Dear authors,
Thanks for your comprehensive response to the reviews. I find that you have adequately addressed all the points raised, and I only have a few more minor comments regarding the figures presented in the revised manuscript. I think that the figures could be somewhat improved, and would be glad if you could implement some or all of the following suggestions:
- Fig 1: The colours are quite hard to tell apart, esp. NEEM-EU-08 and NEEM-09. Could you instead use 3 "types" of line, ie. dotted as well as dashed and solid, and additionally make the lines heavier? The colours are always clearer when the lines are heavier. There also appears to be extra space in the y axis label ( a ).
- Fig. 2: Again - the colours are very difficult to distinguish.
- Fig. 3: This figure will be much smaller in the final version than now in the draft, which will make the axis labels and marks hard to read - can you increase the size of the axis labels and marks relative to the graph?
- Fig.4: Axis labels are not properly printed and very hard to read; there are too many vertical tick marks causing overlap, and the vertical titles overlap with the tick marks.