192 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Global aerosol simulations using NICAM.16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
2. Prognostic Precipitation in the MIROC6‐SPRINTARS GCM: Description and Evaluation Against Satellite Observations T. Michibata et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001596
3. Historical (1850–2014) Aerosol Evolution and Role on Climate Forcing Using the GISS ModelE2.1 Contribution to CMIP6 S. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001978
4. The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6 R. Pincus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016
5. Impact of SO2 injection profiles on simulated volcanic forcing for the 2009 Sarychev eruptions – investigating the importance of using high-vertical-resolution methods when compiling SO2 data E. Axebrink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2047-2025
6. Improved Simulations of Global Black Carbon Distributions by Modifying Wet Scavenging Processes in Convective and Mixed‐Phase Clouds M. Liu & H. Matsui https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033890
7. Cloud adjustments from large-scale smoke–circulation interactions strongly modulate the southeastern Atlantic stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition M. Diamond et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022
8. Effects of Aerosols on Radiative Forcing and Climate Over East Asia With Different SO2 Emissions X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7080099
9. The Turning Point of the Aerosol Era S. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003070
10. Effective Radiative Forcing of the Internally Mixed Sulfate and Black Carbon Aerosol in the GFDL AM4 Model: The Role Played by Other Aerosol Species G. Govardhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038481
11. Implementing detailed nucleation predictions in the Earth system model EC-Earth3.3.4: sulfuric acid–ammonia nucleation C. Svenhag et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4923-2024
12. Comparison of Anthropogenic Aerosol Climate Effects among Three Climate Models with Reduced Complexity X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080456
13. Strong global radiative effects from wildfire dark brown carbon L. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-01972-9
14. Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions* A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00103.1
15. The decomposition of cloud–aerosol forcing in the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1) D. Grosvenor & K. Carslaw https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15681-2020
16. Investigation of Aerosol Direct Effect over China under El Niño and Its Spatial Distribution Using WRF-Chem F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010058
17. Estimating the CMIP6 Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Effects with the Advantage of Prescribed Aerosol Forcing X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030406
18. Impacts of solar-absorbing aerosol layers on the transition of stratocumulus to trade cumulus clouds X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12725-2017
19. The effect of organic nucleation on the indirect radiative forcing with a semi-explicit chemical mechanism for highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4439-2026
20. Regional and seasonal radiative forcing by perturbations to aerosol and ozone precursor emissions N. Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13885-2016
21. Impacts of Aerosol Dry Deposition on Black Carbon Spatial Distributions and Radiative Effects in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017MS001219
22. Impacts of a double-moment bulk cloud microphysics scheme (NDW6-G23) on aerosol fields in NICAM.19 with a global 14 km grid resolution D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-651-2024
23. Dust radiative forcing in CMIP6 Earth System models: insights from the AerChemMIP piClim-2xdust experiment O. Haugvaldstad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13199-2025
24. Variability, timescales, and nonlinearity in climate responses to black carbon emissions Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2405-2019
25. Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0 N. Oshima et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00348-w
26. How Uncertainty in Field Measurements of Ice Nucleating Particles Influences Modeled Cloud Forcing S. Garimella et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0089.1
27. Droplet collection efficiencies inferred from satellite retrievals constrain effective radiative forcing of aerosol–cloud interactions C. Beall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024
28. Quantifying components of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in climate models M. Zelinka et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021710
29. Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001628
30. Trends in aerosol optical properties over Eastern Europe based on MODIS-Aqua M. Filonchyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.014
31. Biosphere–atmosphere related processes influence trace-gas and aerosol satellite–model biases E. Sands et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7269-2025
32. Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0) P. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025
33. Present‐Day and Historical Aerosol and Ozone Characteristics in CNRM CMIP6 Simulations M. Michou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001816
34. Putting the clouds back in aerosol–cloud interactions A. Gettelman https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12397-2015
35. Aerosol radiative forcings induced by substantial changes in anthropogenic emissions in China from 2008 to 2016 M. Liu & H. Matsui https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021
36. Aerosol indirect effects on the nighttime Arctic Ocean surface from thin, predominantly liquid clouds L. Zamora et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7311-2017
37. Assessing the climate and air quality effects of future aerosol mitigation in India using a global climate model combined with statistical downscaling T. Miinalainen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3471-2023
38. Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
39. Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
40. Subgrid-scale variability in clear-sky relative humidity and forcing by aerosol–radiation interactions in an atmosphere model P. Petersik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8589-2018
41. Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
42. Impacts on cloud radiative effects induced by coexisting aerosols converted from international shipping and maritime DMS emissions Q. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16793-2018
43. Decomposing Effective Radiative Forcing Due to Aerosol Cloud Interactions by Global Cloud Regimes T. Langton et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093833
44. Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation’s CO 2 removal benefits J. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg6196
45. Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing H. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
46. High Sensitivity of Asian Dust Emission, Transport, and Climate Impacts to Threshold Friction Velocity K. Kawai et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2021-042
47. Radiative effect and climate impacts of brown carbon with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) H. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018
48. Global source attribution of sulfate concentration and direct and indirect radiative forcing Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8903-2017
49. The Key Role of Warm Rain Parameterization in Determining the Aerosol Indirect Effect in a Global Climate Model X. Jing et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0789.1
50. Future evolution of aerosols and implications for climate change in the Euro-Mediterranean region using the CNRM-ALADIN63 regional climate model T. Drugé et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7639-2021
51. Robust response of Asian summer monsoon to anthropogenic aerosols in CMIP5 models M. Salzmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021783
52. Anthropogenic combustion iron as a complex climate forcer H. Matsui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03997-0
53. Comparison of methods to estimate aerosol effective radiative forcings in climate models M. Zelinka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8879-2023
54. Global radiative effects of solid fuel cookstove aerosol emissions Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5219-2018
55. CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 R. Stouffer et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
56. Climate effects of China’s efforts to improve its air quality Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9e21
57. Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) X. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015
58. Impacts of the East Asian Monsoon on springtime dust concentrations over China S. Lou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024758
59. Biomass burning aerosol radiative effects in the Southeast Atlantic depend strongly on meteorological forcing method E. Giuffrida et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14879-2025
60. Source attribution of cloud condensation nuclei and their impact on stratocumulus clouds and radiation in the south-eastern Atlantic H. Che et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10789-2022
61. Black carbon radiative effects highly sensitive to emitted particle size when resolving mixing-state diversity H. Matsui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1
62. The Regional Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (RAMIP) L. Wilcox et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4451-2023
63. Radiative Forcing of Climate: The Historical Evolution of the Radiative Forcing Concept, the Forcing Agents and their Quantification, and Applications V. Ramaswamy et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-19-0001.1
64. Global source apportionment of aerosols into major emission regions and sectors over 1850–2017 Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6509-2024
65. Cloudy-sky contributions to the direct aerosol effect G. Myhre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8855-2020
66. Investigating the Linear Dependence of Direct and Indirect Radiative Forcing on Emission of Carbonaceous Aerosols in a Global Climate Model Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027244
67. Minimal Climate Impacts From Short‐Lived Climate Forcers Following Emission Reductions Related to the COVID‐19 Pandemic J. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090326
68. Using CESM-RESFire to understand climate–fire–ecosystem interactions and the implications for decadal climate variability Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-995-2020
69. Opinion: The role of AerChemMIP in advancing climate and air quality research P. Griffiths et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8289-2025
70. Global Radiative Impacts of Mineral Dust Perturbations Through Stratiform Clouds Z. McGraw et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031807
71. Atmospheric chemistry enhances the climate mitigation potential of tree restoration R. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02343-9
72. Carbon-climate feedback responses to spatial aerosol model implementation variations E. Monteiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01343-6
73. A 20-year simulated climatology of global dust aerosol deposition Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.086
74. Incorporating an Interactive Fire Plume‐Rise Model in the DOE's Energy Exascale Earth System Model Version 1 (E3SMv1) and Examining Aerosol Radiative Effect Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003818
75. Decomposing the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols based on CMIP6 Earth system models A. Kalisoras et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7837-2024
76. ARM-Led Improvements in Aerosols in Climate and Climate Models S. Ghan & J. Penner https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-15-0033.1
77. How does increasing horizontal resolution in a global climate model improve the simulation of aerosol‐cloud interactions? P. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064183
78. On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2765-2016
79. Investigation of short-term effective radiative forcing of fire aerosols over North America using nudged hindcast ensembles Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-31-2018
80. Implementing a sectional scheme for early aerosol growth from new particle formation in the Norwegian Earth System Model v2: comparison to observations and climate impacts S. Blichner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021
81. Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates E. Gryspeerdt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-613-2020
82. The key role of atmospheric absorption in the Asian summer monsoon response to dust emissions in CMIP6 models A. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024
83. The sensitivity of global climate to the episodicity of fire aerosol emissions S. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024068
84. Observationally constrained aerosol–cloud semi-direct effects R. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0073-9
85. Background Conditions Influence the Estimated Cloud Radiative Effects of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Different Source Regions B. Grandey & C. Wang https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029644
86. A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo A. Kirkevåg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018
87. Characterization of Historical Aerosol Optical Depth Dynamics Using LSTM and Peak Enhancement Techniques H. Cămărășan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060743
88. Decomposing the global and regional aerosol effective radiative forcing associated with strong versus weak air quality policies by Mid-21st century R. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae5418
89. Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing J. Staunton-Sykes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9009-2021
90. Enhanced marine sulphur emissions offset global warming and impact rainfall B. Grandey & C. Wang https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13055
91. Black Carbon Absorption Efficiency Under Preindustrial and Present‐Day Conditions Simulated by a Size‐ and Mixing‐State‐Resolved Global Aerosol Model H. Matsui https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032316
92. On the representation of aerosol activation and its influence on model-derived estimates of the aerosol indirect effect D. Rothenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7961-2018
93. Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model T. Hassan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024
94. Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models M. Sporre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020
95. Aerosol Effective Radiative Forcing in the Online Aerosol Coupled CAS-FGOALS-f3-L Climate Model H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101115
96. Large contribution to secondary organic aerosol from isoprene cloud chemistry H. Lamkaddam et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe2952
97. Direct and semi-direct effects of aerosol climatologies on long-term climate simulations over Europe M. Schultze & B. Rockel https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3808-5
98. Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033622
99. Radiative flux and forcing parameterization error in aerosol‐free clear skies R. Pincus et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064291
100. Reconciling Compensating Errors Between Precipitation Constraints and the Energy Budget in a Climate Model T. Michibata & K. Suzuki https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088340
101. Dissipating the correlation smokescreen: causal decomposition of the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols over the South-East Atlantic E. Fons et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2026.10049
102. Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF L. Regayre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018
103. Perturbations to Global Energy Budget Due to Absorbing and Scattering Aerosols K. Suzuki & T. Takemura https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029808
104. High sensitivity of cloud formation to aerosol changes A. Virtanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01662-y
105. Global Climate and Human Health Effects of the Gasoline and Diesel Vehicle Fleets Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000240
106. The Shortwave Radiative Flux Response to an Injection of Sea Salt Aerosols in the Gulf of Mexico P. Goddard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037067
107. Source attribution of black carbon and its direct radiative forcing in China Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4319-2017
108. A new method for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions in climate models B. Duran et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2123-2025
109. Impact of aerosol radiative effects on 2000–2010 surface temperatures A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2464-2
110. The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
111. Evaluation of a quasi-steady-state approximation of the cloud droplet growth equation (QDGE) scheme for aerosol activation in global models using multiple aircraft data over both continental and marine environments H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022
112. Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model U. Im et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021
113. Chemistry-driven changes strongly influence climate forcing from vegetation emissions J. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34944-9
114. Decomposing pre-industrial to present-day land use change forcing in the UK Earth System Model E. Sands et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8553-2026
115. Future aerosol reductions and widening of the northern tropical belt R. Allen & O. Ajoku https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024803
116. Fast climate responses to emission reductions in aerosol and ozone precursors in China during 2013–2017 J. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7131-2022
117. Hygroscopic Properties of Water-Soluble Counterpart of Ultrafine Particles from Agriculture Crop-Residue Burning in Patiala, Northwestern India A. Alang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070835
118. Improved Dust Representation and Impacts on Dust Transport and Radiative Effect in CAM5 Z. Ke et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002845
119. Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6 P. Forster et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025320
120. Distinct roles of land cover in regulating spatial variabilities of temperature responses to radiative effects of aerosols and clouds L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3f04
121. Impacts of Suppressing Excessive Light Rain on Aerosol Radiative Effects and Health Risks Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036204
122. The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP2.0) for CMIP7 R. Kramer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4447-2026
123. Separating radiative forcing by aerosol–cloud interactions and rapid cloud adjustments in the ECHAM–HAMMOZ aerosol–climate model using the method of partial radiative perturbations J. Mülmenstädt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15415-2019
124. Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability S. Ghan et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113
125. Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033364
126. Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: an intercomparison of metrics and methods W. Collins et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9031-2025
127. Historical Changes and Reasons for Model Differences in Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing in CMIP6 S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104848
128. Global organic and inorganic aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on radiative forcing M. Pöhlker et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8
129. G6-1.5K-MCB: Marine Cloud Brightening scenario design for the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) in CESM2.1, E3SMv2.0, and UKESM1.1 H. Hirasawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3257-2026
130. Tropical African wildfire aerosols trigger teleconnections over mid-to-high latitudes of Northern Hemisphere in January H. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe433
131. Regional aerosol hygroscopicity influences radiative forcing globally S. Deshmukh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03505-z
132. Quantifying the Role of Model Internal Year-to-Year Variability in Estimating Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Effects X. Shi & Y. Zeng https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010079
133. Future warming exacerbated by aged-soot effect on cloud formation U. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0631-0
134. Marine emissions of methanethiol increase aerosol cooling in the Southern Ocean C. Wohl et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq2465
135. The impact of uncertainty in black carbon's refractive index on simulated optical depth and radiative forcing R. Digby et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3109-2025
136. A Strong Anthropogenic Black Carbon Forcing Constrained by Pollution Trends Over China Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098965
137. High Sensitivity of Arctic Black Carbon Radiative Effects to Subgrid Vertical Velocity in Aerosol Activation H. Matsui & N. Moteki https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088978
138. Exploring dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation and implications for global aerosol radiative forcing K. Fung et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1549-2022
139. Assessing combinations of regional MCB designed to target multiple climate response objectives A. Mason et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10861-2026
140. Development and Evaluation of an Explicit Treatment of Aerosol Processes at Cloud Scale Within a Multi‐Scale Modeling Framework (MMF) G. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001287
141. Assessment of CNRM coupled ocean-atmosphere model sensitivity to the representation of aerosols L. Watson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-4054-6
142. Use of Machine Learning to Reduce Uncertainties in Particle Number Concentration and Aerosol Indirect Radiative Forcing Predicted by Climate Models F. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098551
143. Projected impact of combined high-end atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and tree restoration on albedo, forest emissions and carbon uptake R. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-025-00003-9
144. Impacts of emission reductions on aerosol radiative effects J. Pietikäinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5501-2015
145. Evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions in E3SM using a Lagrangian framework M. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023
146. Radiative Forcing of Nitrate Aerosols From 1975 to 2010 as Simulated by MOSAIC Module in CESM2‐MAM4 Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034809
147. Marine cloud brightening mitigates the warming induced by the aerosol reductions toward carbon neutrality Y. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03304-6
148. Warming effects of reduced sulfur emissions from shipping M. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024
149. Transient Climate Impacts for Scenarios of Aerosol Emissions from Asia: A Story of Coal versus Gas B. Grandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0555.1
150. Impacts of global open-fire aerosols on direct radiative, cloud and surface-albedo effects simulated with CAM5 Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14805-2016
151. Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG B. Grandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018
152. Apportionment of the Pre‐Industrial to Present‐Day Climate Forcing by Methane Using UKESM1: The Role of the Cloud Radiative Effect F. O’Connor et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS002991
153. Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015 A. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028776
154. Interhemispheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing and Tropical Precipitation Shifts during the Late Twentieth Century R. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0148.1
155. Significant increase in graupel and lightning occurrence in a warmer climate simulated by prognostic graupel parameterization T. Michibata https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54544-5
156. How well are aerosol–cloud interactions represented in climate models? – Part 2: Isolating the aerosol impact on clouds following the 2014–2015 Holuhraun eruption G. Jordan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13393-2025
157. Studying the impact of biomass burning aerosol radiative and climate effects on the Amazon rainforest productivity with an Earth system model F. Malavelle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1301-2019
158. Snow-induced buffering in aerosol–cloud interactions T. Michibata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13771-2020
159. The Radiative and Cloud Responses to Sea Salt Aerosol Engineering in GFDL Models N. Mahfouz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL102340
160. Simultaneous reductions in emissions of black carbon and co-emitted species will weaken the aerosol net cooling effect Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3671-2015
161. Radiative effects of interannually varying vs. interannually invariant aerosol emissions from fires B. Grandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14495-2016
162. Atmospheric composition and climate impacts of a future hydrogen economy N. Warwick et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13451-2023
163. Development and Evaluation of E3SM‐MOSAIC: Spatial Distributions and Radiative Effects of Nitrate Aerosol M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003157
164. Quantifying CO 2 forcing effects on lightning, wildfires, and climate interactions V. Verjans et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt5088
165. Recent Advances in the Observation and Modeling of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions, Cloud Feedbacks, and Earth’s Energy Imbalance: A Review T. Michibata et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-025-00382-6
166. Influence of land cover change on atmospheric organic gases, aerosols, and radiative effects R. Vella et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025
167. Larger Cloud Liquid Water Enhances Both Aerosol Indirect Forcing and Cloud Radiative Feedback in Two Earth System Models X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105529
168. A seven-year-based characterization of aerosol light scattering properties at a rural central European site L. Suchánková et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120292
169. The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution P. Caldwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001870
170. Impact of aerosol direct effect on East Asian air quality during the EAST‐AIRE campaign J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025108
171. Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes I. Karset et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018
172. Effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols in E3SM version 1: historical changes, causality, decomposition, and parameterization sensitivities K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022
173. Sulfate Aerosol in the Arctic: Source Attribution and Radiative Forcing Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027298
174. An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model P. Rasch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001629
175. Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 P. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022
176. Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024
177. Exploring Impacts of Size‐Dependent Evaporation and Entrainment in a Global Model I. Karset et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031817
178. Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020
179. Reduced effective radiative forcing from cloud–aerosol interactions (ERFaci) with improved treatment of early aerosol growth in an Earth system model S. Blichner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021
180. Impacts of Wildfire Aerosols on Global Energy Budget and Climate: The Role of Climate Feedbacks Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0572.1
181. The Impacts of Aerosol Emissions on Historical Climate in UKESM1 J. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101095
182. On the contribution of fast and slow responses to precipitation changes caused by aerosol perturbations S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10179-2021
183. BVOC–aerosol–climate feedbacks investigated using NorESM M. Sporre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4763-2019
184. EC-Earth3-AerChem: a global climate model with interactive aerosols and atmospheric chemistry participating in CMIP6 T. van Noije et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021
185. Impacts of Shifts in Phytoplankton Community on Clouds and Climate via the Sulfur Cycle S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005862
186. Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study M. Mallet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13191-2020
187. Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison G. Thornhill et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021
188. Assessment of pre-industrial to present-day anthropogenic climate forcing in UKESM1 F. O'Connor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021
189. Consistency of Aerosol Optical Properties between MODIS Satellite Retrievals and AERONET over a 14-Year Period in Central–East Europe L. Deaconu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101677
190. Modeling the global radiative effect of brown carbon: a potentially larger heating source in the tropical free troposphere than black carbon A. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020
191. Low‐Altitude High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Is Feasible With Existing Aircraft A. Duffey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005567
192. Sensitivity study of cloud parameterizations with relative dispersion in CAM5.1: impacts on aerosol indirect effects X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5877-2017