Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8873–8892, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8873-2018

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8873–8892, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8873-2018

Research article 25 Jun 2018

Research article | 25 Jun 2018

Comparison of ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) simulations of the Arctic winter 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 with Envisat/MIPAS and Aura/MLS observations

Farahnaz Khosrawi et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,825 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,162 617 46 1,825 47 45
  • HTML: 1,162
  • PDF: 617
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 1,825
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 45
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,828 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,795 with geography defined and 33 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 16 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
An extensive assessment of the performance of the chemistry–climate model EMAC is given for Arctic winters 2009/2010 and 2010/2011. The EMAC simulations are compared to satellite observations. The comparisons between EMAC simulations and satellite observations show that model and measurements compare well for these two Arctic winters. However, differences between model and observations are found that need improvements in the model in the future.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint