Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13417-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13417-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Research article
 | 
31 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 31 Oct 2016

Non-stomatal exchange in ammonia dry deposition models: comparison of two state-of-the-art approaches

Frederik Schrader, Christian Brümmer, Chris R. Flechard, Roy J. Wichink Kruit, Margreet C. van Zanten, Undine Zöll, Arjan Hensen, and Jan Willem Erisman

Viewed

Total article views: 3,195 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,936 1,109 150 3,195 390 130 199
  • HTML: 1,936
  • PDF: 1,109
  • XML: 150
  • Total: 3,195
  • Supplement: 390
  • BibTeX: 130
  • EndNote: 199
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jun 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jun 2016)
Latest update: 03 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We found a systematic mismatch of modeled and measured NH3 fluxes using two state-of-the-art dry deposition models and data from five sites in Europe. Results of our analysis indicate a too large minimum non-stomatal resistance and too strong temperature response in the parameterization of a unidirectional surface–atmosphere exchange scheme, as well as room for improvement on the emission potential parameterization of a bidirectional model, both directly impacting predicted NH3 exchange fluxes.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint