Articles | Volume 21, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 Jul 2021
Research article |
| 06 Jul 2021
| 06 Jul 2021
Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Douglas G. MacMartin
Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Ben Kravitz
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Olivier Boucher
Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
Andy Jones
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Thibaut Lurton
Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
Michou Martine
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Michael J. Mills
Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Pierre Nabat
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Ulrike Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Roland Séférian
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Simone Tilmes
Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 4,919 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Mar 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,500 | 1,362 | 57 | 4,919 | 251 | 47 | 45 |
- HTML: 3,500
- PDF: 1,362
- XML: 57
- Total: 4,919
- Supplement: 251
- BibTeX: 47
- EndNote: 45
Total article views: 3,777 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Jul 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,910 | 828 | 39 | 3,777 | 154 | 45 | 43 |
- HTML: 2,910
- PDF: 828
- XML: 39
- Total: 3,777
- Supplement: 154
- BibTeX: 45
- EndNote: 43
Total article views: 1,142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Mar 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 590 | 534 | 18 | 1,142 | 97 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 590
- PDF: 534
- XML: 18
- Total: 1,142
- Supplement: 97
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,919 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,068 with geography defined
and -149 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,777 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,888 with geography defined
and -111 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,180 with geography defined
and -38 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
41 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- The Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Extreme Fire Weather Risk D. Touma et al. 10.1029/2023EF003626
- Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of “Middle Atmosphere” Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6)) N. Davis et al. 10.1029/2022MS003579
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
- The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Geoengineering on the Summer Climate Over East Asia Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2021JD035049
- The Indonesian Throughflow circulation under solar geoengineering C. Shen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1317-2023
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on the East Asian Winter Monsoon Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL102109
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Future water storage changes over the Mediterranean, Middle East, and North Africa in response to global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention A. Rezaei et al. 10.5194/esd-15-91-2024
- Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
- “Cooling credits” are not a viable climate solution M. Diamond et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03561-w
- PInc-PanTher estimates of Arctic permafrost soil carbon under the GeoMIP G6solar and G6sulfur experiments A. Liu et al. 10.5194/esd-14-39-2023
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
- Assessing the Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on US Convective Weather Environments I. Glade et al. 10.1029/2023EF004041
- Optimal climate intervention scenarios for crop production vary by nation B. Clark et al. 10.1038/s43016-023-00853-3
- Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations S. Tilmes et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
- Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI): protocol and initial results from the first simulations J. Richter et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Dependence of strategic solar climate intervention on background scenario and model physics J. Fasullo & J. Richter 10.5194/acp-23-163-2023
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- Solar geoengineering and carbon removal significantly lower economic climate damages A. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.09.004
- The Overlooked Role of the Stratosphere Under a Solar Constant Reduction E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2022GL098773
- On the Linearity of External Forcing Response in Solar Geoengineering Experiments J. Virgin & C. Fletcher 10.1029/2022GL100200
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- SURFER v2.0: a flexible and simple model linking anthropogenic CO2 emissions and solar radiation modification to ocean acidification and sea level rise M. Martínez Montero et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8059-2022
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Pflüger et al. 10.1029/2023GL106132
- Brief communication: Reduction in the future Greenland ice sheet surface melt with the help of solar geoengineering X. Fettweis et al. 10.5194/tc-15-3013-2021
40 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- The Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Extreme Fire Weather Risk D. Touma et al. 10.1029/2023EF003626
- Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of “Middle Atmosphere” Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6)) N. Davis et al. 10.1029/2022MS003579
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
- The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Geoengineering on the Summer Climate Over East Asia Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2021JD035049
- The Indonesian Throughflow circulation under solar geoengineering C. Shen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1317-2023
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on the East Asian Winter Monsoon Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL102109
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Future water storage changes over the Mediterranean, Middle East, and North Africa in response to global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention A. Rezaei et al. 10.5194/esd-15-91-2024
- Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
- “Cooling credits” are not a viable climate solution M. Diamond et al. 10.1007/s10584-023-03561-w
- PInc-PanTher estimates of Arctic permafrost soil carbon under the GeoMIP G6solar and G6sulfur experiments A. Liu et al. 10.5194/esd-14-39-2023
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
- Assessing the Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on US Convective Weather Environments I. Glade et al. 10.1029/2023EF004041
- Optimal climate intervention scenarios for crop production vary by nation B. Clark et al. 10.1038/s43016-023-00853-3
- Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations S. Tilmes et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
- Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI): protocol and initial results from the first simulations J. Richter et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Dependence of strategic solar climate intervention on background scenario and model physics J. Fasullo & J. Richter 10.5194/acp-23-163-2023
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- Solar geoengineering and carbon removal significantly lower economic climate damages A. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.09.004
- The Overlooked Role of the Stratosphere Under a Solar Constant Reduction E. Bednarz et al. 10.1029/2022GL098773
- On the Linearity of External Forcing Response in Solar Geoengineering Experiments J. Virgin & C. Fletcher 10.1029/2022GL100200
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- SURFER v2.0: a flexible and simple model linking anthropogenic CO2 emissions and solar radiation modification to ocean acidification and sea level rise M. Martínez Montero et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8059-2022
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Pflüger et al. 10.1029/2023GL106132
Discussed (preprint)
Latest update: 25 Apr 2024
Short summary
A new set of simulations is used to investigate commonalities, differences and sources of uncertainty when simulating the injection of SO2 in the stratosphere in order to mitigate the effects of climate change (solar geoengineering). The models differ in how they simulate the aerosols and how they spread around the stratosphere, resulting in differences in projected regional impacts. Overall, however, the models agree that aerosols have the potential to mitigate the warming produced by GHGs.
A new set of simulations is used to investigate commonalities, differences and sources of...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint