Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
17 Aug 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 17 Aug 2020

Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

Christopher J. Smith, Ryan J. Kramer, Gunnar Myhre, Kari Alterskjær, William Collins, Adriana Sima, Olivier Boucher, Jean-Louis Dufresne, Pierre Nabat, Martine Michou, Seiji Yukimoto, Jason Cole, David Paynter, Hideo Shiogama, Fiona M. O'Connor, Eddy Robertson, Andy Wiltshire, Timothy Andrews, Cécile Hannay, Ron Miller, Larissa Nazarenko, Alf Kirkevåg, Dirk Olivié, Stephanie Fiedler, Anna Lewinschal, Chloe Mackallah, Martin Dix, Robert Pincus, and Piers M. Forster

Viewed

Total article views: 15,495 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
11,738 3,645 112 15,495 993 164 133
  • HTML: 11,738
  • PDF: 3,645
  • XML: 112
  • Total: 15,495
  • Supplement: 993
  • BibTeX: 164
  • EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 15,495 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 15,350 with geography defined and 145 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
The spread in effective radiative forcing for both CO2 and aerosols is narrower in the latest CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) generation than in CMIP5. For the case of CO2 it is likely that model radiation parameterisations have improved. Tropospheric and stratospheric radiative adjustments to the forcing behave differently for different forcing agents, and there is still significant diversity in how clouds respond to forcings, particularly for total anthropogenic forcing.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint