Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Benjamin Hmiel
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Ritesh Gautam
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Mark Omara
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Katherine A. Roberts
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Zachary R. Barkley
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Kenneth J. Davis
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Natasha L. Miles
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Vanessa C. Monteiro
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Scott J. Richardson
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Stephen Conley
Scientific Aviation, Boulder, CO, USA
Mackenzie L. Smith
Scientific Aviation, Boulder, CO, USA
Daniel J. Jacob
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Lu Shen
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel J. Varon
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Aijun Deng
Utopus Insights, Inc., Valhalla, NY, USA
Xander Rudelis
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
now at: Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA
Nikhil Sharma
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
Kyle T. Story
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
Adam R. Brandt
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Mary Kang
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Eric A. Kort
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Anthony J. Marchese
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Steven P. Hamburg
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Viewed
Total article views: 8,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Dec 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6,462 | 1,705 | 69 | 8,236 | 68 | 71 |
- HTML: 6,462
- PDF: 1,705
- XML: 69
- Total: 8,236
- BibTeX: 68
- EndNote: 71
Total article views: 5,559 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 May 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,386 | 1,113 | 60 | 5,559 | 57 | 58 |
- HTML: 4,386
- PDF: 1,113
- XML: 60
- Total: 5,559
- BibTeX: 57
- EndNote: 58
Total article views: 2,677 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Dec 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,076 | 592 | 9 | 2,677 | 11 | 13 |
- HTML: 2,076
- PDF: 592
- XML: 9
- Total: 2,677
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 8,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 8,479 with geography defined
and -243 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,559 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,593 with geography defined
and -34 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,677 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,886 with geography defined
and -209 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
57 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020 S. Peng et al. 10.1038/s41586-022-05447-w
- Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States D. Cusworth et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202338119
- Intermittency of Large Methane Emitters in the Permian Basin D. Cusworth et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173
- Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines in the Permian Basin J. Yu et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00380
- Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys M. Johnson et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00769-7
- Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022
- Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
- Response to Comment on “LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting” S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05197
- Widespread Frequent Methane Emissions From the Oil and Gas Industry in the Permian Basin J. Veefkind et al. 10.1029/2022JD037479
- Significant impact of the covid-19 pandemic on methane emissions evaluated by comprehensive statistical analysis of satellite data B. Trisna et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-72843-9
- Comment on “LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting” T. Donaghy & L. Stockman 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04146
- Meteorological Drivers of Permian Basin Methane Anomalies Derived from TROPOMI E. Crosman 10.3390/rs13050896
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
- Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021) M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
- A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates B. Conrad et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01081-0
- Quantifying NOx Emissions from U.S. Oil and Gas Production Regions Using TROPOMI NO2 B. Dix et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00387
- Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abf4507
- Evaluation of the High Altitude Lidar Observatory (HALO) methane retrievals during the summer 2019 ACT-America campaign R. Barton-Grimley et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4623-2022
- Tracking NO2 Pollution Changes Over Texas: Synthesis of In Situ and Satellite Observations M. Gyawali et al. 10.1029/2022JD037473
- LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03307
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- Flaring volumes in the intermountain west region: A geospatial analysis of satellite and operator-reported data with viable mitigation strategies J. Heimerl et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116729
- High-frequency, continuous hydrogen observations at Mace Head, Ireland from 1994 to 2022: Baselines, pollution events and ‘missing’ sources R. Derwent et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120029
- Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion J. McNorton et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022
- A critical review of natural gas emissions certification in the United States S. Garg et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb4af
- Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
- Methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and isotopic ratios of methane observations from the Permian Basin tower network V. Monteiro et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2401-2022
- Meeting the moment: Reducing methane emissions and the need for better diagnostics M. Wooldridge & J. Stolzman 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105637
- Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins L. Shen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11203-2022
- Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting J. Wang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c06211
- Modeling air emissions from complex facilities at detailed temporal and spatial resolution: The Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET) D. Zimmerle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153653
- Oil and natural gas wells across the NASA ABoVE domain: fugitive methane emissions and broader environmental impacts L. Klotz et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acbe52
- U.S. Ethane Emissions and Trends Estimated from Atmospheric Observations M. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c00380
- Geospatial variation in carbon accounting of hydrogen production and implications for the US Inflation Reduction Act V. Vallejo et al. 10.1038/s41560-024-01653-0
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites M. Omara et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- Developing a spatially explicit global oil and gas infrastructure database for characterizing methane emission sources at high resolution M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3761-2023
- Quantification of oil and gas methane emissions in the Delaware and Marcellus basins using a network of continuous tower-based measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6127-2023
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- The Economics of Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions in US Shale: An Agenda for Research and Policy M. Agerton et al. 10.1086/725004
- Methane emissions decline from reduced oil, natural gas, and refinery production during COVID-19 A. Thorpe et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acb5e5
- Origins of Oil and Gas Sector Methane Emissions: On-Site Investigations of Aerial Measured Sources M. Johnson et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07318
- The role of government healthcare financing in carbon emissions and climate change S. Al Mustanyir & M. Bloor 10.1080/27658511.2023.2275690
- Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin J. Lin et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5
- Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit large quantities of methane G. Plant et al. 10.1126/science.abq0385
