48 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Asymmetry and pathways of inter-hemispheric transport in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere X. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021
2. Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using δ13C‐CH4 X. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007000
3. Enhancing long-term trend simulation of the global tropospheric hydroxyl (TOH) and its drivers from 2005 to 2019: a synergistic integration of model simulations and satellite observations A. Souri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024
4. Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sectors, Coal Mining and Ruminant Farming Drive Methane Growth over the Past Three Decades N. CHANDRA et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2021-015
5. Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH 4 growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH 4 and δ 13 C–CH 4 B. Riddell-Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516543122
6. Isotopic Signatures of Methane Emissions From Dairy Farms in California’s San Joaquin Valley V. Carranza et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006675
7. Rethinking of the adverse effects of NOx-control on the reduction of methane and tropospheric ozone – Challenges toward a denitrified society H. Akimoto & H. Tanimoto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119033
8. Order of magnitude wall time improvement of variational methane inversions by physical parallelization: a demonstration using TM5-4DVAR S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4555-2022
9. Methyl Chloroform Continues to Constrain the Hydroxyl (OH) Variability in the Troposphere P. Patra et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033862
10. The impact of internal climate variability on OH trends between 2005 and 2014 Q. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4b47
11. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006065
12. Influences of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on top-down estimates of the global and regional methane budgets Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9525-2020
13. Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
14. Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
15. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase Y. Oh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00488-5
16. Current understanding of the global cycling of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide T. NAKAZAWA https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.96.030
17. Global emissions and abundances of chemically and radiatively important trace gases from the AGAGE network L. Western et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025
18. Radiocarbon monoxide indicates increasing atmospheric oxidizing capacity O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55603-1
19. Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and δ13C of methane S. Basu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022
20. Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019
21. On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020
22. Exploring the drivers of tropospheric hydroxyl radical trends in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4.1 atmospheric chemistry–climate model G. Chua et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023
23. Trends in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric methane G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08900-8
24. An observation-based, reduced-form model for oxidation in the remote marine troposphere C. Baublitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209735120
25. Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021
26. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009
27. Assessment of the theoretical limit in instrumental detectability of northern high-latitude methane sources using δ13CCH4 atmospheric signals T. Thonat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12141-2019
28. Climate and Tropospheric Oxidizing Capacity A. Fiore et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307
29. Removal of Atmospheric Methane by Increasing Hydroxyl Radicals via a Water Vapor Enhancement Strategy Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091046
30. Effects of Chemical Feedbacks on Decadal Methane Emissions Estimates N. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085706
31. Atmospheric-methane source and sink sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process emulation A. Stell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1717-2021
32. Global atmospheric carbon monoxide budget 2000–2017 inferred from multi-species atmospheric inversions B. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019
33. A three-dimensional-model inversion of methyl chloroform to constrain the atmospheric oxidative capacity S. Naus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4809-2021
34. Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020 N. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x
35. On the Causes and Consequences of Recent Trends in Atmospheric Methane H. Schaefer https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00140-z
36. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019 G. Bernhard et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0pp90011g
37. Investigation of the renewed methane growth post-2007 with high-resolution 3-D variational inverse modeling and isotopic constraints J. Thanwerdas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2129-2024
38. What do we know about the global methane budget? Results from four decades of atmospheric CH4observations and the way forward X. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0440
39. Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993–2017 Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwab200
40. Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402730121
41. Investigation of the global methane budget over 1980–2017 using GFDL-AM4.1 J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-805-2020
42. Technical note: Constraining the hydroxyl (OH) radical in the tropics with satellite observations of its drivers – first steps toward assessing the feasibility of a global observation strategy D. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6319-2023
43. Anthropogenic perturbations to atmospheric methane reflected in Greenland firn air clumped isotope measurements M. Sivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeb2203
44. Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP D. Stevenson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020
45. Rising methane: A new climate challenge S. Fletcher & H. Schaefer https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1828
46. Temporal dynamics and controlling factors of CO2 and CH4 variability in the urban atmosphere of Wroclaw, Poland Y. Bezyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164771
47. Air pollution modulates trends and variability of the global methane budget Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09004-z
48. Investigating the global OH radical distribution using steady-state approximations and satellite data M. Pimlott et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022