Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Soil fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS), carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a boreal forest in southern Finland
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1565, USA
Linda M. J. Kooijmans
Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 6, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands
Kadmiel Maseyk
School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Huilin Chen
Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 6, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Ivan Mammarella
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki,
Finland
Timo Vesala
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki,
Finland
Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Janne Levula
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki,
Finland
Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Hyytiälä Forestry Field Station, University of Helsinki, 35500 Korkeakoski, Finland
Helmi Keskinen
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68, 00014 Helsinki,
Finland
Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Hyytiälä Forestry Field Station, University of Helsinki, 35500 Korkeakoski, Finland
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1565, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,794 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Apr 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,364 | 1,298 | 132 | 3,794 | 872 | 82 | 114 |
- HTML: 2,364
- PDF: 1,298
- XML: 132
- Total: 3,794
- Supplement: 872
- BibTeX: 82
- EndNote: 114
Total article views: 2,721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,862 | 768 | 91 | 2,721 | 289 | 69 | 72 |
- HTML: 1,862
- PDF: 768
- XML: 91
- Total: 2,721
- Supplement: 289
- BibTeX: 69
- EndNote: 72
Total article views: 1,073 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Apr 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
502 | 530 | 41 | 1,073 | 583 | 13 | 42 |
- HTML: 502
- PDF: 530
- XML: 41
- Total: 1,073
- Supplement: 583
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 42
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,794 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,805 with geography defined
and -11 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,710 with geography defined
and 11 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,073 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,095 with geography defined
and -22 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- Predictions of Entropy and Gibbs Energy for Carbonyl Sulfide C. Jia et al. 10.1021/acsomega.9b02950
- Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands A. Zanchetta et al. 10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Double-channel sensors for high precision measurement of methane based on a dual-path Herriott cell H. Ma et al. 10.1039/D4AN01107D
- Microbial community responses determine how soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide, carbon monoxide, and nitric oxide responds to soil moisture T. Behrendt et al. 10.5194/soil-5-121-2019
- Soil respiration analysis using a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser and calibration-free WMS-based dual-gas sensor N. Liu et al. 10.1039/D1AN00503K
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Dual trace gas detection using a compact two-channel multipass cell with dense and line spot patterns R. Kong et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13677
- Influence of fire foci on forest cover in the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil W. Freitas et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106340
- Root and rhizosphere contribution to the net soil COS exchange F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s11104-023-06438-0
- Carbon Monoxide Fate in the Environment as an Inspiration For Biorefinery Industry: A Review K. Sobieraj et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.822463
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Atmospheric Components Using an NIR and MIR Laser Hybrid Gas Sensing System N. Liu et al. 10.1021/acssensors.0c01910
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- The role of termite CH<sub>4</sub> emissions on the ecosystem scale: a case study in the Amazon rainforest H. van Asperen et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2609-2021
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis L. Kooijmans et al. 10.1073/pnas.1807600116
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
- Soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide in a Mediterranean citrus orchard F. Yang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3873-2019
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Seasonal fluxes of carbon monoxide from an intensively grazed grassland in Scotland N. Cowan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.039
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Canopy uptake dominates nighttime carbonyl sulfide fluxes in a boreal forest L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/acp-17-11453-2017
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- Predictions of Entropy and Gibbs Energy for Carbonyl Sulfide C. Jia et al. 10.1021/acsomega.9b02950
- Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands A. Zanchetta et al. 10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Double-channel sensors for high precision measurement of methane based on a dual-path Herriott cell H. Ma et al. 10.1039/D4AN01107D
- Microbial community responses determine how soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide, carbon monoxide, and nitric oxide responds to soil moisture T. Behrendt et al. 10.5194/soil-5-121-2019
- Soil respiration analysis using a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser and calibration-free WMS-based dual-gas sensor N. Liu et al. 10.1039/D1AN00503K
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Dual trace gas detection using a compact two-channel multipass cell with dense and line spot patterns R. Kong et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13677
- Influence of fire foci on forest cover in the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil W. Freitas et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106340
- Root and rhizosphere contribution to the net soil COS exchange F. Kitz et al. 10.1007/s11104-023-06438-0
- Carbon Monoxide Fate in the Environment as an Inspiration For Biorefinery Industry: A Review K. Sobieraj et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.822463
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Atmospheric Components Using an NIR and MIR Laser Hybrid Gas Sensing System N. Liu et al. 10.1021/acssensors.0c01910
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- The role of termite CH<sub>4</sub> emissions on the ecosystem scale: a case study in the Amazon rainforest H. van Asperen et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2609-2021
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements K. Kohonen et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4067-2022
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis L. Kooijmans et al. 10.1073/pnas.1807600116
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
- Soil–atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide in a Mediterranean citrus orchard F. Yang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3873-2019
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Seasonal fluxes of carbon monoxide from an intensively grazed grassland in Scotland N. Cowan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.039
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
Discussed (final revised paper)
Discussed (final revised paper)
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
Most soils consume carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO due to microbial uptake, but whether boreal forest soils act like this is uncertain. We measured growing season soil COS and CO fluxes in a Finnish pine forest. The soil behaved as a consistent and relatively invariant sink of COS and CO. Uptake rates of COS and CO decrease with soil moisture due to diffusion limitation and increase with respiration because of microbial control. Using COS to infer photosynthesis is not affected by soil COS flux.
Most soils consume carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO due to microbial uptake, but whether boreal...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint