Articles | Volume 15, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9747–9763, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9747-2015
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9747–9763, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9747-2015

Research article 01 Sep 2015

Research article | 01 Sep 2015

Comparing the CarbonTracker and TM5-4DVar data assimilation systems for CO2 surface flux inversions

A. Babenhauserheide et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,724 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,506 1,011 207 3,724 247 110 104
  • HTML: 2,506
  • PDF: 1,011
  • XML: 207
  • Total: 3,724
  • Supplement: 247
  • BibTeX: 110
  • EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 22 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
We compare two different data assimilation systems for estimating sources and sinks of CO_2 from concentration measurements. The systems are CarbonTracker and TM5-4DVar, which have both been used in a number of scientific studies. We analyze the differences between both models as well as the sensitivity of the estimated sources and sinks to the observation coverage. The results provide a lower limit for the uncertainty of surface carbon fluxes with the current measurement network.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint