This manuscript can be reconsidered after attention to the issues raised by both reviewers. The two reviews are consistent with regard to the idea that the manuscript is much longer than need be, that you should discuss the results in the context of existing measurements of NOx and NOy, the need for discussion of nitrite in snow, and other issues. The inconsistencies mentioned by reviewer #1 should be addressed.
I also note that:
1. Yuan et al. 2016 is not in the reference list.
2. The apparent loss of NO3- with depth should be discussed.
3. You might also discuss the extent to which the small snowpack N source could be important to surface level N photochemistry in stable boundary layer conditions.

We appreciate your attention to the concerns of the referees in the production of your revised manuscript. Please incorporate the typographical corrections suggestions from Reviewer No. 2 regarding this revised manuscript.