Articles | Volume 20, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3809-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3809-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
31 Mar 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 31 Mar 2020
| 31 Mar 2020
Description and Evaluation of the specified-dynamics experiment in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
David A. Plummer
Climate Research Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
Darryn W. Waugh
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Huang Yang
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Patrick Jöckel
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Douglas E. Kinnison
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling (ACOM) Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Beatrice Josse
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Virginie Marecal
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
Makoto Deushi
Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan
Nathan Luke Abraham
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge, UK
Alexander T. Archibald
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge, UK
Martyn P. Chipperfield
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Sandip Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Wuhu Feng
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge, UK
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Slimane Bekki
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), Palaiseau, France
Viewed
Total article views: 6,398 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Aug 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,067 | 1,186 | 145 | 6,398 | 176 | 192 |
- HTML: 5,067
- PDF: 1,186
- XML: 145
- Total: 6,398
- BibTeX: 176
- EndNote: 192
Total article views: 5,469 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 Mar 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,613 | 731 | 125 | 5,469 | 146 | 166 |
- HTML: 4,613
- PDF: 731
- XML: 125
- Total: 5,469
- BibTeX: 146
- EndNote: 166
Total article views: 929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Aug 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 454 | 455 | 20 | 929 | 213 | 30 | 26 |
- HTML: 454
- PDF: 455
- XML: 20
- Total: 929
- Supplement: 213
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,398 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,188 with geography defined
and 210 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,469 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,296 with geography defined
and 173 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 892 with geography defined
and 37 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- GCAP 2.0: a global 3-D chemical-transport model framework for past, present, and future climate scenarios L. Murray et al.
- Evaluation of O3, H2O, CO, and NOy climatologies simulated by four global models in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere with IAGOS measurements Y. Cohen et al.
- Hydroxyl Radical (OH) Response to Meteorological Forcing and Implication for the Methane Budget J. He et al.
- Challenges in simulating ozone depletion events in the Arctic boundary layer: a case study using ECHAM/MESSy for spring 2019/2020 S. Falk et al.
- Surface ozone interannual variability, trends, and extremes in CCMI models L. Zhang & Y. Cui
- Evaluating reanalysis representations of climatological trace gas distributions in the Asian monsoon tropopause layer J. Wright et al.
- The historical ozone trends simulated with the SOCOLv4 and their comparison with observations and reanalyses A. Karagodin-Doyennel et al.
- Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: an intercomparison of metrics and methods W. Collins et al.
- Perspectives and Challenges in High-Resolution Whole-Atmosphere Modeling C. Stephan et al.
- Specified dynamics scheme impacts on wave-mean flow dynamics, convection, and tracer transport in CESM2 (WACCM6) N. Davis et al.
- Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence M. Amos et al.
- Mapping Yearly Fine Resolution Global Surface Ozone through the Bayesian Maximum Entropy Data Fusion of Observations and Model Output for 1990–2017 M. DeLang et al.
- Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers D. Anderson et al.
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al.
- Effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone trends and age of air from a chemical transport model Y. Li et al.
- Evaluation of stratospheric transport in three generations of Chemistry-Climate Models M. Abalos et al.
- Interpol-IAGOS: a new method for assessing long-term chemistry–climate simulations in the UTLS based on IAGOS data, and its application to the MOCAGE CCMI REF-C1SD simulation Y. Cohen et al.
- Subseasonal Earth System Prediction with CESM2 J. Richter et al.
- Mechanisms Linked to Recent Ozone Decreases in the Northern Hemisphere Lower Stratosphere C. Orbe et al.
- The Lack of a QBO‐MJO Connection in Climate Models With a Nudged Stratosphere Z. Martin et al.
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- GCAP 2.0: a global 3-D chemical-transport model framework for past, present, and future climate scenarios L. Murray et al.
- Evaluation of O3, H2O, CO, and NOy climatologies simulated by four global models in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere with IAGOS measurements Y. Cohen et al.
- Hydroxyl Radical (OH) Response to Meteorological Forcing and Implication for the Methane Budget J. He et al.
- Challenges in simulating ozone depletion events in the Arctic boundary layer: a case study using ECHAM/MESSy for spring 2019/2020 S. Falk et al.
- Surface ozone interannual variability, trends, and extremes in CCMI models L. Zhang & Y. Cui
- Evaluating reanalysis representations of climatological trace gas distributions in the Asian monsoon tropopause layer J. Wright et al.
- The historical ozone trends simulated with the SOCOLv4 and their comparison with observations and reanalyses A. Karagodin-Doyennel et al.
- Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: an intercomparison of metrics and methods W. Collins et al.
- Perspectives and Challenges in High-Resolution Whole-Atmosphere Modeling C. Stephan et al.
- Specified dynamics scheme impacts on wave-mean flow dynamics, convection, and tracer transport in CESM2 (WACCM6) N. Davis et al.
- Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence M. Amos et al.
- Mapping Yearly Fine Resolution Global Surface Ozone through the Bayesian Maximum Entropy Data Fusion of Observations and Model Output for 1990–2017 M. DeLang et al.
- Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers D. Anderson et al.
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al.
- Effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone trends and age of air from a chemical transport model Y. Li et al.
- Evaluation of stratospheric transport in three generations of Chemistry-Climate Models M. Abalos et al.
- Interpol-IAGOS: a new method for assessing long-term chemistry–climate simulations in the UTLS based on IAGOS data, and its application to the MOCAGE CCMI REF-C1SD simulation Y. Cohen et al.
- Subseasonal Earth System Prediction with CESM2 J. Richter et al.
- Mechanisms Linked to Recent Ozone Decreases in the Northern Hemisphere Lower Stratosphere C. Orbe et al.
- The Lack of a QBO‐MJO Connection in Climate Models With a Nudged Stratosphere Z. Martin et al.
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 14 May 2026
Short summary
Atmospheric composition is strongly influenced by global-scale winds that are not always properly simulated in computer models. A common approach to correct for this bias is to relax or
nudgeto the observed winds. Here we systematically evaluate how well this technique performs across a large suite of chemistry–climate models in terms of its ability to reproduce key aspects of both the tropospheric and stratospheric circulations.
Atmospheric composition is strongly influenced by global-scale winds that are not always...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint