State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Peng Zhang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Changgeng Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Jun Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,038
1,605
71
4,714
488
92
141
HTML: 3,038
PDF: 1,605
XML: 71
Total: 4,714
Supplement: 488
BibTeX: 92
EndNote: 141
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Total article views: 3,602 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,636
906
60
3,602
319
83
128
HTML: 2,636
PDF: 906
XML: 60
Total: 3,602
Supplement: 319
BibTeX: 83
EndNote: 128
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 1,112 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
402
699
11
1,112
169
9
13
HTML: 402
PDF: 699
XML: 11
Total: 1,112
Supplement: 169
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,424 with geography defined
and 290 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,602 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,455 with geography defined
and 147 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,112 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 969 with geography defined
and 143 with unknown origin.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3 smog chamber. With the increase in SO2 and NH3 concentrations, formation of SA and each of its chemical species was promoted. Meanwhile, NPF and particle size growth were also significantly enhanced. This work indicates that gasoline evaporation emissions will be a significant source of SA and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing organics, especially in the presence of high concentrations of SO2 and NH3.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3...
