Dear Authors,
The lifetimes and subsequent metrics for the title molecules calculated in this work have neglected to include their atmospheric loss due to UV photolysis in the 200 to 230 nm region as stated in the revised submission: "Note that in our modeling we neglected the photolysis caused by 200-230 photons and also the temperature dependence of the UV photolysis. This causes 20% error on the global lifetime values.". It is not sufficient to simply state that the UV photolysis in this region was neglected when the SPARC (2013) report, which is cited in this paper, clearly demonstrated its significance with regard to determining atmospheric lifetimes. Therefore, the lifetimes and dependent radiative parameters reported in this work are, most likely, over estimated and the comparison with previously reported lifetimes and loss processes in Section 5.2 Atmospheric Lifetimes not valid. Stating in the conclusions that the lifetimes are in error by 20% is not sufficient (also it is not clear whether a correction was applied to the reported values, or not).
The authors have used a more "sophisticated" model than applied in previous studies, but the impact of these calculations is significantly diminished if the up to date recommendations for atmospheric loss processes are not included. Therefore, I recommend the authors revise the paper to include the neglected photolysis processes prior to consideration for publication.

Dear Authors,
The comparison of the integrated absorption cross sections of NF3 given in Table 2 show a large discrepancy with previous literature values over the 1330-1440 cm-1 region (a very weak band). This band is approximately equal in strength to the band in the region 1085-1200 cm-1. However, the log plot shown in Figure 1 does not show the absorption in the 1330-1440 cm-1 region. I assume that this is a simple baseline or offset problem with the experimental data. I recommend revising the data shown in Figure 1 (either correcting the baseline or expanding the range of the y-axis) to show this weak band (this is the point of including a log plot).
Also, digitized spectra for NF3 and CFC-115 should be included as supplementary material for future reference. I trust that this can be done without further review.