Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6691-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6691-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
Research article
 | 
14 May 2018
Research article |  | 14 May 2018

The airglow layer emission altitude cannot be determined unambiguously from temperature comparison with lidars

Tim Dunker

Viewed

Total article views: 3,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,183 1,105 107 3,395 229 131 150
  • HTML: 2,183
  • PDF: 1,105
  • XML: 107
  • Total: 3,395
  • Supplement: 229
  • BibTeX: 131
  • EndNote: 150
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,337 with geography defined and 58 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Often, the emission height of the mesospheric hydroxyl layer has been inferred from a comparison of temperature measured by ground-based lidars and hydroxyl spectrometers. I use temperatures measured by two independent instruments to show that such comparisons usually lead to ambiguous height determinations, especially if a variable layer width is taken into account. Even though this dataset is from a single location, the results apply to all airglow layers at any location.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint