Articles | Volume 16, issue 14
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8899–8914, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8899-2016
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8899–8914, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8899-2016
Research article
19 Jul 2016
Research article | 19 Jul 2016

Comparing contact and immersion freezing from continuous flow diffusion chambers

Baban Nagare et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,139 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,143 728 268 2,139 51 56
  • HTML: 1,143
  • PDF: 728
  • XML: 268
  • Total: 2,139
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 16 May 2022
Short summary
The relative importance of contact freezing and immersion freezing at mixed-phase cloud temperatures is the subject of debate. We performed experiments using continuous-flow diffusion chambers to compare the freezing efficiency of ice-nucleating particles for both these nucleation modes. Silver iodide, kaolinite and Arizona Test Dust were used as ice-nucleating particles. We could not confirm the dominance of contact freezing over immersion freezing for our experimental conditions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint