suggests a well-mixed aerosol (or CCN) population. However, when considering median values alone, for SS >0.15% a slight decrease in κ values with increasing SS can be seen for Leg 2. Lower κ values at higher SS are in line with condensable organic vapours contributing to the aerosol chemical composition, while larger, aged particles activating at lower SS are associated with higher κ values (McFiggans et al.2006). Legs 1 and 3 do not feature increasing κ values with decreasing SS, which suggests an internally mixed CCN population.

Comparison to Herenz et al. (2019) shows that our κ values observed over the SO are much lower than the ones reported for the austral summer on continental Antarctica, where κ values at SS =0.1% were found to be in the range between 0.8 and 1.3. This suggests significantly different particle composition at PES compared to the SO. Herenz et al. (2019) interpreted their sampled particles to be of mostly inorganic nature (i.e. sea salt) and therefore assumed a primary, marine origin. Our values, because of the overall small κ values, hint towards a composition dominated by organics. Note that particle sizes between 30 and 110nm were probed with the SS range of our instrument, hinting at the encountered aerosol population being mainly comprised of smaller particles. For SOCRATES, Saliba et al. (2020) report κ values between 0.2 and 0.5 for particles with Dp<100nm. Our κ values in this size range (corresponding to SS >0.2%) lie partially in a similar range (Leg 1) and partially on the upper end (Legs 2 and 3) of the range found during SOCRATES, respectively.

Using a global numerical weather model, simulations of κ values at SS =0.1% for the SO region were presented in Pringle et al. (2010). Model results give values of 0.9±0.1 for the surface layer. Comparison to our results suggests an overestimation of sea salt contribution and/or an underestimation of the presence of organic material in the model. A similar effect is noted in Schmale et al. (2019), when the NCCN,0.2 values measured during ACE are compared to the output of the Global Model of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP). The largest differences between measurements and model output coincided with the highest gaseous MSA concentrations, suggesting an underestimation of CCN from secondary origin. A global model producing κ values for the SO region twice as high compared to what we measured in situ reveals a strong discrepancy in CCN properties and suggests possible model deficiencies in the representation of CCN sources and modelled aerosol–cloud interactions.

Geometric mean values (and respective geometric standard deviation) of NCCN and Dcrit and median values (and respective IQR) of κ for the entire cruise and its legs are summarized in Table S1 in the Supplement.

Probability density functions (PDFs) of normalized frequencies for NCCN(SS) and κ(SS) during Legs 1–3 are given in Fig. 4. PDFs of NCCN (Fig. 4a) show mono-modal distributions for all SS, with the PDF maxima shifting towards higher NCCN with increasing SS, e.g. ∼90cm−3 at 0.15% to ∼210cm−3 at 1%. Comparing the distribution for NCCN,0.2 (blue line in Fig. 4a) with yearly-averaged PDFs from measurement sites around the globe in Schmale et al. (2018), our values show lower number concentrations with a PDF maximum at ∼100cm−3 and share resemblance in terms of number of modes and maximum location with the distribution reported for clean marine conditions (mono-modal, maximum at ∼200cm−3). For the MBL legs of SOCRATES, the PDF for NCCN,0.3 is bi-modal, with peaks at 100 and 150cm−3 (Sanchez et al.2021). In their study, the low concentration mode was associated with precipitation events, effectively removing larger particles. The high concentration mode was associated with atmospheric processes causing particle growth, e.g. (1) oxidation of volatile organic compounds and subsequent condensation or (2) cloud processing.

A change in distribution shape with increasing SS can be seen for PDFs of κ(SS) in Fig. 4b. All five distributions are mono-modal, with maxima between 0.4 and 0.6. PDFs for SS of 0.3 %, 0.5 %, and 1% (green, purple, and orange line, respectively) feature a tail towards smaller values of κ. This occurrence of small particles (activated at high SS) consisting of mainly organic material forms a strong case for the sampled Aitken mode CCN originating from secondary organic aerosol formation and growth processes. The accumulation mode, probed with the measurement at SS =0.15%, shows similar κ values to the Aitken mode (Fig. 4b).

PDFs for all SS other than 0.15% feature a tail towards higher κ values. Such high κ values at high SS seem counter-intuitive and are indicative of highly hygroscopic Aitken mode particles being sampled. A sensitivity study of our methodology with respect to (1) modelling the measurement uncertainty via Monte Carlo simulations (Fig. S3a), (2) consideration of error propagation, and (3) quality of the fitted modes to the PNSD was performed. As κ values were robust against these variations, we conclude that this tail (while counter-intuitive) is not an artefact of our methodology. However, to avoid speculation on the reason, we take a conservative approach in keeping the focus of the interpretation on the median values presented in Fig. 3b.

3.2 Ice-nucleating particles

Time series of NINP(T) for T=-24C (NINP,-24; orange), NINP,-20 (purple), NINP,-16 (blue), NINP,-12 (green), and NINP,-8 (magenta) are given in Fig. 5a–e, respectively. INP number concentrations outside the detectable range (indicated by triangles and estimated as described in Sect. 2.3) are represented in the figure by each filter's lowest (lower detection limit) and highest resolvable concentration value (upper detection limit). For T-12C (Fig. 5a–d), the respective measurement background INP number concentrations are represented via the averaged FBF spectra (dashed–dotted lines), as described in Sect. 2.3. Measurement uncertainties (indicated by error bars) become smaller with decreasing temperature. This is due to (1) increased freezing probability with decreasing temperature and (2) the measurement uncertainty being described by binomial sampling confidence intervals (following Agresti and Coull1998). The combination of both effects results in smaller error bars at lower temperatures. At −12 and −16C, NINP values show the highest variability of around 3 orders of magnitude. At −8 and −20C the variability decreases to about 2 orders of magnitude, while NINP,-24 only varies within 1 order of magnitude. This decrease in the range of values is considered a bias due to NINP being close to or above the upper detection limit. Each of the shown time series of NINP in Fig. 5 contains episodes of elevated INP number concentrations, coinciding with the RV being close to land (grey area; within 200km) and ports (dashed line). During the open-ocean sections of the cruise the majority of data points show concentrations up to 2 orders of magnitude lower (e.g. NINP,-16=0.110m−3). This suggests that elevated atmospheric INP concentrations are connected to terrestrial (including coastal) INP sources. This assumption is supported by the results of the air-mass origin analysis (Sect. 2.4) using the LAGRANTO backward trajectories for ACE provided in Thurnherr et al. (2020). An overview of the results is given in Fig. S6 showing time series of surface contributions to each LV filter. The time series for the surface type contributions to the PBL signal (Fig. S6c) and the contribution of geographical regions (Fig. S6d) show that periods of elevated INP number concentration (Fig. 5) coincide with periods when air masses that passed over African, Australian, and South American land masses or coastal regions were sampled. Contrary to these regions, air masses passing over Antarctica did not show higher NINP than oceanic air masses (Fig. S7).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f05

Figure 5Time series of INP number concentration (NINP) at (a) −24, (b) −20, (c) −16, (d) −12, and (e) −8C from the LV filters sampled during ACE. NINP values outside the detectable range are indicated by downward (upward) pointing triangles if they are below (above) the lower (upper) edge of the detectable range. The legs of ACE (dashed lines) and periods when the RV was close to land (grey area) are indicated. In (a)–(d) the measurement background from averaged spectra of field blank filters (FBFs) is indicated (dashed–dotted lines). NINP values from McCluskey et al. (2018a) are included for reference (blue area). In addition, NINP,-15 values from Bigg (1973) are included in (c) as the range between their 5th and 95th percentile (orange area). A correction of the NINP,-15 values from Bigg (1973) was applied, following the supporting information to McCluskey et al. (2018a).

Download

For comparison, Fig. 5c contains the range between the 5th and 95th percentile of NINP,-15 from Bigg (1973) (orange area). They sampled filters over the SO around Australia, collecting 0.3 and 3m3 of ambient air through a pair of membrane filters. In terms of sampling strategy, our LV sampling of 12m3 through a porous filter over 8 h compares well with the sampling of Bigg (1973). The techniques to measure NINP were, however, different. Filters sampled during ACE were analysed with a freezing array method (Sect. 2.3), while INP contents in Bigg (1973) were analysed by means of a thermal diffusion chamber. In the Supplement of McCluskey et al. (2018a), the effect of background INP concentrations during the study of Bigg (1973) is assessed and a correction proposed (22% lower values). This correction was applied to the values shown in Fig. 5c. The majority of our NINP,-16 measurements are in the open-ocean sectors and clearly below the range of NINP,-15 observed by Bigg (1973). However, the NINP,-16 values larger than 10m−3 at the end of Leg 1, when the RV was in the vicinity of Australia, lie within the range of values given in Bigg (1973).

In McCluskey et al. (2018a) INP measurements from CAPRICORN-I are presented. The range of observed INP concentrations is included in Fig. 5 for comparison. At each temperature, NINP values observed during ACE are at the upper end or higher than concentrations observed during CAPRICORN-I, except at −16C when low concentrations were measured on the open ocean in air masses without terrestrial influence. Differences in sampled geographical area (CAPRICORN-I: 4353 S and 141151 E; this study: 3478 S, circum-Antarctic) and season (CAPRICORN-I: March–April; this study: December–March) could be reasons for the differences in observed INP abundance. Our results are consistent with preliminary results from MARCUS, CAPRICORN-I & II in McFarquhar et al. (2021), where NINP values in the MBL over the SO are shown to exhibit a large variability, very low overall values, and a weak overall latitudinal dependence. Further, the highest concentrations were found near land, and values differed largely from historical measurements (e.g. Bigg1973). Feedback of the Earth's changing climate on INPs in the SO region as a contributor to the observed difference between current and historical observations cannot be ruled out (e.g. Bigg1990). However, potential mechanisms behind such hypothetical feedback have not been identified so far. For completeness, spatial distributions of NINP,-16 from our study and NINP,-15 from Bigg (1973) are shown in Fig. S4c.

Averaging of the NINP at selected temperatures has been performed, in order to showcase typical values for the SO region. A summary of average INP concentrations for Legs 1–3 at selected temperatures is given in Table S2. Two different approaches were used for averaging the INP concentrations of the LV samples. In the first approach only values which are inside the detectable range are considered, and the averages are given as NINP,LV in Table S2. For the second approach, values outside the detectable range (NINP,LV) were included by using a value on the edge of the detectable range instead (see Sect. 2.3). Results of the two approaches differ in mean, median, and geometric mean concentration values by up to ±50%. The largest differences were found at a T of −8 and −24C, where the number of data points outside the detectable range is largest. We report all averaged values with explicit reference to their potential biases.

Average values of NINP,-24, NINP,-20, NINP,-16, NINP,-12, and NINP,-8, sorted by legs of ACE, are given in Fig. 6. Values were determined including the estimates for INP concentrations outside the detectable range (triangles in Fig. 5). As a point of reference for the measurement background, concentrations of the averaged FBF are included (dashed–dotted lines). Differences in median values between different legs are largest at −20C, though still within the respective IQR. Mean values (crosses in Fig. 6) are higher than the median, and outside of the IQR for all temperatures other than −24C.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f06

Figure 6Mean values (crosses) and box-and-whiskers plots indicating the median (horizontal lines), inter-quartile range (boxes), and 10th to 90th percentiles (whiskers) of INP number concentration (NINP) from the LV filters sampled during Leg 1 (green), Leg 2 (orange), and Leg 3 (purple). Averaging was performed by treating zero (infinite) values of NINP at given temperature as values of the lower (upper) limit of the detectable range. In the figure, the measurement background is represented by the averaged spectra of the field blank filters (FBFs; dashed–dotted lines), and the number of data points (n) are indicated.

Download

The air-mass origin for the whole cruise and individual legs are presented in Fig. 7. The average contributions for the whole cruise are dominated by air masses from the open ocean, with contributions of at least 80% and up to 97% (Leg 1). The terrestrial air masses (land and coast; excluding Antarctica) contribute only between 2% (Leg 1) and 12% (Leg 3). Similar leg-wise average contributions could, hypothetically, be a result of the dominant contribution of “open-ocean” conditions during all legs combined with limited INP variability over the entire SO for “open-ocean” conditions.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f07

Figure 7Percents of surface type over-passed by 10 d backward trajectories (see Sect. 2.4 and Text S1 in the Supplement for details). Colour codes for surface types are non-Antarctic land masses (red), non-Antarctic coastal regions or islands (orange), Antarctic continent or coastal regions (ANT; yellow), ice-covered regions (light blue), and open ocean (dark blue). From left to right, the different surface contributions to the air masses are shown for the entire circumnavigation (Legs 1–3), separated by leg (see Fig. 1), and cases of NINP,-20 below (“low”) or above 40m−3 (“high”), NINP,-16 below/above 10m−3, and NINP,-12 below/above 4m−3 are analogous to ranges indicated in the respective PDF (see Fig. 8b–d). The number of trajectory clusters (n) are indicated in the figure. Trajectory maps for ACE are available at an hourly resolution from Thurnherr et al. (2020).

Download

PDFs of NINP at selected temperatures are shown in Fig. 8. NINP(T) values outside of the detectable range are not considered for the PDF. As an indication for the detectable range, averages for the upper and lower concentration limit are indicated in Fig. 8c–e (dashed line). Interpretation of the PDFs for NINP,-8 and NINP,-24 is omitted due to the low number of samples compared to other temperatures and concentrations being close to the FBFs, respectively. Also, for the other temperatures, the overall number of samples considered in the PDF is small. Hence, the following discussion has to be considered semi-quantitative in consequence. The NINP,-12 and NINP,-16 PDFs (Fig. 8c and d) are tri-modal, and the NINP,-20 PDF (Fig. 8b) is bi-modal. The lowest concentration mode for NINP,-12 and NINP,-16 contains concentrations below 0.2m−3, which are on the lower boundary of the detectable range. Attributing these concentrations to a source or geographical origin is ambiguous when considering the FBF as a point of reference for the background freezing signal. FBF concentrations are 0.08 and 0.59m−3 for −12 and −16C, respectively (Table S3). We therefore only discuss the two highest concentration modes in the following. The second (first) mode of NINP,-12 and NINP,-16 (NINP,-20), referred to as “low concentration mode” in the following, covers a range of concentration values (e.g. NINP,-16=0.310m−3) encountered mainly during the open-ocean sections of the cruise (Fig. 5b–d). The analysis of the air-mass origin in Fig. 7 shows that air masses reaching the RV during the sampling of this mode contained mainly open-ocean signal (∼90%) and only small contributions from either Antarctic (6%), marine ice-covered regions (MIZ/sea ice; 2%), or coastal regions (1%). In consequence, we interpret this mode to be dominated by INPs of marine origin potentially including some long-range-transported terrestrial or coastal INPs. This mode is therefore labelled as “open ocean” (light blue area) in Fig. 8b–d. Moallemi et al. (2021) show that fluorescent primary biological aerosol particles (PBAPs) measured during the open-ocean sections of ACE originate mainly from SSA. PBAPs were found to act as INPs in several studies in marine regions of the Northern Hemisphere (e.g. McCluskey et al.2018b; Hartmann et al.2021), and we assume the same to be the case for the Southern Hemisphere. Therefore, we conclude PBAP from SSA to be a potential source for the INPs measured on the open-ocean sections of the cruise.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f08

Figure 8Normalized probability density functions (solid black line) and geometric mean values (dotted black line) for INP number concentrations (NINP) at (a) −24, (b) −20, (c) −16, (d) −12, and (e) −8C from the LV filters sampled during ACE. For reference, NINP,-16, NINP,-12, and NINP,-8 for Cabo Verde (North Atlantic; Welti et al.2018) are given in (c)–(e), respectively (blue). Additionally, NINP,-15 from Bigg (1973) for data points south of 43 S (orange) is given for comparison. A classification of modes based on sampling location and air-mass origin is given (yellow area: terrestrial/coastal; light blue area: open ocean). Averages of the upper (dark red) and lower concentration limit (dark blue) are indicated by dashed lines. The number of data points (n) are indicated in the figure.

Download

The high concentration mode in the PDF of NINP,-12, NINP,-16, and NINP,-20 consists of values (e.g. NINP,-16=10100m−3) measured close to land (Fig. 5b–d). This mode has a greater terrestrial and coastal influence (combined ∼35%) than the low concentration mode, based on the air-mass origin analysis (Fig. 7). In consequence, the high concentration mode is labelled “terrestrial/coastal” in Fig. 8b–d (yellow area).

In Fig. 8c, a PDF of NINP,-15 from Bigg (1973) is included (orange line). Here, only a subset of the total of 126 data points from Bigg (1973) is shown, containing the 58 data points south of 43 S, mimicking the latitudinal range of the ACE cruise for a better comparison (Fig. S4). Differences between NINP,-16 from this study and NINP,-15 from Bigg (1973) are clearly visible, with over 1 order of magnitude lower maximum NINP observed in our study. Agreement of their values is highest with the subset of our observations in the proximity to land. In a recent study, Cornwell et al. (2020) have shown that re-emission of dust particles from sea water into the atmosphere is possible and that the re-emitted particles retained their ability to act as INPs. However, quantifying the contribution of this potential source is not possible with our data set.

Welti et al. (2018) presented PDFs of NINP(T) based on filters sampled at a fixed location on the Cabo Verde island of Sao Vicente, over a 4-year period (2009–2013). The PDFs comprise changes in season, air-mass origin, and bulk aerosol composition. The respective PDFs of NINP,-16, NINP,-12, and NINP,-8 are included for comparison in Fig. 8c–e. Welti et al. (2018) found log-normal distributions for all temperatures, and attributed them to random dilution during transport, indicating a lack of strong local sources. In other words, the PDFs are thought to represent background INP concentrations at the Cabo Verde islands. Comparing PDFs, it can be seen that for NINP,-16 the bulk of our values is below what is reported in Welti et al. (2018), shifted by roughly 1 order of magnitude towards lower concentrations. For NINP,-12 a respective shift is not as clearly seen; however, a tendency towards more frequent occurrence of higher concentrations compared to our study is obvious. For NINP,-8 this tendency is not visible anymore. The difference between the PDFs given in Welti et al. (2018) and our study for NINP,-12 and NINP,-16 illustrates the latitudinal difference in marine NINP with lower concentrations in the SO compared to the Atlantic.

The temperature spectra of NINP for all LV filters sampled during ACE are given in Fig. S8a. The highest freezing onset was found at −4C. Between filters, NINP is spread over up to 3 orders of magnitude at individual temperatures. This mirrors what can be seen in the PDF in Fig. 8. A typical, steady increase in NINP with decreasing temperature (1 order of magnitude per 5K) can be observed for the majority of filters and the averaged FBF's curve (pink line). At higher temperatures (>-20C) a shoulder in the INP spectra of a number of filters is apparent. This feature is unlike those previously mentioned, steady increase in NINP. A high concentration of INPs above −15C is typically associated with a signal of a biological INP source mixed with a mineral or less efficient INP source (e.g. Creamean et al.2019). In the range of −12.5 to −22.5C, only the lowest curves of our spectra lie within the range observed by McCluskey et al. (2018a), who observed even lower NINP over the SO.

In order to test the hypothesis that typical marine INPs (e.g. SSA) were encountered for the majority of the cruise, concentration values were normalized. This was achieved by dividing NINP by the particle surface area concentration or the particle volume concentration derived from the total aerosol particle number size distributions under the assumption of spherical particles (see Sect. 2.3). Normalization enables comparison of INP properties across different studies, which can include different NINP derivation approaches or sampled particle size ranges, independent of NINP. The resulting spectra of ice-active number site density, ns, and volume site density, nv, are given in Fig. S8b and c. Values of ns spread over 4 orders of magnitude (0.11000cm−2) in the observed temperature range. For comparison, values from two laboratory experiments are included in Fig. S8b, which focused on sampling of artificially generated SSA and assessing its ice activity (DeMott et al.2016; Mitts et al.2021). The results from DeMott et al. (2016) span a wider range of ns and T than the ACE data, while values from Mitts et al. (2021) overlap with the open-ocean-sampled filters from ACE. Field measurements from CAPRICORN-I (McCluskey et al.2018a) showing a large variability in ns are included for comparison. Contrary to NINP (Fig. S8a), ns values from ACE lie within the lower end of what is reported from CAPRICORN-I. This indicates observation of a similar or more ice-active particle population during CAPRICORN-I compared to ACE. The ranges of nv reported in Mitts et al. (2021) are included in Fig. S8c for comparison. The range overlaps with the lower range of the values from ACE. In conclusion, the strong overlap between ice-active site density profiles from ACE (derived from NINP) and studies of artificial SSA (e.g. DeMott et al.2016; Mitts et al.2021) supports the idea that low NINP measured on the open ocean might be driven by SSA.

As mentioned in Sect. 2.3, HV filters were also analysed for INPs, but due to better higher data coverage (LV: nfilter=253; HV: nfilter=79) we focused on the LV samples. For the sake of completeness we give in Fig. S5 the additional INP spectra determined from HV samples (DHA-80 sampler). Compared to the LV results in Fig. S8a, the determined NINP(T) are higher and in a narrower range. LV and HV samples differ in sample collection interval and filter material (LV: poly-carbonate pore filter, 200nm pore size; HV: quartz fibre filter). Concerning collection intervals, continuous sampling over 8 h intervals were chosen for the LV filters to resolve diurnal NINP variations (non-detected). HV filters were collected during intervals of 24h, interrupted by breaks due to the automatic shutdown to avoid contamination from ship exhaust. Possible low biases of NINP for higher sampled volumes have been discussed in Bigg et al. (1963) and Mossop and Thorndike (1966) but do not reflect the trend found for our two sampling techniques. There could be an averaging effect from the longer sampling interval for the HV filters, when sampling from an unevenly distributed INP population. However, such effects require further investigation. The differences in filter material could be another factor but are in contrast to Wex et al. (2020) finding good agreement between quartz fibre and poly-carbonate filters for identical sampling intervals. The higher background INP levels for the HV filters, indicated by higher NINP,FBF compared to the LV sampling (Table S3), hints towards a limited ability of the HV sampling to measure lower INP number concentrations and in consequence overall higher measured INP number concentrations. Contamination from ship exhaust should not effect INP analysis results (see Appendix C in Welti et al.2020) as exhaust particles are not ice-active in the investigated temperature range. However, deactivation of some INPs due to exhaust contamination cannot be ruled out.

3.3 Analysis of sodium and MSA

Information on the aerosol chemical composition is widely used to infer the origin of the sampled aerosol particles. To aid the characterization of CCN and INP sources over the SO, sampled HV filters were analysed regarding the aerosol load and the atmospheric particle mass concentrations of sodium and MSA, two compounds known to be unaffected by stack exhaust.

On average, 32.4µg m−3 (median; IQR: 26.149.6µg m−3) of PM10 was observed during ACE (Table S5). Leg 1 exhibits a higher median value (42.4µg m−3) compared to Legs 2 and 3 (31.1 and 33.3µg m−3). Note that contrary to sodium and MSA (see Sect. 2.3), an influence of the RV's ship exhaust on PM10 mass cannot be ruled out. However, the quantification of this potential influence is beyond the scope of this study.

Averaging sodium mass concentrations for the whole cruise gives a median value of 2.8µg m−3, with an IQR from 1.8 to 3.9µg m−3 (Table S5). Higher median values for Legs 1 and 3 compared to Leg 2 are found, similar to what is observed for PM10. This is consistent with Blanchard and Woodcock (1957) showing SSA production to be driven by wave breaking and Schmale et al. (2019) showing on average higher wind speeds and significant wave heights for the legs with extended open-ocean sections (Legs 1 and 3). For the 34th Chinese National Antarctic and Arctic Research Expeditions (CHINARE) cruise over the SO (4076 S, 170 E–110 W) in February–March 2018, Yan et al. (2020c) report an average sodium mass concentration of 0.8±0.8µg m−3 (mean±SD). During Leg 2 of ACE, the part of the cruise that has the largest geographical overlap with the region covered during CHINARE, the median sodium mass concentration was 1.8µg m−3, i.e. more than 2 times higher than that observed during CHINARE.

MSA mass concentrations were generally 2 orders and 1 order of magnitude lower than the ones for PM10 and sodium, respectively. Consequently, values are reported in ng m−3 in the following. A median mass concentration of 102ng m−3 for the entire ACE cruise was found (Table S5), with highly variable values ranging from 1 to 455ng m−3. Differences in median values between legs are very small. The highest mass concentration of 455ng m−3 was observed on the Ross Sea close to the Antarctic coast (Leg 2). Davison et al. (1996) report for south of the Falkland islands in November 1992 a mean MSA mass concentration of 27ng m−3, with values ranging up to 99ng m−3. During ACE in late February of 2017, values around 120ng m−3 were found in this part of the SO between 7036 W. Besides long-term trends over the last two decades, the difference of up to 1 order of magnitude might be due to the difference in season, with higher mass concentrations for ACE due to increased marine biological activity in early fall compared to late fall for Davison et al. (1996). Another factor is the large degree of variability in MSA abundance across the SO, depending on season and location as illustrated in Castebrunet et al. (2009), with values during ACE on the higher end of the scale.

For a number of CHINARE Antarctic cruises, MSA mass concentrations are reported. Yan et al. (2020b) report for the polynya regions of the Ross Sea (5078 S, 160185 E) an average value of 44±22ng m−3 (mean±SD) for December of 2017 and 39±28ng m−3 for January 2018. The maximum mass concentration of 211ng m−3 was reported for the Ross Sea, at around 6467 S, connected to the position of the dynamic sea ice edge at ∼64 S. Here, with the start of the sea ice melting in early December, the release of iron from ice into the water can spur marine microbial activity (Turner et al.2004), which may result in an increased DMS emission and consequently secondary MSA production. Consistently, the maximum MSA mass concentration during ACE was encountered near the sea ice edge (∼70 S) of the Ross Sea in early February 2017. For the Amundsen Sea (4076 S, 170 E–110 W) in February–March 2018 (34th CHINARE cruise), average MSA mass concentrations of 31±17ng m−3 are reported in Yan et al. (2020c). The ACE cruise went on the Amundsen Sea in early February 2017, and MSA mass concentrations in this region show a median value of 210ng m−3. Overall, a difference in average MSA mass concentrations of up to 1 order of magnitude between our study and the CHINARE cruises becomes apparent. One factor might be the usage of different instrumentation and analysis techniques. Another factor causing year-to-year variability could be the presence of sea ice. Schmale et al. (2019) note a significantly lower sea ice extent on the Amundsen Sea during ACE when compared to climatological records. The lack of a sea ice cover enables marine activity and the emission of aerosol precursors into the air. Additionally, variations in atmospheric MSA sink strength are a potential contributor to variability in observed MSA mass concentrations. For example, MSA is efficiently removed from the atmosphere by precipitation. In the SO, rain events are associated with frontal zones. For South Georgia, a sub-micron (PM1) MSA mass concentration of up to 200ng m−3 was reported in Schmale et al. (2013). During ACE, the RV was on station close to this island in the beginning of March 2017, with MSA mass concentrations around 75ng m−3 during these days, underlining the high variability in MSA abundance over the SO.

3.4 Correlation analysis

The results of a correlation analysis performed with a selection of variables gathered during ACE is given as a Spearman rank correlation matrix in Fig. 9.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9721/2022/acp-22-9721-2022-f09

Figure 9Spearman rank correlation matrix of quantities directly measured or derived from measurements during ACE. From the 24h long HV sampling, PM10 mass and mass concentrations of particulate sodium and MSA are included. INP number concentrations at temperatures of −8, −12, −16, −20, and −24C (INP(T)) are included from the LV filters, sampling for 8 h. Here, the estimates for INP concentrations above and below the detection limit are included. From hourly smoothed particle number size distributions, the total particle number concentration (Ntotal), respective three modes (Nmode1, Nmode2, and Nmode3), and the number concentration of particles larger 500nm in diameter (N>500) are included. CCN number concentration at 0.15 %, 0.2 %, 0.3 %, 0.5 %, and 1% supersaturation (CCN(SS)) and derived aerosol particle hygroscopicity parameter (κ(SS)) are included. Additionally, daily-averaged wind speed at 10 m a.s.l. (U10) and in-water concentrations of chlorophyll-a (Chl-awater) and dimethyl sulfide (DMSwater) are used. Positive correlation between two quantities indicates a similar trend over time, while an opposing behaviour is indicated by a negative correlation coefficient.

Download

With regards to the results of our in situ aerosol particle measurement, Ntotal was found to be correlated with Nmode1 (correlation coefficient ρ=0.9, p<.001) and NCCN,1.0 (ρ=0.8, p<.001). This mirrors the behaviour these quantities show in Fig. 2a and is indicative for the importance of Aitken mode particles for the total particle and CCN number concentrations at high SS.

Correlations between sodium and mode 3 (ρ=0.7, p<.001) as well as PM10 (ρ=0.7, p<.001) concentrations were found. As sodium is used as a conservative tracer for primary aerosol particles of marine origin (Legrand and Pasteur1998), especially sea salt, the correlations suggest that SSA significantly contributes to both PM10 and the coarse mode. However, we do not find a significant correlation between wind speed (U10) and sodium mass concentration. Bates et al. (1998) attributed this kind of observation to the fact that the instantaneous wind speed at the RV is not representative for the conditions an air parcel experienced prior to its measurement. Other studies in the SO region found positive but non-linear connections between wind speed and sodium mass concentrations (e.g. Schmale et al.2013; Yan et al.2020a; Landwehr et al.2021). Another factor might be that the wind speed was averaged over 24h in order to match the temporal resolution of the filter sampling. Possible short-term effects might be lost due to the averaging process. Note that the wind conditions encountered during ACE are characterized by median values of 9.88 (Leg 1), 6.62 (Leg 2), and 8.85m s−1 (Leg 3; Schmale et al.2019), and the relative variability of the daily U10 averages is roughly ±70%.

The particle concentration of mode 2 shows a positive correlation (ρ≈0.7) with NCCN at SS≤0.5%, pointing at the importance of accumulation mode particles for the CCN population at atmospherically relevant SS. No correlation was found between NCCN and mode 3 number concentrations, suggesting little influence of SSA on the CCN population probed with our SS.

No correlation between CCN number concentration and MSA mass concentration was found. The lack of a correlation in our analysis seemingly contradicts findings of previous studies (e.g. Ayers and Gras1991). This might be a smearing effect due to averaging, since the highest NCCN values (Sect. 3.1) coincide with the highest MMSA values (Sect. 3.3) when the cruise was in the vicinity of the Antarctic coast (Leg 2). However, finding no correlation does not imply that there could not be a connection under specific conditions and shorter timescales.

Furthermore, no correlation between NCCN and in-water Chl-a or DMS concentration could be found, which is in line with Ayers et al. (1997). Considering the long process chain from in-water DMS to particles of CCN size, this is not surprising. The argument in Bates et al. (1998), that conditions at measurement point may not be representative for the conditions encountered by the air-parcel during transport, is applicable here as well.

Looking at κ values, high correlation between different levels of supersaturation (except SS =1%) could be found, mirroring the lack of size-dependent composition presented in Sect. 3.1. Further, no correlation between sodium concentration and κ values was found. This indicates that the chemical information for CCN between 30 and 110nm approximated by κ is not connected to the mass-dominating, seemingly larger particles represented by sodium and MSA. This again supports the observation of SSA particles not significantly contributing to the CCN population, as SSA dominates the sampled particle mass but not the particle number.

No correlations with any other variable was found for the MSA mass concentration. This includes the absence of the correlation between MSA and in-water DMS concentration. Although MSA is known to form exclusively from oxidation of DMS in the atmosphere (Sorooshian et al.2007), a direct correlation is not expected. In-water DMS concentrations are not representative of DMS concentrations in the atmosphere (Ayers et al.1997), and DMS has an atmospheric lifetime of several days over the SO (Chen et al.2018).

INP concentrations measured at a temperature difference (ΔT) of 4K showed positive correlation (ρ>0.6). This could indicate a common source that contributes INPs over a wide T range. For ΔT≥8K, only NINP,-12 and NINP,-20 show a correlation (ρ=0.7, p<.001). This correlation between NINP at −12 and −20C points at the importance of long-range transport and mixing influencing the INP population in the same way at both temperatures (Welti et al.2018). The in-water Chl-a concentrations were also included in the correlation analysis, as they can be used as a proxy for biological activity (e.g. McCluskey et al.2018a). However, no direct correlation between NINP and Chl-a was found. This suggests that the measured INPs are not originating from local biogenic sources but does not exclude a time-shifted response. In DeMott et al. (2010) a parameterization for NINP is given that is based on N>500 for terrestrial conditions. We find no respective correlation between our measured NINP and N>500, underlining that a parameterization based solely on N>500 is not applicable for a marine environment as the SO region. A number of additional INP parameterizations are available in the literature that include the normalization of the INP number concentration to the particle surface (e.g. McCluskey et al.2018a) or volume (e.g. Mitts et al.2021). Both approaches of normalization were performed with the ACE data (Fig. S8b and c) and show good agreement with previous studies of marine environments. However, as discussed below the absence of a correlation between NINP and neither PM10 nor Ntotal shows that both denominators (particle volume or surface) for the normalization are not directly linked to the INPs. No significant correlations were found between NINP and PM10, Ntotal, or any other physical and chemical properties measured. This clearly shows that deriving INP-related properties from total number-based or total mass-based aerosol properties without considering air-mass history might lead to results not representative for atmospheric NINP. Instead, INP number concentrations must be compared with results from methods selective to individual, rare particle types that could act as INPs, and the data must be segregated in terms of air-mass properties or some other, more specific INP tracers such as mineral dust or proteins, to further elucidate INP sources.

4 Summary

During the austral summer of 2016–2017, we performed in situ measurements of PM40 and filter sampling of PM10 aerosol particles for characterizing the physical and chemical properties of aerosol particles over the Southern Ocean (SO) during the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE). We focused on the abundance and properties of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice-nucleating particles (INPs). An air-mass origin and a correlation analysis was performed to identify CCN and INP sources and interpret possible links between different aerosol physico-chemical parameters.

For the in situ measured aerosol particles, bi-modal aerosol particle number size distributions (PNSDs) with a distinct Hoppel minimum between 50 and 80nm were found (Fig. 2a). When the RV was close to continental land masses (including Antarctica), increased total particle (Ntotal) and CCN number concentrations (NCCN) were observed (Fig. 2b). The absolute difference between Ntotal and NCCN varied during the cruise and was associated with particle activation in the Aitken mode size range. This indicates an importance of the Aitken mode for the CCN population and cloud formation. Generally, NCCN values spanned 2 orders of magnitude (e.g. at 0.3 % supersaturation (SS) from roughly 3 to 590cm−3), with the respective probability density functions (PDFs) sharing resemblance with distributions in Schmale et al. (2018) for clean marine conditions of other locations around the globe. Averages of NCCN per leg (Fig. 3a) showed little difference between the legs and compare well (<30% percentage difference) with measurements of previous studies in the SO region. Values of the aerosol hygroscopicity parameter, κ, were found to be in the range between 0.2 and 0.9, corresponding to mixtures with different amounts of organic and inorganic materials. Our κ values are about a factor of 2 lower than what was measured, e.g. over continental Antarctica or modelled for the SO region. Average values of κ were found to be independent of SS and thus particle size (Fig. 3b), indicating in first approximation an internally mixed CCN population in the Aitken and accumulation modes. The PDF of κ values was found to be mono-modal for SS =0.15% (Fig. 4c), while for higher SS tails towards smaller κ values were found, hinting at an increasing amount of organics in the smaller Aitken mode particles. In addition, tails towards higher κ values at SS >0.15% indicate the occurrence of highly hygroscopic Aitken mode particles. The correlation analysis showed little-to-no connection between the CCN number concentration and quantities from the offline filter analysis, e.g. the mass concentrations of sodium and methanesulfonic acid(MSA; Fig. 9). This is due to the fact that the in situ measured aerosol properties considered here are governed by particle number, while the quantities determined from the filter samples (except for INPs) are governed by particle mass. This often implies a focus on different size ranges. However, a connection was found through a positive correlation between total particle number concentration of the coarse mode and sodium mass concentration (Fig. 9). In addition, the absence of correlation between the sodium mass concentration and CCN number concentration clearly implies that SSA is not an important source of CCN. This agrees well with previous findings, e.g. in Schmale et al. (2019).

Analysis of filter-collected atmospheric aerosol samples for INPs yielded temperature-dependent number concentrations (NINP) between −4 and −27C (Fig. S8a). Typically, the NINP from one filter sample increased by 3 orders of magnitude within steps of −10C. Time series of NINP showed elevated values coinciding with the research vessel (RV) being in the proximity of land (Fig. 5). This points towards terrestrial and/or coastal sources influencing the INP population. The air-mass origin (Fig. S6) underlines this finding. The comparison with other studies shows that the concentrations observed during ACE are lower than what was observed previously over the SO (Bigg1973), while being on the upper end of what is reported in McCluskey et al. (2018a) for a specific sector of the SO in March–April 2016 (Figs. 5 and S8a). The PDFs for NINP(T) shows two concentration modes at −20, −16, and −12C (Fig. 8). The analysis of backward trajectories indicates that low concentrations are associated with air masses from the open ocean and from Antarctica, while the air masses transporting higher NINP passed over (non-Antarctic) land. INP spectra (Fig. S8a) for the most part of the cruise feature a steady increase in INP number concentration with decreasing temperature. Features in the spectra of increased NINP at warm temperatures indicate warm-temperature INPs which are connected to biological origin (e.g. Creamean et al.2019). The correlation analysis indicates correlations between NINP values in the temperature range between −12 and −24C. We interpret this signal as indication that mixed long-range-transported populations of INPs of biogenic origin (T>-20C) and mineral dust (T<-20C) were present. Indications for local INP sources are very rare, and no correlation between NINP and Chl-a, as proxy for biological activity in the ocean, was found.

The results for the analysis of sodium and MSA in the sampled PM10 show that during ACE we encountered (mass-wise) a marine aerosol environment with typical SSA signals. Sodium mass concentrations showed a median of 2.8µg m−3 (Table S5). A moderate positive correlation between sodium and PM10 (Fig. 9) underlined the importance of SSA for the sampled mass. During ACE, MSA mass concentrations were found to be highly variable, with a median of 102ng m−3 (Table S5). Values were up to 1 order of magnitude higher than in comparable studies and seasonal variation seems to be one reason. The location of peak MSA mass concentrations near the sea ice edge is consistent with other studies. Similar patterns in the occurrence of maximum MSA mass concentrations and the hypothesized κ value for MSA were found. However, a clear connection between MSA mass concentration and CCN number concentrations or κ values did not show in our correlation analysis. With our data covering all sectors of the SO and the rich variety of atmospheric conditions encountered during the cruise, we conclude that such a connection might only be event-based.

The presented data set gives a unique, circum-Antarctic view on CCN and INP abundance, their properties, and indications towards aerosol particle origin. Our data give insights into the conditions over the SO regarding cloud-relevant aerosol particles, compare well with previous studies, and have already found use in climate modelling (Regayre et al.2020) and remote sensing applications (Efraim et al.2020).

Data availability

The ACE data are available through web portal Zenodo, with INP data from LV sampling under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311665 (Tatzelt et al.2020a; version 1.1), CCN data under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4415495 (Tatzelt et al.2020b; version 1.1), and data on MSA and sodium under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3922147 (Tatzelt et al.2020c; version 1.0). Backward-trajectories for ACE are available under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031705 (Thurnherr et al.2020; version 1.0). The distance between the RV and the nearest land mass for ACE is available under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3832045 (Volpi et al.2020; version 1.0). INP data from HV sampling are available from the authors upon request. Further data sets are available at relevant citations within the article.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9721-2022-supplement.

Author contributions

CT performed the analysis and interpretation with contributions from SH, AW, JS, and FS. CT, SH, and FS wrote the article. SH, AW, AB, JS, and MH performed the measurements during ACE. MGB and FS provided the in situ instrumentation. MvP provided the analysis of sodium and MSA of the filter samples. RLM provided the PNSD data. All authors contributed to the writing and review of the article.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the PIs of ACE's project 1, David Antoine and Sandy Thomalla, for the chlorophyll a data. All data processing was performed using Python (version 2.7.14) on Ipython (version 5.4.1; Pérez and Granger2007). The correlation analysis was made possible by the spearmanr function of the scipy.stats package for Python. All figures in this study were created using the Matplotlib package for Python (Hunter2007). The authors would like to thank the editor Andreas Petzold and acknowledge the constructive comments from the two anonymous referees.

Financial support

ACE was a scientific expedition carried out under the auspices of the Swiss Polar Institute, supported by funding from the ACE Foundation and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the framework of the priority programme “Antarctic Research with comparative investigations in the Arctic sea ice areas” (SPP 1158 (grant no. STR 453/12-1)). EU FP7 (“BACCHUS” (grant no. 603445)) is acknowledged for financial support. Julia Schmale holds the Ingvar Kamrad Chair for Extreme Environments Research. Andrea Baccarini was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 169090).

The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Andreas Petzold and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Abram, N. J., Thomas, E. R., McConnell, J. R., Mulvaney, R., Bracegirdle, T. J., Sime, L. C., and Aristarain, A. J.: Ice core evidence for a 20th century decline of sea ice in the Bellingshausen Sea, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D23101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014644, 2010. a

Agresti, A. and Coull, B. A.: Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions, Am. Stat., 52, 119–126, https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1998.10480550, 1998. a, b

Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a, b

Ayers, G. and Gras, J.: Seasonal relationship between cloud condensation nuclei and aerosol methanesulphonate in marine air, Nature, 353, 834–835, https://doi.org/10.1038/353834a0, 1991. a

Ayers, G., Cainey, J., Gillett, R., and Ivey, J.: Atmospheric sulphur and cloud condensation nuclei in marine air in the Southern Hemisphere, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 352, 203–211, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0015, 1997. a, b

Baccarini, A., Dommen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Henning, S., Modini, R. L., Gysel-Beer, M., Baltensperger, U., and Schmale, J.: Low-Volatility Vapors and New Particle Formation Over the Southern Ocean During the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035126, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035126, 2021. a

Bates, T. S., Kapustin, V. N., Quinn, P. K., Covert, D. S., Coffman, D. J., Mari, C., Durkee, P. A., De Bruyn, W. J., and Saltzman, E. S.: Processes controlling the distribution of aerosol particles in the lower marine boundary layer during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16369–16383, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03720, 1998. a, b

Bigg, E.: Ice nucleus concentrations in remote areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1153–1157, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<1153:INCIRA>2.0.CO;2, 1973. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s

Bigg, E.: Long-term trends in ice nucleus concentrations, Atmos. Res., 25, 409–415, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(90)90025-8, 1990. a

Bigg, E., Mossop, S., Meade, R., and Thorndike, N.: The measurement of ice nucleus concentrations by means of Millipore filters, J. Appl. Meteorol., 2, 266–269, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1963)002<0266:TMOINC>2.0.CO;2, 1963. a

Blanchard, D. and Woodcock, A.: Bubble formation and modification in the sea and its meteorological significance, Tellus, 9, 145–158, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v9i2.9094, 1957. a

Carslaw, K., Lee, L., Reddington, C., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Forster, P., Mann, G., Spracklen, D., Woodhouse, M., Regayre, L., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12674, 2013. a

Castebrunet, H., Martinerie, P., Genthon, C., and Cosme, E.: A three-dimensional model study of methanesulphonic acid to non sea salt sulphate ratio at mid and high-southern latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9449–9469, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9449-2009, 2009. a

Chen, Q., Sherwen, T., Evans, M., and Alexander, B.: DMS oxidation and sulfur aerosol formation in the marine troposphere: a focus on reactive halogen and multiphase chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13617–13637, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13617-2018, 2018. a, b

Conen, F., Henne, S., Morris, C. E., and Alewell, C.: Atmospheric ice nucleators active -12C can be quantified on PM10 filters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 321–327, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-321-2012, 2012. a

Cornwell, G. C., Sultana, C. M., Prank, M., Cochran, R. E., Hill, T. C., Schill, G. P., DeMott, P. J., Mahowald, N., and Prather, K. A.: Ejection of dust from the ocean as a potential source of marine ice nucleating particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033073, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033073, 2020. a

Covert, D. S., Kapustin, V. N., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: New particle formation in the marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 20581–20589, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02074, 1992. a

Creamean, J. M., Mignani, C., Bukowiecki, N., and Conen, F.: Using freezing spectra characteristics to identify ice-nucleating particle populations during the winter in the Alps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8123–8140, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8123-2019, 2019. a, b

Curran, M. A., van Ommen, T. D., Morgan, V. I., Phillips, K. L., and Palmer, A. S.: Ice core evidence for Antarctic sea ice decline since the 1950s, Science, 302, 1203–1206, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087888, 2003. a

Dall’Osto, M., Ovadnevaite, J., Paglione, M., Beddows, D. C., Ceburnis, D., Cree, C., Cortés, P., Zamanillo, M., Nunes, S. O., Pérez, G. L., Ortega-Retuerta, E., Emelianov, M., Vaqué, D., Marrasé, C., Estrada, M., Sala, M. M., Vidal, M., Fitzsimons, M. F., Beale, R., Airs, R., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Harrison, R. M., O’Dowd, C., and Simó, R.: Antarctic sea ice region as a source of biogenic organic nitrogen in aerosols, Sci. Rep., 7, 6047, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06188-x, 2017. a

Davison, B., O'Dowd, C., Hewitt, C., Smith, M., Harrison, R., Peel, D., Wolf, E., Mulvaney, R., Schwikowski, M., and Baltenspergert, U.: Dimethyl sulfide and its oxidation products in the atmosphere of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1895–1906, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00428-9, 1996. a, b

de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E. R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349, 2011. a

DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D.: Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010. a

DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5797–5803, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112, 2016. a, b, c

Dusek, U., Frank, G., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and Andreae, M. O.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261, 2006. a

Efraim, A., Rosenfeld, D., Schmale, J., and Zhu, Y.: Satellite retrieval of cloud condensation nuclei concentrations in marine stratocumulus by using clouds as CCN chambers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032409, 2020. a

Fossum, K. N., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Dall’Osto, M., Marullo, S., Bellacicco, M., Simó, R., Liu, D., Flynn, M., Zuend, A., and O'Dowd, C.: Summertime Primary and Secondary Contributions to Southern Ocean Cloud Condensation Nuclei, Sci. Rep., 8, 13844, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32047-4, 2018. a, b, c, d

Gong, X., Wex, H., van Pinxteren, M., Triesch, N., Fomba, K. W., Lubitz, J., Stolle, C., Robinson, T.-B., Müller, T., Herrmann, H., and Stratmann, F.: Characterization of aerosol particles at Cabo Verde close to sea level and at the cloud level – Part 2: Ice-nucleating particles in air, cloud and seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1451–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1451-2020, 2020. a

Gras, J. L. and Keywood, M.: Cloud condensation nuclei over the Southern Ocean: wind dependence and seasonal cycles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4419–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4419-2017, 2017. a, b

Gysel, M. and Stratmann, F.: WP3-NA3: In-situ chemical, physical and optical properties of aerosols, Deliverable D3.11: Standardized protocol for CCN measurements, https://actris-ecac.eu/pluginAppObj/pluginAppObj_230_192/WP3_D3.13_M24.pdf (last access: 6 July 2022), 2014. a

Hamilton, D. S., Lee, L. A., Pringle, K. J., Reddington, C. L., Spracklen, D. V., and Carslaw, K. S.: Occurrence of pristine aerosol environments on a polluted planet, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 18466–18471, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415440111, 2014. a

Hartmann, M., Blunier, T., Brügger, S. O., Schmale, J., Schwikowski, M., Vogel, A., Wex, H., and Stratmann, F.: Variation of ice nucleating particles in the European Arctic over the last centuries, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4007–4016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082311, 2019. a

Hartmann, M., Gong, X., Kecorius, S., van Pinxteren, M., Vogl, T., Welti, A., Wex, H., Zeppenfeld, S., Herrmann, H., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Terrestrial or marine – indications towards the origin of ice-nucleating particles during melt season in the European Arctic up to 83.7 N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11613–11636, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11613-2021, 2021. a

Herenz, P., Wex, H., Mangold, A., Laffineur, Q., Gorodetskaya, I. V., Fleming, Z. L., Panagi, M., and Stratmann, F.: CCN measurements at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica research station during three austral summers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 275–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-275-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g

Hoppel, W., Frick, G., and Larson, R.: Effect of nonprecipitating clouds on the aerosol size distribution in the marine boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 125–128, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00125, 1986. a

Humphries, R. S., Keywood, M. D., Gribben, S., McRobert, I. M., Ward, J. P., Selleck, P., Taylor, S., Harnwell, J., Flynn, C., Kulkarni, G. R., Mace, G. G., Protat, A., Alexander, S. P., and McFarquhar, G.: Southern Ocean latitudinal gradients of cloud condensation nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12757–12782, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12757-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f

Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007. a

IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2013. a

Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S. N.: An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 229–238, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229543, 2004. a

Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets, T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152, 1936. a

Kristensen, T. B., Müller, T., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Hartmann, M., Prospero, J. M., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Properties of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) in the trade wind marine boundary layer of the western North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2675–2688, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2675-2016, 2016. a

Landwehr, S., Thurnherr, I., Cassar, N., Gysel-Beer, M., and Schmale, J.: Using global reanalysis data to quantify and correct airflow distortion bias in shipborne wind speed measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3487–3506, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020, 2020. a

Landwehr, S., Volpi, M., Haumann, F. A., Robinson, C. M., Thurnherr, I., Ferracci, V., Baccarini, A., Thomas, J., Gorodetskaya, I., Tatzelt, C., Henning, S., Modini, R. L., Forrer, H. J., Lin, Y., Cassar, N., Simó, R., Hassler, C., Moallemi, A., Fawcett, S. E., Harris, N., Airs, R., Derkani, M. H., Alberello, A., Toffoli, A., Chen, G., Rodríguez-Ros, P., Zamanillo, M., Cortés-Greus, P., Xue, L., Bolas, C. G., Leonard, K. C., Perez-Cruz, F., Walton, D., and Schmale, J.: Exploring the coupled ocean and atmosphere system with a data science approach applied to observations from the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1295–1369, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1295-2021, 2021. a, b

Legrand, M. and Pasteur, E. C.: Methane sulfonic acid to non-sea-salt sulfate ratio in coastal Antarctic aerosol and surface snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 10991–11006, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00929, 1998. a, b

Lindzen, R. S.: Some coolness concerning global warming, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 71, 288–299, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26227522 (last access: 6 July 2022), 1990. a

McCluskey, C., Hill, T., Humphries, R., Rauker, A., Moreau, S., Strutton, P., Chambers, S., Williams, A., McRobert, I., Ward, J., Keywood, M. D., Harnwell, J., Ponsonby, W., Loh, Z. M., Krummel, P. B., Protat, A., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Observations of ice nucleating particles over Southern Ocean waters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11–989, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079981, 2018a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n

McCluskey, C. S., Ovadnevaite, J., Rinaldi, M., Atkinson, J., Belosi, F., Ceburnis, D., Marullo, S., Hill, T. C. J., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A., O'Dowd, C., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Marine and Terrestrial Organic Ice-Nucleating Particles in Pristine Marine to Continentally Influenced Northeast Atlantic Air Masses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6196–6212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028033, 2018b. a

McCoy, I. L., Bretherton, C. S., Wood, R., Twohy, C. H., Gettelman, A., Bardeen, C. G., and Toohey, D. W.: Influences of recent particle formation on Southern Ocean aerosol variability and low cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033529, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033529, 2021. a

McFarquhar, G. M., Bretherton, C. S., Marchand, R., Protat, A., DeMott, P. J., Alexander, S. P., Roberts, G. C., Twohy, C. H., Toohey, D., Siems, S., Huang, Y., Wood, R., Rauber, R. M., Lasher-Trapp, S., Jensen, J., Stith, J. L., Mace, J., Um, J., Järvinen, E., Schnaiter, M., Gettelman, A., Sanchez, K. J., McCluskey, C. S., Russell, L. M., McCoy, I. L., Atlas, R. L., Bardeen, C. G., Moore, K. A., Hill, T. C. J., Humphries, R. S., Keywood, M. D., Ristovski, Z., Cravigan, L., Schofield, R., Fairall, C., Mallet, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Rainwater, B., D’Alessandro, J., Wang, Y., Wu, W., Saliba, G., Levin, E. J. T., Ding, S., Lang, F., Truong, S. C. H., Wolff, C., Haggerty, J., Harvey, M. J., Klekociuk, A. R., and McDonald, A.: Observations of Clouds, Aerosols, Precipitation, and Surface Radiation over the Southern Ocean: An Overview of CAPRICORN, MARCUS, MICRE, and SOCRATES, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E894–E928, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0132.1, 2021. a, b

McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., Mentel, T. F., Murphy, D. M., O'Dowd, C. D., Snider, J. R., and Weingartner, E.: The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2593–2649, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006, 2006. a

Mitts, B. A., Wang, X., Lucero, D. D., Beall, C. M., Deane, G. B., DeMott, P. J., and Prather, K. A.: Importance of Supermicron Ice Nucleating Particles in Nascent Sea Spray, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL089633, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089633, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f

Moallemi, A., Landwehr, S., Robinson, C., Simó, R., Zamanillo, M., Chen, G., Baccarini, A., Schnaiter, M., Henning, S., Modini, R. L., Gysel-Beer, M., and Schmale, J.: Sources, Occurrence and Characteristics of Fluorescent Biological Aerosol Particles Measured Over the Pristine Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034811, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034811, 2021. a, b

Modini, R. L., Frossard, A. A., Ahlm, L., Russell, L. M., Corrigan, C. E., Roberts, G. C., Hawkins, L. N., Schroder, J. C., Bertram, A. K., Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lin, J., Nenes, A., Wang, Z., Wonaschütz, A., Sorooshian, A., Noone, K. J., Jonsson, H., Seinfeld, J. H., Toom-Sauntry, D., Macdonald, A. M., and Leaitch, W. R.: Primary marine aerosol-cloud interactions off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 4282–4303, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022963, 2015. a

Mossop, S. and Thorndike, N.: The use of membrane filters in measurements of ice nucleus concentration. I. Effect of sampled air volume, J. Appl. Meteorol., 5, 474–480, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1966)005<0474:TUOMFI>2.0.CO;2, 1966. a

Müller, K., Lehmann, S., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Niedermeier, N., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.: Particle characterization at the Cape Verde atmospheric observatory during the 2007 RHaMBLe intensive, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2709–2721, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2709-2010, 2010. a

Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35200A, 2012. a

O'Dowd, C. D., Lowe, J. A., Smith, M. H., Davison, B., Hewitt, C. N., and Harrison, R. M.: Biogenic sulphur emissions and inferred non-sea-salt-sulphate cloud condensation nuclei in and around Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 12839–12854, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02749, 1997. a, b

Pérez, F. and Granger, B. E.: IPython: a system for interactive scientific computing, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 21–29, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.53, 2007. a

Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007. a, b, c

Polen, M., Brubaker, T., Somers, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Cleaning up our water: reducing interferences from nonhomogeneous freezing of “pure” water in droplet freezing assays of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5315–5334, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5315-2018, 2018. a

Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Pöschl, U., and Lelieveld, J.: Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5241–5255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010, 2010. a, b

Quinn, P., Coffman, D., Johnson, J., Upchurch, L., and Bates, T.: Small fraction of marine cloud condensation nuclei made up of sea spray aerosol, Nat. Geosci., 10, 674, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO3003, 2017. a, b

Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Kapustin, V. N., Bates, T. S., and Covert, D. S.: Aerosol optical properties in the marine boundary layer during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1) and the underlying chemical and physical aerosol properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16547–16563, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02345, 1998. a, b

Radenz, M., Seifert, P., Baars, H., Floutsi, A. A., Yin, Z., and Bühl, J.: Automated time–height-resolved air mass source attribution for profiling remote sensing applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3015–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3015-2021, 2021. a

Raes, F.: Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 2893–2903, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02832, 1995. a

Regayre, L. A., Schmale, J., Johnson, J. S., Tatzelt, C., Baccarini, A., Henning, S., Yoshioka, M., Stratmann, F., Gysel-Beer, M., Grosvenor, D. P., and Carslaw, K. S.: The value of remote marine aerosol measurements for constraining radiative forcing uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10063–10072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10063-2020, 2020. a, b

Roberts, G. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221, https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988, 2005. a

Rodriguez-Ros, P., Galí, M., Cortés, P., Robinson, C. M., Antoine, D., Wohl, C., Yang, M., and Simo, R.: Remote sensing retrieval of isoprene concentrations in the Southern Ocean, Earth and Space Science Open Archive, 21, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10502496.1, 2020. a

Saliba, G., Sanchez, K. J., Russell, L. M., Twohy, C. H., Roberts, G. C., Lewis, S., Dedrick, J., McCluskey, C. S., Moore, K., DeMott, P. J., and Toohey, D. W.: Organic composition of three different size ranges of aerosol particles over the Southern Ocean, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 55, 268–288, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1845296, 2020. a

Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G. C., Saliba, G., Russell, L. M., Twohy, C., Reeves, J. M., Humphries, R. S., Keywood, M. D., Ward, J. P., and McRobert, I. M.: Measurement report: Cloud processes and the transport of biological emissions affect southern ocean particle and cloud condensation nuclei concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3427–3446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3427-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d

Savoie, D. L. and Prospero, J. M.: Comparison of oceanic and continental sources of non-sea-salt sulphate over the Pacific Ocean, Nature, 339, 685–687, https://doi.org/10.1038/339685a0, 1989. a

Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Nemitz, E., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Blackall, T. D., Trathan, P. N., Phillips, G. J., Sutton, M., and Braban, C. F.: Sub-Antarctic marine aerosol: dominant contributions from biogenic sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8669–8694, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8669-2013, 2013. a, b

Schmale, J., Henning, S., Henzing, B., Keskinen, H., Sellegri, K., Ovadnevaite, J., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Jefferson, A., Park, M., Schlag, P., Kristensson, A., Iwamoto, Y., Pringle, K., Reddington, C., Aalto, P., Äijälä, M., Baltensperger, U., Bialek, J., Birmili, W., Bukowiecki, N., Ehn, M., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Frank, G., Fröhlich, R., Frumau, A., Furuya, M., Hammer, E., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, E., Holzinger, R., Hyono, H., Kanakidou, M., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kinouchi, K., Kos, G., Kulmala, M., Mihalopoulos, N., Motos, G., Nenes, A., O’Dowd, C., Paramonov, M., Petäjä, T., Picard, D., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Slowik, J., Sonntag, A., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Tsurumaru, H., Wiedensohler, A., Wittbom, C., Ogren, J. A., Matsuki, A., Yum, S. S., Myhre, C. L., Carslaw, K., Stratmann, F., and Gysel, M.: Collocated observations of cloud condensation nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition, Sci. data, 4, 170003, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.3, 2017. a

Schmale, J., Henning, S., Decesari, S., Henzing, B., Keskinen, H., Sellegri, K., Ovadnevaite, J., Pöhlker, M. L., Brito, J., Bougiatioti, A., Kristensson, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Carbone, S., Jefferson, A., Park, M., Schlag, P., Iwamoto, Y., Aalto, P., Äijälä, M., Bukowiecki, N., Ehn, M., Frank, G., Fröhlich, R., Frumau, A., Herrmann, E., Herrmann, H., Holzinger, R., Kos, G., Kulmala, M., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., O'Dowd, C., Petäjä, T., Picard, D., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Swietlicki, E., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Wiedensohler, A., Ogren, J., Matsuki, A., Yum, S. S., Stratmann, F., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Long-term cloud condensation nuclei number concentration, particle number size distribution and chemical composition measurements at regionally representative observatories, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2853–2881, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2853-2018, 2018. a, b

Schmale, J., Baccarini, A., Thurnherr, I., Henning, S., Efraim, A., Regayre, L., Bolas, C., Hartmann, M., Welti, A., Lehtipalo, K., Aemisegger, F., Tatzelt, C., Landwehr, S., Modini, R. L., Tummon, F., Johnson, J., Harris, N., Schnaiter, M., Toffoli, A., Derkani, M., Bukowiecki, N., Stratmann, F., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., Wernli, H., Rosenfeld, D., Gysel-Beer, M., and Carslaw, K.: Overview of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition: Study of Preindustrial-like Aerosols and Their Climate Effects (ACE-SPACE), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2260–2283, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0187.1, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n

Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: On the source of organic acid aerosol layers above clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0630442, 2007. a

Tatzelt, C., Henning, S., Tummon, F., Hartmann, M., Baccarini, A., Welti, A., Lehtipalo, K., and Schmale, J.: Ice Nucleating Particle number concentration from low-volume sampling over the Southern Ocean during the austral summer of 2016/2017 on board the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE), Version 1.1, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311665, 2020a. a

Tatzelt, C., Henning, S., Tummon, F., Hartmann, M., Baccarini, A., Welti, A., Lehtipalo, K., Schmale, J., and Modini, R.: Cloud Condensation Nuclei number concentrations over the Southern Ocean during the austral summer of 2016/2017 on board the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE), Version 1.1, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4415495, 2020b. a

Tatzelt, C., Henning, S., Tummon, F., Hartmann, M., Baccarini, A., Welti, A., Lehtipalo, K., Schmale, J., and Van Pinxteren, M.: Ionic composition of particulate matter (PM10) from high-volume sampling over the Southern Ocean during the austral summer of 2016/2017 on board the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE), Version 1.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3922147, 2020c. a

Thurnherr, I., Wernli, H., and Aemisegger, F.: 10-day backward trajectories from ECMWF analysis data along the ship track of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition in austral summer 2016/2017., Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031705, 2020. a, b, c, d

Turner, S. M., Harvey, M. J., Law, C. S., Nightingale, P. D., and Liss, P. S.: Iron-induced changes in oceanic sulfur biogeochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L14307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020296, 2004. a

Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251–1256, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3, 1974. a

Uetake, J., Hill, T. C., Moore, K. A., DeMott, P. J., Protat, A., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Airborne bacteria confirm the pristine nature of the Southern Ocean boundary layer, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 13275–13282, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000134117, 2020. a

Vali, G.: Quantitative evaluation of experimental results an the heterogeneous freezing nucleation of supercooled liquids, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 402–409, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0402:QEOERA>2.0.CO;2, 1971. a

van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., Von Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in submicron aerosol particles–measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elementa, 5, 35, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225, 2017. a

Vergara-Temprado, J., Miltenberger, A. K., Furtado, K., Grosvenor, D. P., Shipway, B. J., Hill, A. A., Wilkinson, J. M., Field, P. R., Murray, B. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Strong control of Southern Ocean cloud reflectivity by ice-nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2687–2692, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721627115, 2018. a

Volpi, M., Landwehr, S., Thomas, J., and Schmale, J.: Distance to the nearest land/coastline (including small subantarctic islands) for the five-minute average cruise track of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE) during the austral summer of 2016/2017., Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3832045, 2020. a, b

Walton, D. W. H. and Thomas, J.: Cruise Report – Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE) 20th December 2016–19th March 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1443511, 2018. a, b, c, d

Wegener, A.: Thermodynamik der Atmosphäre, JA Barth, https://digital.ub.uni-leipzig.de/object/viewid/0000008744 (last access: 6 July 2022), 1911. a

Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal variation of aerosol size distributions (10<D<750 nm) at a high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580 m a.s.l.), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 26809–26820, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900170, 1999. a

Welti, A., Müller, K., Fleming, Z. L., and Stratmann, F.: Concentration and variability of ice nuclei in the subtropical maritime boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5307–5320, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f

Welti, A., Bigg, E. K., DeMott, P. J., Gong, X., Hartmann, M., Harvey, M., Henning, S., Herenz, P., Hill, T. C. J., Hornblow, B., Leck, C., Löffler, M., McCluskey, C. S., Rauker, A. M., Schmale, J., Tatzelt, C., van Pinxteren, M., and Stratmann, F.: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15191–15206, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15191-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d

Wex, H., Huang, L., Zhang, W., Hung, H., Traversi, R., Becagli, S., Sheesley, R. J., Moffett, C. E., Barrett, T. E., Bossi, R., Skov, H., Hünerbein, A., Lubitz, J., Löffler, M., Linke, O., Hartmann, M., Herenz, P., and Stratmann, F.: Annual variability of ice-nucleating particle concentrations at different Arctic locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5293–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019, 2019.  a

Wex, H., Jentsch, C., Mertes, S., Freney, E., and Stratmann, F.: Varitations in off-line filter sampling and analysis of Ice Nucleating Particle measurements, in: European Aerosol Conference, Aachen, Germany, 30 August–4 September, 2020. a

Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Nowak, A., Sonntag, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Wehner, B., Tuch, T., Pfeifer, S., Fiebig, M., Fjäraa, A. M., Asmi, E., Sellegri, K., Depuy, R., Venzac, H., Villani, P., Laj, P., Aalto, P., Ogren, J. A., Swietlicki, E., Williams, P., Roldin, P., Quincey, P., Hüglin, C., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Riccobono, F., Santos, S., Grüning, C., Faloon, K., Beddows, D., Harrison, R., Monahan, C., Jennings, S. G., O'Dowd, C. D., Marinoni, A., Horn, H.-G., Keck, L., Jiang, J., Scheckman, J., McMurry, P. H., Deng, Z., Zhao, C. S., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Löschau, G., and Bastian, S.: Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 657–685, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-657-2012, 2012. a

Yan, J., Jung, J., Lin, Q., Zhang, M., Xu, S., and Zhao, S.: Effect of sea ice retreat on marine aerosol emissions in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica, Sci. Total Environ., 745, 140773, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140773, 2020a. a

Yan, J., Jung, J., Zhang, M., Bianchi, F., Tham, Y. J., Xu, S., Lin, Q., Zhao, S., Li, L., and Chen, L.: Uptake selectivity of methanesulfonic acid (MSA) on fine particles over polynya regions of the Ross Sea, Antarctica, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3259–3271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3259-2020, 2020b. a

Yan, J., Zhang, M., Jung, J., Lin, Q., Zhao, S., Xu, S., and Chen, L.: Influence on the conversion of DMS to MSA and SO42− in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica, Atmos. Environ., 233, 117611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117611, 2020c. a, b

Download
Short summary
We present the abundance and origin of cloud-relevant aerosol particles in the preindustral-like conditions of the Southern Ocean (SO) during austral summer. Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice-nucleating particles (INP) were measured during a circum-Antarctic scientific cruise with in situ instrumentation and offline filter measurements, respectively. Transport processes were found to play an equally important role as local sources for both the CCN and INP population of the SO.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint