Articles | Volume 19, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2561-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2561-2019
Research article
 | 
28 Feb 2019
Research article |  | 28 Feb 2019

Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study

Anna Karion, Thomas Lauvaux, Israel Lopez Coto, Colm Sweeney, Kimberly Mueller, Sharon Gourdji, Wayne Angevine, Zachary Barkley, Aijun Deng, Arlyn Andrews, Ariel Stein, and James Whetstone

Viewed

Total article views: 3,185 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,125 1,011 49 3,185 386 40 59
  • HTML: 2,125
  • PDF: 1,011
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 3,185
  • Supplement: 386
  • BibTeX: 40
  • EndNote: 59
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,185 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,021 with geography defined and 164 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 28 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study, we use atmospheric methane concentration observations collected during an airborne campaign to compare different model-based emissions estimates from the Barnett Shale oil and natural gas production basin in Texas, USA. We find that the tracer dispersion model has a significant impact on the results because the models differ in their simulation of vertical dispersion. Additional work is needed to evaluate and improve vertical mixing in the tracer dispersion models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint