Dear Authors,

Thank you for your response to the reviewers' comments. I have received further comments from Reviewers 1 and 3, which I copied below. In addition to the reviewers' comments, I think it'd be important to also include Figure R2.2 and Figure R3.3a in the revised manuscript and discuss accordingly.

Best,
Sally

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer 1
A minor revision: The authors could consider adding the 'response to comment 1' to the main text somewhere, especially the comparison of the calculated condensational sinks at 20 C and 0 C, to clarify that the temperature effect on the gas-particle partitioning process has been accounted for.

Reviewer 3
I thank the authors for addressing my comments. However, there is still a major issue with the revised manuscript. As shown in Figure R2, there is clear difference between 20C and 0C. This figure disproves the stated conclusion that "Surprisingly, very little difference was seen in the mass spectral distribution of the HOM molecules of interest at 0 °C and 20 °C". This conclusion must be revised.