Articles | Volume 22, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15489-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15489-2022
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2022

How do Cl concentrations matter for the simulation of CH4 and δ13C(CH4) and estimation of the CH4 budget through atmospheric inversions?

Joël Thanwerdas, Marielle Saunois, Isabelle Pison, Didier Hauglustaine, Antoine Berchet, Bianca Baier, Colm Sweeney, and Philippe Bousquet

Viewed

Total article views: 2,538 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,894 590 54 2,538 161 26 40
  • HTML: 1,894
  • PDF: 590
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 2,538
  • Supplement: 161
  • BibTeX: 26
  • EndNote: 40
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,538 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,514 with geography defined and 24 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations have been rising since 2007, resulting from an imbalance between CH4 sources and sinks. The CH4 budget is generally estimated through top-down approaches using CH4 and δ13C(CH4) observations as constraints. The oxidation by chlorine (Cl) contributes little to the total oxidation of CH4 but strongly influences δ13C(CH4). Here, we compare multiple recent Cl fields and quantify the influence of Cl concentrations on CH4, δ13C(CH4), and CH4 budget estimates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint