Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8259-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8259-2022
Research article
 | 
27 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 27 Jun 2022

An evaluation of the liquid cloud droplet effective radius derived from MODIS, airborne remote sensing, and in situ measurements from CAMP2Ex

Dongwei Fu, Larry Di Girolamo, Robert M. Rauber, Greg M. McFarquhar, Stephen W. Nesbitt, Jesse Loveridge, Yulan Hong, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Brian Cairns, Mikhail D. Alexandrov, Paul Lawson, Sarah Woods, Simone Tanelli, Sebastian Schmidt, Chris Hostetler, and Amy Jo Scarino

Viewed

Total article views: 3,210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,248 890 72 3,210 81 46 66
  • HTML: 2,248
  • PDF: 890
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 3,210
  • Supplement: 81
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 66
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,293 with geography defined and -83 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Satellite-retrieved cloud microphysics are widely used in climate research because of their central role in water and energy cycles. Here, we provide the first detailed investigation of retrieved cloud drop sizes from in situ and various satellite and airborne remote sensing techniques applied to real cumulus cloud fields. We conclude that the most widely used passive remote sensing method employed in climate research produces high biases of 6–8 µm (60 %–80 %) caused by 3-D radiative effects.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint