Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7539-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7539-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
Research article
 | 
31 May 2018
Research article |  | 31 May 2018

Isoprene and monoterpene emissions in south-east Australia: comparison of a multi-layer canopy model with MEGAN and with atmospheric observations

Kathryn M. Emmerson, Martin E. Cope, Ian E. Galbally, Sunhee Lee, and Peter F. Nelson

Viewed

Total article views: 3,537 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,238 1,214 85 3,537 553 107 143
  • HTML: 2,238
  • PDF: 1,214
  • XML: 85
  • Total: 3,537
  • Supplement: 553
  • BibTeX: 107
  • EndNote: 143
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,537 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,505 with geography defined and 32 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We compare the CSIRO in-house biogenic emissions model (ABCGEM) with the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN), for eucalypt-rich south-east Australia. Differences in emissions are not only due to the emission factors, but also how these emission factors are processed. ABCGEM assumes monoterpenes are not light dependent, whilst MEGAN does. Comparison with observations suggests that Australian monoterpenes may not be as light dependent as other vegetation globally.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint