Articles | Volume 19, issue 13
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8563–8568, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8563-2019
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8563–8568, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8563-2019

Peer-reviewed comment 05 Jul 2019

Peer-reviewed comment | 05 Jul 2019

Comment on “Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze pollution in Beijing” by Shen et al. (2018)

Run Liu et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (19 Jun 2019) by Bryan N. Duncan
Short summary
The recent paper by Shen et al. (2018; referred to hereafter as SHEN) made a sweeping statement on the winter haze pollution in Beijing by claiming an Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze in Beijing. We argue that the paper contains three serious flaws. Any one of the three flaws can nullify the claim of SHEN.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint