22 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. World Climate Research Programme lighthouse activity: an assessment of major research gaps in solar radiation modification research J. Haywood et al. 10.3389/fclim.2025.1507479
2. Developing a Plume‐in‐Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2021MS002816
3. Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
4. A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
5. Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
6. An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
7. Chemical Impact of Stratospheric Alumina Particle Injection for Solar Radiation Modification and Related Uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1029/2023GL105889
8. A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deployment scenario W. Smith et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac8cd3
9. Solar geoengineering can alleviate climate change pressures on crop yields Y. Fan et al. 10.1038/s43016-021-00278-w
10. Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
11. Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
12. Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols M. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2021JD035379
13. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
14. An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
15. Future dust concentration over the Middle East and North Africa region under global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios S. Mousavi et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10677-2023
16. A specialised delivery system for stratospheric sulphate aerosols (part 2): financial cost and equivalent CO2 emission I. de Vries et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02686-6
17. Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2023GL105371
18. Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies B. Kravitz et al. 10.1029/2019JD030329
19. Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment C. Golja et al. 10.1029/2020JD033438
20. Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
21. Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
22. Application of Tropospheric Sulfate Aerosol Emissions to Mitigate Meteorological Phenomena with Extremely High Daily Temperatures G. Mulena et al. 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0002