Articles | Volume 21, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16745-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16745-2021
Measurement report
 | 
18 Nov 2021
Measurement report |  | 18 Nov 2021

Measurement report: Comparison of airborne, in situ measured, lidar-based, and modeled aerosol optical properties in the central European background – identifying sources of deviations

Sebastian Düsing, Albert Ansmann, Holger Baars, Joel C. Corbin, Cyrielle Denjean, Martin Gysel-Beer, Thomas Müller, Laurent Poulain, Holger Siebert, Gerald Spindler, Thomas Tuch, Birgit Wehner, and Alfred Wiedensohler

Viewed

Total article views: 3,638 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,292 1,290 56 3,638 160 46 43
  • HTML: 2,292
  • PDF: 1,290
  • XML: 56
  • Total: 3,638
  • Supplement: 160
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,638 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,640 with geography defined and -2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The work deals with optical properties of aerosol particles in dried and atmospheric states. Based on two measurement campaigns in the rural background of central Europe, different measurement approaches were compared with each other, such as modeling based on Mie theory and direct in situ or remote sensing measurements. Among others, it was shown that the aerosol extinction-to-backscatter ratio is relative humidity dependent, and refinement with respect to the model input parameters is needed.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint