Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3703-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3703-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Apr 2014
Research article |
| 11 Apr 2014
Inferring regional sources and sinks of atmospheric CO2 from GOSAT XCO2 data
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
D. B. A. Jones
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
D. K. Henze
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
N. Bousserez
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
K. W. Bowman
Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
J. B. Fisher
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
R. Nassar
Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
C. O'Dell
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
P. O. Wennberg
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
E. A. Kort
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
S. C. Wofsy
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
T. Blumenstock
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe, Germany
N. M. Deutscher
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
D. W. T. Griffith
School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
F. Hase
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe, Germany
P. Heikkinen
FMI-Arctic Research Center, Sodankylä, Finland
V. Sherlock
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
K. Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
R. Sussmann
IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
T. Warneke
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 10,252 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,364 | 4,366 | 522 | 10,252 | 517 | 442 |
- HTML: 5,364
- PDF: 4,366
- XML: 522
- Total: 10,252
- BibTeX: 517
- EndNote: 442
Total article views: 8,966 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Apr 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,657 | 3,823 | 486 | 8,966 | 500 | 437 |
- HTML: 4,657
- PDF: 3,823
- XML: 486
- Total: 8,966
- BibTeX: 500
- EndNote: 437
Total article views: 1,286 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 707 | 543 | 36 | 1,286 | 17 | 5 |
- HTML: 707
- PDF: 543
- XML: 36
- Total: 1,286
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 5
Cited
110 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Estimates of Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions for Moscow and St. Petersburg Based on OCO-2 Satellite Measurements Y. Timofeev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856020060238
- Satellite-Based Emission Inversion for Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases: A Review Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-025-4914-7
- Consistent regional fluxes of CH4 and CO2 inferred from GOSAT proxy XCH4 : XCO2 retrievals, 2010–2014 L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017
- Regional CO2 fluxes from 2010 to 2015 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals using a new version of the Global Carbon Assimilation System F. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1963-2021
- Analysis of Regional Surface CO2 Fluxes Using the MEGA Satellite Data Assimilation System L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223720
- Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Multi-Satellite Observed Column Atmospheric CO2 Using Precision-Weighted Kriging Method Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030576
- High-resolution GEOS-Chem model for Indian monsoon region: Seasonal cycle and budget of tropospheric CO2 S. Allahudheen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119913
- Inverse modeling of GOSAT-retrieved ratios of total column CH4 and CO2 for 2009 and 2010 S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5043-2016
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025100
- Ratios of greenhouse gas emissions observed over the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250
- Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of atmospheric methane using GOSAT data in Iran S. Mousavi & S. Falahatkar https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00378-5
- Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7 H. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
- Inter-annual variability of summertime CO 2 exchange in Northern Eurasia inferred from GOSAT XCO 2 M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/105001
- Top-down constraints on global N2O emissions at optimal resolution: application of a new dimension reduction technique K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-735-2018
- Top-down estimate of regional carbon sinks over East Asia for 2010–2019 using satellite observations M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6869-2026
- Future inhibition of ecosystem productivity by increasing wildfire pollution over boreal North America X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13699-2017
- Sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of discrepancies in stratosphere–troposphere exchange on inferred sources and sinks of CO2 F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11773-2015
- On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems? B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019
- Atmospheric CO2 inversions on the mesoscale using data-driven prior uncertainties: quantification of the European terrestrial CO2 fluxes P. Kountouris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3047-2018
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
- Constraining a terrestrial biosphere model with remotely sensed atmospheric carbon dioxide T. Kaminski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.017
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Satellite Detection of Diffuse Tectonic CO2 Degassing in the East African Rift C. Flesia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18152586
- Improved estimates of net ecosystem exchanges in mega-countries using GOSAT and OCO-2 observations L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01910-w
- A Cluster of CO2 Change Characteristics with GOSAT Observations for Viewing the Spatial Pattern of CO2 Emission and Absorption D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6111695
- High-Resolution Geos-Chem Model for Indian Monsoon Region: Seasonal Cycle and Budget of Tropospheric Co2 S. Allahudheen et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4161842
- Global and regional carbon budget for 2015–2020 inferred from OCO-2 based on an ensemble Kalman filter coupled with GEOS-Chem Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022
- An inversion model based on GEOS-Chem for estimating global and China's terrestrial carbon fluxes in 2019 C. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2023.01.001
- Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake Over North America in 2011 and 2012 W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004520
- National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Sensitivity of the simulated CO2 concentration to inter-annual variations of its sources and sinks over East Asia Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.03.001
- Identifying local anthropogenic CO2 emissions with satellite retrievals: a case study in South Korea C. Shim et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1523585
- Evidence of Carbon Uptake Associated with Vegetation Greening Trends in Eastern China Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040718
- Combining GOSAT XCO2 observations over land and ocean to improve regional CO2 flux estimates F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024157
- The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network S. Crowell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9797-2019
- An 11-year record of XCO2 estimates derived from GOSAT measurements using the NASA ACOS version 9 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-325-2022
- A Step Forward to Global Segment CO2 Flux Estimation Benefiting from Large Swath of Coordinated CO2 and Solar-Induced Fluorescence Measurements from the TanSat-2 Mission D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-026-6150-1
- Mapping of satellite Earth observations using moving window block kriging J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3311-2015
- Net CO2 fossil fuel emissions of Tokyo estimated directly from measurements of the Tsukuba TCCON site and radiosondes A. Babenhauserheide et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2697-2020
- OCO‐2 Satellite‐Imposed Constraints on Terrestrial Biospheric CO2 Fluxes Over South Asia S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035035
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040758
- Adjoint of the global Eulerian–Lagrangian coupled atmospheric transport model (A-GELCA v1.0): development and validation D. Belikov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-749-2016
- Inverse modeling of pan-Arctic methane emissions at high spatial resolution: what can we learn from assimilating satellite retrievals and using different process-based wetland and lake biogeochemical models? Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12649-2016
- Critical review on mobile direct air capture: Concept expansion, characteristic description, and performance evaluation S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.003
- Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb) B. Badawy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018
- The status of carbon neutrality of the world's top 5 CO2 emitters as seen by carbon satellites F. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.001
- Sensitivity of CO2 surface flux constraints to observational coverage B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026164
- Technical note: Posterior uncertainty estimation via a Monte Carlo procedure specialized for 4D-Var data assimilation M. Stanley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9419-2024
- A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017
- Study on CO 2 concentration assimilation by integrating a multi-source satellite fusion dataset based on the WRF-Chem model W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2026.2612845
- A regional CO2 observing system simulation experiment for the ASCENDS satellite mission J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12897-2014
- Detecting drought impact on terrestrial biosphere carbon fluxes over contiguous US with satellite observations J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5ef
- Source‐receptor relationships of column‐average CO2 and implications for the impact of observations on flux inversions J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022914
- Constraints on methane emissions in North America from future geostationary remote-sensing measurements N. Bousserez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6175-2016
- Seamless mapping of long-term (2010–2020) daily global XCO2 and XCH4 from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2), and CAMS global greenhouse gas reanalysis (CAMS-EGG4) with a spatiotemporally self-supervised fusion method Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3597-2023
- The Effect of GOSAT Observations on Estimates of Net CO<sub>2</sub> Flux in Semi-Arid Regions of the Southern Hemisphere M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-037
- Global Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Flux Inferred from TanSat XCO 2 Retrievals H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9816536
- Prior biosphere model impact on global terrestrial CO2 fluxes estimated from OCO-2 retrievals S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13267-2019
- Spatio-Temporal Consistency Evaluation of XCO2 Retrievals from GOSAT and OCO-2 Based on TCCON and Model Data for Joint Utilization in Carbon Cycle Research Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10070354
- Comparative Evaluation of Top-Down GOSAT XCO2 vs. Bottom-Up National Reports in the European Countries Y. Hwang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126700
- Assimilation of OCO-2 retrievals with WRF-Chem/DART: A case study for the Midwestern United States Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118106
- Canada's Forests Are Shifting From a Recovery‐Driven Carbon Sink to a Disturbance‐Driven Carbon Source S. Curasi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70958
- Long-Term Observations of Atmospheric Constituents at the First Ground-Based High-Resolution Fourier-Transform Spectrometry Observation Station in China C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.11.022
- Improved Constraints on the Recent Terrestrial Carbon Sink Over China by Assimilating OCO‐2 XCO2 Retrievals W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037773
- A measurement-based verification framework for UK greenhouse gas emissions: an overview of the Greenhouse gAs Uk and Global Emissions (GAUGE) project P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018
- Global atmospheric CO2 inverse models converging on neutral tropical land exchange, but disagreeing on fossil fuel and atmospheric growth rate B. Gaubert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-117-2019
- The status and development proposal of carbon sources and sinks monitoring satellite system G. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00033-5
- A Robust Estimate of Continental‐Scale Terrestrial Carbon Sinks Using GOSAT XCO2 Retrievals L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL102815
- Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON S. Kulawik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-683-2016
- The potential of Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 data to reduce the uncertainties in CO2 surface fluxes over Australia using a variational assimilation scheme Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8473-2020
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Seasonal variability of tropospheric CO2 over India based on model simulation, satellite retrieval and in-situ observation M. Krishnapriya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01478-x
- Review and perspective of remote sensing research on global greenhouse gas monitoring and stocktaking L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-1033
- Automatic processing of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 mole fractions at the ICOS Atmosphere Thematic Centre L. Hazan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4719-2016
- A review of datasets and methods for deriving spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO2 C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116101
- Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000204
- Was Australia a sink or source of CO2 in 2015? Data assimilation using OCO-2 satellite measurements Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021
- Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016
- Development of the WRF-CO2 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 T. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1725-2018
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO2 fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- Preliminary Assessment of Methane Concentration Variation Observed by GOSAT in China X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/125059
- Terrestrial ecosystem carbon flux estimated using GOSAT and OCO-2 XCO2 retrievals H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12067-2019
- Thermal infrared laser heterodyne spectroradiometry for solar occultation atmospheric CO2 measurements A. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5975-2016
- A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO2 adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions S. Polavarapu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- Global-Scale Evaluation of XCO2 Products from GOSAT, OCO-2 and CarbonTracker Using Direct Comparison and Triple Collocation Method Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225635
- Greenhouse gas column observations from a portable spectrometer in Uganda N. Humpage et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5679-2024
- Improved analysis‐error covariance matrix for high‐dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model N. Bousserez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2495
- Bias corrections of GOSAT SWIR XCO<sub>2</sub> and XCH<sub>4</sub> with TCCON data and their evaluation using aircraft measurement data M. Inoue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3491-2016
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
- Fourier transform spectrometer measurements of column CO2 at Sodankylä, Finland R. Kivi & P. Heikkinen https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-271-2016
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- CO2 Flux over the Contiguous United States in 2016 Inverted by WRF-Chem/DART from OCO-2 XCO2 Retrievals Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152996
- Evaluating GPP and Respiration Estimates Over Northern Midlatitude Ecosystems Using Solar‐Induced Fluorescence and Atmospheric CO2 Measurements B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004472
- A Top-Down Method for Estimating Regional Fossil Fuel Carbon Emissions Based on Satellite XCO2 Retrievals L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030447
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- 基于星载IPDA激光雷达与多源数据的北极海表二氧化碳分压估算（特邀） 陈. Chen Yingxue et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS252039
- Estimating power plant CO2 emission using OCO-2 XCO2 and high resolution WRF-Chem simulations T. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab25ae
- The First Global Carbon Dioxide Flux Map Derived from TanSat Measurements D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1179-7
- Improved method for linear carbon monoxide simulation and source attribution in atmospheric chemistry models illustrated using GEOS-Chem v9 J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4129-2017
- Comparison of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Based on GOSAT, OCO-2 Observations and Ground-Based TCCON Data J. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215172
- Regional data assimilation of multi-spectral MOPITT observations of CO over North America Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6801-2015
- Important evidence of constant low CO2 windows and impacts on the non-closure of the greenhouse effect J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41562-x
- Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfac1
- Comparison of the data‐driven top‐down and bottom‐up global terrestrial CO2 exchanges: GOSAT CO2 inversion and empirical eddy flux upscaling M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002866
- Global land mapping of satellite-observed CO2 total columns using spatio-temporal geostatistics Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1156777
- Characterizing biospheric carbon balance using CO2 observations from the OCO-2 satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6785-2018
- Examining partial-column density retrieval of lower-tropospheric CO2 from GOSAT target observations over global megacities A. Kuze et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112966
- Estimates of European uptake of CO2 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals: sensitivity to measurement bias inside and outside Europe L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
110 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Estimates of Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions for Moscow and St. Petersburg Based on OCO-2 Satellite Measurements Y. Timofeev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856020060238
- Satellite-Based Emission Inversion for Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases: A Review Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-025-4914-7
- Consistent regional fluxes of CH4 and CO2 inferred from GOSAT proxy XCH4 : XCO2 retrievals, 2010–2014 L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4781-2017
- Regional CO2 fluxes from 2010 to 2015 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals using a new version of the Global Carbon Assimilation System F. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1963-2021
- Analysis of Regional Surface CO2 Fluxes Using the MEGA Satellite Data Assimilation System L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223720
- Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Multi-Satellite Observed Column Atmospheric CO2 Using Precision-Weighted Kriging Method Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030576
- High-resolution GEOS-Chem model for Indian monsoon region: Seasonal cycle and budget of tropospheric CO2 S. Allahudheen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119913
- Inverse modeling of GOSAT-retrieved ratios of total column CH4 and CO2 for 2009 and 2010 S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5043-2016
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025100
- Ratios of greenhouse gas emissions observed over the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250
- Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of atmospheric methane using GOSAT data in Iran S. Mousavi & S. Falahatkar https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00378-5
- Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7 H. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
- Inter-annual variability of summertime CO 2 exchange in Northern Eurasia inferred from GOSAT XCO 2 M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/105001
- Top-down constraints on global N2O emissions at optimal resolution: application of a new dimension reduction technique K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-735-2018
- Top-down estimate of regional carbon sinks over East Asia for 2010–2019 using satellite observations M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6869-2026
- Future inhibition of ecosystem productivity by increasing wildfire pollution over boreal North America X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13699-2017
- Sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of discrepancies in stratosphere–troposphere exchange on inferred sources and sinks of CO2 F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11773-2015
- On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems? B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019
- Atmospheric CO2 inversions on the mesoscale using data-driven prior uncertainties: quantification of the European terrestrial CO2 fluxes P. Kountouris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3047-2018
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
- Constraining a terrestrial biosphere model with remotely sensed atmospheric carbon dioxide T. Kaminski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.017
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Satellite Detection of Diffuse Tectonic CO2 Degassing in the East African Rift C. Flesia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18152586
- Improved estimates of net ecosystem exchanges in mega-countries using GOSAT and OCO-2 observations L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01910-w
- A Cluster of CO2 Change Characteristics with GOSAT Observations for Viewing the Spatial Pattern of CO2 Emission and Absorption D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6111695
- High-Resolution Geos-Chem Model for Indian Monsoon Region: Seasonal Cycle and Budget of Tropospheric Co2 S. Allahudheen et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4161842
- Global and regional carbon budget for 2015–2020 inferred from OCO-2 based on an ensemble Kalman filter coupled with GEOS-Chem Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022
- An inversion model based on GEOS-Chem for estimating global and China's terrestrial carbon fluxes in 2019 C. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2023.01.001
- Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake Over North America in 2011 and 2012 W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004520
- National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Sensitivity of the simulated CO2 concentration to inter-annual variations of its sources and sinks over East Asia Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.03.001
- Identifying local anthropogenic CO2 emissions with satellite retrievals: a case study in South Korea C. Shim et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1523585
- Evidence of Carbon Uptake Associated with Vegetation Greening Trends in Eastern China Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040718
- Combining GOSAT XCO2 observations over land and ocean to improve regional CO2 flux estimates F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024157
- The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network S. Crowell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9797-2019
- An 11-year record of XCO2 estimates derived from GOSAT measurements using the NASA ACOS version 9 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-325-2022
- A Step Forward to Global Segment CO2 Flux Estimation Benefiting from Large Swath of Coordinated CO2 and Solar-Induced Fluorescence Measurements from the TanSat-2 Mission D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-026-6150-1
- Mapping of satellite Earth observations using moving window block kriging J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3311-2015
- Net CO2 fossil fuel emissions of Tokyo estimated directly from measurements of the Tsukuba TCCON site and radiosondes A. Babenhauserheide et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2697-2020
- OCO‐2 Satellite‐Imposed Constraints on Terrestrial Biospheric CO2 Fluxes Over South Asia S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035035
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040758
- Adjoint of the global Eulerian–Lagrangian coupled atmospheric transport model (A-GELCA v1.0): development and validation D. Belikov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-749-2016
- Inverse modeling of pan-Arctic methane emissions at high spatial resolution: what can we learn from assimilating satellite retrievals and using different process-based wetland and lake biogeochemical models? Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12649-2016
- Critical review on mobile direct air capture: Concept expansion, characteristic description, and performance evaluation S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.003
- Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb) B. Badawy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018
- The status of carbon neutrality of the world's top 5 CO2 emitters as seen by carbon satellites F. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.001
- Sensitivity of CO2 surface flux constraints to observational coverage B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026164
- Technical note: Posterior uncertainty estimation via a Monte Carlo procedure specialized for 4D-Var data assimilation M. Stanley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9419-2024
- A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017
- Study on CO 2 concentration assimilation by integrating a multi-source satellite fusion dataset based on the WRF-Chem model W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2026.2612845
- A regional CO2 observing system simulation experiment for the ASCENDS satellite mission J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12897-2014
- Detecting drought impact on terrestrial biosphere carbon fluxes over contiguous US with satellite observations J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5ef
- Source‐receptor relationships of column‐average CO2 and implications for the impact of observations on flux inversions J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022914
- Constraints on methane emissions in North America from future geostationary remote-sensing measurements N. Bousserez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6175-2016
- Seamless mapping of long-term (2010–2020) daily global XCO2 and XCH4 from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2), and CAMS global greenhouse gas reanalysis (CAMS-EGG4) with a spatiotemporally self-supervised fusion method Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3597-2023
- The Effect of GOSAT Observations on Estimates of Net CO<sub>2</sub> Flux in Semi-Arid Regions of the Southern Hemisphere M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-037
- Global Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Flux Inferred from TanSat XCO 2 Retrievals H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9816536
- Prior biosphere model impact on global terrestrial CO2 fluxes estimated from OCO-2 retrievals S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13267-2019
- Spatio-Temporal Consistency Evaluation of XCO2 Retrievals from GOSAT and OCO-2 Based on TCCON and Model Data for Joint Utilization in Carbon Cycle Research Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10070354
- Comparative Evaluation of Top-Down GOSAT XCO2 vs. Bottom-Up National Reports in the European Countries Y. Hwang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126700
- Assimilation of OCO-2 retrievals with WRF-Chem/DART: A case study for the Midwestern United States Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118106
- Canada's Forests Are Shifting From a Recovery‐Driven Carbon Sink to a Disturbance‐Driven Carbon Source S. Curasi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70958
- Long-Term Observations of Atmospheric Constituents at the First Ground-Based High-Resolution Fourier-Transform Spectrometry Observation Station in China C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.11.022
- Improved Constraints on the Recent Terrestrial Carbon Sink Over China by Assimilating OCO‐2 XCO2 Retrievals W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037773
- A measurement-based verification framework for UK greenhouse gas emissions: an overview of the Greenhouse gAs Uk and Global Emissions (GAUGE) project P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018
- Global atmospheric CO2 inverse models converging on neutral tropical land exchange, but disagreeing on fossil fuel and atmospheric growth rate B. Gaubert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-117-2019
- The status and development proposal of carbon sources and sinks monitoring satellite system G. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00033-5
- A Robust Estimate of Continental‐Scale Terrestrial Carbon Sinks Using GOSAT XCO2 Retrievals L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL102815
- Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON S. Kulawik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-683-2016
- The potential of Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 data to reduce the uncertainties in CO2 surface fluxes over Australia using a variational assimilation scheme Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8473-2020
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Seasonal variability of tropospheric CO2 over India based on model simulation, satellite retrieval and in-situ observation M. Krishnapriya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01478-x
- Review and perspective of remote sensing research on global greenhouse gas monitoring and stocktaking L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-1033
- Automatic processing of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 mole fractions at the ICOS Atmosphere Thematic Centre L. Hazan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4719-2016
- A review of datasets and methods for deriving spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO2 C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116101
- Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000204
- Was Australia a sink or source of CO2 in 2015? Data assimilation using OCO-2 satellite measurements Y. Villalobos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021
- Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016
- Development of the WRF-CO2 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 T. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1725-2018
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO2 fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- Preliminary Assessment of Methane Concentration Variation Observed by GOSAT in China X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/125059
- Terrestrial ecosystem carbon flux estimated using GOSAT and OCO-2 XCO2 retrievals H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12067-2019
- Thermal infrared laser heterodyne spectroradiometry for solar occultation atmospheric CO2 measurements A. Hoffmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5975-2016
- A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO2 adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions S. Polavarapu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- Global-Scale Evaluation of XCO2 Products from GOSAT, OCO-2 and CarbonTracker Using Direct Comparison and Triple Collocation Method Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225635
- Greenhouse gas column observations from a portable spectrometer in Uganda N. Humpage et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5679-2024
- Improved analysis‐error covariance matrix for high‐dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model N. Bousserez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2495
- Bias corrections of GOSAT SWIR XCO<sub>2</sub> and XCH<sub>4</sub> with TCCON data and their evaluation using aircraft measurement data M. Inoue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3491-2016
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
- Fourier transform spectrometer measurements of column CO2 at Sodankylä, Finland R. Kivi & P. Heikkinen https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-271-2016
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- CO2 Flux over the Contiguous United States in 2016 Inverted by WRF-Chem/DART from OCO-2 XCO2 Retrievals Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152996
- Evaluating GPP and Respiration Estimates Over Northern Midlatitude Ecosystems Using Solar‐Induced Fluorescence and Atmospheric CO2 Measurements B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004472
- A Top-Down Method for Estimating Regional Fossil Fuel Carbon Emissions Based on Satellite XCO2 Retrievals L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030447
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- 基于星载IPDA激光雷达与多源数据的北极海表二氧化碳分压估算（特邀） 陈. Chen Yingxue et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS252039
- Estimating power plant CO2 emission using OCO-2 XCO2 and high resolution WRF-Chem simulations T. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab25ae
- The First Global Carbon Dioxide Flux Map Derived from TanSat Measurements D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1179-7
- Improved method for linear carbon monoxide simulation and source attribution in atmospheric chemistry models illustrated using GEOS-Chem v9 J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4129-2017
- Comparison of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Based on GOSAT, OCO-2 Observations and Ground-Based TCCON Data J. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215172
- Regional data assimilation of multi-spectral MOPITT observations of CO over North America Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6801-2015
- Important evidence of constant low CO2 windows and impacts on the non-closure of the greenhouse effect J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41562-x
- Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfac1
- Comparison of the data‐driven top‐down and bottom‐up global terrestrial CO2 exchanges: GOSAT CO2 inversion and empirical eddy flux upscaling M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002866
- Global land mapping of satellite-observed CO2 total columns using spatio-temporal geostatistics Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1156777
- Characterizing biospheric carbon balance using CO2 observations from the OCO-2 satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6785-2018
- Examining partial-column density retrieval of lower-tropospheric CO2 from GOSAT target observations over global megacities A. Kuze et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112966
- Estimates of European uptake of CO2 inferred from GOSAT XCO2 retrievals: sensitivity to measurement bias inside and outside Europe L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1289-2016
Saved (final revised paper)
Discussed (final revised paper)
Latest update: 08 Oct 2026
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint