State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Peng Zhang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Changgeng Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Jun Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,194
1,642
78
4,914
532
102
151
HTML: 3,194
PDF: 1,642
XML: 78
Total: 4,914
Supplement: 532
BibTeX: 102
EndNote: 151
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Total article views: 3,791 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,791
933
67
3,791
343
93
138
HTML: 2,791
PDF: 933
XML: 67
Total: 3,791
Supplement: 343
BibTeX: 93
EndNote: 138
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 1,123 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
403
709
11
1,123
189
9
13
HTML: 403
PDF: 709
XML: 11
Total: 1,123
Supplement: 189
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,620 with geography defined
and 294 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,791 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,639 with geography defined
and 152 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,123 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 981 with geography defined
and 142 with unknown origin.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3 smog chamber. With the increase in SO2 and NH3 concentrations, formation of SA and each of its chemical species was promoted. Meanwhile, NPF and particle size growth were also significantly enhanced. This work indicates that gasoline evaporation emissions will be a significant source of SA and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing organics, especially in the presence of high concentrations of SO2 and NH3.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3...
