Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1363–1378, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1363–1378, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018

Research article 01 Feb 2018

Research article | 01 Feb 2018

Soil fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS), carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a boreal forest in southern Finland

Wu Sun et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,443 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,408 969 66 2,443 602 36 69
  • HTML: 1,408
  • PDF: 969
  • XML: 66
  • Total: 2,443
  • Supplement: 602
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,455 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,444 with geography defined and 11 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 18 Jan 2022
Download
Short summary
Most soils consume carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO due to microbial uptake, but whether boreal forest soils act like this is uncertain. We measured growing season soil COS and CO fluxes in a Finnish pine forest. The soil behaved as a consistent and relatively invariant sink of COS and CO. Uptake rates of COS and CO decrease with soil moisture due to diffusion limitation and increase with respiration because of microbial control. Using COS to infer photosynthesis is not affected by soil COS flux.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint