Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Apr 2019
Research article |
| 11 Apr 2019
| 11 Apr 2019
Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model
Sandro Vattioni
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Debra Weisenstein
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
David Keith
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Aryeh Feinberg
Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
Thomas Peter
Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
Andrea Stenke
Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
Viewed
Total article views: 4,464 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Nov 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,115 | 1,288 | 61 | 4,464 | 71 | 64 |
- HTML: 3,115
- PDF: 1,288
- XML: 61
- Total: 4,464
- BibTeX: 71
- EndNote: 64
Total article views: 3,730 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Apr 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,635 | 1,039 | 56 | 3,730 | 65 | 58 |
- HTML: 2,635
- PDF: 1,039
- XML: 56
- Total: 3,730
- BibTeX: 65
- EndNote: 58
Total article views: 734 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Nov 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480 | 249 | 5 | 734 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 480
- PDF: 249
- XML: 5
- Total: 734
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,464 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,442 with geography defined
and 22 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,730 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,727 with geography defined
and 3 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 734 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 715 with geography defined
and 19 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Developing a Plume‐in‐Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2021MS002816
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO<sub>2</sub> or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
- Chemical Impact of Stratospheric Alumina Particle Injection for Solar Radiation Modification and Related Uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1029/2023GL105889
- A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
- Solar geoengineering can alleviate climate change pressures on crop yields Y. Fan et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00278-w
- Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols M. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021JD035379
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Future dust concentration over the Middle East and North Africa region under global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios S. Mousavi et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10677-2023
- A specialised delivery system for stratospheric sulphate aerosols (part 2): financial cost and equivalent CO2 emission I. de Vries et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02686-6
- Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2023GL105371
- Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies B. Kravitz et al. 10.1029/2019JD030329
- Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment C. Golja et al. 10.1029/2020JD033438
- Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Developing a Plume‐in‐Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2021MS002816
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO<sub>2</sub> or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
- Chemical Impact of Stratospheric Alumina Particle Injection for Solar Radiation Modification and Related Uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1029/2023GL105889
- A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
- Solar geoengineering can alleviate climate change pressures on crop yields Y. Fan et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00278-w
- Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols M. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021JD035379
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Future dust concentration over the Middle East and North Africa region under global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios S. Mousavi et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10677-2023
- A specialised delivery system for stratospheric sulphate aerosols (part 2): financial cost and equivalent CO2 emission I. de Vries et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02686-6
- Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2023GL105371
- Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies B. Kravitz et al. 10.1029/2019JD030329
- Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment C. Golja et al. 10.1029/2020JD033438
- Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
Discussed (preprint)
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
This study is among the first modeling studies on stratospheric sulfate geoengineering that interactively couple a size-resolved sectional aerosol module to well-described stratospheric chemistry and radiation schemes in a global 3-D chemistry–climate model. We found that compared with SO2 injection, the direct emission of aerosols results in more effective radiative forcing and that sensitivities to different injection strategies vary for different forms of injected sulfur.
This study is among the first modeling studies on stratospheric sulfate geoengineering that...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint