Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1065-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1065-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
29 Jan 2016
Research article |
| 29 Jan 2016
The importance of temporal collocation for the evaluation of aerosol models with observations
N. A. J. Schutgens
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks road, Oxford OX1 3PU, England
D. G. Partridge
Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bert Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks road, Oxford OX1 3PU, England
Viewed
Total article views: 4,026 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,426 | 1,502 | 98 | 4,026 | 111 | 106 |
- HTML: 2,426
- PDF: 1,502
- XML: 98
- Total: 4,026
- BibTeX: 111
- EndNote: 106
Total article views: 3,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Jan 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,125 | 1,210 | 60 | 3,395 | 78 | 74 |
- HTML: 2,125
- PDF: 1,210
- XML: 60
- Total: 3,395
- BibTeX: 78
- EndNote: 74
Total article views: 631 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | 292 | 38 | 631 | 33 | 32 |
- HTML: 301
- PDF: 292
- XML: 38
- Total: 631
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 32
Cited
54 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Comparing multiple model-derived aerosol optical properties to spatially collocated ground-based and satellite measurements I. Ocko & P. Ginoux 10.5194/acp-17-4451-2017
- The Annual Cycle of Fractional Atmospheric Shortwave Absorption in Observations and Models: Spatial Structure, Magnitude, and Timing M. Schwarz et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0212.1
- Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation J. Kaiser et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
- Spatial Representativeness of Surface‐Measured Variations of Downward Solar Radiation M. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2017JD027261
- Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG B. Grandey et al. 10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold 10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- An assessment of the climatological representativeness of IAGOS-CARIBIC trace gas measurements using EMAC model simulations J. Eckstein et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2775-2017
- Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
- Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations M. Lund et al. 10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Aerosol and Cloud Properties Over the Southeast Atlantic: An Observational Analysis I. Chang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091469
- The resolution dependence of cloud effects and ship‐induced aerosol‐cloud interactions in marine stratocumulus A. Possner et al. 10.1002/2015JD024685
- Community Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observations D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3093-2016
- Comparison of particle number size distribution trends in ground measurements and climate models V. Leinonen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12873-2022
- Concentrations and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols from 1750 to 2014 simulated with the Oslo CTM3 and CEDS emission inventory M. Lund et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4909-2018
- Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 2: Minimising the effects of aerosol swelling and wet scavenging in ECHAM6-HAM2 for comparison to satellite data D. Neubauer et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13165-2017
- Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins J. Katich et al. 10.1029/2018JD029206
- Bridging the gap: integrating models and observations for better ecosystem understanding M. Skogen et al. 10.3354/meps14616
- The sensitivity of Southern Ocean aerosols and cloud microphysics to sea spray and sulfate aerosol production in the HadGEM3-GA7.1 chemistry–climate model L. Revell et al. 10.5194/acp-19-15447-2019
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- On the Limits of CALIOP for Constraining Modeled Free Tropospheric Aerosol D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2018GL078195
- Aerosol model evaluation using two geostationary satellites over East Asia in May 2016 D. Goto et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.10.016
- An Evaluation of Four MODIS Collection 6 Aerosol Products in a Humid Subtropical Region M. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs9111173
- Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
- Description and evaluation of a secondary organic aerosol and new particle formation scheme within TM5-MP v1.2 T. Bergman et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-683-2022
- On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-17-9761-2017
- Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China and the Simulations of the Aerosol Properties T. Fan et al. 10.1007/s00376-021-1119-6
- From Point to Area: Worldwide Assessment of the Representativeness of Monthly Surface Solar Radiation Records M. Schwarz et al. 10.1029/2018JD029169
- How Long Is Too Long? Variogram Analysis of AERONET Data to Aid Aerosol Validation and Intercomparison Studies A. Sayer 10.1029/2020EA001290
- Numerical simulation and evaluation of global ultrafine particle concentrations at the Earth's surface M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13191-2023
- How should we aggregate data? Methods accounting for the numerical distributions, with an assessment of aerosol optical depth A. Sayer & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
- Processes controlling the vertical aerosol distribution in marine stratocumulus regions – a sensitivity study using the climate model NorESM1-M L. Frey et al. 10.5194/acp-21-577-2021
- Exploring systematic offsets between aerosol products from the two MODIS sensors R. Levy et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4073-2018
- AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations J. Gliß et al. 10.5194/acp-21-87-2021
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Evaluation of biomass burning aerosols in the HadGEM3 climate model with observations from the SAMBBA field campaign B. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14657-2016
- The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation I. Tegen et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
- Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements E. Andrews et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017
- Spatial Representativeness Error in the Ground‐Level Observation Networks for Black Carbon Radiation Absorption R. Wang et al. 10.1002/2017GL076817
- How much of the global aerosol optical depth is found in the boundary layer and free troposphere? Q. Bourgeois et al. 10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
- Comparison of aerosol optical depth between observation and simulation from MIROC-SPRINTARS: Effects of temporal inhomogeneous sampling S. Park et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.021
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
- Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft, surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model C. Reddington et al. 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
- Observations of the Interaction and Transport of Fine Mode Aerosols With Cloud and/or Fog in Northeast Asia From Aerosol Robotic Network and Satellite Remote Sensing T. Eck et al. 10.1029/2018JD028313
- Simulating the radiative forcing of oceanic dimethylsulfide (DMS) in Asia based on machine learning estimates J. Zhao et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9583-2022
- Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei P. Stier 10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
- A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity M. Burgos et al. 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020
- Site representativity of AERONET and GAW remotely sensed aerosol optical thickness and absorbing aerosol optical thickness observations N. Schutgens 10.5194/acp-20-7473-2020
- Optical Properties of Boundary Layer Aerosols From High Spectral Resolution Lidar Measurements in a Polluted Urban Environment (Seoul, Korea) S. Park et al. 10.1029/2023JD038523
- Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
- Evaluation of the Aqua-MODIS C6 and C6.1 Aerosol Optical Depth Products in the Yellow River Basin, China M. Zhang et al. 10.3390/atmos10080426
53 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Comparing multiple model-derived aerosol optical properties to spatially collocated ground-based and satellite measurements I. Ocko & P. Ginoux 10.5194/acp-17-4451-2017
- The Annual Cycle of Fractional Atmospheric Shortwave Absorption in Observations and Models: Spatial Structure, Magnitude, and Timing M. Schwarz et al. 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0212.1
- Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation J. Kaiser et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
- Spatial Representativeness of Surface‐Measured Variations of Downward Solar Radiation M. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2017JD027261
- Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG B. Grandey et al. 10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold 10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- An assessment of the climatological representativeness of IAGOS-CARIBIC trace gas measurements using EMAC model simulations J. Eckstein et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2775-2017
- Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
- Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations M. Lund et al. 10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Aerosol and Cloud Properties Over the Southeast Atlantic: An Observational Analysis I. Chang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091469
- The resolution dependence of cloud effects and ship‐induced aerosol‐cloud interactions in marine stratocumulus A. Possner et al. 10.1002/2015JD024685
- Community Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observations D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3093-2016
- Comparison of particle number size distribution trends in ground measurements and climate models V. Leinonen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12873-2022
- Concentrations and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols from 1750 to 2014 simulated with the Oslo CTM3 and CEDS emission inventory M. Lund et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4909-2018
- Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 2: Minimising the effects of aerosol swelling and wet scavenging in ECHAM6-HAM2 for comparison to satellite data D. Neubauer et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13165-2017
- Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins J. Katich et al. 10.1029/2018JD029206
- Bridging the gap: integrating models and observations for better ecosystem understanding M. Skogen et al. 10.3354/meps14616
- The sensitivity of Southern Ocean aerosols and cloud microphysics to sea spray and sulfate aerosol production in the HadGEM3-GA7.1 chemistry–climate model L. Revell et al. 10.5194/acp-19-15447-2019
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- On the Limits of CALIOP for Constraining Modeled Free Tropospheric Aerosol D. Watson‐Parris et al. 10.1029/2018GL078195
- Aerosol model evaluation using two geostationary satellites over East Asia in May 2016 D. Goto et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.10.016
- An Evaluation of Four MODIS Collection 6 Aerosol Products in a Humid Subtropical Region M. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs9111173
- Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
- Description and evaluation of a secondary organic aerosol and new particle formation scheme within TM5-MP v1.2 T. Bergman et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-683-2022
- On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-17-9761-2017
- Comparison of the Anthropogenic Emission Inventory for CMIP6 Models with a Country-Level Inventory over China and the Simulations of the Aerosol Properties T. Fan et al. 10.1007/s00376-021-1119-6
- From Point to Area: Worldwide Assessment of the Representativeness of Monthly Surface Solar Radiation Records M. Schwarz et al. 10.1029/2018JD029169
- How Long Is Too Long? Variogram Analysis of AERONET Data to Aid Aerosol Validation and Intercomparison Studies A. Sayer 10.1029/2020EA001290
- Numerical simulation and evaluation of global ultrafine particle concentrations at the Earth's surface M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13191-2023
- How should we aggregate data? Methods accounting for the numerical distributions, with an assessment of aerosol optical depth A. Sayer & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
- Processes controlling the vertical aerosol distribution in marine stratocumulus regions – a sensitivity study using the climate model NorESM1-M L. Frey et al. 10.5194/acp-21-577-2021
- Exploring systematic offsets between aerosol products from the two MODIS sensors R. Levy et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4073-2018
- AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations J. Gliß et al. 10.5194/acp-21-87-2021
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Evaluation of biomass burning aerosols in the HadGEM3 climate model with observations from the SAMBBA field campaign B. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14657-2016
- The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation I. Tegen et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
- Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements E. Andrews et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017
- Spatial Representativeness Error in the Ground‐Level Observation Networks for Black Carbon Radiation Absorption R. Wang et al. 10.1002/2017GL076817
- How much of the global aerosol optical depth is found in the boundary layer and free troposphere? Q. Bourgeois et al. 10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
- Comparison of aerosol optical depth between observation and simulation from MIROC-SPRINTARS: Effects of temporal inhomogeneous sampling S. Park et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.021
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
- Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft, surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model C. Reddington et al. 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
- Observations of the Interaction and Transport of Fine Mode Aerosols With Cloud and/or Fog in Northeast Asia From Aerosol Robotic Network and Satellite Remote Sensing T. Eck et al. 10.1029/2018JD028313
- Simulating the radiative forcing of oceanic dimethylsulfide (DMS) in Asia based on machine learning estimates J. Zhao et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9583-2022
- Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei P. Stier 10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
- A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity M. Burgos et al. 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020
- Site representativity of AERONET and GAW remotely sensed aerosol optical thickness and absorbing aerosol optical thickness observations N. Schutgens 10.5194/acp-20-7473-2020
- Optical Properties of Boundary Layer Aerosols From High Spectral Resolution Lidar Measurements in a Polluted Urban Environment (Seoul, Korea) S. Park et al. 10.1029/2023JD038523
- Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 04 Nov 2024
Short summary
When comparing models against observations, researchers often use long-term averages without due regard for the temporal sampling of the underlying data sets.
We study the errors introduced by this practice and show they are often larger than observational errors and comparable to model errors. We further analyse what causes these errors and suggest best practices for eliminating them.
When comparing models against observations, researchers often use long-term averages without due...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint