Articles | Volume 16, issue 19
Research article
12 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 12 Oct 2016

Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise – evaluation of the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint analysis with meteorology

Bertrand Bessagnet, Guido Pirovano, Mihaela Mircea, Cornelius Cuvelier, Armin Aulinger, Giuseppe Calori, Giancarlo Ciarelli, Astrid Manders, Rainer Stern, Svetlana Tsyro, Marta García Vivanco, Philippe Thunis, Maria-Teresa Pay, Augustin Colette, Florian Couvidat, Frédérik Meleux, Laurence Rouïl, Anthony Ung, Sebnem Aksoyoglu, José María Baldasano, Johannes Bieser, Gino Briganti, Andrea Cappelletti, Massimo D'Isidoro, Sandro Finardi, Richard Kranenburg, Camillo Silibello, Claudio Carnevale, Wenche Aas, Jean-Charles Dupont, Hilde Fagerli, Lucia Gonzalez, Laurent Menut, André S. H. Prévôt, Pete Roberts, and Les White


Total article views: 4,967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,645 2,126 196 4,967 506 90 94
  • HTML: 2,645
  • PDF: 2,126
  • XML: 196
  • Total: 4,967
  • Supplement: 506
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 94
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2016)


Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 15 Jun 2024
Short summary
The EURODELTA III exercise allows a very comprehensive intercomparison and evaluation of air quality models' performance. On average, the models provide a rather good picture of the particulate matter (PM) concentrations over Europe even if the highest concentrations are underestimated. The meteorology is responsible for model discrepancies, while the lack of emissions, particularly in winter, is mentioned as the main reason for the underestimations of PM.
Final-revised paper