Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 May 2021
Research article |
| 06 May 2021
| 06 May 2021
AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements
Department of Earth Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Oleg Dubovik
Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, CNRS/Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France
Otto Hasekamp
Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON), Utrecht, the Netherlands
Omar Torres
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Hiren Jethva
Universities Space Research Association – GESTAR, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Peter J. T. Leonard
ADNET Systems, Inc., Suite A100, 7515 Mission Drive, Lanham, MD 20706, USA
Pavel Litvinov
Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, CNRS/Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France
Jens Redemann
School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA
Yohei Shinozuka
Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland, USA
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
Gerrit de Leeuw
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Climate Research Programme, Helsinki, Finland
currently at: Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), R&D Satellite Observations, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Stefan Kinne
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Thomas Popp
German Aerospace Center (DLR), German Remote Sensing Data Center Atmosphere, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
Philip Stier
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 3,509 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Dec 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,667 | 788 | 54 | 3,509 | 243 | 43 | 52 |
- HTML: 2,667
- PDF: 788
- XML: 54
- Total: 3,509
- Supplement: 243
- BibTeX: 43
- EndNote: 52
Total article views: 2,956 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,335 | 573 | 48 | 2,956 | 141 | 39 | 44 |
- HTML: 2,335
- PDF: 573
- XML: 48
- Total: 2,956
- Supplement: 141
- BibTeX: 39
- EndNote: 44
Total article views: 553 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Dec 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 332 | 215 | 6 | 553 | 102 | 4 | 8 |
- HTML: 332
- PDF: 215
- XML: 6
- Total: 553
- Supplement: 102
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,509 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,554 with geography defined
and -45 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,956 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,923 with geography defined
and 33 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 553 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 631 with geography defined
and -78 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- A comparison of atmospheric aerosol absorption properties from the MERRA-2 reanalysis with AERONET V. Bakatsoula et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119997
- Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023
- Validation and diurnal variation evaluation of MERRA-2 multiple aerosol properties on a global scale X. Su et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120019
- Estimating aerosol emission from SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission using an ensemble Kalman smoother: observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022
- Uncertainty in Aerosol Optical Depth From Modern Aerosol‐Climate Models, Reanalyses, and Satellite Products A. Vogel et al. 10.1029/2021JD035483
- Aerosol absorption has an underappreciated role in historical precipitation change B. Samset 10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6
- Multi-angular polarimetric remote sensing to pinpoint global aerosol absorption and direct radiative forcing C. Chen et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-35147-y
- Circular polarization in atmospheric aerosols S. Gassó & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-22-13581-2022
- Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols Q. Zhong et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adi3568
- Retrieval of aerosol single scattering albedo using joint satellite and surface visibility measurements Y. Dong et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113654
- Aerosol Shortwave Radiative Heating and Cooling by the 2017 and 2023 Chilean Wildfire Smoke Plumes M. de Graaf et al. 10.1029/2023GL104387
- Climate models generally underrepresent the warming by Central Africa biomass-burning aerosols over the Southeast Atlantic M. Mallet et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abg9998
- Ocean flux of salt, sulfate, and organic components to atmospheric aerosol L. Russell et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104364
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
- Properties of aerosol and surface derived from OLCI/Sentinel-3A using GRASP approach: Retrieval development and preliminary validation C. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113142
- Reducing Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty by Combining Models With Satellite and Within‐The‐Atmosphere Observations: A Three‐Way Street R. Kahn et al. 10.1029/2022RG000796
- Spatio-Temporal Variability of Aerosol Components, Their Optical and Microphysical Properties over North China during Winter Haze in 2012, as Derived from POLDER/PARASOL Satellite Observations Y. Ou et al. 10.3390/rs13142682
- Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system J. Li et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7
- Algorithm evaluation for polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols O. Hasekamp et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1497-2024
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Increased aerosol scattering contributes to the recent monsoon rainfall decrease over the Gangetic Plain T. Ying et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.08.052
- A Comprehensive Description of Multi-Term LSM for Applying Multiple a Priori Constraints in Problems of Atmospheric Remote Sensing: GRASP Algorithm, Concept, and Applications O. Dubovik et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.706851
- Long-term variability in black carbon emissions constrained by gap-filled absorption aerosol optical depth and associated premature mortality in China W. Zhao et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6593-2024
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
24 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- A comparison of atmospheric aerosol absorption properties from the MERRA-2 reanalysis with AERONET V. Bakatsoula et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119997
- Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023
- Validation and diurnal variation evaluation of MERRA-2 multiple aerosol properties on a global scale X. Su et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120019
- Estimating aerosol emission from SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission using an ensemble Kalman smoother: observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022
- Uncertainty in Aerosol Optical Depth From Modern Aerosol‐Climate Models, Reanalyses, and Satellite Products A. Vogel et al. 10.1029/2021JD035483
- Aerosol absorption has an underappreciated role in historical precipitation change B. Samset 10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6
- Multi-angular polarimetric remote sensing to pinpoint global aerosol absorption and direct radiative forcing C. Chen et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-35147-y
- Circular polarization in atmospheric aerosols S. Gassó & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-22-13581-2022
- Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols Q. Zhong et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adi3568
- Retrieval of aerosol single scattering albedo using joint satellite and surface visibility measurements Y. Dong et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113654
- Aerosol Shortwave Radiative Heating and Cooling by the 2017 and 2023 Chilean Wildfire Smoke Plumes M. de Graaf et al. 10.1029/2023GL104387
- Climate models generally underrepresent the warming by Central Africa biomass-burning aerosols over the Southeast Atlantic M. Mallet et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abg9998
- Ocean flux of salt, sulfate, and organic components to atmospheric aerosol L. Russell et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104364
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
- Properties of aerosol and surface derived from OLCI/Sentinel-3A using GRASP approach: Retrieval development and preliminary validation C. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113142
- Reducing Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty by Combining Models With Satellite and Within‐The‐Atmosphere Observations: A Three‐Way Street R. Kahn et al. 10.1029/2022RG000796
- Spatio-Temporal Variability of Aerosol Components, Their Optical and Microphysical Properties over North China during Winter Haze in 2012, as Derived from POLDER/PARASOL Satellite Observations Y. Ou et al. 10.3390/rs13142682
- Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system J. Li et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7
- Algorithm evaluation for polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols O. Hasekamp et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1497-2024
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Increased aerosol scattering contributes to the recent monsoon rainfall decrease over the Gangetic Plain T. Ying et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.08.052
- A Comprehensive Description of Multi-Term LSM for Applying Multiple a Priori Constraints in Problems of Atmospheric Remote Sensing: GRASP Algorithm, Concept, and Applications O. Dubovik et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.706851
- Long-term variability in black carbon emissions constrained by gap-filled absorption aerosol optical depth and associated premature mortality in China W. Zhao et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6593-2024
Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Short summary
Absorptive aerosol has a potentially large impact on climate change. We evaluate and intercompare four global satellite datasets of absorptive aerosol optical depth (AAOD) and single-scattering albedo (SSA). We show that these datasets show reasonable correlations with the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) reference, although significant biases remain. In a follow-up paper we show that these observations nevertheless can be used for model evaluation.
Absorptive aerosol has a potentially large impact on climate change. We evaluate and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint