Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.414 IF 5.414
  • IF 5-year value: 5.958 IF 5-year
    5.958
  • CiteScore value: 9.7 CiteScore
    9.7
  • SNIP value: 1.517 SNIP 1.517
  • IPP value: 5.61 IPP 5.61
  • SJR value: 2.601 SJR 2.601
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 191 Scimago H
    index 191
  • h5-index value: 89 h5-index 89
Volume 16, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1289–1302, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1289–1302, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 04 Feb 2016

Research article | 04 Feb 2016

Estimates of European uptake of CO2 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals: sensitivity to measurement bias inside and outside Europe

L. Feng et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,924 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,023 806 95 2,924 139 140
  • HTML: 2,023
  • PDF: 806
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 2,924
  • BibTeX: 139
  • EndNote: 140
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 31 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
There is an on-going debate on the larger European biospheric uptake inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals than those inferred from in situ data. Using a set of 15 experiments, we found that the elevated uptake over Europe could largely be explained by mis-fitting data due to regional XCO2 biases: 50–80 % of the elevated European uptake is due to retrievals outside the immediate European; and a varying monthly bias of up to 0.5 ppm for XCO2 retrievals over Europe could explain most of the remainder.
There is an on-going debate on the larger European biospheric uptake inferred from GOSAT XCO2...
Citation
Final-revised paper
Preprint