Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Li Qi
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Qiaohua Zhao
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Jinhai He
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Julian X. L. Wang
Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, College Park, MD, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,858
868
100
3,826
425
103
133
HTML: 2,858
PDF: 868
XML: 100
Total: 3,826
Supplement: 425
BibTeX: 103
EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 2,950 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,222
634
94
2,950
247
98
122
HTML: 2,222
PDF: 634
XML: 94
Total: 2,950
Supplement: 247
BibTeX: 98
EndNote: 122
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Total article views: 876 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
636
234
6
876
178
5
11
HTML: 636
PDF: 234
XML: 6
Total: 876
Supplement: 178
BibTeX: 5
EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,668 with geography defined
and 158 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,950 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,876 with geography defined
and 74 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 876 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 792 with geography defined
and 84 with unknown origin.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the mechanism of how SST anomalies over the subtropical North Atlantic and western North Pacific drive the interannual variability of the autumnal haze days in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The two pathways of SST anomaly forcings can result in an anticyclonic (cyclonic) anomaly over Northeast Asia, leading to a lower-level southerly (northerly) anomaly and in turn more (fewer) haze days in this region.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the...
