Articles | Volume 16, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8899-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8899-2016
Research article
 | 
19 Jul 2016
Research article |  | 19 Jul 2016

Comparing contact and immersion freezing from continuous flow diffusion chambers

Baban Nagare, Claudia Marcolli, André Welti, Olaf Stetzer, and Ulrike Lohmann

Viewed

Total article views: 3,524 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,091 1,124 309 3,524 81 107
  • HTML: 2,091
  • PDF: 1,124
  • XML: 309
  • Total: 3,524
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Short summary
The relative importance of contact freezing and immersion freezing at mixed-phase cloud temperatures is the subject of debate. We performed experiments using continuous-flow diffusion chambers to compare the freezing efficiency of ice-nucleating particles for both these nucleation modes. Silver iodide, kaolinite and Arizona Test Dust were used as ice-nucleating particles. We could not confirm the dominance of contact freezing over immersion freezing for our experimental conditions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint