Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8873-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8873-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
Research article
 | 
25 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 25 Jun 2018

Comparison of ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) simulations of the Arctic winter 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 with Envisat/MIPAS and Aura/MLS observations

Farahnaz Khosrawi, Oliver Kirner, Gabriele Stiller, Michael Höpfner, Michelle L. Santee, Sylvia Kellmann, and Peter Braesicke

Viewed

Total article views: 3,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,516 1,138 116 3,770 134 133
  • HTML: 2,516
  • PDF: 1,138
  • XML: 116
  • Total: 3,770
  • BibTeX: 134
  • EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,684 with geography defined and 86 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
An extensive assessment of the performance of the chemistry–climate model EMAC is given for Arctic winters 2009/2010 and 2010/2011. The EMAC simulations are compared to satellite observations. The comparisons between EMAC simulations and satellite observations show that model and measurements compare well for these two Arctic winters. However, differences between model and observations are found that need improvements in the model in the future.
Read more
Share
Special issue
The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint