State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Peng Zhang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Changgeng Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Jun Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 5,122 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,355
1,678
89
5,122
561
117
168
HTML: 3,355
PDF: 1,678
XML: 89
Total: 5,122
Supplement: 561
BibTeX: 117
EndNote: 168
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Total article views: 3,995 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,951
966
78
3,995
361
108
154
HTML: 2,951
PDF: 966
XML: 78
Total: 3,995
Supplement: 361
BibTeX: 108
EndNote: 154
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 1,127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
404
712
11
1,127
200
9
14
HTML: 404
PDF: 712
XML: 11
Total: 1,127
Supplement: 200
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,122 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,849 with geography defined
and 273 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,995 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,860 with geography defined
and 135 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 989 with geography defined
and 138 with unknown origin.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3 smog chamber. With the increase in SO2 and NH3 concentrations, formation of SA and each of its chemical species was promoted. Meanwhile, NPF and particle size growth were also significantly enhanced. This work indicates that gasoline evaporation emissions will be a significant source of SA and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing organics, especially in the presence of high concentrations of SO2 and NH3.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3...
