Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12465–12485, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12465-2015
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12465–12485, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12465-2015

Research article 10 Nov 2015

Research article | 10 Nov 2015

Comparison of the CMAM30 data set with ACE-FTS and OSIRIS: polar regions

D. Pendlebury et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Diane Pendlebury on behalf of the Authors (23 Jun 2015)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (23 Jun 2015) by Quentin Errera
RR by Michelle Santee (06 Jul 2015)
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (13 Jul 2015) by Quentin Errera
AR by Diane Pendlebury on behalf of the Authors (28 Jul 2015)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (17 Aug 2015) by Quentin Errera
Download
Short summary
The CMAM30 data set takes a chemistry-climate model and relaxes the dynamics to reanalysis, which can then provide chemistry fields not available from the reanalysis data set. This paper addresses this gap by comparing temperature, water vapour, ozone and methane to satellite data to determine and document any biases in the model fields. The lack of ozone destruction and dehydration in the SH polar vortex is shown to be due to the treatment of polar stratosphere clouds in the model.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint