Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models
Christopher J. Smith
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg 2361, Austria
Ryan J. Kramer
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Universities Space Research Association, 7178 Columbia Gateway Drive, Columbia, MD 21046, USA
Gunnar Myhre
CICERO, Oslo, Norway
Kari Alterskjær
CICERO, Oslo, Norway
William Collins
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
Adriana Sima
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, ENS, PSL Université, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France
Olivier Boucher
Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
Jean-Louis Dufresne
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, ENS, PSL Université, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France
Pierre Nabat
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Martine Michou
CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Seiji Yukimoto
Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba 305-0052, Japan
Jason Cole
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
David Paynter
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University Forrestal Campus, 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649, USA
Hideo Shiogama
Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8564, Japan
Fiona M. O'Connor
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Eddy Robertson
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Andy Wiltshire
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Timothy Andrews
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Cécile Hannay
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Ron Miller
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY 10025, USA
Larissa Nazarenko
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY 10025, USA
Alf Kirkevåg
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Dirk Olivié
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Stephanie Fiedler
Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Anna Lewinschal
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Sweden
Chloe Mackallah
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
Martin Dix
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
Robert Pincus
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Piers M. Forster
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 16,870 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jan 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12,839 | 3,912 | 119 | 16,870 | 1,144 | 172 | 145 |
- HTML: 12,839
- PDF: 3,912
- XML: 119
- Total: 16,870
- Supplement: 1,144
- BibTeX: 172
- EndNote: 145
Total article views: 14,949 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11,896 | 2,949 | 104 | 14,949 | 883 | 142 | 128 |
- HTML: 11,896
- PDF: 2,949
- XML: 104
- Total: 14,949
- Supplement: 883
- BibTeX: 142
- EndNote: 128
Total article views: 1,921 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jan 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
943 | 963 | 15 | 1,921 | 261 | 30 | 17 |
- HTML: 943
- PDF: 963
- XML: 15
- Total: 1,921
- Supplement: 261
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 16,870 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 16,744 with geography defined
and 126 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 14,949 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 14,916 with geography defined
and 33 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,921 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,828 with geography defined
and 93 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
158 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Are Northern Hemisphere boreal forest fires more sensitive to future aerosol mitigation than to greenhouse gas–driven warming? R. Allen et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl4007
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2020EF001900
- Decomposing the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols based on CMIP6 Earth system models A. Kalisoras et al. 10.5194/acp-24-7837-2024
- ACCESS datasets for CMIP6: methodology and idealised experiments C. Mackallah et al. 10.1071/ES21031
- Compensation Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in CMIP6 Models C. Wang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091024
- Climate effects of future aerosol reductions for achieving carbon neutrality in China Y. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.03.048
- On the Linearity of External Forcing Response in Solar Geoengineering Experiments J. Virgin & C. Fletcher 10.1029/2022GL100200
- Historical Changes and Reasons for Model Differences in Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing in CMIP6 S. Fiedler et al. 10.1029/2023GL104848
- Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui 10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Climate impacts of U.S. forest loss span net warming to net cooling C. Williams et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aax8859
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
- Constraining Uncertainty in Aerosol Direct Forcing D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2020GL087141
- Effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols in E3SM version 1: historical changes, causality, decomposition, and parameterization sensitivities K. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022
- Projected changes in mean annual cycle of temperature and precipitation over the Czech Republic: Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 E. Holtanová et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.1018661
- Global modeling of hydrogen using GFDL-AM4.1: Sensitivity of soil removal and radiative forcing F. Paulot et al. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088
- Effective Radiative Forcings Due To Anthropogenic Emission Changes Under Covid‐19 and Post‐Pandemic Recovery Scenarios X. Yu et al. 10.1029/2021JD036251
- Matilda v1.0: An R package for probabilistic climate projections using a reduced complexity climate model J. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000295
- Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 P. Ma et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022
- Biases in the albedo sensitivity to deforestation in CMIP5 models and their impacts on the associated historical radiative forcing Q. Lejeune et al. 10.5194/esd-11-1209-2020
- Bias in CMIP6 models as compared to observed regional dimming and brightening K. Moseid et al. 10.5194/acp-20-16023-2020
- Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models L. Hahn et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.710036
- A Novel Measurement-Based Method for Assessing Global Warming Mitigation via High-Albedo Solutions F. Rossi et al. 10.3390/en15155695
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Observational Assessment of Changes in Earth’s Energy Imbalance Since 2000 N. Loeb et al. 10.1007/s10712-024-09838-8
- Contributions to regional precipitation change and its polar-amplified pattern under warming D. Bonan et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ace27a
- Regional Features of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Air Quality over Asia under SSP Scenarios Based on CMIP6 Models S. Shim et al. 10.3390/ijerph18136817
- Making climate projections conditional on historical observations A. Ribes et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abc0671
- Variability in Biomass Burning Emissions Weakens Aerosol Forcing Due To Nonlinear Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions K. Heyblom et al. 10.1029/2022GL102685
- Uncertainty separation of drought projection in the 21st century using SMILEs and CMIP6 Y. Ji et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130497
- Significance of the organic aerosol driven climate feedback in the boreal area T. Yli-Juuti et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25850-7
- The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3) J. Cole et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023
- Aerosol transport pathways and source attribution in China during the COVID-19 outbreak L. Ren et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15431-2021
- Improvement and Uncertainties of Global Simulation of Sulfate Concentration and Radiative Forcing in CESM2 W. Ge et al. 10.1029/2022JD037623
- CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool M. Sandstad et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024
- The role of anthropogenic aerosols in the anomalous cooling from 1960 to 1990 in the CMIP6 Earth system models J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021
- Arctic warming in response to regional aerosol emissions reductions M. Previdi et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ace4e8
- Observed and future shifts in climate zone of Borneo based on CMIP6 models Z. Sa’adi et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121087
- Evaluating uncertainty in aerosol forcing of tropical precipitation shifts A. Peace et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1215-2022
- Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives J. Quaas et al. 10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020
- The Impacts of Aerosol Emissions on Historical Climate in UKESM1 J. Seo et al. 10.3390/atmos11101095
- Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6 C. Tebaldi et al. 10.5194/esd-12-253-2021
- Representation of land–atmosphere coupling processes over Africa in coupled model intercomparison project Phase 6 A. Mwanthi et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06710-0
- High Flux of Small Sulfate Aerosols During the 1970s Reconstructed From the SE‐Dome Ice Core in Greenland Y. Iizuka et al. 10.1029/2022JD036880
- Detecting Climate Signals Using Explainable AI With Single‐Forcing Large Ensembles Z. Labe & E. Barnes 10.1029/2021MS002464
- The Cause of Negative CO2 Forcing at the Top‐Of‐Atmosphere: The Role of Stratospheric Versus Tropospheric Temperature Inversions Y. Chen et al. 10.1029/2023GL106433
- Impacts of Suppressing Excessive Light Rain on Aerosol Radiative Effects and Health Risks Y. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021JD036204
- The impact of global changes in near-term climate forcers on East Africa’s climate R. Opio et al. 10.1186/s40068-023-00304-9
- Errors in Simple Climate Model Emulations of Past and Future Global Temperature Change L. Jackson et al. 10.1029/2022GL098808
- Effective Radiative Forcing in a GCM With Fixed Surface Temperatures T. Andrews et al. 10.1029/2020JD033880
- Potential and Investment Attractiveness of Implementing Climate Projects on Disturbed Lands S. Morkovina et al. 10.3390/su16198562
- Estimating Radiative Forcing With a Nonconstant Feedback Parameter and Linear Response H. Fredriksen et al. 10.1029/2020JD034145
- Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks C. Smith & P. Forster 10.1029/2021GL094948
- Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
- Present-day methane shortwave absorption mutes surface warming relative to preindustrial conditions R. Allen et al. 10.5194/acp-24-11207-2024
- Ocean Heat Content Responses to Changing Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing Strength: Regional and Multi‐Decadal Variability E. Boland et al. 10.1029/2022JC018725
- Aerosol Forcing Masks and Delays the Formation of the North Atlantic Warming Hole by Three Decades G. Dagan et al. 10.1029/2020GL090778
- Effective Radiative Forcing of the Internally Mixed Sulfate and Black Carbon Aerosol in the GFDL AM4 Model: The Role Played by Other Aerosol Species G. Govardhan et al. 10.1029/2023JD038481
- Apportionment of the Pre‐Industrial to Present‐Day Climate Forcing by Methane Using UKESM1: The Role of the Cloud Radiative Effect F. O’Connor et al. 10.1029/2022MS002991
- Radiative feedbacks on land surface change and associated tropical precipitation shifts M. Laguë et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0883.1
- Compensating atmospheric adjustments reduce the volcanic forcing from Hunga stratospheric water vapor enhancement Y. Wang & Y. Huang 10.1126/sciadv.adl2842
- Future evolution of aerosols and implications for climate change in the Euro-Mediterranean region using the CNRM-ALADIN63 regional climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-21-7639-2021
- Compatible Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions in the CMIP6 Earth System Models’ Historical and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway Experiments of the Twenty-First Century S. Liddicoat et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0991.1
- Advances in Atmospheric Radiation: Theories, Models, and Their Applications. Part II: Radiative Transfer Models and Related Applications H. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s13351-024-3089-y
- The Role of Aerosol‐Radiation Interaction in the Meteorology Prediction at the Weather Scale in the Numerical Weather Prediction Model W. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021GL097026
- Climate Base State Influences on South Asian Monsoon Processes Derived From Analyses of E3SMv2 and CESM2 G. Meehl et al. 10.1029/2023GL104313
- Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
- Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery S. Fiedler et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105866
- Relevance of surface albedo to forestry policy in high latitude and altitude regions may be overvalued R. Bright et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad657e
- Spurious Late Historical‐Era Warming in CESM2 Driven by Prescribed Biomass Burning Emissions J. Fasullo et al. 10.1029/2021GL097420
- Updated Simulation of Tropospheric Ozone and Its Radiative Forcing over the Globe and China Based on a Newly Developed Chemistry-Climate Model A. Qi et al. 10.1007/s13351-022-1187-2
- Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011 D. Pérez-Ramírez et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021
- Amplified Decadal Variability of Extratropical Surface Temperatures by Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling A. Butler et al. 10.1029/2023GL104607
- Evaluation of liquid cloud albedo susceptibility in E3SM using coupled eastern North Atlantic surface and satellite retrievals A. Varble et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13523-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Local and remote climate impacts of future African aerosol emissions C. Wells et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3575-2023
- Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme H. Wan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024
- Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China and the Simulations of the Aerosol Properties T. Fan et al. 10.1007/s00376-021-1119-6
- Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models C. Flynn et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023
- Reduced effective radiative forcing from cloud–aerosol interactions (ERF<sub>aci</sub>) with improved treatment of early aerosol growth in an Earth system model S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021
- Updating the intensity-duration-frequency curves in major Canadian cities under changing climate using CMIP5 and CMIP6 model projections V. Crévolin et al. 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104473
- Efficacy of climate forcings in transient CMIP6 simulations G. Myhre et al. 10.3389/fclim.2024.1397358
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- Identifying Potential Household Waste as Secondary Raw Materials in the Construction Industry: A Case Study of Sri Lanka T. Weerakoon et al. 10.2478/bjreecm-2023-0012
- Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach J. Li et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024
- Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution D. Goto et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024
- Nonlinearity of the cloud response postpones climate penalty of mitigating air pollution in polluted regions H. Jia & J. Quaas 10.1038/s41558-023-01775-5
- Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. 10.1029/2020JD033364
- Joint optimization of land carbon uptake and albedo can help achieve moderate instantaneous and long-term cooling effects A. Graf et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00958-4
- Stronger Arctic amplification from anthropogenic aerosols than from greenhouse gases Y. Wu et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00696-0
- Strong control of effective radiative forcing by the spatial pattern of absorbing aerosol A. Williams et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01415-4
- Projected Changes and Time of Emergence of Temperature Extremes Over Australia in CMIP5 and CMIP6 X. Deng et al. 10.1029/2021EF002645
- Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean L. Stecher et al. 10.5194/acp-21-731-2021
- Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean C. Wall et al. 10.1073/pnas.2210481119
- Effect of Regional Marine Cloud Brightening Interventions on Climate Tipping Elements H. Hirasawa et al. 10.1029/2023GL104314
- Surface warming and wetting due to methane’s long-wave radiative effects muted by short-wave absorption R. Allen et al. 10.1038/s41561-023-01144-z
- Climate sensitivity indices and their relation with projected temperature change in CMIP6 models L. Huusko et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0748
- On the Correspondence Between Atmosphere‐Only and Coupled Simulations for Radiative Feedbacks and Forcing From CO2 Y. Qin et al. 10.1029/2021JD035460
- The radiative feedback continuum from Snowball Earth to an ice-free hothouse I. Eisenman & K. Armour 10.1038/s41467-024-50406-w
- CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalence metrics for surface albedo change based on the radiative forcing concept: a critical review R. Bright & M. Lund 10.5194/acp-21-9887-2021
- Changes to population-based emergence of climate change from CMIP5 to CMIP6 H. Douglas et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aca91e
- Origins of a Relatively Tight Lower Bound on Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Forcing from Bayesian Analysis of Historical Observations A. Albright et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0167.1
- Asymmetric Warming/Cooling Response to CO2 Increase/Decrease Mainly Due To Non‐Logarithmic Forcing, Not Feedbacks I. Mitevski et al. 10.1029/2021GL097133
- Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model T. Hassan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024
- Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2022GL099788
- Increases in extreme precipitation expected in Northeast China under continued global warming Z. Xie et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07144-y
- Anthropogenic aerosol impacts on Pacific Coast precipitation in CMIP6 models R. Allen & X. Zhao 10.1088/2752-5295/ac7d68
- Scenario choice impacts carbon allocation projection at global warming levels L. de Mora et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1295-2023
- Impacts of coal use phase-out in China on the atmospheric environment: (2) public health and global radiative forcing Y. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120280
- Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-853-2021
- Is natural variability really natural? The case of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation investigated by a neural network model A. Pasini et al. 10.1007/s00704-022-04207-0
- 21st Century Scenario Forcing Increases More for CMIP6 Than CMIP5 Models H. Fredriksen et al. 10.1029/2023GL102916
- Global warming impacts of carbon dioxide, methane, and albedo in an island forest nature reserve L. Wu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad86d1
- Warming proportional to cumulative carbon emissions not explained by heat and carbon sharing mixing processes N. Gillett 10.1038/s41467-023-42111-x
- Detection and Attribution of Climate Change Using a Neural Network C. Bône et al. 10.1029/2022MS003475
- The HadGEM3-GA7.1 radiative kernel: the importance of a well-resolved stratosphere C. Smith et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2157-2020
- Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing R. Kramer et al. 10.1029/2020GL091585
- Fast climate responses to emission reductions in aerosol and ozone precursors in China during 2013–2017 J. Gao et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7131-2022
- Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets P. Goodwin & B. Cael 10.5194/esd-12-709-2021
- Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations J. Fyfe et al. 10.1073/pnas.2016549118
- Clear-Sky Direct Aerosol Radiative Forcing Uncertainty Associated with Aerosol Optical Properties Based on CMIP6 models L. Zhang et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0479.1
- Anthropogenic aerosol forcing of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and the associated mechanisms in CMIP6 models T. Hassan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-5821-2021
- Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration N. Hasler et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-46577-1
- Comparison of methods to estimate aerosol effective radiative forcings in climate models M. Zelinka et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8879-2023
- Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms M. Byrne et al. 10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024
- PM2.5 decrease with precipitation as revealed by single‐point ground‐based observation R. Fujino & Y. Miyamoto 10.1002/asl.1088
- Aggressive Aerosol Mitigation Policies Reduce Chances of Keeping Global Warming to Below 2C R. Wood et al. 10.1029/2023EF004233
- Assessing observational constraints on future European climate in an out-of-sample framework C. O’Reilly et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00648-8
- Overlooked cooling effects of albedo in terrestrial ecosystems J. Chen et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad661d
- The aerosol pathway is crucial for observationally constraining climate sensitivity and anthropogenic forcing R. Skeie et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1435-2024
- Aperture division multispectral camera for the Earth's reflected solar radiation observation based on the Lagrange L1 point of the Earth-Moon system H. Zhang et al. 10.1364/OE.500994
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- State dependence of CO 2 forcing and its implications for climate sensitivity H. He et al. 10.1126/science.abq6872
- Progress of aerosol direct radiative forcing A. Chen & C. Zhao 10.1360/TB-2023-0375
- The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation J. Golaz et al. 10.1029/2022MS003156
- Significant human health co-benefits of mitigating African emissions C. Wells et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1025-2024
- Evaluation of Simulated Cloud Diurnal Variation in CMIP6 Climate Models G. Chen et al. 10.1029/2021JD036422
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- The Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Hydration of the Stratosphere L. Millán et al. 10.1029/2022GL099381
- Biased Estimates of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity and Transient Climate Response Derived From Historical CMIP6 Simulations Y. Dong et al. 10.1029/2021GL095778
- Global evaluation of simulated surface shortwave radiation in CMIP6 models J. He et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106896
- First assessment of the earth heat inventory within CMIP5 historical simulations F. Cuesta-Valero et al. 10.5194/esd-12-581-2021
- An Assessment of Short-term Global and East Asian Local Climate Feedbacks using New Radiative Kernels F. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06369-z
- Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. 10.1029/2020JD033622
- Reducing uncertainty in local temperature projections S. Qasmi & A. Ribes 10.1126/sciadv.abo6872
- Droplet collection efficiencies inferred from satellite retrievals constrain effective radiative forcing of aerosol–cloud interactions C. Beall et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024
- Observational Constraint on the Climate Sensitivity to Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Changes Derived from the 1971–2017 Global Energy Budget J. Chenal et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0565.1
- Probability of committed warming exceeding 1.5 ∘C and 2.0 ∘C Paris targets S. Sherwood et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6ff6
- Climate sensitivity and relative humidity changes in global storm-resolving model simulations of climate change T. Merlis et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adn5217
- The contributions of individual countries and regions to the global radiative forcing B. Fu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2018211118
- Toward carbon neutrality: Projecting a desert-based photovoltaic power network circumnavigating the globe Y. Zhou et al. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad097
- Addressing the difficulties in quantifying droplet number response to aerosol from satellite observations H. Jia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7353-2022
- Can Global Mean Temperatures be Held to 1.5∘C or Less without Major Efforts in Carbon Removal/Geoengineering? D. Wuebbles 10.1142/S2972312423500017
- Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon, and sulfate K. Nordling et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14941-2021
- Significance of the organic aerosol driven climate feedback in the boreal area T. Yli-Juuti et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25850-7
- Interpreting the Dependence of Cloud‐Radiative Adjustment on Forcing Agent P. Salvi et al. 10.1029/2021GL093616
- Correlation Between Cloud Adjustments and Cloud Feedbacks Responsible for Larger Range of Climate Sensitivities in CMIP6 N. Lutsko et al. 10.1029/2022JD037486
- Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0 N. Oshima et al. 10.1186/s40645-020-00348-w
154 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Are Northern Hemisphere boreal forest fires more sensitive to future aerosol mitigation than to greenhouse gas–driven warming? R. Allen et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl4007
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2020EF001900
- Decomposing the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols based on CMIP6 Earth system models A. Kalisoras et al. 10.5194/acp-24-7837-2024
- ACCESS datasets for CMIP6: methodology and idealised experiments C. Mackallah et al. 10.1071/ES21031
- Compensation Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in CMIP6 Models C. Wang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091024
- Climate effects of future aerosol reductions for achieving carbon neutrality in China Y. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.03.048
- On the Linearity of External Forcing Response in Solar Geoengineering Experiments J. Virgin & C. Fletcher 10.1029/2022GL100200
- Historical Changes and Reasons for Model Differences in Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing in CMIP6 S. Fiedler et al. 10.1029/2023GL104848
- Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui 10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Climate impacts of U.S. forest loss span net warming to net cooling C. Williams et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aax8859
- Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
- Constraining Uncertainty in Aerosol Direct Forcing D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2020GL087141
- Effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols in E3SM version 1: historical changes, causality, decomposition, and parameterization sensitivities K. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022
- Projected changes in mean annual cycle of temperature and precipitation over the Czech Republic: Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 E. Holtanová et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.1018661
- Global modeling of hydrogen using GFDL-AM4.1: Sensitivity of soil removal and radiative forcing F. Paulot et al. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088
- Effective Radiative Forcings Due To Anthropogenic Emission Changes Under Covid‐19 and Post‐Pandemic Recovery Scenarios X. Yu et al. 10.1029/2021JD036251
- Matilda v1.0: An R package for probabilistic climate projections using a reduced complexity climate model J. Brown et al. 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000295
- Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 P. Ma et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022
- Biases in the albedo sensitivity to deforestation in CMIP5 models and their impacts on the associated historical radiative forcing Q. Lejeune et al. 10.5194/esd-11-1209-2020
- Bias in CMIP6 models as compared to observed regional dimming and brightening K. Moseid et al. 10.5194/acp-20-16023-2020
- Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models L. Hahn et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.710036
- A Novel Measurement-Based Method for Assessing Global Warming Mitigation via High-Albedo Solutions F. Rossi et al. 10.3390/en15155695
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Observational Assessment of Changes in Earth’s Energy Imbalance Since 2000 N. Loeb et al. 10.1007/s10712-024-09838-8
- Contributions to regional precipitation change and its polar-amplified pattern under warming D. Bonan et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ace27a
- Regional Features of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Air Quality over Asia under SSP Scenarios Based on CMIP6 Models S. Shim et al. 10.3390/ijerph18136817
- Making climate projections conditional on historical observations A. Ribes et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abc0671
- Variability in Biomass Burning Emissions Weakens Aerosol Forcing Due To Nonlinear Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions K. Heyblom et al. 10.1029/2022GL102685
- Uncertainty separation of drought projection in the 21st century using SMILEs and CMIP6 Y. Ji et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130497
- Significance of the organic aerosol driven climate feedback in the boreal area T. Yli-Juuti et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25850-7
- The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3) J. Cole et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023
- Aerosol transport pathways and source attribution in China during the COVID-19 outbreak L. Ren et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15431-2021
- Improvement and Uncertainties of Global Simulation of Sulfate Concentration and Radiative Forcing in CESM2 W. Ge et al. 10.1029/2022JD037623
- CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool M. Sandstad et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024
- The role of anthropogenic aerosols in the anomalous cooling from 1960 to 1990 in the CMIP6 Earth system models J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021
- Arctic warming in response to regional aerosol emissions reductions M. Previdi et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ace4e8
- Observed and future shifts in climate zone of Borneo based on CMIP6 models Z. Sa’adi et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121087
- Evaluating uncertainty in aerosol forcing of tropical precipitation shifts A. Peace et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1215-2022
- Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives J. Quaas et al. 10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020
- The Impacts of Aerosol Emissions on Historical Climate in UKESM1 J. Seo et al. 10.3390/atmos11101095
- Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6 C. Tebaldi et al. 10.5194/esd-12-253-2021
- Representation of land–atmosphere coupling processes over Africa in coupled model intercomparison project Phase 6 A. Mwanthi et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06710-0
- High Flux of Small Sulfate Aerosols During the 1970s Reconstructed From the SE‐Dome Ice Core in Greenland Y. Iizuka et al. 10.1029/2022JD036880
- Detecting Climate Signals Using Explainable AI With Single‐Forcing Large Ensembles Z. Labe & E. Barnes 10.1029/2021MS002464
- The Cause of Negative CO2 Forcing at the Top‐Of‐Atmosphere: The Role of Stratospheric Versus Tropospheric Temperature Inversions Y. Chen et al. 10.1029/2023GL106433
- Impacts of Suppressing Excessive Light Rain on Aerosol Radiative Effects and Health Risks Y. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021JD036204
- The impact of global changes in near-term climate forcers on East Africa’s climate R. Opio et al. 10.1186/s40068-023-00304-9
- Errors in Simple Climate Model Emulations of Past and Future Global Temperature Change L. Jackson et al. 10.1029/2022GL098808
- Effective Radiative Forcing in a GCM With Fixed Surface Temperatures T. Andrews et al. 10.1029/2020JD033880
- Potential and Investment Attractiveness of Implementing Climate Projects on Disturbed Lands S. Morkovina et al. 10.3390/su16198562
- Estimating Radiative Forcing With a Nonconstant Feedback Parameter and Linear Response H. Fredriksen et al. 10.1029/2020JD034145
- Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks C. Smith & P. Forster 10.1029/2021GL094948
- Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
- Present-day methane shortwave absorption mutes surface warming relative to preindustrial conditions R. Allen et al. 10.5194/acp-24-11207-2024
- Ocean Heat Content Responses to Changing Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing Strength: Regional and Multi‐Decadal Variability E. Boland et al. 10.1029/2022JC018725
- Aerosol Forcing Masks and Delays the Formation of the North Atlantic Warming Hole by Three Decades G. Dagan et al. 10.1029/2020GL090778
- Effective Radiative Forcing of the Internally Mixed Sulfate and Black Carbon Aerosol in the GFDL AM4 Model: The Role Played by Other Aerosol Species G. Govardhan et al. 10.1029/2023JD038481
- Apportionment of the Pre‐Industrial to Present‐Day Climate Forcing by Methane Using UKESM1: The Role of the Cloud Radiative Effect F. O’Connor et al. 10.1029/2022MS002991
- Radiative feedbacks on land surface change and associated tropical precipitation shifts M. Laguë et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0883.1
- Compensating atmospheric adjustments reduce the volcanic forcing from Hunga stratospheric water vapor enhancement Y. Wang & Y. Huang 10.1126/sciadv.adl2842
- Future evolution of aerosols and implications for climate change in the Euro-Mediterranean region using the CNRM-ALADIN63 regional climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-21-7639-2021
- Compatible Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions in the CMIP6 Earth System Models’ Historical and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway Experiments of the Twenty-First Century S. Liddicoat et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0991.1
- Advances in Atmospheric Radiation: Theories, Models, and Their Applications. Part II: Radiative Transfer Models and Related Applications H. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s13351-024-3089-y
- The Role of Aerosol‐Radiation Interaction in the Meteorology Prediction at the Weather Scale in the Numerical Weather Prediction Model W. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021GL097026
- Climate Base State Influences on South Asian Monsoon Processes Derived From Analyses of E3SMv2 and CESM2 G. Meehl et al. 10.1029/2023GL104313
- Effect of aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty on projected exceedance year of a 1.5 °C global temperature rise A. Peace et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba20c
- Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery S. Fiedler et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105866
- Relevance of surface albedo to forestry policy in high latitude and altitude regions may be overvalued R. Bright et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad657e
- Spurious Late Historical‐Era Warming in CESM2 Driven by Prescribed Biomass Burning Emissions J. Fasullo et al. 10.1029/2021GL097420
- Updated Simulation of Tropospheric Ozone and Its Radiative Forcing over the Globe and China Based on a Newly Developed Chemistry-Climate Model A. Qi et al. 10.1007/s13351-022-1187-2
- Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011 D. Pérez-Ramírez et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021
- Amplified Decadal Variability of Extratropical Surface Temperatures by Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling A. Butler et al. 10.1029/2023GL104607
- Evaluation of liquid cloud albedo susceptibility in E3SM using coupled eastern North Atlantic surface and satellite retrievals A. Varble et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13523-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Local and remote climate impacts of future African aerosol emissions C. Wells et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3575-2023
- Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme H. Wan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024
- Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China and the Simulations of the Aerosol Properties T. Fan et al. 10.1007/s00376-021-1119-6
- Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models C. Flynn et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023
- Reduced effective radiative forcing from cloud–aerosol interactions (ERF<sub>aci</sub>) with improved treatment of early aerosol growth in an Earth system model S. Blichner et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021
- Updating the intensity-duration-frequency curves in major Canadian cities under changing climate using CMIP5 and CMIP6 model projections V. Crévolin et al. 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104473
- Efficacy of climate forcings in transient CMIP6 simulations G. Myhre et al. 10.3389/fclim.2024.1397358
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- Identifying Potential Household Waste as Secondary Raw Materials in the Construction Industry: A Case Study of Sri Lanka T. Weerakoon et al. 10.2478/bjreecm-2023-0012
- Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach J. Li et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024
- Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution D. Goto et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024
- Nonlinearity of the cloud response postpones climate penalty of mitigating air pollution in polluted regions H. Jia & J. Quaas 10.1038/s41558-023-01775-5
- Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. 10.1029/2020JD033364
- Joint optimization of land carbon uptake and albedo can help achieve moderate instantaneous and long-term cooling effects A. Graf et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00958-4
- Stronger Arctic amplification from anthropogenic aerosols than from greenhouse gases Y. Wu et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00696-0
- Strong control of effective radiative forcing by the spatial pattern of absorbing aerosol A. Williams et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01415-4
- Projected Changes and Time of Emergence of Temperature Extremes Over Australia in CMIP5 and CMIP6 X. Deng et al. 10.1029/2021EF002645
- Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean L. Stecher et al. 10.5194/acp-21-731-2021
- Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean C. Wall et al. 10.1073/pnas.2210481119
- Effect of Regional Marine Cloud Brightening Interventions on Climate Tipping Elements H. Hirasawa et al. 10.1029/2023GL104314
- Surface warming and wetting due to methane’s long-wave radiative effects muted by short-wave absorption R. Allen et al. 10.1038/s41561-023-01144-z
- Climate sensitivity indices and their relation with projected temperature change in CMIP6 models L. Huusko et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0748
- On the Correspondence Between Atmosphere‐Only and Coupled Simulations for Radiative Feedbacks and Forcing From CO2 Y. Qin et al. 10.1029/2021JD035460
- The radiative feedback continuum from Snowball Earth to an ice-free hothouse I. Eisenman & K. Armour 10.1038/s41467-024-50406-w
- CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalence metrics for surface albedo change based on the radiative forcing concept: a critical review R. Bright & M. Lund 10.5194/acp-21-9887-2021
- Changes to population-based emergence of climate change from CMIP5 to CMIP6 H. Douglas et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aca91e
- Origins of a Relatively Tight Lower Bound on Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Forcing from Bayesian Analysis of Historical Observations A. Albright et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0167.1
- Asymmetric Warming/Cooling Response to CO2 Increase/Decrease Mainly Due To Non‐Logarithmic Forcing, Not Feedbacks I. Mitevski et al. 10.1029/2021GL097133
- Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model T. Hassan et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024
- Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. 10.1029/2022GL099788
- Increases in extreme precipitation expected in Northeast China under continued global warming Z. Xie et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07144-y
- Anthropogenic aerosol impacts on Pacific Coast precipitation in CMIP6 models R. Allen & X. Zhao 10.1088/2752-5295/ac7d68
- Scenario choice impacts carbon allocation projection at global warming levels L. de Mora et al. 10.5194/esd-14-1295-2023
- Impacts of coal use phase-out in China on the atmospheric environment: (2) public health and global radiative forcing Y. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120280
- Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-853-2021
- Is natural variability really natural? The case of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation investigated by a neural network model A. Pasini et al. 10.1007/s00704-022-04207-0
- 21st Century Scenario Forcing Increases More for CMIP6 Than CMIP5 Models H. Fredriksen et al. 10.1029/2023GL102916
- Global warming impacts of carbon dioxide, methane, and albedo in an island forest nature reserve L. Wu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad86d1
- Warming proportional to cumulative carbon emissions not explained by heat and carbon sharing mixing processes N. Gillett 10.1038/s41467-023-42111-x
- Detection and Attribution of Climate Change Using a Neural Network C. Bône et al. 10.1029/2022MS003475
- The HadGEM3-GA7.1 radiative kernel: the importance of a well-resolved stratosphere C. Smith et al. 10.5194/essd-12-2157-2020
- Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing R. Kramer et al. 10.1029/2020GL091585
- Fast climate responses to emission reductions in aerosol and ozone precursors in China during 2013–2017 J. Gao et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7131-2022
- Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets P. Goodwin & B. Cael 10.5194/esd-12-709-2021
- Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations J. Fyfe et al. 10.1073/pnas.2016549118
- Clear-Sky Direct Aerosol Radiative Forcing Uncertainty Associated with Aerosol Optical Properties Based on CMIP6 models L. Zhang et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0479.1
- Anthropogenic aerosol forcing of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and the associated mechanisms in CMIP6 models T. Hassan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-5821-2021
- Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration N. Hasler et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-46577-1
- Comparison of methods to estimate aerosol effective radiative forcings in climate models M. Zelinka et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8879-2023
- Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms M. Byrne et al. 10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024
- PM2.5 decrease with precipitation as revealed by single‐point ground‐based observation R. Fujino & Y. Miyamoto 10.1002/asl.1088
- Aggressive Aerosol Mitigation Policies Reduce Chances of Keeping Global Warming to Below 2C R. Wood et al. 10.1029/2023EF004233
- Assessing observational constraints on future European climate in an out-of-sample framework C. O’Reilly et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00648-8
- Overlooked cooling effects of albedo in terrestrial ecosystems J. Chen et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad661d
- The aerosol pathway is crucial for observationally constraining climate sensitivity and anthropogenic forcing R. Skeie et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1435-2024
- Aperture division multispectral camera for the Earth's reflected solar radiation observation based on the Lagrange L1 point of the Earth-Moon system H. Zhang et al. 10.1364/OE.500994
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- State dependence of CO 2 forcing and its implications for climate sensitivity H. He et al. 10.1126/science.abq6872
- Progress of aerosol direct radiative forcing A. Chen & C. Zhao 10.1360/TB-2023-0375
- The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation J. Golaz et al. 10.1029/2022MS003156
- Significant human health co-benefits of mitigating African emissions C. Wells et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1025-2024
- Evaluation of Simulated Cloud Diurnal Variation in CMIP6 Climate Models G. Chen et al. 10.1029/2021JD036422
- Mechanisms and Impacts of Earth System Tipping Elements S. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021RG000757
- The Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Hydration of the Stratosphere L. Millán et al. 10.1029/2022GL099381
- Biased Estimates of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity and Transient Climate Response Derived From Historical CMIP6 Simulations Y. Dong et al. 10.1029/2021GL095778
- Global evaluation of simulated surface shortwave radiation in CMIP6 models J. He et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106896
- First assessment of the earth heat inventory within CMIP5 historical simulations F. Cuesta-Valero et al. 10.5194/esd-12-581-2021
- An Assessment of Short-term Global and East Asian Local Climate Feedbacks using New Radiative Kernels F. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06369-z
- Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. 10.1029/2020JD033622
- Reducing uncertainty in local temperature projections S. Qasmi & A. Ribes 10.1126/sciadv.abo6872
- Droplet collection efficiencies inferred from satellite retrievals constrain effective radiative forcing of aerosol–cloud interactions C. Beall et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024
- Observational Constraint on the Climate Sensitivity to Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Changes Derived from the 1971–2017 Global Energy Budget J. Chenal et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0565.1
- Probability of committed warming exceeding 1.5 ∘C and 2.0 ∘C Paris targets S. Sherwood et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6ff6
- Climate sensitivity and relative humidity changes in global storm-resolving model simulations of climate change T. Merlis et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adn5217
- The contributions of individual countries and regions to the global radiative forcing B. Fu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2018211118
- Toward carbon neutrality: Projecting a desert-based photovoltaic power network circumnavigating the globe Y. Zhou et al. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad097
- Addressing the difficulties in quantifying droplet number response to aerosol from satellite observations H. Jia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7353-2022
- Can Global Mean Temperatures be Held to 1.5∘C or Less without Major Efforts in Carbon Removal/Geoengineering? D. Wuebbles 10.1142/S2972312423500017
- Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon, and sulfate K. Nordling et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14941-2021
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Significance of the organic aerosol driven climate feedback in the boreal area T. Yli-Juuti et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25850-7
- Interpreting the Dependence of Cloud‐Radiative Adjustment on Forcing Agent P. Salvi et al. 10.1029/2021GL093616
- Correlation Between Cloud Adjustments and Cloud Feedbacks Responsible for Larger Range of Climate Sensitivities in CMIP6 N. Lutsko et al. 10.1029/2022JD037486
- Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0 N. Oshima et al. 10.1186/s40645-020-00348-w
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
The spread in effective radiative forcing for both CO2 and aerosols is narrower in the latest CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) generation than in CMIP5. For the case of CO2 it is likely that model radiation parameterisations have improved. Tropospheric and stratospheric radiative adjustments to the forcing behave differently for different forcing agents, and there is still significant diversity in how clouds respond to forcings, particularly for total anthropogenic forcing.
The spread in effective radiative forcing for both CO2 and aerosols is narrower in the latest...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint