State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Peng Zhang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Changgeng Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Jun Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 5,196 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,404
1,696
96
5,196
572
121
172
HTML: 3,404
PDF: 1,696
XML: 96
Total: 5,196
Supplement: 572
BibTeX: 121
EndNote: 172
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Total article views: 4,058 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,996
977
85
4,058
368
112
158
HTML: 2,996
PDF: 977
XML: 85
Total: 4,058
Supplement: 368
BibTeX: 112
EndNote: 158
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 1,138 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
408
719
11
1,138
204
9
14
HTML: 408
PDF: 719
XML: 11
Total: 1,138
Supplement: 204
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,196 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,919 with geography defined
and 277 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,058 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,919 with geography defined
and 139 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,138 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,000 with geography defined
and 138 with unknown origin.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3 smog chamber. With the increase in SO2 and NH3 concentrations, formation of SA and each of its chemical species was promoted. Meanwhile, NPF and particle size growth were also significantly enhanced. This work indicates that gasoline evaporation emissions will be a significant source of SA and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing organics, especially in the presence of high concentrations of SO2 and NH3.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3...