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- A review of the status of air quality monitoring in the Permian Basin, USA, and its implications for effective long-term monitoring of industrial operations S. Adkins & M. Zavada 10.1080/01916122.2024.2370368
- Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
- Empirical quantification of methane emission intensity from oil and gas producers in the Permian basin B. Hmiel et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb27e
- Contribution of Regionalized Methane Emissions to Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity and Carbon Capture in the United States D. Burns & E. Grubert 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00531
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Where the Methane Is—Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data D. Tyner & M. Johnson 10.1021/acs.est.1c01572
- Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey Y. Chen et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c06458
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
- Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters T. Lauvaux et al. 10.1126/science.abj4351
56 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020 S. Peng et al. 10.1038/s41586-022-05447-w
- Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States D. Cusworth et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202338119
- Intermittency of Large Methane Emitters in the Permian Basin D. Cusworth et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173
- Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines in the Permian Basin J. Yu et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00380
- Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys M. Johnson et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00769-7
- Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022
- Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
- Response to Comment on “LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting” S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05197
- Widespread Frequent Methane Emissions From the Oil and Gas Industry in the Permian Basin J. Veefkind et al. 10.1029/2022JD037479
- Significant impact of the covid-19 pandemic on methane emissions evaluated by comprehensive statistical analysis of satellite data B. Trisna et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-72843-9
- Comment on “LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting” T. Donaghy & L. Stockman 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04146
- Meteorological Drivers of Permian Basin Methane Anomalies Derived from TROPOMI E. Crosman 10.3390/rs13050896
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
- Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021) M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
- A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates B. Conrad et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01081-0
- Quantifying NOx Emissions from U.S. Oil and Gas Production Regions Using TROPOMI NO2 B. Dix et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00387
- Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abf4507
- Evaluation of the High Altitude Lidar Observatory (HALO) methane retrievals during the summer 2019 ACT-America campaign R. Barton-Grimley et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4623-2022
- Tracking NO2 Pollution Changes Over Texas: Synthesis of In Situ and Satellite Observations M. Gyawali et al. 10.1029/2022JD037473
- LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03307
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- Flaring volumes in the intermountain west region: A geospatial analysis of satellite and operator-reported data with viable mitigation strategies J. Heimerl et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116729
- High-frequency, continuous hydrogen observations at Mace Head, Ireland from 1994 to 2022: Baselines, pollution events and ‘missing’ sources R. Derwent et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120029
- Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion J. McNorton et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022
- A critical review of natural gas emissions certification in the United States S. Garg et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb4af
- Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
- Methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and isotopic ratios of methane observations from the Permian Basin tower network V. Monteiro et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2401-2022
- Meeting the moment: Reducing methane emissions and the need for better diagnostics M. Wooldridge & J. Stolzman 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105637
- Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins L. Shen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11203-2022
- Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting J. Wang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c06211
- Modeling air emissions from complex facilities at detailed temporal and spatial resolution: The Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET) D. Zimmerle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153653
- Oil and natural gas wells across the NASA ABoVE domain: fugitive methane emissions and broader environmental impacts L. Klotz et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acbe52
- U.S. Ethane Emissions and Trends Estimated from Atmospheric Observations M. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c00380
- Geospatial variation in carbon accounting of hydrogen production and implications for the US Inflation Reduction Act V. Vallejo et al. 10.1038/s41560-024-01653-0
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites M. Omara et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- Developing a spatially explicit global oil and gas infrastructure database for characterizing methane emission sources at high resolution M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3761-2023
- Quantification of oil and gas methane emissions in the Delaware and Marcellus basins using a network of continuous tower-based measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6127-2023
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- The Economics of Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions in US Shale: An Agenda for Research and Policy M. Agerton et al. 10.1086/725004
- Methane emissions decline from reduced oil, natural gas, and refinery production during COVID-19 A. Thorpe et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acb5e5
- Origins of Oil and Gas Sector Methane Emissions: On-Site Investigations of Aerial Measured Sources M. Johnson et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07318
- The role of government healthcare financing in carbon emissions and climate change S. Al Mustanyir & M. Bloor 10.1080/27658511.2023.2275690
- Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin J. Lin et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5
- Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit large quantities of methane G. Plant et al. 10.1126/science.abq0385
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- A review of the status of air quality monitoring in the Permian Basin, USA, and its implications for effective long-term monitoring of industrial operations S. Adkins & M. Zavada 10.1080/01916122.2024.2370368
- Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
- Empirical quantification of methane emission intensity from oil and gas producers in the Permian basin B. Hmiel et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acb27e
- Contribution of Regionalized Methane Emissions to Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity and Carbon Capture in the United States D. Burns & E. Grubert 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00531
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Where the Methane Is—Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data D. Tyner & M. Johnson 10.1021/acs.est.1c01572
- Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey Y. Chen et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c06458
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 17 Nov 2024
Short summary
The Permian Basin (USA) is the world’s largest oil field. We use tower- and aircraft-based approaches to measure how methane emissions in the Permian Basin changed throughout 2020. In early 2020, 3.3 % of the region’s gas was emitted; then in spring 2020, the loss rate temporarily dropped to 1.9 % as oil price crashed. We find this short-term reduction to be a result of reduced well development, less gas flaring, and fewer abnormal events despite minimal reductions in oil and gas production.
The Permian Basin (USA) is the world’s largest oil field. We use tower- and aircraft-based...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint