Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10961-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10961-2019
Research article
 | 
29 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 29 Aug 2019

Comparison of two automated aerosol typing methods and their application to an EARLINET station

Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Nikolaos Siomos, Konstantinos Michailidis, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Lucia Mona, Carmela Cornacchia, Doina Nicolae, and Dimitris Balis

Viewed

Total article views: 2,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,566 740 51 2,357 55 61
  • HTML: 1,566
  • PDF: 740
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 2,357
  • BibTeX: 55
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Dec 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,275 with geography defined and 82 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study, a first attempt at comparing and evaluating two classification tools developed within EARLINET that provide near-real-time aerosol typing information for the lidar profiles of Thessaloniki is presented. Our aim is (i) to check the performance of both supervised learning techniques in their low-resolution mode and (ii) to investigate the reasons for typing agreement and disagreement with respect to the uncertainties and the threshold criteria applied.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint