Articles | Volume 14, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6369-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6369-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
26 Jun 2014
Research article |
| 26 Jun 2014
The importance of vertical velocity variability for estimates of the indirect aerosol effects
R. E. L. West
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
now at: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London, UK
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
C. E. Johnson
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
G. W. Mann
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, UK
N. Bellouin
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
now at: Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
D. G. Partridge
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Z. Kipling
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 7,461 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,335 | 2,743 | 383 | 7,461 | 427 | 404 |
- HTML: 4,335
- PDF: 2,743
- XML: 383
- Total: 7,461
- BibTeX: 427
- EndNote: 404
Total article views: 6,117 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 26 Jun 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,627 | 2,149 | 341 | 6,117 | 401 | 390 |
- HTML: 3,627
- PDF: 2,149
- XML: 341
- Total: 6,117
- BibTeX: 401
- EndNote: 390
Total article views: 1,344 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 708 | 594 | 42 | 1,344 | 26 | 14 |
- HTML: 708
- PDF: 594
- XML: 42
- Total: 1,344
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 14
Cited
64 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Impact of Asian aerosols on the summer monsoon strongly modulated by regional precipitation biases Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7227-2024
- Improved Aerosol Processes and Effective Radiative Forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1 J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001464
- Trends in vertical wind velocity variability reveal cloud microphysical feedback D. Barahona et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67541-7
- Identifying climate model structural inconsistencies allows for tight constraint of aerosol radiative forcing L. Regayre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8749-2023
- Long-term variation of cloud droplet number concentrations from space-based Lidar J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.011
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2765-2016
- Impact of Holuhraun volcano aerosols on clouds in cloud-system-resolving simulations M. Haghighatnasab et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8457-2022
- Aerosol properties and their influences on low warm clouds during the Two-Column Aerosol Project J. Liu & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9515-2019
- Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- Meteorological and aerosol effects on marine cloud microphysical properties K. Sanchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024595
- Overview of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition: Study of Preindustrial-like Aerosols and Their Climate Effects (ACE-SPACE) J. Schmale et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0187.1
- The decomposition of cloud–aerosol forcing in the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1) D. Grosvenor & K. Carslaw https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15681-2020
- Coupling spectral‐bin cloud microphysics with the MOSAIC aerosol model in WRF‐Chem: Methodology and results for marine stratocumulus clouds W. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000676
- Volcano and Ship Tracks Indicate Excessive Aerosol‐Induced Cloud Water Increases in a Climate Model V. Toll et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075280
- Meteorological conditions and their effects on the relationship between aerosol optical depth and macro-physical properties of warm clouds over Shanghai based on MODIS Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.07.001
- The sensitivity of Southern Ocean aerosols and cloud microphysics to sea spray and sulfate aerosol production in the HadGEM3-GA7.1 chemistry–climate model L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15447-2019
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- Multimodel evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data G. Cesana et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022932
- Impacts of reducing scattering and absorbing aerosols on the temporal extent and intensity of South Asian summer monsoon and East Asian summer monsoon C. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8341-2023
- On the relationship between cloud water composition and cloud droplet number concentration A. MacDonald et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7645-2020
- Use of Short‐Range Forecasts to Evaluate Fast Physics Processes Relevant for Climate Sensitivity K. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001986
- Evaluating the Lagrangian Evolution of Subtropical Low Clouds in GCMs Using Observations: Mean Evolution, Time Scales, and Responses to Predictors R. Eastman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0178.1
- Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001628
- Dynamic subgrid heterogeneity of convective cloud in a global model: description and evaluation of the Convective Cloud Field Model (CCFM) in ECHAM6–HAM2 Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-327-2017
- Strong Dependence of Atmospheric Feedbacks on Mixed‐Phase Microphysics and Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions in HadGEM3 A. Bodas‐Salcedo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001688
- Inverse modelling of Köhler theory – Part 1: A response surface analysis of CCN spectra with respect to surface-active organic species S. Lowe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016
- Retrieving Cloud Sensitivity to Aerosol Using Ship Emissions in Overcast Conditions R. Ribeiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105620
- Scale-aware representation of aerosol activation and cloud droplet condensation processes to improve microphysical consistency across model resolutions Q. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.02.084
- An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model D. Rothenberg & C. Wang https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017
- Influence of horizontal resolution and complexity of aerosol–cloud interactions on marine stratocumulus and stratocumulus‐to‐cumulus transition in HadGEM3‐GC3.1 A. Ekman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4494
- Introducing aerosol-cloud interactions in the ECMWF model reveals new constraints on aerosol representation P. Andreozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11309-2026
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest L. Heikkinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5117-2024
- Revealing Bias of Cloud Radiative Effect in WRF Simulation: Bias Quantification and Source Attribution Y. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036319
- Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF L. Regayre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018
- Assessing the Impact of Self‐Lofting on Increasing the Altitude of Black Carbon in a Global Climate Model B. Johnson & J. Haywood https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038039
- The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations D. Walters et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019
- In-plume and out-of-plume analysis of aerosol–cloud interactions derived from the 2014–2015 Holuhraun volcanic eruption A. Peace et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9533-2024
- Significant Climate Impact of Highly Hygroscopic Atmospheric Aerosols in Delhi, India Y. Wang & Y. Chen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082339
- Contribution of regional aerosol nucleation to low-level CCN in an Amazonian deep convective environment: results from a regionally nested global model X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4431-2023
- Explicit representation of subgrid variability in cloud microphysics yields weaker aerosol indirect effect in the ECHAM5-HAM2 climate model J. Tonttila et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-703-2015
- Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability S. Ghan et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113
- Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0) P. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025
- Pristine oceans are a significant source of uncertainty in quantifying global cloud condensation nuclei G. Choudhury et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3841-2025
- Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15261-2018
- The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity D. Neubauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019
- NUMAC: Description of the Nested Unified Model With Aerosols and Chemistry, and Evaluation With KORUS‐AQ Data H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003457
- Effects of atmospheric dynamics and aerosols on the fraction of supercooled water clouds J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1847-2017
- Global response of parameterised convective cloud fields to anthropogenic aerosol forcing Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4445-2020
- Environmental effects on aerosol–cloud interaction in non-precipitating marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds over the eastern North Atlantic X. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-335-2022
- Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis K. Block et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-443-2024
- Assessing combinations of regional MCB designed to target multiple climate response objectives A. Mason et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10861-2026
- Development of aerosol activation in the double-moment Unified Model and evaluation with CLARIFY measurements H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10997-2020
- High Sensitivity of Arctic Black Carbon Radiative Effects to Subgrid Vertical Velocity in Aerosol Activation H. Matsui & N. Moteki https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088978
- Aerosol–fog interaction and the transition to well-mixed radiation fog I. Boutle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018
- How Well Can We Represent the Spectrum of Convective Clouds in a Climate Model? Comparisons between Internal Parameterization Variables and Radar Observations L. Labbouz et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0191.1
- Technical note: Emulation of a large-eddy simulator for stratocumulus clouds in a general circulation model K. Nordling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-869-2024
- Processes controlling the vertical aerosol distribution in marine stratocumulus regions – a sensitivity study using the climate model NorESM1-M L. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-577-2021
- Is a more physical representation of aerosol activation needed for simulations of fog? C. Poku et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7271-2021
- UKESM1.1: development and evaluation of an updated configuration of the UK Earth System Model J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023
- The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 8.0 and JULES Global Land 9.0 configurations M. Willett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026
- Decomposing Effective Radiative Forcing Due to Aerosol Cloud Interactions by Global Cloud Regimes T. Langton et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093833
64 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Impact of Asian aerosols on the summer monsoon strongly modulated by regional precipitation biases Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7227-2024
- Improved Aerosol Processes and Effective Radiative Forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1 J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001464
- Trends in vertical wind velocity variability reveal cloud microphysical feedback D. Barahona et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67541-7
- Identifying climate model structural inconsistencies allows for tight constraint of aerosol radiative forcing L. Regayre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8749-2023
- Long-term variation of cloud droplet number concentrations from space-based Lidar J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.011
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2765-2016
- Impact of Holuhraun volcano aerosols on clouds in cloud-system-resolving simulations M. Haghighatnasab et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8457-2022
- Aerosol properties and their influences on low warm clouds during the Two-Column Aerosol Project J. Liu & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9515-2019
- Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- Meteorological and aerosol effects on marine cloud microphysical properties K. Sanchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024595
- Overview of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition: Study of Preindustrial-like Aerosols and Their Climate Effects (ACE-SPACE) J. Schmale et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0187.1
- The decomposition of cloud–aerosol forcing in the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1) D. Grosvenor & K. Carslaw https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15681-2020
- Coupling spectral‐bin cloud microphysics with the MOSAIC aerosol model in WRF‐Chem: Methodology and results for marine stratocumulus clouds W. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000676
- Volcano and Ship Tracks Indicate Excessive Aerosol‐Induced Cloud Water Increases in a Climate Model V. Toll et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075280
- Meteorological conditions and their effects on the relationship between aerosol optical depth and macro-physical properties of warm clouds over Shanghai based on MODIS Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.07.001
- The sensitivity of Southern Ocean aerosols and cloud microphysics to sea spray and sulfate aerosol production in the HadGEM3-GA7.1 chemistry–climate model L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15447-2019
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- Multimodel evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data G. Cesana et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022932
- Impacts of reducing scattering and absorbing aerosols on the temporal extent and intensity of South Asian summer monsoon and East Asian summer monsoon C. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8341-2023
- On the relationship between cloud water composition and cloud droplet number concentration A. MacDonald et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7645-2020
- Use of Short‐Range Forecasts to Evaluate Fast Physics Processes Relevant for Climate Sensitivity K. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001986
- Evaluating the Lagrangian Evolution of Subtropical Low Clouds in GCMs Using Observations: Mean Evolution, Time Scales, and Responses to Predictors R. Eastman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0178.1
- Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001628
- Dynamic subgrid heterogeneity of convective cloud in a global model: description and evaluation of the Convective Cloud Field Model (CCFM) in ECHAM6–HAM2 Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-327-2017
- Strong Dependence of Atmospheric Feedbacks on Mixed‐Phase Microphysics and Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions in HadGEM3 A. Bodas‐Salcedo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001688
- Inverse modelling of Köhler theory – Part 1: A response surface analysis of CCN spectra with respect to surface-active organic species S. Lowe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016
- Retrieving Cloud Sensitivity to Aerosol Using Ship Emissions in Overcast Conditions R. Ribeiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105620
- Scale-aware representation of aerosol activation and cloud droplet condensation processes to improve microphysical consistency across model resolutions Q. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.02.084
- An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model D. Rothenberg & C. Wang https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017
- Influence of horizontal resolution and complexity of aerosol–cloud interactions on marine stratocumulus and stratocumulus‐to‐cumulus transition in HadGEM3‐GC3.1 A. Ekman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4494
- Introducing aerosol-cloud interactions in the ECMWF model reveals new constraints on aerosol representation P. Andreozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11309-2026
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest L. Heikkinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5117-2024
- Revealing Bias of Cloud Radiative Effect in WRF Simulation: Bias Quantification and Source Attribution Y. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036319
- Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF L. Regayre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018
- Assessing the Impact of Self‐Lofting on Increasing the Altitude of Black Carbon in a Global Climate Model B. Johnson & J. Haywood https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038039
- The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations D. Walters et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019
- In-plume and out-of-plume analysis of aerosol–cloud interactions derived from the 2014–2015 Holuhraun volcanic eruption A. Peace et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9533-2024
- Significant Climate Impact of Highly Hygroscopic Atmospheric Aerosols in Delhi, India Y. Wang & Y. Chen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082339
- Contribution of regional aerosol nucleation to low-level CCN in an Amazonian deep convective environment: results from a regionally nested global model X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4431-2023
- Explicit representation of subgrid variability in cloud microphysics yields weaker aerosol indirect effect in the ECHAM5-HAM2 climate model J. Tonttila et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-703-2015
- Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability S. Ghan et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113
- Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0) P. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025
- Pristine oceans are a significant source of uncertainty in quantifying global cloud condensation nuclei G. Choudhury et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3841-2025
- Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15261-2018
- The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity D. Neubauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019
- NUMAC: Description of the Nested Unified Model With Aerosols and Chemistry, and Evaluation With KORUS‐AQ Data H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003457
- Effects of atmospheric dynamics and aerosols on the fraction of supercooled water clouds J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1847-2017
- Global response of parameterised convective cloud fields to anthropogenic aerosol forcing Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4445-2020
- Environmental effects on aerosol–cloud interaction in non-precipitating marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds over the eastern North Atlantic X. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-335-2022
- Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis K. Block et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-443-2024
- Assessing combinations of regional MCB designed to target multiple climate response objectives A. Mason et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10861-2026
- Development of aerosol activation in the double-moment Unified Model and evaluation with CLARIFY measurements H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10997-2020
- High Sensitivity of Arctic Black Carbon Radiative Effects to Subgrid Vertical Velocity in Aerosol Activation H. Matsui & N. Moteki https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088978
- Aerosol–fog interaction and the transition to well-mixed radiation fog I. Boutle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018
- How Well Can We Represent the Spectrum of Convective Clouds in a Climate Model? Comparisons between Internal Parameterization Variables and Radar Observations L. Labbouz et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0191.1
- Technical note: Emulation of a large-eddy simulator for stratocumulus clouds in a general circulation model K. Nordling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-869-2024
- Processes controlling the vertical aerosol distribution in marine stratocumulus regions – a sensitivity study using the climate model NorESM1-M L. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-577-2021
- Is a more physical representation of aerosol activation needed for simulations of fog? C. Poku et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7271-2021
- UKESM1.1: development and evaluation of an updated configuration of the UK Earth System Model J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023
- The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 8.0 and JULES Global Land 9.0 configurations M. Willett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026
- Decomposing Effective Radiative Forcing Due to Aerosol Cloud Interactions by Global Cloud Regimes T. Langton et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093833
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 06 Oct 2026
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint