State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Peng Zhang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Changgeng Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Jun Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution
Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,764 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,076
1,612
76
4,764
498
97
145
HTML: 3,076
PDF: 1,612
XML: 76
Total: 4,764
Supplement: 498
BibTeX: 97
EndNote: 145
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Total article views: 3,649 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,673
911
65
3,649
322
88
132
HTML: 2,673
PDF: 911
XML: 65
Total: 3,649
Supplement: 322
BibTeX: 88
EndNote: 132
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 1,115 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
403
701
11
1,115
176
9
13
HTML: 403
PDF: 701
XML: 11
Total: 1,115
Supplement: 176
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,764 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,472 with geography defined
and 292 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,649 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,500 with geography defined
and 149 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,115 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 972 with geography defined
and 143 with unknown origin.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3 smog chamber. With the increase in SO2 and NH3 concentrations, formation of SA and each of its chemical species was promoted. Meanwhile, NPF and particle size growth were also significantly enhanced. This work indicates that gasoline evaporation emissions will be a significant source of SA and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing organics, especially in the presence of high concentrations of SO2 and NH3.
Effects of SO2 and NH3 on SA formation from unburned gasoline vapor were investigated in a 30 m3...
