Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Benjamin Hmiel
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Ritesh Gautam
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Mark Omara
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Katherine A. Roberts
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Zachary R. Barkley
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Kenneth J. Davis
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Natasha L. Miles
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Vanessa C. Monteiro
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Scott J. Richardson
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Stephen Conley
Scientific Aviation, Boulder, CO, USA
Mackenzie L. Smith
Scientific Aviation, Boulder, CO, USA
Daniel J. Jacob
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Lu Shen
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel J. Varon
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Aijun Deng
Utopus Insights, Inc., Valhalla, NY, USA
Xander Rudelis
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
now at: Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA
Nikhil Sharma
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
Kyle T. Story
Descartes Labs, Santa Fe, NM, USA
Adam R. Brandt
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Mary Kang
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Eric A. Kort
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Anthony J. Marchese
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Steven P. Hamburg
Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave., Suite 1300, Austin, TX,
USA
Viewed
Total article views: 6,193 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Dec 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,832 | 1,330 | 31 | 6,193 | 34 | 34 |
- HTML: 4,832
- PDF: 1,330
- XML: 31
- Total: 6,193
- BibTeX: 34
- EndNote: 34
Total article views: 3,745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 May 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,909 | 813 | 23 | 3,745 | 24 | 22 |
- HTML: 2,909
- PDF: 813
- XML: 23
- Total: 3,745
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 22
Total article views: 2,448 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Dec 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,923 | 517 | 8 | 2,448 | 10 | 12 |
- HTML: 1,923
- PDF: 517
- XML: 8
- Total: 2,448
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,193 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,421 with geography defined
and -228 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,754 with geography defined
and -9 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,448 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,667 with geography defined
and -219 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Intermittency of Large Methane Emitters in the Permian Basin D. Cusworth et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173
- Modeling air emissions from complex facilities at detailed temporal and spatial resolution: The Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET) D. Zimmerle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153653
- Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin J. Lin et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5
- Quantifying NOx Emissions from U.S. Oil and Gas Production Regions Using TROPOMI NO2 B. Dix et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00387
- Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abf4507
- Where the Methane Is—Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data D. Tyner & M. Johnson 10.1021/acs.est.1c01572
- LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03307
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
- Contribution of Regionalized Methane Emissions to Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity and Carbon Capture in the United States D. Burns & E. Grubert 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00531
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Meteorological Drivers of Permian Basin Methane Anomalies Derived from TROPOMI E. Crosman 10.3390/rs13050896
- Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters T. Lauvaux et al. 10.1126/science.abj4351
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Intermittency of Large Methane Emitters in the Permian Basin D. Cusworth et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173
- Modeling air emissions from complex facilities at detailed temporal and spatial resolution: The Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET) D. Zimmerle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153653
- Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin J. Lin et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5
- Quantifying NOx Emissions from U.S. Oil and Gas Production Regions Using TROPOMI NO2 B. Dix et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00387
- Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abf4507
- Where the Methane Is—Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data D. Tyner & M. Johnson 10.1021/acs.est.1c01572
- LNG Supply Chains: A Supplier-Specific Life-Cycle Assessment for Improved Emission Accounting S. Roman-White et al. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03307
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
- Contribution of Regionalized Methane Emissions to Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity and Carbon Capture in the United States D. Burns & E. Grubert 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00531
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
Latest update: 27 Mar 2023
Short summary
The Permian Basin (USA) is the world’s largest oil field. We use tower- and aircraft-based approaches to measure how methane emissions in the Permian Basin changed throughout 2020. In early 2020, 3.3 % of the region’s gas was emitted; then in spring 2020, the loss rate temporarily dropped to 1.9 % as oil price crashed. We find this short-term reduction to be a result of reduced well development, less gas flaring, and fewer abnormal events despite minimal reductions in oil and gas production.
The Permian Basin (USA) is the world’s largest oil field. We use tower- and aircraft-based...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint