Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Jun 2018
Research article |
| 13 Jun 2018
| 13 Jun 2018
Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales
Alexander J. Turner
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
College of Chemistry/Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel J. Jacob
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Joshua Benmergui
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Jeremy Brandman
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, NJ, USA
Laurent White
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, NJ, USA
Cynthia A. Randles
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, NJ, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,659 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Feb 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,308 | 1,261 | 90 | 3,659 | 78 | 92 |
- HTML: 2,308
- PDF: 1,261
- XML: 90
- Total: 3,659
- BibTeX: 78
- EndNote: 92
Total article views: 2,914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Jun 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,843 | 995 | 76 | 2,914 | 66 | 74 |
- HTML: 1,843
- PDF: 995
- XML: 76
- Total: 2,914
- BibTeX: 66
- EndNote: 74
Total article views: 745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Feb 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 465 | 266 | 14 | 745 | 12 | 18 |
- HTML: 465
- PDF: 266
- XML: 14
- Total: 745
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,659 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,614 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,861 with geography defined
and 53 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 753 with geography defined
and -8 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2019RG000675
- Evaluation of single-footprint AIRS CH<sub>4</sub> profile retrieval uncertainties using aircraft profile measurements S. Kulawik et al. 10.5194/amt-14-335-2021
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part II: Results Using Optimal Error Statistics S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020375
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Synthesis of Satellite and Surface Measurements, Model Results, and FRAPPÉ Study Findings to Assess the Impacts of Oil and Gas Emissions Reductions on Maximum Ozone in the Denver Metro and Northern Front Range Region in Colorado P. Reddy 10.1029/2023EA002917
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- An optimal estimation-based retrieval of upper atmospheric oxygen airglow and temperature from SCIAMACHY limb observations K. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3721-2022
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Observed Impacts of COVID‐19 on Urban CO2 Emissions A. Turner et al. 10.1029/2020GL090037
- NASA’s carbon monitoring system (CMS) and arctic-boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) social network and community of practice M. Brown et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba300
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- Synthesis of Methane Observations Across Scales: Strategies for Deploying a Multitiered Observing Network D. Cusworth et al. 10.1029/2020GL087869
- Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. 10.1073/pnas.1814297116
- On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production C. Bauer et al. 10.1039/D1SE01508G
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/atmos14040758
- Assessing urban methane emissions using column-observing portable Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers and a novel Bayesian inversion framework T. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-21-13131-2021
- On-line wavenumber optimization for a ground-based CH4-DIAL X. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.03.013
- Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
- A Method for Estimating the Background Column Concentration of CO2 Using the Lagrangian Approach Z. Pei et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3176134
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2019RG000675
- Evaluation of single-footprint AIRS CH<sub>4</sub> profile retrieval uncertainties using aircraft profile measurements S. Kulawik et al. 10.5194/amt-14-335-2021
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part II: Results Using Optimal Error Statistics S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020375
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Synthesis of Satellite and Surface Measurements, Model Results, and FRAPPÉ Study Findings to Assess the Impacts of Oil and Gas Emissions Reductions on Maximum Ozone in the Denver Metro and Northern Front Range Region in Colorado P. Reddy 10.1029/2023EA002917
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- An optimal estimation-based retrieval of upper atmospheric oxygen airglow and temperature from SCIAMACHY limb observations K. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3721-2022
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Observed Impacts of COVID‐19 on Urban CO2 Emissions A. Turner et al. 10.1029/2020GL090037
- NASA’s carbon monitoring system (CMS) and arctic-boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) social network and community of practice M. Brown et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aba300
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- Synthesis of Methane Observations Across Scales: Strategies for Deploying a Multitiered Observing Network D. Cusworth et al. 10.1029/2020GL087869
- Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. 10.1073/pnas.1814297116
- On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production C. Bauer et al. 10.1039/D1SE01508G
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/atmos14040758
- Assessing urban methane emissions using column-observing portable Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers and a novel Bayesian inversion framework T. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-21-13131-2021
- On-line wavenumber optimization for a ground-based CH4-DIAL X. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.03.013
- Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
- A Method for Estimating the Background Column Concentration of CO2 Using the Lagrangian Approach Z. Pei et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3176134
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
Latest update: 14 Nov 2024
Short summary
We conduct a 1-week WRF-STILT simulation to generate methane column footprints at 1.3 km spatial resolution and hourly temporal resolution over the Barnett Shale. We find that a week of TROPOMI observations should provide regional (~30 km) information on temporally invariant sources and GeoCARB should provide information on temporally invariant sources at 2–7 km spatial resolution. An instrument precision better than 6 ppb is an important threshold for achieving fine resolution of emissions.
We conduct a 1-week WRF-STILT simulation to generate methane column footprints at 1.3 km spatial...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint