Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Research article
 | 
11 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 11 Apr 2019

Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model

Sandro Vattioni, Debra Weisenstein, David Keith, Aryeh Feinberg, Thomas Peter, and Andrea Stenke

Viewed

Total article views: 5,516 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,918 1,513 85 5,516 122 133
  • HTML: 3,918
  • PDF: 1,513
  • XML: 85
  • Total: 5,516
  • BibTeX: 122
  • EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,516 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,516 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
This study is among the first modeling studies on stratospheric sulfate geoengineering that interactively couple a size-resolved sectional aerosol module to well-described stratospheric chemistry and radiation schemes in a global 3-D chemistry–climate model. We found that compared with SO2 injection, the direct emission of aerosols results in more effective radiative forcing and that sensitivities to different injection strategies vary for different forms of injected sulfur.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint