128 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. High level of methylmercury exposure causes persisted toxicity in Nauphoeta cinerea B. Piccoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06989-9
2. A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs) Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128132
3. Atmospheric Mercury Concentrations and Isotopic Compositions Impacted by Typical Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions Sources C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07649
4. One-step utilizing of waste acidic Cu-containing etching solution to prepare hierarchical Cu-ZSM-5 for efficient flue gas Hg0 removal Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129559
5. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use D. Obrist et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9
6. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.043
7. Urban source term estimation for mercury using a boundary-layer budget method B. Denzler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3821-2019
8. Mercury Flows in China and Global Drivers M. Hui et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04094
9. Sulfur Dioxide Promoted Mercury Fast Deposition over a Selenite-Chloride-Induced Surface from Wet Flue Gas Q. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03411
10. Recyclable CuS sorbent with large mercury adsorption capacity in the presence of SO2 from non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.062
11. Spherical-shaped CuS modified carbon nitride nanosheet for efficient capture of elemental mercury from flue gas at low temperature F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125692
12. A mini review: Chalcogenated triazole schiff base ligands utilized for Hg2+ metal ion detection A. Sumayya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2025.122789
13. Selective uptake of gaseous sulfur trioxide and mercury in ZnO-CuS composite at elevated temperatures from SO2-rich flue gas X. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132035
14. Advances in rational design of catalysts for efficient Hg0 removal D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125922
15. Evolution of four-decade atmospheric mercury release from a coal-fired power plant in North China Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.045
16. Nanomineral-fueled chemolithoautotrophy leads to substantial mercury emission Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaf581
17. Improving Flue Gas Mercury Removal in Waste Incinerators by Optimization of Carbon Injection Rate G. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05560
18. Mercury stable isotope fractionation during gaseous elemental mercury adsorption onto coal fly ash particles: Experimental and field observations B. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124280
19. Five hundred years of anthropogenic mercury: spatial and temporal release profiles* D. Streets et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab281f
20. Division approach of high-risk heavy metal(loid)s areas in metallurgical industrial regions: A practical inversion approach M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141350
21. Novel applications of vacuum distillation for heavy metals removal from wastewater, copper nitrate hydroxide recovery, and copper sulfide impregnated activated carbon synthesis for gaseous mercury adsorption C. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158870
22. DFT studies on exposure of sulfur impregnated and sulfur functionalized activated carbon to Hg 0 vapors H. Desai & A. Kannan https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2023.2236264
23. Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants H. Agarwalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.06.035
24. Methylmercury's chemistry: From the environment to the mammalian brain P. Nogara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.01.006
25. Fly ash-derived zeolites and their sorption abilities in relation to elemental mercury in a simulated gas stream P. Kunecki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136181
26. Effect of Vanadium Oxide Loading for the Simultaneous NO Reduction and Hg0 Oxidation over a V2O5-WO3/TiO2 Catalyst J. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03066
27. Trace Element Mass Flow Rates from U.S. Coal Fired Power Plants X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01039
28. A synthesis of research needs for improving the understanding of atmospheric mercury cycling L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9133-2017
29. Efficient mercury removal in high SO2 flue gas using a CuS-BTC metal-organic frameworks W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2024.101682
30. Mercury re-emission from adipic acid enhanced FGD absorber – Full scale investigations on ∼400 MWe boiler (lignite) with oxidant injection to flue gas M. Jędrusik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.131
31. Mercury adsorption characteristics of Cl-impregnated activated carbons in simulated flue gases S. Choi & S. Lee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120822
32. Tailoring of Cu sites with Co2+/Co3+ to synthesize CuCo2S4 for boosting mercury adsorption strengthen and capacity X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134597
33. Adsorptive-catalytic removal of Hg0 in simulated nonferrous smelting flue gas over Co3Fe layered double hydroxide: Performance and mechanisms Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2026.105568
34. Mitigation Options of Atmospheric Hg Emissions in China Q. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03702
35. Anthracite coal-based activated carbon for elemental Hg adsorption in simulated flue gas: Preparation and evaluation G. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117921
36. Atmospheric Chemistry of HOHg(II)O• Mimics That of a Hydroxyl Radical D. Hewa Edirappulige et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04159
37. Deepening insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics and multi-scenario projections of Pb, Hg, Cr, Cd, and As emissions from China’s copper-lead-zinc smelting industry F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141866
38. Analysis of solid sorbents for control and removal processes for elemental mercury from gas streams: a review P. Kunecki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00336-x
39. Partitioning and Emission of Hazardous Trace Elements in a 100 MW Coal-Fired Power Plant Equipped with Selective Catalytic Reduction, Electrostatic Precipitator, and Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01608
40. Atmospheric mercury deposition over the land surfaces and the associated uncertainties in observations and simulations: a critical review L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15587-2019
41. Mercury Adsorption Characteristics of Activated Carbon with Flue Gas Composition S. Choi & S. Lee https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2019.35.5.555
42. Atmospheric mercury emissions from two pre-calciner cement plants in Southwest China X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.011
43. Removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas over MnO /TiO2 adsorbent: The synergistic effect of anatase and brookite TiO2 B. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.115332
44. Development of the application of speciation in chemistry T. Kiss et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.016
45. One-step preparation of functionalized cotton exocarp-based sorbent for efficient Hg0 immobilization X. Duan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-021-00263-0
46. Analysis of selected mineral and waste sorbents for the capture of elemental mercury from exhaust gases M. Wdowin et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mipo-2020-0003
47. Advances in the sources, chemical behaviour, and whole process distribution of Hg, As, and Pb in the iron and steel smelting industry H. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135912
48. Characteristics and inhibition of mercury re-emission from desulfurization slurry by Fenton reagent H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.02.006
49. Deep removal of elemental mercury from non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas: A critical review F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102283
50. Mass Flow Analysis of Mercury Transformation and Effect of Seawater Flue Gas Desulfurization on Mercury Removal in a Full-Scale Coal-Fired Power Plant S. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02029
51. Effects of Ultralow-Emission Retrofitting on Mercury Emission from a Coal-Fired Power Plant S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00366
52. Colorimetric Detection of Mercury Ions in Water with Capped Silver Nanoprisms F. Tanvir et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091533
53. SO2-Driven In Situ Formation of Superstable Hg3Se2Cl2 for Effective Flue Gas Mercury Removal H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09640
54. HgCl2 Reduction under a Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction Atmosphere S. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b04284
55. Mercury distribution and emission reduction potentials of Chinese coal-fired industrial boilers Y. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01183-2
56. Assessment of heavy metals released into the air from the cement kilns co-burning waste: Case of Oujda cement manufacturing (Northeast Morocco) Y. Arfala et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2018.07.005
57. Simple construction of a two-component fluorescent sensor for turn-on detection of Hg2+ in human serum F. Geng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03837-z
58. Enhanced natural releases of mercury in response to the reduction in anthropogenic emissions during the COVID-19 lockdown by explainable machine learning X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15851-2022
59. Mercury in desulfurization gypsum and its dependence on coal properties in coal-fired power plants Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120413
60. Non-negligible environmental risks of typical hazardous trace elements in wastes from Chinese coal-fired industrial boilers Y. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173779
61. Research on mercury re-release model in wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) in coal-fired power plants R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.156819
62. Dispersion of airborne mercury species emitted from the cement plant S. Vijayakumaran Nair et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120057
63. Speciation-driven toxicity and remediation of mercury: Mechanistic insights and policy implications N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101233
64. A rhodamine B-based fluorescent probe for Hg2+ and its analytical applications P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2025.126331
65. Co-doped ZnS with large adsorption capacity for recovering Hg0 from non-ferrous metal smelting gas as a co-benefit of electrostatic demisters W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08401-3
66. Emission characteristics for gaseous- and size-segregated particulate PAHs in coal combustion flue gas from circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.051
67. Role of H+, HF, SO42− and kaolin in fixing Hg of coal fire sponge C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145510
68. Triggering Low-Temperature Chlorine Activation via Interfacial Ru–O–Mn Coordination Bridges for Robust Waste Incineration Flue Gas Mercury Oxidation H. Qi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c04609
69. Gaseous mercury capture using supported CuSx on layered double hydroxides from SO2-rich flue gas Q. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125963
70. Denitrification devices in urban boilers change mercury isotope fractionation signatures of coal combustion products J. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115753
71. Utilization of desulfurization gypsum potentially impairs the efforts for reducing Hg emissions from coal-fired power plants in China Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122898
72. Mechanism identification of temperature influence on mercury adsorption capacity of different halides modified bio-chars G. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.030
73. Factors Affecting Slurry Oxidation in a Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001563
74. An isotope dilution approach for validating the output of mercury gas generators for mercury pollution monitoring S. Page et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4JA00373J
75. Migration and emission of mercury from circulating fluidized bed boilers co-firing petroleum coke and coal J. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.062
76. Emission Characteristics During the Co-Firing of Fine Coal and Refuse-Derived Fuel from Municipal Waste Z. Jelonek & P. Rompalski https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205414
77. Comparison of Elemental Mercury Oxidation Across Vanadium and Cerium Based Catalysts in Coal Combustion Flue Gas: Catalytic Performances and Particulate Matter Effects Q. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06020
78. Present Knowledge and Future Perspectives of Atmospheric Emission Inventories of Toxic Trace Elements: A Critical Review X. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07147
79. Total Mercury Released to the Environment by Human Activities D. Streets et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00451
80. Recent Development in Fluorescent Probes for the Detection of Hg 2+ Ions A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2023.2238066
81. Simultaneous Removal of Elemental Mercury and Arsine from a Reducing Atmosphere Using Chloride and Cerium Modified Activated Carbon Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04999
82. The Legacy of Mercury Contamination from Colonial Nonferrous Mining in the Southern Hemisphere L. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c03607
83. Mercury co-beneficial capture in air pollution control devices of coal-fired power plants D. Pudasainee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2016.08.013
84. Study on the Hg emission and migration characteristics in coal-fired power plant of China with an ammonia desulfurization process C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.083
85. Multipollutant Control (MPC) of Flue Gas from Stationary Sources Using SCR Technology: A Critical Review D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07326
86. New insight into the intrinsic effect of sulfur dioxide on Hg0 oxidation in the absence/presence of SCR atmosphere B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127054
87. Effect of air pollution control devices on mercury isotopic fractionation in coal-fired power plants H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.04.019
88. Performance of CuCl2-Modified Activated Carbon on Mercury Capture after Injection in an Entrained Flow Reactor Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06189
89. Pyrolysis solid product as a sorbent for flue gases mercury capture — Part II: Sorbent utilization M. Jadlovec et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103678
90. New insight into simultaneous removal of NO and Hg0 on CeO2-modified V2O5/TiO2 catalyst: A new modification strategy Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.103
91. Quantification of an integrated approach to heavy metal source apportionment and probabilistic health risk assessment in the black soil region of central Jilin Province, China P. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118358
92. Remarkable improvement of Ti incorporation on Hg0 capture from smelting flue gas by sulfurated γ-Fe2O3: Performance and mechanism J. Mei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120967
93. Construction of a regional inventory to characterize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from coal-fired power plants in Anhui, China from 2010 to 2030 R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115972
94. Analysis of metal(loid)s contamination and their continuous input in soils around a zinc smelter: Development of methodology and a case study in South Korea S. Yun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.020
95. Magnetically recyclable CoS-modified graphitic carbon nitride-based materials for efficient immobilization of gaseous elemental mercury F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125117
96. Effect of a Mechanochemical Process on the Stability of Mercury in Simulated Fly Ash. Part 1. Ball Milling X. Geng et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c03783
97. Universal pathway towards metal sulfides decorated 3D porous Ti3C2Tx MXene aerogel for vapor-phase mercury removal W. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.146402
98. Potential sources and processes affecting speciated atmospheric mercury at Kejimkujik National Park, Canada: comparison of receptor models and data treatment methods X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1381-2017
99. Isotope signatures of atmospheric mercury emitted from residential coal combustion X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118175
100. Role of Ceria in the Design of Composite Materials for Elemental Mercury Removal D. Jampaiah et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201800161
101. Influence of Fe‐modified Mn–Ce–Fe–Co–Ox/P84 catalytic filter materials for low‐temperature NO removal synergistic Hg0oxidation G. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2677
102. Improved Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Inventories for China from 1980 to 2020: Toward More Accurate Effectiveness Evaluation for the Minamata Convention Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01065
103. Hybrid electrostatic filtration systems for fly ash particles emission control. A review A. Jaworek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.011
104. Identifying Changes in Source Regions Impacting Speciated Atmospheric Mercury at a Rural Site in the Eastern United States I. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0086.1
105. Removal of Elemental Mercury from Simulated Flue Gas by a Copper-Based ZSM-5 Molecular Sieve Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060772
106. Bayesian multivariate receptor model and convolutional neural network to identify quantitative sources and spatial distributions of potentially toxic elements in soils: A case study in Qingzhou City, China X. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135184
107. Effect of Lignite Composition on Mercury Removal from Flue Gas in Sulfide Forced Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) Installations—Full-Scale Experiments D. Łuszkiewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18081982
108. Waste-to-resource conversion of copper tailings into multifunctional catalytic adsorptive materials for Hg0 removal via H₂O₂/K₂S₂O₈ oxidation S. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2026.105195
109. Simultaneous removal of PCDD/Fs and mercury by activated carbon from a full-scale MSW incinerator in southeast China P. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22425-x
110. Simple approaches to on-line and off-line speciation analysis of mercury in flue gases with detection by atomic absorption spectrometry: A pilot study J. Švehla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2019.05.002
111. Partitioning of Hazardous Trace Elements among Air Pollution Control Devices in Ultra-Low-Emission Coal-Fired Power Plants C. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00894
112. Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes C. Chou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1860158
113. Arctic atmospheric mercury: Sources and changes A. Dastoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156213
114. Development and application of an updated geospatial distribution model for gridding 2015 global mercury emissions F. Steenhuisen & S. Wilson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.003
115. Two decades of changing anthropogenic mercury emissions in Australia: inventory development, trends, and atmospheric implications S. MacFarlane et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EM00019A
116. Single-atom Co-N-C catalyst for efficient Hg0 oxidation at low temperature X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132660
117. Experimental Research on Mercury Catalytic Oxidation over Ce Modified SCR Catalyst Y. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.32604/EE.2022.015477
118. Effect of addition of sulphide based additive to WFGD slurry on mercury removal from flue gas D. Łuszkiewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126953
119. Atmospheric mercury: recent advances in theoretical, computational, experimental, observational, and isotopic understanding to decipher its redox transformations in the upper and lower atmosphere and interactions with Earth surface reservoirs J. Sommar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12233-2025
120. Historical releases of mercury to air, land, and water from coal combustion D. Streets et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.207
121. Nonferrous metal flue gas purification based on high-temperature electrostatic precipitation Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.08.015
122. Recent progress on the advancements of adsorbent materials in elemental mercury removal from industrial flue gases H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2025.11.021
123. Modeling the OH-Initiated Oxidation of Mercury in the Global Atmosphere without Violating Physical Laws T. Dibble et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b10121
124. Quantum Chemical Investigation of Snow–Mercury Interactions and Their Implication of Mercury Deposition in the Arctic E. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c08551
125. Co-benefit of hazardous trace elements capture in dust removal devices of ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants C. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700229
126. A review on mercury in coal combustion process: Content and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2019.02.001
127. Temporal and spatial analysis of anthropogenic mercury and CO2 emissions from municipal solid waste incineration in China: Implications for mercury and climate change mitigation J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108068
128. Integrating point sources to map anthropogenic atmospheric mercury emissions in China, 1978–2021 Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3315-2025