Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2123-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2123-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
25 Feb 2016
Research article |
| 25 Feb 2016
Towards understanding the variability in biospheric CO2 fluxes: using FTIR spectrometry and a chemical transport model to investigate the sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide and its link to CO2
Yuting Wang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany
Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of
Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Mathias Palm
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany
Thorsten Warneke
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany
Justus Notholt
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany
Ian Baker
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Joe Berry
Carnegie Institute of Washington, Stanford, CA, USA
Parvadha Suntharalingam
University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Nicholas Jones
Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of
Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Emmanuel Mahieu
Institute of Astrophysics and Geophysics, University of Liège,
Liège, Belgium
Bernard Lejeune
Institute of Astrophysics and Geophysics, University of Liège,
Liège, Belgium
James Hannigan
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Stephanie Conway
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Joseph Mendonca
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Kimberly Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
J. Elliott Campbell
University of California, Merced, CA, USA
Adam Wolf
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Stefanie Kremser
Bodeker Scientific, Alexandra, New Zealand
Viewed
Total article views: 4,132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,728 | 1,200 | 204 | 4,132 | 109 | 124 |
- HTML: 2,728
- PDF: 1,200
- XML: 204
- Total: 4,132
- BibTeX: 109
- EndNote: 124
Total article views: 3,606 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Feb 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,453 | 980 | 173 | 3,606 | 80 | 91 |
- HTML: 2,453
- PDF: 980
- XML: 173
- Total: 3,606
- BibTeX: 80
- EndNote: 91
Total article views: 526 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 275 | 220 | 31 | 526 | 29 | 33 |
- HTML: 275
- PDF: 220
- XML: 31
- Total: 526
- BibTeX: 29
- EndNote: 33
Cited
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Plant Uptake of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide in Coast Redwood Forests J. Campbell et al. 10.1002/2016JG003703
- Global gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory of carbonyl sulfide A. Zumkehr et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.063
- Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (OCS) measured remotely by FTIR solar absorption spectrometry G. Toon et al. 10.5194/acp-18-1923-2018
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Optimized approach to retrieve information on atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (OCS) above the Jungfraujoch station and change in its abundance since 1995 B. Lejeune et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.001
- Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) L. Kuai et al. 10.1029/2021GB007216
- Gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory and atmospheric transport of carbonyl sulfide in the U.S. A. Zumkehr et al. 10.1002/2016JD025550
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Global Atmospheric OCS Trend Analysis From 22 NDACC Stations J. Hannigan et al. 10.1029/2021JD035764
- Technical note: Sensitivity of instrumental line shape monitoring for the ground-based high-resolution FTIR spectrometer with respect to different optical attenuators Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-10-989-2017
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Direct oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide S. Lennartz et al. 10.5194/acp-17-385-2017
- Retrieval of vertical profiles and tropospheric CO2 columns based on high-resolution FTIR over Hefei, China C. Shan et al. 10.1364/OE.411383
- Influence of dissolved organic matter on carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide formation from dimethyl sulfide during sunlight photolysis M. Modiri Gharehveran & A. Shah 10.1002/wer.1650
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- Fiducial Reference Measurement for Greenhouse Gases (FRM4GHG) M. Sha et al. 10.3390/rs16183525
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Plant Uptake of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide in Coast Redwood Forests J. Campbell et al. 10.1002/2016JG003703
- Global gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory of carbonyl sulfide A. Zumkehr et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.063
- Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (OCS) measured remotely by FTIR solar absorption spectrometry G. Toon et al. 10.5194/acp-18-1923-2018
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Optimized approach to retrieve information on atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (OCS) above the Jungfraujoch station and change in its abundance since 1995 B. Lejeune et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.001
- Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) L. Kuai et al. 10.1029/2021GB007216
- Gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory and atmospheric transport of carbonyl sulfide in the U.S. A. Zumkehr et al. 10.1002/2016JD025550
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Global Atmospheric OCS Trend Analysis From 22 NDACC Stations J. Hannigan et al. 10.1029/2021JD035764
- Technical note: Sensitivity of instrumental line shape monitoring for the ground-based high-resolution FTIR spectrometer with respect to different optical attenuators Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-10-989-2017
- Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4) L. Kooijmans et al. 10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Direct oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide S. Lennartz et al. 10.5194/acp-17-385-2017
- Retrieval of vertical profiles and tropospheric CO2 columns based on high-resolution FTIR over Hefei, China C. Shan et al. 10.1364/OE.411383
- Influence of dissolved organic matter on carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide formation from dimethyl sulfide during sunlight photolysis M. Modiri Gharehveran & A. Shah 10.1002/wer.1650
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles M. Whelan et al. 10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- Fiducial Reference Measurement for Greenhouse Gases (FRM4GHG) M. Sha et al. 10.3390/rs16183525
- Remotely Sensed Carbonyl Sulfide Constrains Model Estimates of Amazon Primary Productivity J. Stinecipher et al. 10.1029/2021GL096802
- Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3507-2021
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
OCS could provide an additional constraint on the carbon cycle. The FTIR networks have existed for more than 20 years. For the first time, we used FTIR measurements of OCS and CO2 to study their relationship. We put the coupled CO2 and OCS land fluxes from the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB) into a transport model, and compared the simulations to the measurements. Looking at OCS and CO2 together inspires some new thoughts in how the biospheric models reproduce the carbon cycle in the real world.
OCS could provide an additional constraint on the carbon cycle. The FTIR networks have existed...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint