Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
Research article
 | 
04 Feb 2016
Research article |  | 04 Feb 2016

Estimates of European uptake of CO2 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals: sensitivity to measurement bias inside and outside Europe

L. Feng, P. I. Palmer, R. J. Parker, N. M. Deutscher, D. G. Feist, R. Kivi, I. Morino, and R. Sussmann

Viewed

Total article views: 6,232 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,368 1,697 167 6,232 220 211
  • HTML: 4,368
  • PDF: 1,697
  • XML: 167
  • Total: 6,232
  • BibTeX: 220
  • EndNote: 211
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 10 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
There is an on-going debate on the larger European biospheric uptake inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals than those inferred from in situ data. Using a set of 15 experiments, we found that the elevated uptake over Europe could largely be explained by mis-fitting data due to regional XCO2 biases: 50–80 % of the elevated European uptake is due to retrievals outside the immediate European; and a varying monthly bias of up to 0.5 ppm for XCO2 retrievals over Europe could explain most of the remainder.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint