Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
Volume 18, issue 11
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8331–8351, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8331-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Water vapour in the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere:...

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8331–8351, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8331-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 14 Jun 2018

Research article | 14 Jun 2018

Trend differences in lower stratospheric water vapour between Boulder and the zonal mean and their role in understanding fundamental observational discrepancies

Stefan Lossow et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,681 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,005 579 97 1,681 41 36
  • HTML: 1,005
  • PDF: 579
  • XML: 97
  • Total: 1,681
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,609 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,575 with geography defined and 34 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 31 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Trend estimates of lower stratospheric H2O derived from the FPH observations at Boulder and a merged zonal mean satellite data set clearly differ for the time period from the late 1980s to 2010. We investigate if a sampling bias between Boulder and the zonal mean around the Boulder latitude can explain these trend discrepancies. Typically they are small and not sufficient to explain the trend discrepancies in the observational database.
Trend estimates of lower stratospheric H2O derived from the FPH observations at Boulder and a...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint