Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Li Qi
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Qiaohua Zhao
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Jinhai He
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Julian X. L. Wang
Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, College Park, MD, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 4,049 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,994
933
122
4,049
463
126
177
HTML: 2,994
PDF: 933
XML: 122
Total: 4,049
Supplement: 463
BibTeX: 126
EndNote: 177
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 3,160 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,357
688
115
3,160
270
120
164
HTML: 2,357
PDF: 688
XML: 115
Total: 3,160
Supplement: 270
BibTeX: 120
EndNote: 164
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Total article views: 889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
637
245
7
889
193
6
13
HTML: 637
PDF: 245
XML: 7
Total: 889
Supplement: 193
BibTeX: 6
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,049 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,879 with geography defined
and 170 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,160 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,076 with geography defined
and 84 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 803 with geography defined
and 86 with unknown origin.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the mechanism of how SST anomalies over the subtropical North Atlantic and western North Pacific drive the interannual variability of the autumnal haze days in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The two pathways of SST anomaly forcings can result in an anticyclonic (cyclonic) anomaly over Northeast Asia, leading to a lower-level southerly (northerly) anomaly and in turn more (fewer) haze days in this region.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the...
