Articles | Volume 17, issue 5
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3769–3784, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3769–3784, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3769-2017

Research article 17 Mar 2017

Research article | 17 Mar 2017

Global sensitivity analysis of the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model: ozone and hydrogen oxides during ARCTAS (2008)

Kenneth E. Christian et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,941 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,032 867 42 1,941 159 42 52
  • HTML: 1,032
  • PDF: 867
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 1,941
  • Supplement: 159
  • BibTeX: 42
  • EndNote: 52
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,913 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Nov 2021
Download
Short summary
To better understand the sources of uncertainty in modeled Arctic tropospheric oxidants, we created and analyzed an ensemble of chemical transport model runs with inputs perturbed according to their respective uncertainties. Ozone and OH were most sensitive to various emissions and chemical factors. HO2 was overwhelmingly sensitive to aerosol particle uptake. When compared to airborne measurements, better agreement was found when the model used lower aerosol particle uptake rates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint