Articles | Volume 16, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9935-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9935-2016
Research article
 | 
08 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 08 Aug 2016

Intercomparison of in situ NDIR and column FTIR measurements of CO2 at Jungfraujoch

Michael F. Schibig, Emmanuel Mahieu, Stephan Henne, Bernard Lejeune, and Markus C. Leuenberger

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by M.F. Schibig on behalf of the Authors (20 Jun 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (22 Jun 2016) by Andreas Engel
AR by M.F. Schibig on behalf of the Authors (23 Jun 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (01 Jul 2016) by Andreas Engel
AR by M.F. Schibig on behalf of the Authors (08 Jul 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (14 Jul 2016) by Andreas Engel
AR by M.F. Schibig on behalf of the Authors (15 Jul 2016)
Download
Short summary
Two CO2 time series measured at the High Alpine Research Station Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (3580 m a.s.l.), in the period from 2005 to 2013 were compared. One data set was measured in situ whereas the other data set was measured in the column above Jungfraujoch. The trends of the column integrated and the in situ data set are in good agreement, the amplitude of the in situ data set is ca. two times the amplitude of the column integrated data set, because it is closer to the sources and sinks.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint