Dear authors,
I am happy to consider your paper for publication, subject to various corrections. These corrections refer particularly to improving the quality of the Figures. Bear in mind that you are producing a publication that is intended to serve a readership. Therefore, much care should be put towards making the appearance of the graphics and labels clear, and as uniform as possible. Try to embed vector graphics (particularly for the simple graphs) that can be arbitrarily scaled rather than blurry bitmaps. Details are listed below.
Before final acceptance, I will need to look at the manuscript again.
Figure 1: Decrease font size of labels “(a)” etc. These appear quite large at present.
Figure 2: Insert vertical space between tick labels of the color bar of subfigure (a) and the label “CMORPH Precipitation…” Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 3: Caption “Daily … Precipiptaiton”, obviously a heavy typo… Also, insert vertical space between tick labels of the color bar of subfigure (a) and the label
Figure 4: Enhance graphical resolution. Try to submit a vector graphics instead of a bitmap image. Thin out auxiliary grid lines in subfigures (b)-(d). Why not remove them altogether? They look too busy. Increase font size in the axis labels of subfigures (b)-(d). They look much too small compared to the rest of the subfigures.
Figure 5: This Figure will probably appear in layout as a two-column figure. For that purpose, the labels appear quite huge in comparison. (-> decrease all font sizes). Choose a different color for the orange cross sectional lines (black?). They are hard to see at the moment because orange is part of the color map’s color code.
Figure 6: Decrease / homogenize font sizes (try to use only 2 font sizes, perhaps). Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 7: Figure is extremely busy, needs to be cleaned up thoroughly. Make font sizes regular (only 2 font sizes). Erase fonts that appear stretched or compressed. Remove all grid lines, they interfere all the time with the lines belonging to sampling events. Avoid superposition of labels “(a)” etc. with other graphical elements. Best, put these labels to the left of the graph. Align the axis denominations to the left along one straight vertical line. Reduce time resolutions of the time series in (c), (d), and (e). These time series just look too busy. Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 8: Avoid superposition of labels “e)” etc. with other graphical elements. Use a consistent format “(a)” etc. like in the rest of the Figures. Remove black box around the legend of subfigure e). This is not needed. Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 9: Decrease / homogenize font sizes (try to use only 2 font sizes, perhaps). Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 10: Align the axis denominations along straight vertical lines. Move the color bars of subfigure (d) and (e) outside of the plot. Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 11: Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 12: Align the axis denominations along straight vertical lines. Leave sufficient space between the axis denominations and the axis ticks. Can you put the sub-legends into one single boxed legend per each sub-figure? Enhance graphical resolution.
Figure 13. This time, it seems that the font sizes should be actually increased. Enhance graphical resolution.
Wolfram Birmili

In Figure 3 I can still read on top of the Figure "(a) Daily Mean Surface Wind and Precipiptaiton"... Please fix this.
After this correction, the MS can be published.