Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Li Qi
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Qiaohua Zhao
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Jinhai He
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC), and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Julian X. L. Wang
Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, College Park, MD, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 4,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,021
946
126
4,093
469
128
186
HTML: 3,021
PDF: 946
XML: 126
Total: 4,093
Supplement: 469
BibTeX: 128
EndNote: 186
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 3,201 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,384
698
119
3,201
272
122
173
HTML: 2,384
PDF: 698
XML: 119
Total: 3,201
Supplement: 272
BibTeX: 122
EndNote: 173
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Feb 2019)
Total article views: 892 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
637
248
7
892
197
6
13
HTML: 637
PDF: 248
XML: 7
Total: 892
Supplement: 197
BibTeX: 6
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,920 with geography defined
and 173 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,201 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,114 with geography defined
and 87 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 892 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 806 with geography defined
and 86 with unknown origin.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the mechanism of how SST anomalies over the subtropical North Atlantic and western North Pacific drive the interannual variability of the autumnal haze days in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The two pathways of SST anomaly forcings can result in an anticyclonic (cyclonic) anomaly over Northeast Asia, leading to a lower-level southerly (northerly) anomaly and in turn more (fewer) haze days in this region.
Less attention has been paid to haze weather during the autumn season. Here, we unravel the...
