Articles | Volume 21, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
Research article
 | 
06 Jul 2021
Research article |  | 06 Jul 2021

Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations

Daniele Visioni, Douglas G. MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michou Martine, Michael J. Mills, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes

Viewed

Total article views: 5,314 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,826 1,425 63 5,314 282 48 48
  • HTML: 3,826
  • PDF: 1,425
  • XML: 63
  • Total: 5,314
  • Supplement: 282
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,314 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,468 with geography defined and -154 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 11 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
A new set of simulations is used to investigate commonalities, differences and sources of uncertainty when simulating the injection of SO2 in the stratosphere in order to mitigate the effects of climate change (solar geoengineering). The models differ in how they simulate the aerosols and how they spread around the stratosphere, resulting in differences in projected regional impacts. Overall, however, the models agree that aerosols have the potential to mitigate the warming produced by GHGs.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint