Articles | Volume 22, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14243-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14243-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
COVID-19 lockdown emission reductions have the potential to explain over half of the coincident increase in global atmospheric methane
David S. Stevenson
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Richard G. Derwent
rdscientific, Newbury, UK
Oliver Wild
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
William J. Collins
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 5,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Aug 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,960 | 1,847 | 66 | 5,873 | 141 | 58 | 80 |
- HTML: 3,960
- PDF: 1,847
- XML: 66
- Total: 5,873
- Supplement: 141
- BibTeX: 58
- EndNote: 80
Total article views: 3,285 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Nov 2022)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,442 | 808 | 35 | 3,285 | 141 | 44 | 56 |
- HTML: 2,442
- PDF: 808
- XML: 35
- Total: 3,285
- Supplement: 141
- BibTeX: 44
- EndNote: 56
Total article views: 2,588 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Aug 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,518 | 1,039 | 31 | 2,588 | 14 | 24 |
- HTML: 1,518
- PDF: 1,039
- XML: 31
- Total: 2,588
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,889 with geography defined
and -16 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,285 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,211 with geography defined
and 74 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,588 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,678 with geography defined
and -90 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020 A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3829-2023
- Zonal variability of methane trends derived from satellite data J. Hachmeister et al. 10.5194/acp-24-577-2024
- Increased methane emissions from oil and gas following the Soviet Union’s collapse T. He et al. 10.1073/pnas.2314600121
- Anomalies of O3, CO, C2H2, H2CO, and C2H6 detected with multiple ground-based Fourier-transform infrared spectrometers and assessed with model simulation in 2020: COVID-19 lockdowns versus natural variability I. Ortega et al. 10.1525/elementa.2023.00015
- Long-term variations and trends of tropospheric and ground-level NO2 over typical coastal areas X. Tian et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112163
- Exploring the drivers of tropospheric hydroxyl radical trends in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4.1 atmospheric chemistry–climate model G. Chua et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- Ship- and aircraft-based XCH4 over oceans as a new tool for satellite validation A. Müller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1297-2024
- Effect of methane mitigation on global temperature under a permafrost feedback H. Bäck et al. 10.1016/j.gecadv.2024.100005
- Significant impact of the covid-19 pandemic on methane emissions evaluated by comprehensive statistical analysis of satellite data B. Trisna et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-72843-9
- Evaluation of the Stratospheric Contribution to the Inter‐Annual Variabilities of Tropospheric Methane Growth Rates P. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023GL103350
- Clean air policy makes methane harder to control due to longer lifetime B. Fu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.010
- An observation-based, reduced-form model for oxidation in the remote marine troposphere C. Baublitz et al. 10.1073/pnas.2209735120
- Trends in CO, CO2, CH4, BC, and NOx during the First 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown: Source Insights from the WMO/GAW Station of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy) F. D’Amico et al. 10.3390/su16188229
- Atmospheric methane removal may reduce climate risks S. Abernethy & R. Jackson 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3b22
- High-frequency, continuous hydrogen observations at Mace Head, Ireland from 1994 to 2022: Baselines, pollution events and ‘missing’ sources R. Derwent et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120029
- Towards near-real-time air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions: lessons learned from multiple estimates during the COVID-19 pandemic M. Guevara et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8081-2023
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
- Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2023GB007875
- Unusual response of O 3 and CH 4 to NO 2 emissions reduction in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic A. Phan & H. Fukui 10.1080/17538947.2023.2297844
- Mitigating climate change by abating coal mine methane: A critical review of status and opportunities C. Karacan et al. 10.1016/j.coal.2024.104623
- The use of δ 13C in CO to determine removal of CH4 by Cl radicals in the atmosphere * T. Röckmann et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad4375
- The worldwide COVID-19 lockdown impacts on global secondary inorganic aerosols and radiative budget T. Sekiya et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2688
- Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions R. Skeie et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00969-1
- Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion J. McNorton et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022
- Spatiotemporal Geostatistical Analysis and Global Mapping of CH4 Columns from GOSAT Observations L. Li et al. 10.3390/rs14030654
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020 A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3829-2023
- Zonal variability of methane trends derived from satellite data J. Hachmeister et al. 10.5194/acp-24-577-2024
- Increased methane emissions from oil and gas following the Soviet Union’s collapse T. He et al. 10.1073/pnas.2314600121
- Anomalies of O3, CO, C2H2, H2CO, and C2H6 detected with multiple ground-based Fourier-transform infrared spectrometers and assessed with model simulation in 2020: COVID-19 lockdowns versus natural variability I. Ortega et al. 10.1525/elementa.2023.00015
- Long-term variations and trends of tropospheric and ground-level NO2 over typical coastal areas X. Tian et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112163
- Exploring the drivers of tropospheric hydroxyl radical trends in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4.1 atmospheric chemistry–climate model G. Chua et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- Ship- and aircraft-based XCH4 over oceans as a new tool for satellite validation A. Müller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1297-2024
- Effect of methane mitigation on global temperature under a permafrost feedback H. Bäck et al. 10.1016/j.gecadv.2024.100005
- Significant impact of the covid-19 pandemic on methane emissions evaluated by comprehensive statistical analysis of satellite data B. Trisna et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-72843-9
- Evaluation of the Stratospheric Contribution to the Inter‐Annual Variabilities of Tropospheric Methane Growth Rates P. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023GL103350
- Clean air policy makes methane harder to control due to longer lifetime B. Fu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.010
- An observation-based, reduced-form model for oxidation in the remote marine troposphere C. Baublitz et al. 10.1073/pnas.2209735120
- Trends in CO, CO2, CH4, BC, and NOx during the First 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown: Source Insights from the WMO/GAW Station of Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Southern Italy) F. D’Amico et al. 10.3390/su16188229
- Atmospheric methane removal may reduce climate risks S. Abernethy & R. Jackson 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3b22
- High-frequency, continuous hydrogen observations at Mace Head, Ireland from 1994 to 2022: Baselines, pollution events and ‘missing’ sources R. Derwent et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120029
- Towards near-real-time air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions: lessons learned from multiple estimates during the COVID-19 pandemic M. Guevara et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8081-2023
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
- Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2023GB007875
- Unusual response of O 3 and CH 4 to NO 2 emissions reduction in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic A. Phan & H. Fukui 10.1080/17538947.2023.2297844
- Mitigating climate change by abating coal mine methane: A critical review of status and opportunities C. Karacan et al. 10.1016/j.coal.2024.104623
- The use of δ 13C in CO to determine removal of CH4 by Cl radicals in the atmosphere * T. Röckmann et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad4375
- The worldwide COVID-19 lockdown impacts on global secondary inorganic aerosols and radiative budget T. Sekiya et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2688
- Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions R. Skeie et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00969-1
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion J. McNorton et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022
- Spatiotemporal Geostatistical Analysis and Global Mapping of CH4 Columns from GOSAT Observations L. Li et al. 10.3390/rs14030654
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
Atmospheric methane’s growth rate rose by 50 % in 2020 relative to 2019. Lower nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions tend to increase methane’s atmospheric residence time; lower carbon monoxide (CO) and non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions decrease its lifetime. Combining model sensitivities with emission changes, we find that COVID-19 lockdown emission reductions can explain over half the observed increases in methane in 2020.
Atmospheric methane’s growth rate rose by 50 % in 2020 relative to 2019. Lower nitrogen oxide...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint