Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1601–1613, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1601-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1601–1613, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1601-2022
Research article
01 Feb 2022
Research article | 01 Feb 2022

Marine gas-phase sulfur emissions during an induced phytoplankton bloom

Delaney B. Kilgour et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-615', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Sep 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2021-615', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Oct 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Delaney Kilgour on behalf of the Authors (22 Nov 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Nov 2021) by Yafang Cheng
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (06 Dec 2021)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (09 Dec 2021)
ED: Publish as is (18 Dec 2021) by Yafang Cheng
Download
Short summary
We report measurements of gas-phase volatile organosulfur molecules made during a mesocosm phytoplankton bloom experiment. Dimethyl sulfide (DMS), methanethiol (MeSH), and benzothiazole accounted for on average over 90 % of total gas-phase sulfur emissions. This work focuses on factors controlling the production and emission of DMS and MeSH and the role of non-DMS molecules (such as MeSH and benzothiazole) in secondary sulfate formation in coastal marine environments.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint