Articles | Volume 22, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
08 Apr 2022
Research article |
| 08 Apr 2022
| 08 Apr 2022
Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Daniele Visioni
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Andy Jones
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK
James Haywood
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Roland Séférian
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Pierre Nabat
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Olivier Boucher
Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
Ewa Monica Bednarz
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Ulrike Niemeier
Atmosphere in the Earth System, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,919 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Dec 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,054 | 818 | 47 | 3,919 | 31 | 37 |
- HTML: 3,054
- PDF: 818
- XML: 47
- Total: 3,919
- BibTeX: 31
- EndNote: 37
Total article views: 2,985 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Apr 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,404 | 555 | 26 | 2,985 | 22 | 30 |
- HTML: 2,404
- PDF: 555
- XML: 26
- Total: 2,985
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 30
Total article views: 934 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Dec 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 650 | 263 | 21 | 934 | 9 | 7 |
- HTML: 650
- PDF: 263
- XML: 21
- Total: 934
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,919 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,941 with geography defined
and -22 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,985 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,991 with geography defined
and -6 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 934 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 950 with geography defined
and -16 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- Opinion: Stratospheric ozone – depletion, recovery and new challenges M. Chipperfield & S. Bekki 10.5194/acp-24-2783-2024
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- Clear-sky control of anvils in response to increased CO2 or surface warming or volcanic eruptions M. Saint-Lu et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00304-z
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
- Potential Non‐Linearities in the High Latitude Circulation and Ozone Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2023GL104726
- Like diamonds in the sky? Public perceptions, governance, and information framing of solar geoengineering activities in Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States C. Baum et al. 10.1080/09644016.2023.2301262
- “Cooling credits” are not a viable climate solution M. Diamond et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03561-w
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7667-2022
- Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1 A. Wells et al. 10.1029/2023EF004358
- Stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate interactions G. Bernhard et al. 10.1007/s43630-023-00371-y
- Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of “Middle Atmosphere” Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6)) N. Davis et al. 10.1029/2022MS003579
- A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- Opinion: Stratospheric ozone – depletion, recovery and new challenges M. Chipperfield & S. Bekki 10.5194/acp-24-2783-2024
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- Clear-sky control of anvils in response to increased CO2 or surface warming or volcanic eruptions M. Saint-Lu et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00304-z
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
- Potential Non‐Linearities in the High Latitude Circulation and Ozone Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Injection E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2023GL104726
- Like diamonds in the sky? Public perceptions, governance, and information framing of solar geoengineering activities in Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States C. Baum et al. 10.1080/09644016.2023.2301262
- “Cooling credits” are not a viable climate solution M. Diamond et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03561-w
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7667-2022
- Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1 A. Wells et al. 10.1029/2023EF004358
- Stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate interactions G. Bernhard et al. 10.1007/s43630-023-00371-y
- Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of “Middle Atmosphere” Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6)) N. Davis et al. 10.1029/2022MS003579
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Short summary
This study assesses the impacts of climate interventions, using stratospheric sulfate aerosol and solar dimming on stratospheric ozone, based on three Earth system models with interactive stratospheric chemistry. The climate interventions have been applied to a high emission (baseline) scenario in order to reach global surface temperatures of a medium emission scenario. We find significant increases and decreases in total column ozone, depending on regions and seasons.
This study assesses the impacts of climate interventions, using stratospheric sulfate aerosol...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint