Multi-instrument comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol precursors

Hatch, Lindsay E.; Yokelson, Robert J.; Stockwell, Chelsea E.; Veres, Patrick R.; Simpson, Isobel J.; Blake, Donald R.; Orlando, John J.; Barsanti, Kelley C.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017

Articles | Volume 17, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 17, issue 2

Research article

|

31 Jan 2017

Research article |

| 31 Jan 2017

Multi-instrument comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol precursors

Lindsay E. Hatch, Robert J. Yokelson, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Patrick R. Veres, Isobel J. Simpson, Donald R. Blake, John J. Orlando, and Kelley C. Barsanti

Download

Final revised paper (published on 31 Jan 2017)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 18 Jul 2016)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Reviewer comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2016
- AC1: 'Author response to Referee 1', Lindsay Hatch, 02 Dec 2016
RC2: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2016
- AC2: 'Author response to Referee 2', Lindsay Hatch, 02 Dec 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Lindsay Hatch on behalf of the Authors (02 Dec 2016) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (06 Jan 2017) by Annmarie Carlton

ED: Publish as is (10 Jan 2017) by Annmarie Carlton

AR by Lindsay Hatch on behalf of the Authors (10 Jan 2017)

Download

Article (5886 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

The most comprehensive database of gaseous biomass burning emissions to date was compiled. Four complementary instruments were deployed together during laboratory fires. The results generally compared within experimental uncertainty and highlighted that a range of measurement approaches are required for adequate characterization of smoke composition. Observed compounds were binned based on volatility, and priority recommendations were made to improve secondary organic aerosol predictions.