Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
Volume 18, issue 4
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2443–2460, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2443–2460, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 19 Feb 2018

Research article | 19 Feb 2018

Global sensitivity analysis of GEOS-Chem modeled ozone and hydrogen oxides during the INTEX campaigns

Kenneth E. Christian1,a, William H. Brune1, Jingqiu Mao2, and Xinrong Ren3,4 Kenneth E. Christian et al.
  • 1Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska at Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA
  • 3Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • 4Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, MD, USA
  • anow at: Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research & Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

Abstract. Making sense of modeled atmospheric composition requires not only comparison to in situ measurements but also knowing and quantifying the sensitivity of the model to its input factors. Using a global sensitivity method involving the simultaneous perturbation of many chemical transport model input factors, we find the model uncertainty for ozone (O3), hydroxyl radical (OH), and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2) mixing ratios, and apportion this uncertainty to specific model inputs for the DC-8 flight tracks corresponding to the NASA Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX) campaigns of 2004 and 2006. In general, when uncertainties in modeled and measured quantities are accounted for, we find agreement between modeled and measured oxidant mixing ratios with the exception of ozone during the Houston flights of the INTEX-B campaign and HO2 for the flights over the northernmost Pacific Ocean during INTEX-B. For ozone and OH, modeled mixing ratios were most sensitive to a bevy of emissions, notably lightning NOx, various surface NOx sources, and isoprene. HO2 mixing ratios were most sensitive to CO and isoprene emissions as well as the aerosol uptake of HO2. With ozone and OH being generally overpredicted by the model, we find better agreement between modeled and measured vertical profiles when reducing NOx emissions from surface as well as lightning sources.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We applied a global sensitivity analysis to the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model analyzing some well-studied tropospheric oxidants for a time period corresponding to an aircraft field campaign. We find modeled results generally agree with measurements when uncertainties in both the model and measurements are taken into account. While model results were largely sensitive to emissions, chemical reaction rates also represented a large source of uncertainty.
We applied a global sensitivity analysis to the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model analyzing...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint