75 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Evaluating integrated impacts of low-emission transitions in the livestock sector E. Spijker et al. 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.003
2. Harmful Algal Blooms in Chinese Coastal Waters Will Persist Due to Perturbed Nutrient Ratios J. Wang et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00012
3. Advances in air quality research – current and emerging challenges R. Sokhi et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4615-2022
4. Development of the Low Emissions Analysis Platform – Integrated Benefits Calculator (LEAP-IBC) tool to assess air quality and climate co-benefits: Application for Bangladesh J. Kuylenstierna et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106155
5. Costs and benefits of synthetic nitrogen for global cereal production in 2015 and in 2050 under contrasting scenarios A. Rodríguez et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169357
6. An overview of air quality analysis by big data techniques: Monitoring, forecasting, and traceability W. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.03.010
7. Nighttime Light Pollution and Economic Activities: A Spatio-Temporal Model with Common Factors for US Counties G. Bresson et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4526268
8. Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality M. Harmsen et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02800-8
9. Surface ozone impacts on major crop production in China from 2010 to 2017 D. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2625-2022
10. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda B. Soergel et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3
11. Climate and air pollution implications of potential energy infrastructure and policy measures in India B. Yarlagadda et al. 10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100067
12. Lower air pollution during COVID-19 lock-down: improving models and methods estimating ozone impacts on crops F. Dentener et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0188
13. The Double Dividend of International Cooperation for Climate Mitigation Cost Effectiveness and Public Health Cobenefits H. Wang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c08326
14. Effects of black carbon mitigation on Arctic climate T. Kühn et al. 10.5194/acp-20-5527-2020
15. High-resolution modeling of the distribution of surface air pollutants and their intercontinental transport by a global tropospheric atmospheric chemistry source–receptor model (GNAQPMS-SM) Q. Ye et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7573-2021
16. Source–Receptor Relationships Between Precursor Emissions and O3 and PM2.5 Air Pollution Impacts K. Baker et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c03317
17. The Impact of the Glasgow Commitments for the Paris Agreement Long-Term Goals L. Aleluia Reis & M. Tavoni 10.2139/ssrn.4075227
18. Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM 2.5 air pollution B. Gu et al. 10.1126/science.abf8623
19. Marginal Damage of Methane Emissions: Ozone Impacts on Agriculture J. Sampedro et al. 10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6
20. Evaluation and uncertainty estimation of the impact of air quality modelling on crop yields and premature deaths using a multi-model ensemble E. Solazzo et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.317
21. Emission factors of PM2.5-Bounded selected metals, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and water-soluble ionic species emitted from combustions of biomass materials for source Apportionment—A new database for 17 plant species S. Pongpiachan et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101453
22. Role of existing and emerging technologies in advancing climate-smart agriculture through modeling: A review D. Gupta et al. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101805
23. Effects of global climate mitigation on regional air quality and health X. Huang et al. 10.1038/s41893-023-01133-5
24. Scenario analysis of PM2.5 and ozone impacts on health, crops and climate with TM5-FASST: A case study in the Western Balkans C. Belis et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115738
25. Evaluation of short-lived atmospheric fine particles in Tehran, Iran F. Borhani et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-10667-5
26. The global and regional air quality impacts of dietary change M. Springmann et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-41789-3
27. The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)-30 study on short-lived climate forcers: introduction and overview S. Smith et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02938-5
28. Source apportionment to support air quality planning: Strengths and weaknesses of existing approaches P. Thunis et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.019
29. Can better technologies avoid all air pollution damages to the global economy? F. Chantret et al. 10.1007/s10584-019-02631-2
30. Comparison of source apportionment approaches and analysis of non-linearity in a real case model application C. Belis et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-4731-2021
31. A Source Apportionment and Emission Scenario Assessment of PM2.5‐ and O3‐Related Health Impacts in G20 Countries M. Nawaz et al. 10.1029/2022GH000713
32. The impacts of decarbonization pathways on Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union J. Moreno et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01309-7
33. Why is the city's responsibility for its air pollution often underestimated? A focus on PM<sub>2.5</sub> P. Thunis et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18195-2021
34. Optimal emission reduction scheme aimed at eliminating PM2.5 city pollution days within North China during a haze episode Z. Ye et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101712
35. Reducing global food loss and waste could improve air quality and lower the risk of premature mortality A. Gatto & M. Chepeliev 10.1088/1748-9326/ad19ee
36. Global, high-resolution, reduced-complexity air quality modeling for PM2.5 using InMAP (Intervention Model for Air Pollution) S. Thakrar et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0268714
37. International trade sanctions imposed due to the Russia-Ukraine war may cause unequal distribution of environmental and health impacts G. Huang et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01741-9
38. Local mortality impacts due to future air pollution under climate change scenarios V. Ingole et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153832
39. Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models M. Diao et al. 10.1080/10962247.2019.1668498
40. Deep learning-based gas-phase chemical kinetics kernel emulator: Application in a global air quality simulation case Z. Wang et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.955980
41. Quantifying the reductions in mortality from air-pollution by cancelling new coal power plants J. Sampedro et al. 10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100023
42. Internalising health-economic impacts of air pollution into climate policy: a global modelling study L. Reis et al. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00259-X
43. Enabling probabilistic retrospective transport modeling for accurate source detection W. Rosenthal et al. 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106849
44. The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy N. Scovronick et al. 10.1038/s41467-019-09499-x
45. Coal-exit health and environmental damage reductions outweigh economic impacts S. Rauner et al. 10.1038/s41558-020-0728-x
46. Emulation of a Chemical Transport Model to Assess Air Quality under Future Emission Scenarios for the Southwest of Western Australia S. Vander Hoorn et al. 10.3390/atmos13122009
47. Health co-benefits and mitigation costs as per the Paris Agreement under different technological pathways for energy supply J. Sampedro et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105513
48. The importance of health co-benefits under different climate policy cooperation frameworks N. Scovronick et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abf2e7
49. Assessing the Implications of a Global Net-Zero Transition for Developing Asia: Insights from Integrated Assessment Modeling J. Emmerling et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4671439
50. Air pollutant emissions from global food systems are responsible for environmental impacts, crop losses and mortality M. Crippa et al. 10.1038/s43016-022-00615-7
51. Enabling comprehensive assessment of marine eutrophication impacts and their evaluation against regional safe operating space E. Vea et al. 10.1007/s11367-024-02311-z
52. Mortality Attributable to Ambient Air Pollution: A Review of Global Estimates A. Pozzer et al. 10.1029/2022GH000711
53. Indigenized Characterization Factors for Health Damage Due to Ambient PM2.5 in Life Cycle Impact Assessment in China Q. Ma et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08122
54. Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions T. Vandyck et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02685-7
55. Spatially Explicit Inventory of Sources of Nitrogen Inputs to the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea for the Period 1970–2010 J. Wang et al. 10.1029/2020EF001516
56. Optimal emission control plan aiming to basically eliminate PM2.5 heavy pollution in North and Northwest China in 2018 Z. Ye et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142893
57. TransClim (v1.0): a chemistry–climate response model for assessing the effect of mitigation strategies for road traffic on ozone V. Rieger & V. Grewe 10.5194/gmd-15-5883-2022
58. Air quality and related health impact in the UNECE region: source attribution and scenario analysis C. Belis & R. Van Dingenen 10.5194/acp-23-8225-2023
59. Assessment of health impacts and costs attributable to air pollution in urban areas using two different approaches. A case study in the Western Balkans C. Belis et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108347
60. Source attribution of nitrogen oxides across Germany: Comparing the labelling approach and brute force technique with LOTOS-EUROS M. Thürkow et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119412
61. Air quality co-benefits of ratcheting up the NDCs S. Rauner et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02699-1
62. Enhanced Integration of Health, Climate, and Air Quality Management Planning at the Urban Scale G. Kleiman et al. 10.3389/frsc.2022.934672
63. Machine learning approaches reveal highly heterogeneous air quality co-benefits of the energy transition D. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107652
64. Contribution and uncertainty of sectorial and regional emissions to regional and global PM<sub>2.5</sub> health impacts M. Crippa et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5165-2019
65. Future impacts of ozone driven damages on agricultural systems J. Sampedro et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117538
66. Assessing SDG Synergies and Trade-Offs of Diverging Paris-Compliant Mitigation Strategies J. Moreno et al. 10.2139/ssrn.3990057
67. Health effects of a global carbon price N. Selin 10.1038/s41893-023-01140-6
68. Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges T. Vandyck et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9
69. Modelling the air quality benefits of EU climate mitigation policies using two different PM2.5-related health impact methodologies E. Pisoni et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107760
70. Glasgow to Paris—The impact of the Glasgow commitments for the Paris climate agreement L. Aleluia Reis & M. Tavoni 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105933
71. LC‐IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method F. Verones et al. 10.1111/jiec.13018
72. rfasst: An R tool to estimate air pollution impacts on health and agriculture J. Sampedro et al. 10.21105/joss.03820
73. Assessing synergies and trade-offs of diverging Paris-compliant mitigation strategies with long-term SDG objectives J. Moreno et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102624
74. Integrated policy assessment and optimisation over multiple sustainable development goals in Eastern Africa D. Van de Ven et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab375d
75. Multi-level policies for air quality: implications of national and sub-national emission reductions on population exposure E. Peduzzi et al. 10.1007/s11869-018-0613-1